Gaza protesters: Hamas does not represent us
As protests against Hamas intensify in northern Gaza, Israel threatens to hold onto territory until all hostages are released. Becky Anderson speaks with Gaza researcher, writer and human rights activist Muhammad Shehada about the escalating unrest, and Israel's reaction to the anti-Hamas demonstrations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Luke's Lost The Force: Mark Hamill's Trump Attacks Turn Jedi Legacy Into Political Grudge
Actor Mark Hamill, best known for portraying Luke Skywalker in the Star Wars saga, ignited a social media firestorm this week after unleashing a string of politically charged comments targeting President Donald Trump. In an interview published by the Los Angeles Times, Hamill, 73, titled 'Mark Hamill starred in the ultimate battle of good and evil. Now he just wants to make America normal again,' the piece explored Hamill's evolving career, his personal struggles after the January 2025 Malibu wildfires, and his outspoken criticism of Trump during the former President's second term. Shared on X by the LA Times, the post quickly ignited a firestorm of backlash, with users excoriating Hamill as a 'whack job liberal' and implicitly mocking the outlet as a far-left mouthpiece. The interview veered from promoting his latest film to railing against Trump's second term in office, likening the President to a fictional Sith Lord and framing himself as part of 'the Resistance.' The remarks—delivered with signature sarcasm and wrapped in Star Wars metaphors—drew swift criticism from audiences across the political spectrum, with many accusing the veteran actor of using his platform to peddle partisan vitriol. Proof this guy is full of SITH. — Mark Hamill (@ 2025-05-04T19:44:09.954Z 'Proof this guy is full of SITH,' Hamill wrote on Bluesky, mocking an AI-generated image of Trump holding a red lightsaber, the iconic weapon of Star Wars villains. He has also referred to his political opponents as fascists and openly mocked Trump supporters online. While Hamill's fans praised his outspokenness, critics blasted the LA Times for platforming what they described as a divisive political tirade disguised as entertainment journalism. 'The has become nothing more than a far-left megaphone,' one commenter wrote. 'This isn't reporting. It's partisan propaganda dressed up in a puff piece.' Others questioned why a legacy media outlet would run a glowing feature that offered little scrutiny of Hamill's increasingly aggressive rhetoric. Hamill, who also described himself as a supporter of 'MANA — Make America Normal Again,' admitted he obsessively tracks his follower count and spends hours muting dissenting voices on social media. He acknowledged that his political commentary often overshadows his acting, saying, 'I didn't want to talk about politics — I know when I talk about it, that's the headline,' before launching into yet another attack on Trump. Critics say the actor's efforts to align himself with anti-Trump resistance movements reflect the broader trend of celebrity activism encroaching into political discourse without real-world accountability. 'You're an actor, not a policymaker,' one user replied to a viral clip of the LA Times interview. 'Stick to playing pretend.' Even some longtime Star Wars fans expressed disappointment, lamenting the politicization of a character originally meant to represent universal themes of good versus evil. Hamill's latest film, The Life of Chuck, is based on a Stephen King novella. The actor plays a small but emotional role as a dying grandfather. But for many, the off-screen theatrics have distracted from any on-screen nuance. 'Hollywood can't help itself,' another social media user posted. 'They'd rather alienate half the country than keep politics out of movies and interviews.' For many Americans, the episode is just another reminder that the line between fiction and politics has all but disappeared in today's media landscape.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colorado Dems face backlash for fundraiser with Ilhan Omar after Boulder terror attack: 'Reprehensible'
Colorado Democrats are facing criticism for leading a fundraiser with Rep. Ilhan Omar less than an hour after Sunday's antisemitic terrorist attack in which 12 people were hurt, including a Holocaust survivor. The suspect, 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is facing federal hate crime charges and numerous state-level attempted murder charges for using incendiary devices to burn people who were rallying for the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza ever since the terrorist group attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Soliman was in the country illegally after overstaying his visa and work authorization, according to authorities. About 30 minutes later in nearby Denver, there was a "private reception" with Omar, who has been a major critic of Israel, with many other Democrats listed as the hosts. Ticket prices ranged from $500 to $7,000. Omar is a member of a progressive group of lawmakers in Congress called the "Squad." Rise In Antisemitic Extremism Fuels Wave Of Terror Plots In The United States Since 2020 "Colorado Democrats who raise money for a notorious anti-Semite should be ashamed of themselves for ever doing so, but doing it while victims of the latest wave of anti-Semitic violence were en route to the hospital is even more hypocritical and reprehensible," Colorado House Minority Caucus Chair Rep. Anthony Hartsook, a Republican, said in a statement on Monday. Read On The Fox News App "Just last year, House Democrats turned away families of Israeli hostages, denying them access to the House floor for fear that House Democrats' own radical members might cause a scene. Enough is enough. We must speak loudly and clearly against extremists who justify violence against Jewish communities worldwide. There is no place for anti-Semitism in Colorado," Harstook added. In the aftermath of the attack, Omar posted on X, "Violence against all forms is never acceptable. We must reject hatred and harm in all its forms." 'Squad' Members Condemn Antisemitic Attack In Boulder After Years Of Controversy Rep. Junie Joseph, D-Boulder, who attended the event, faced additional scrutiny, but she told Fox News Digital that she condemns antisemitism. "Sunday was a deeply painful day for our community. My heart is with the victims of the Boulder attack and all those affected. I unequivocally condemn hate and violence in all forms—including antisemitism and Islamophobia," Joseph said in an email to Fox News Digital. "I've heard concerns about my attendance at a private event for Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. I was originally invited to introduce her at a Young Democrats event focused on youth engagement—something I care deeply about. When she was unable to attend, I chose to welcome her at a separate gathering, as a matter of courtesy and civic respect," she continued. Holocaust Survivor Among Victims In Boulder, Colorado Suspected Terror Attack "Attending that event was not an endorsement of any particular policy or comment. It was an extension of my role as a public servant who believes in dialogue, inclusion, and maintaining open lines of communication—even when views differ." "Condemning antisemitism and supporting peace, dignity, and human rights for all—including Israelis and Palestinians—are not mutually exclusive. I believe both are essential to a just and compassionate society," Joseph further stated. "These are difficult times, and I remain committed to listening, learning, and leading with care—for all members of our community—Jewish, Muslim, and beyond." Fox News Digital reached out to Omar's campaign for article source: Colorado Dems face backlash for fundraiser with Ilhan Omar after Boulder terror attack: 'Reprehensible'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The long and deadly walk Gazans are forced to take for a food parcel
Carrying empty sacks and plastic containers, many walked for hours in hopes of collecting basic food supplies for their families. Gazans are forced to travel long, often dangerous distances — through active combat zones — to reach new, controversial aid distribution sites. The journey is impossible for many disabled or injured people, as well as the elderly and families with small children. Many of those who can take the risk of being killed in an active war zone and of being shot during chaotic scenes at aid centres say the journey for aid is worth it. Ahmed Bashir, 36, walked more than 12 kilometres to reach the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) centre. "My feet and back hurt," says the father of several children, "but coming back with a parcel of food is a victory." The package — containing flour, rice, pasta, sugar, salt, and tea — can last a family about a week, Bashir estimates. "Every morning I wake up wondering if I can feed my children today." Still, Bashir, who lives with his children in the al-Mawasi humanitarian zone after being driven from his home during Israel's Gaza offensive, feels conflicted. "It feels like we're being manipulated. Like they want us to forget where we come from." Israeli soldiers have been accused of opening fire and killing dozens of people seeking aid amid chaotic scenes during the distribution of food in the new centre in Rafah in Gaza's south. GHF employees have denied killings and say they fire warning shots when Palestinians rush to the front, forcing employees of the US company to retreat. Israel halted aid deliveries in March Most of the population in Gaza has been desperate for food since Israel began blocking all aid deliveries to the Gaza Strip in March, before it ended a ceasefire with the Islamist Hamas. It has justified its moves as increasing pressure on the group to release the remaining hostages. According to Israel, at least 20 hostages are still alive and being held in Gaza by Hamas or affiliated militant groups. The fate of three other captives remains uncertain, while the bodies of 35 abductees have been identified. Former hostages have described their captivity as brutal, recounting experiences of torture, humiliation and being kept in chains. Israel began its offensive in Gaza more than a year and a half ago after the Hamas-led attacks in October 2023 which killed around 1,200 people. Israel's offensive has since killed more than 53,000 according to the Hamas-led Health Ministry. External analysis suggests the death toll is significantly higher in reality. According to the GHF, which was established just a few months ago, the controversial aid system requires one representative from each Palestinian family to visit a distribution centre every five days to collect a food parcel. According to the organization, around 8,000 food parcels have been distributed so far — each intended to sustain roughly 5.5 people for 3.5 days — providing a total of approximately 462,000 meals. In its initial phase, the system is expected to reach only about 60% of Gaza's population. Roughly two million Palestinians live in the war-torn territory, many of whom have been displaced multiple times by ongoing fighting. UN considers the new aid mechanism dangerous With the establishment of four initial distribution points in the southern and central Gaza Strip, Israel says it aims to bypass the United Nations and other international aid organizations. The stated goal is to prevent Hamas from intercepting supplies or profiting from them. However, UN officials have criticized the plan, noting that Israel has not provided concrete evidence that aid is being diverted by Hamas. The United Nations has also warned that the new aid mechanism is both inefficient and unsafe. Critics say the system fails to meet the basic standards of humanitarian relief and that Israel is using hunger to kettle starving civilians into Gaza's south. "Aid should be coordinated by the United Nations, not by an unknown foundation," says Ibtisam Abu Salem, a nurse from central Gaza. Adding to the disruption, deliveries are frequently halted whenever the Israeli army issues new evacuation orders — a recurring occurrence in the volatile region. Many residents say they are physically and emotionally exhausted, worn down not only by fear of attacks but also by the repeated calls to flee their homes. Locals suspicious of new system Many in Gaza express scepticism and mistrust of the new system. "We don't know who is behind it," says Ibrahim Abdul Jawad, who lives in the City of Gaza in the north. He believes that people are afraid that the operators are working with the Israeli military and that there could be arrests or pressure to help Israeli intelligence services in the distribution centres. The Hamas-controlled Interior Ministry has called on residents to boycott the new distribution mechanism, claiming the new system is part of an intelligence gathering operation. "We don't want any help from unknown groups," says Abu Chalid, an elderly man who comes from Beit Lahia in the north of the coastal strip. Forced to flee to Nuseirat in central Gaza during the war, he shares the concern about potential arrests at the newly established aid distribution centres. "We trust [the UN agency for Palestinian refugees] because it has been here for decades," says the Palestinian, who used to be a farmer. The UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) employs around 13,000 people in the Gaza Strip. Israel accuses the organization of being infiltrated by the Islamist Hamas. Israel has not provided evidence to back up its claim, which the UN body denies. Jalal Hamatu, another father, speaks with bitter clarity: "The world is debating our existence while we starve. We don't need speeches — we need bread."
