Fast Five Quiz: Obstructive HCM Management
Learn more about beta-blockers for obstructive HCM.
Guidelines from the US, Canada, and Europe recommend alcohol septal ablation over invasive surgery for patients with advanced age and comorbidities, due to its less invasive nature and shorter recovery time. However, alcohol septal ablation has been associated with higher risk for complete heart block requiring permanent pacing and might result in less uniform reduction in LVOT gradient, similar to myectomy. It should not be used in pediatric or younger patients or those with cardiac abnormalities that would require surgery.
Learn more about alcohol septal ablation for obstructive HCM.
Transaortic septal myectomy is the preferred treatment for patients with obstructive HCM who have severe, drug-refractory symptoms, according to a state-of-the-art review from the Journal of American College of Cardiology. Similarly, Canadian guidelines note that surgical myectomy is 'usually' the most effective therapy for obstruction and has a low risk for adverse outcomes, although contraindications to its use do exist. The AHA also notes that transaortic septal myectomy adds little risk to other cardiac procedures and that the relief in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction can minimize postoperative hemodynamic instability.
Although dual chamber pacing and mitral valve replacement are effective treatments and can be used for management in some cases, transaortic septal myectomy is generally the preferred option.
Learn more about surgical myectomy for obstructive HCM.
Surgical myectomy is encouraged to be performed in high-volume HCM centers because in-hospital mortality for surgical myectomy is inversely correlated with surgical volume. Specifically, one recent review found that high-volume hospitals had an in-hospital mortality rate for surgical myectomy of 2.4% compared with 3.9% for medium volume and 5.7% for low volume centers. Another recent review notes that mortality rate for surgical myectomy has decreased 'strikingly' from the highs of up to 8% from 30 years ago but also acknowledges the need for more experienced surgeons in the US and Europe to increase its accessibility.
Learn more about surgical outcomes for obstructive HCM.
A recent review of HCM published by the American Journal of Cardiology lists history of sustained or repetitive ventricular tachycardia, unexplained syncope, massive left ventricular hypertrophy, or extensive late gadolinium enhancement or a family history of this complication as indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Similarly, the AHA/ACC joint guidelines specifically recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for patients with any prior history of sudden cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia. It should also be considered in shared decision-making with a 5-year risk estimate if a patient has an ejection fraction < 50%, apical aneurysm, unexplained syncope, massive left ventricular hypertrophy, or a family history of sudden cardiac death.
Though mild left ventricular hypertrophy and minimal late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI can cause cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive HCM, they are typically not sole indicators for implanting a cardioverter-defibrillator. Asymptomatic status with normal exercise capacity is not an indicator as well.
Learn more about implantable cardioverter defibrillators for obstructive HCM.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including generative AI models, as part of the process. Human review and editing of this content were performed prior to publication. Lead image: Science Source
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
From strain to support: Your AC could help stabilize the power grid
As summer arrives, people are turning on air conditioners in most of the U.S. But if you're like me, you always feel a little guilty about that. Past generations managed without air conditioning—do I really need it? And how bad is it to use all this electricity for cooling in a warming world? If I leave my air conditioner off, I get too hot. But if everyone turns on their air conditioner at the same time, electricity demand spikes, which can force power grid operators to activate some of the most expensive, and dirtiest, power plants. Sometimes those spikes can ask too much of the grid and lead to brownouts or blackouts. Research I recently published with a team of scholars makes me feel a little better, though. We have found that it is possible to coordinate the operation of large numbers of home air-conditioning units, balancing supply and demand on the power grid—and without making people endure high temperatures inside their homes. Studies along these lines, using remote control of air conditioners to support the grid, have for many years explored theoretical possibilities like this. However, few approaches have been demonstrated in practice and never for such a high-value application and at this scale. The system we developed not only demonstrated the ability to balance the grid on timescales of seconds, but also proved it was possible to do so without affecting residents' comfort. The benefits include increasing the reliability of the power grid, which makes it easier for the grid to accept more renewable energy. Our goal is to turn air conditioners from a challenge for the power grid into an asset, supporting a shift away from fossil fuels toward cleaner energy. Adjustable equipment My research focuses on batteries, solar panels, and electric equipment—such as electric vehicles, water heaters, air conditioners, and heat pumps—that can adjust itself to consume different amounts of energy at different times. Originally, the U.S. electric grid was built to transport electricity from large power plants to customers' homes and businesses. And originally, power plants were large, centralized operations that burned coal or natural gas, or harvested energy from nuclear reactions. These plants were typically always available and could adjust how much power they generated in response to customer demand, so the grid would be balanced between power coming in from producers and being used by consumers. But the grid has changed. There are more renewable energy sources from which power isn't always available, like solar panels at night or wind turbines on calm days. And there are the devices and equipment I study. These newer options, called 'distributed energy resources,' generate or store energy near where consumers need it—or adjust how much energy they're using in real time. One aspect of the grid hasn't changed, though: There's not much storage built into the system. So every time you turn on a light, for a moment there's not enough electricity to supply everything that wants it right then: The grid needs a power producer to generate a little more power. And when you turn off a light, there's a little too much: A power producer needs to ramp down. The way power plants know what real-time power adjustments are needed is by closely monitoring the grid frequency. The goal is to provide electricity at a constant frequency—60 hertz—at all times. If more power is needed than is being produced, the frequency drops and a power plant boosts output. If there's too much power being produced, the frequency rises and a power plant slows production a little. These actions, a process called 'frequency regulation,' happen in a matter of seconds to keep the grid balanced. This output flexibility, primarily from power plants, is key to keeping the lights on for everyone. Finding new options I'm interested in how distributed energy resources can improve flexibility in the grid. They can release more energy, or consume less, to respond to the changing supply or demand, and help balance the grid, ensuring the frequency remains near 60 hertz. Some people fear that doing so might be invasive, giving someone outside your home the ability to control your battery or air conditioner. Therefore, we wanted to see if we could help balance the grid with frequency regulation using home air-conditioning units rather than power plants, without affecting how residents use their appliances or how comfortable they are in their homes. From 2019 to 2023, my group at the University of Michigan tried this approach, in collaboration with researchers at Pecan Street Inc., Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the University of California, Berkeley, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. We recruited 100 homeowners in Austin to do a real-world test of our system. All the homes had whole-house forced-air cooling systems, which we connected to custom control boards and sensors the owners allowed us to install in their homes. This equipment let us send instructions to the air-conditioning units based on the frequency of the grid. Before I explain how the system worked, I first need to explain how thermostats work. When people set thermostats, they pick a temperature, and the thermostat switches the air-conditioning compressor on and off to maintain the air temperature within a small range around that set point. If the temperature is set at 68 degrees, the thermostat turns the AC on when the temperature is, say, 70, and turns it off when it's cooled down to, say, 66. Every few seconds, our system slightly changed the timing of air-conditioning compressor switching for some of the 100 air conditioners, causing the units' aggregate power consumption to change. In this way, our small group of home air conditioners reacted to grid changes the way a power plant would—using more or less energy to balance the grid and keep the frequency near 60 hertz. Moreover, our system was designed to keep home temperatures within the same small temperature range around the set point. Testing the approach We ran our system in four tests, each lasting one hour. We found two encouraging results. First, the air conditioners were able to provide frequency regulation at least as accurately as a traditional power plant. Therefore, we showed that air conditioners could play a significant role in increasing grid flexibility. But perhaps more importantly—at least in terms of encouraging people to participate in these types of systems—we found that we were able to do so without affecting people's comfort in their homes. We found that home temperatures did not deviate more than 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit from their set point. Homeowners were allowed to override the controls if they got uncomfortable, but most didn't. For most tests, we received zero override requests. In the worst case, we received override requests from 2 of the 100 homes in our test. In practice, this sort of technology could be added to commercially available internet-connected thermostats. In exchange for credits on their energy bills, users could choose to join a service run by the thermostat company, their utility provider, or some other third party.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
We Think You Can Look Beyond Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau's (MUN:JTH) Lackluster Earnings
Shareholders appeared unconcerned with Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau AG's (MUN:JTH) lackluster earnings report last week. Our analysis suggests that while the profits are soft, the foundations of the business are strong. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Importantly, our data indicates that Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau's profit was reduced by €1.7m, due to unusual items, over the last year. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau took a rather significant hit from unusual items in the year to December 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items made its statutory profit significantly weaker than it would otherwise be. Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau. As we discussed above, we think the significant unusual expense will make Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau's statutory profit lower than it would otherwise have been. Because of this, we think Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau's underlying earnings potential is as good as, or possibly even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about. Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Gesundheitswelt Chiemgau's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Mexico non-profit raises awareness for hereditary brain disorder
NEW MEXICO (KRQE) — One group is bringing awareness to a hereditary disease that has deep roots here in New Mexico. Story continues below Investigation: Politicians sink $13M in closed New Mexico tourist attraction Space: LIST: 5 places to go stargazing in New Mexico News: Videos show man in dumpster getting dumped into waste truck in Albuquerque Trending: Albuquerque City Council votes down 'RENT' ordinance 'Cerebral Cavernous Malformation' can cause brain bleeds that lead to paralysis or stroke. A non-profit dedicated to bringing awareness to the hereditary disease says CCM could exist in thousands of New Mexican, but some go through life without knowing they have Friday, the community came together to continue the fight for a cure. 'So we would like to know how many people actually have this disease, and then therefore teach them how to cope with it,' said Alliance to Cure volunteer Christina Campos. 'And then, you know, what we would really like to do is start doing more testing and more drug trials and come up with a cure.' You can find more information and some warning signs of the disease at this link. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
