Donald Trump says he turned down invitation to Jeffrey Epstein's island
Photo:
AFP / NEW YORK STATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY/HANDOUT
By
Andrea Shalal
and
Nandita Bose
, Reuters
US President Donald Trump said on Monday he "never had the privilege" of visiting Jeffrey Epstein's island, saying he turned down an invitation from the convicted sex offender in what the president called a moment of good judgment.
Trump's remarks were his latest effort to distance himself from the political furor over his administration's handling of files related to Epstein's case and renewed questions over his past relationship with the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019.
"I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down," Trump told reporters during a trip to Scotland. "In one of my very good moments, I turned it down."
Epstein owned a private island in the US Virgin Islands where he entertained prominent people from politics, business and entertainment. Prosecutors have alleged he used the compound to conceal the sex trafficking and abuse of under-age victims.
Trump, who socialised with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, also offered new insight into why their relationship ended. The president said he cut ties after Epstein attempted to recruit staff who worked for Trump.
"He hired help. And I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He stole people that work for me," Trump said. "He did it again. And I threw him out of the place persona non grata."
Last week, White House communications director Steven Cheung
said Trump had cut ties with Epstein
because he regarded him as a "creep."
The White House has been under growing pressure from Trump's supporters and political opponents to release more information about the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein.
After Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this year promised to release additional materials related to possible Epstein clients and the circumstances surrounding his death, the Justice Department reversed course this month and issued a memo concluding there was no basis to continue investigating and no evidence of a client list.
Those findings sparked an angry outcry from some of Trump's supporters who have long believed the government was covering up Epstein's ties to the rich and powerful.
Trump's efforts to deflect attention from the case have so far faltered. On Monday, the president again called the story "a hoax."
"It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion," Trump said, saying Democrats controlled the Epstein files for several years and would have used them against him during the last presidential election if there was anything in them.
Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island.
Trump has denied ever being on the plane and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
- Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
41 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Britain and France talk of recognising a Palestinian state. What would it mean?
That assault killed about 1200 people and led to the abduction of about 250 others to Gaza. The announcements raise questions about what the recognition of a Palestinian state would mean and what it can actually do. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the Trump Turnberry golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, on Tuesday. Photo / Tierney L. Cross, the New York Times What is a state? The criteria for statehood were laid out in an international treaty in 1933. They include four elements: a permanent population; defined territorial boundaries; a government; and an ability to conduct international affairs. Recognition is an official acknowledgement that a would-be state broadly meets those conditions. It can occur even if an element is in dispute, including territorial boundaries. Like all legal questions, 'interpretation matters', said Zinaida Miller, a professor of law and international affairs at Northeastern University in the United States. The criteria for recognising a Palestinian state have been met at a basic level, many experts on international law say. A permanent population and land exist. The borders, while disputed, are broadly understood to be in Israeli-occupied territories, including the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which was seized in 1967 in a war with a coalition of Arab states; as well as East Jerusalem, which Israel has effectively annexed. The Palestinian Authority is a government body that administers part of the West Bank and represents Palestinians. Its creation was authorised by the Palestine Liberation Organisation, which represents Palestinians internationally. While there are limits to what the Palestinian Authority can do, given the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Hamas' control of Gaza, foreign recognition of a Palestinian state would mean the establishment of direct diplomatic contact between the authority and the recognising nation. Recognition would also send diplomatic and political messages. It would acknowledge the Palestinian right to self-determination and reject the positions and actions of the Israeli Government that undermine that right, Miller said. 'A basis for added pressure.' A major consequence of recognising Palestinian statehood is that it provides a basis for 'a complete revision of bilateral relations with Israel', said Ardi Imseis, an associate professor at Queen's University Faculty of Law in Ontario and a former United Nations official. A country that recognises Palestine has to review agreements with Israel to make sure they do not violate its obligations to the Palestinian state. This would include political and territorial integrity, as well as economic, cultural, social and civil relations, he said. For example, if an aspect of trade aids or assists Israel in violation of the rights of a Palestinian state, then the recognising nation would have to cease that exchange. 'Practically speaking, recognition would provide a basis for added pressure to be brought to bear by civil society and lawmakers in the recognising state' to change policies and align them with other requirements, Imseis said. A recognising nation would not have to stop all trade with Israel, said Paul Reichler, a lawyer who represents sovereign states and has argued for the state of Palestine at the International Court of Justice. But if, for example, a country that recognises a state of Palestine imports agricultural products from farms belonging to settlers in occupied territories, those agreements would be aiding and abetting the commission of a wrongful act, he said. International law experts note that an advisory ruling from the International Court of Justice last year concluded, among other things, that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories violated a prohibition on territorial conquest. A UN majority for recognition already exists. Most countries in the United Nations — 147 out of 193 — already recognise a Palestinian state. Britain and France would be joining them, and their position has extra heft because they are permanent members of the UN Security Council, with the power to veto any substantive council resolution, including on the admission of new member states. The two countries would be bolstering the stance taken by most other nations and sending a political message, but their shift would also have a practical effect. They would join China and Russia in recognising a Palestinian state and leave the US as the sole permanent member of the Security Council with veto power that is holding out. The state of Palestine currently has observer status at the UN, and that will not change if the US maintains its opposition to full membership. Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo / Eric Lee, the New York Times What is the goal of recognition? It is part of a political, diplomatic, and legal push to reach a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict despite resistance from Israel's current government. 'There are two peoples living between the river and the sea, not one, and they are entitled to separate states in which each of these peoples enjoys the full panoply of civil and human rights,' Reichler said. 'The only solution is two states, and it so happens that is what international law requires and is reflected in UN resolutions and in determinations of the ICJ,' he said. Although the declarations of Palestinian statehood may appear symbolic, 'small steps' like recognition 'make a contribution' to the goal of establishing two states, he said. Some nations, like Norway, once held off recognising a Palestinian state in the belief that recognition would someday emerge from a negotiated peace process. With such a process seemingly currently out of reach and outrage over Israeli policies growing, some countries have put recognition first in the hope that it would lead to a peace process. Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has said that the establishment of a Palestinian state would endanger Israel's security, and he has rejected the notion, particularly since the war in Gaza began. His governing coalition includes far-right ministers who are settlers and staunchly opposed to a Palestinian state, and he risks their abandoning the bloc if he indicates a willingness to consider it. In a statement yesterday, Netanyahu said Britain's announcement 'rewards Hamas' monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Ephrat Livni Photographs by: Saher Alghorra, Tierney L. Cross, Eric Lee ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Trump hits India with 25% tariff and ‘penalty' over Russia ties
US President Donald Trump said imports to the US from India will face 25% tariffs, while also announcing an unspecified 'penalty' over New Delhi's purchases of Russian weapons and energy. The measures will kick in on Friday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, adding to a host of other
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Maga movement increasingly at odds with establishment Republicans over Israel's war in Gaza
Unconditional support for Israel has long been an entry requirement in United States Republican politics, but that orthodoxy is being challenged by Donald Trump's populist base - where invocations of the 'special relationship' are falling on deaf ears.
