Canara Robeco AMC files for Rs 1,000 crore IPO
The final size of the issue will be disclosed after the price discovery but investment banking sources told TNIE that they expect the issue size to be in the Rs 800 crore to Rs 1,000 crore range.
According to draft IPO papers, the OFS will see promoters -- Canara Bank and Orix Corporation Europe NV--offloading 4.98 crore shares, with no fresh issue component and therefore, no money will come to the company.
Of this, the state-run Canara Bank plans to sell 2.59 crore shares, and the Japanese conglomerate Orix Corporation-owned subsidiary Orix Corporation NV (previously known as Robeco Groep) will be selling the remainder 2.39 crore shares.Incorporated in 1993, Canara Robeco AMC is a joint venture company between Canara Bank and Orix Corporation Europe with a 51:49 per cent shareholding ratio.
As of December 2024, it managed 25 schemes comprising 12 equity schemes, 10 debt schemes and three hybrid schemes with a quarterly average asset under management of Rs 1,08,366 crore.
Profit for the nine months period to December 2024 stood at Rs 149 crore, growing 40.3 per cent from a revenue of Rs 302.9 crore, which rose 35.9 per cent -on-year. The numbers for FY24 stood at Rs 151 crore up 91.1 per cent and Rs 318 crore up 55.5 per cent, respectively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
What will be price of petrol, diesel if India stops importing oil from Russia? Prices of petrol, diesel will reach…,Indian customers will have to pay…
India-Russia relations- File image New Delhi: In a significant update amid the trade talks between India and the US and Donald Trump imposing an additional 25% tariff on India, taking the total tariff to 50% due to India's continued crude oil purchase from Russia, reports are now talking about the inflationary impact if India stops buying oil from Russia. Notably, Russia become India's largest oil supplier since the Russia-Ukraine war and is currently supplying 35% to 40% of India's oil needs. Why Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India? In a massive action against India, the United States, under the leadership of Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India as India continued to purchase crude oil from Russia. In response to the move, India clarified its stand and said that it buys Russian oil because Europe stopped sourcing from Moscow. How much loss will India face if Russia cuts imports? As per experts, if India cuts Russian import of crude oil to India, India will have to rely more on costlier oil from West Asia, Africa, the US, and Latin America, which will pose technical, economic, and strategic challenges. More notably, the shifting could raise annual costs by Rs 25,000–40,000 crore for Indian refiners, which would ultimately hit the budgets of Indian consumers. Earlier, a SBI report has also indicated that the fuel bill might increase by USD 9 billion in FY26 and USD 11.7 billion in FY27 if Russia cuts its crude oil imports to India. US President Trump on whether US will impose additional 25 pc tariffs on India? In a significant statement and a matter of good news for India, US President Trump said the US may not impose secondary tariffs on countries continuing to buying Russian crude oil. Speaking to Fox News aboard Air Force One en route to Alaska, he said that, 'Well, he (Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot…'. (With inputs from agencies)
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kunnukara panchayat gets govt nod to set up food processing park
Kochi: A food processing park is set to come up at Kunnukara grama panchayat in Kalamassery constituency, with state govt granting administrative sanction for the project. Industries minister P Rajeeve said the 37.5-acre park will open new avenues for farmers by ensuring better value addition and market access for their produce. The minister made the announcement while inaugurating Farmers' Day celebrations, organized by Alangad Krishi Bhavan, at Kottappuram KEMH School on Sunday. He said in private sector, LuLu Group will establish a food processing facility on HMT campus in Kalamassery with an investment of around Rs 500 crore. "Once operational, the project will help increase agricultural income by connecting farm produce with modern processing and value-addition facilities. It will significantly strengthen agricultural economy of the state," Rajeeve said. According to Rajeeve, agricultural revival efforts in Kalamassery have proved successful, with paddy cultivation reintroduced across more than 1,000 acres. Alongside paddy, farmers in Alangad have diversified into production of jaggery, arrowroot powder and sweet potato powder, which are now reaching local market. Highlighting govt's push to strengthen farm-to-market linkages, Rajeeve announced that Farm to Home scheme which delivers freshly harvested vegetables and other produce directly to households will begin operations this month with the launch of its first vehicle. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo "Such initiatives ensure that farmers get fair prices while consumers receive safe, fresh produce at their doorstep," he said. According to officials from Kunnukara panchayat, food processing park is expected to attract private investment and create large-scale employment opportunities. The facility is also expected to enhance storage, processing and distribution capabilities for a variety of crops, giving farmers greater stability against market fluctuations. The minister said combined impact of the upcoming park and existing agricultural projects would help rebuild confidence in farming and make it a sustainable livelihood in the region. Inauguration ceremony was attended by local elected representatives, govt officials and farmers. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future
The fatal explosion last week at US Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the US along with profits, share prices and steel prices have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved US Steel's nearly USD 15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley, David Burritt, US Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time. Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalised 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the US. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong and that it sent technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support. Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay. US Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend USD 100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get US Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two where the explosion occurred were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, US Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odour into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organisation, said US Steel has been forced to pay USD 57 million in fines and settlements since January 1, 2020 for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he found no indication that US Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance programme for the Clairton plant. The Clairton plant, he wrote, is inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design. US Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said US Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernised? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest USD 11 billion into US Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the USD 2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, US Steel had signalled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that US Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, US Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, US steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the US has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favour. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the US, there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Centre for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe, Briem said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
