logo
Operation Keller: 3 local Lashkar terrorists killed in south Kashmir

Operation Keller: 3 local Lashkar terrorists killed in south Kashmir

Time of India13-05-2025

Operation Keller
SRINAGAR: Three
Kashmiri terrorists
linked to Pakistan-backed banned group
Lashkar-e-Taiba
were shot dead Tuesday during an Army-led
counterterrorism operation
in upper reaches of
south Kashmir
's Shopian district, about 80km south of Srinagar.
Two of the slain men were identified as Shahid Kuttay and Adnan Shafi Dar, both locals from Shopian whose family homes were demolished with explosives following the April 22
Pahalgam attack
that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Officials have yet to confirm identity of the third terrorist.
Officials have not confirmed if the trio had direct links to Pahalgam massacre, saying investigations are underway.
Police records list Kuttay as an active terrorist since March 8, 2023. Dar joined LeT on Oct 18, 2024. Both were trained locally.
Police said Kuttay was involved in the April 8 shooting at Danish Resort in Shopian, where two German tourists and their driver were wounded. The resort lies along Mughal Road connecting Kashmir valley with Poonch district of Jammu. He also had a role in the killing of a BJP sarpanch in Heerpora of Shopian on May 18, 2024.
Dar, according to police, was responsible for killing a migrant labourer in Shopian's Wachi on the day he joined LeT.
Tuesday's offensive was launched after intelligence inputs received by Rashtriya Rifles indicated presence of armed terrorists in Shoekal Keller area. Joint teams of Army and paramilitary forces quickly cordoned off the dense forest zone in a search operation codenamed
Operation Keller
.
A fierce firefight broke out as forces surrounded the terrorists and blocked escape routes, resulting in deaths of all three. 'Operation is in progress,' Army said in a statement.
This marked Kashmir valley's second security shootout with terrorists this year. On March 16, J&K police shot dead a Pakistani terrorist in Handwara forest, roughly 100km north of Srinagar.
Posters featuring images of three suspects in Pahalgam attack have appeared across parts of south Kashmir, particularly Shopian, offering a reward of Rs 20 lakh for information. Written in Urdu, the posters urge public assistance: 'Those who killed the innocents do not have a place in our country.' Another line reads: 'Kashmir is united against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.'
Security forces are on high alert and in pursuit of terrorists amid a pause in Indo-Pak military action, which was triggered by India launching airstrikes on nine terrorist sites in PoK and Pakistan under Operation Sindoor on May 7, a fortnight after the Pahalgam massacre.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'
Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'

Mint

time21 minutes ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump says it might be good to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'

During a meeting in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, President Donald Trump remarked that it might be better to allow Ukraine and Russia to 'fight for a while' before stepping in to separate them and pursue peace. Comparing the conflict to a quarrel between two young children who despise each other, Trump said he had conveyed this analogy to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their phone conversation the previous day. Chancellor Merz, seated alongside Trump, emphasised their shared condemnation of the ongoing war, describing it as 'terrible' and highlighting Trump's role as a key figure capable of ending the bloodshed. However, Merz was clear that Germany firmly supports Ukraine, noting that Kyiv targets only military objectives and not Russian civilians. 'We are trying to get them stronger,' he added. This marked the first in-person meeting between the two leaders, who exchanged pleasantries including a gift from Merz to Trump—a gold-framed birth certificate of Trump's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, who emigrated from Germany. Their discussions were expected to cover a range of issues including the war in Ukraine, trade relations, and NATO defence spending. Since assuming office on 6 May, Merz and Trump have spoken several times by phone, with German officials describing the relationship as 'decent' and Merz seeking to avoid the antagonism that characterised Trump's dealings with his predecessor, Angela Merkel. Merz, a conservative with a strong business background and former rival to Merkel, has been active in diplomatic efforts surrounding Ukraine, travelling to Kyiv shortly after taking office and hosting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin last week. A White House official indicated that Trump planned to raise topics such as Germany's defence spending, trade, Ukraine, and concerns over 'democratic backsliding,' suggesting that shared values like freedom of speech have deteriorated in Germany and should be restored. Merz responded by saying he was open to discussing German domestic politics but stressed that Germany generally refrains from commenting on American internal affairs. Under Merz's predecessor, Olaf Scholz, Germany became the second-largest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the United States. Merz has pledged to maintain this support and recently committed to assisting Ukraine in developing long-range missile systems free from range restrictions. Despite his comments on letting the conflict play out, Trump did not rule out sanctions, warning that 'when I see the moment where it's not going to stop … we'll be very, very tough,' signalling that sanctions could be imposed on both Ukraine and Russia. Domestically, Merz's government is intensifying efforts to strengthen the German military, a campaign initiated by Scholz following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Trump, who criticised Germany during his first term for failing to meet NATO's 2% GDP defence spending target, is now demanding that allies increase their contributions to at least 5%. The upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month is seen as a crucial opportunity for Germany to commit to this higher spending level.

How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State

India.com

time23 minutes ago

  • India.com

How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State

New Delhi: Pakistan is broke. Its economy is shattered. Foreign reserves are vanishing. Yet it keeps getting blank cheques. Weeks after the International Monetry Fund (IMF) handed it over $1 billion in emergency funds plus an additional $1.3 billion in loans, the nuclear-armed state got another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). India protested. The world ignored. And it is not the first time. Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'? The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight: Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages. 1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working. 2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit. 3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers. Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives. And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier. The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not. Who Really Benefits? Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure. These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.

'Without me, Trump would have lost election': Elon Musk launches all-out attack on US President
'Without me, Trump would have lost election': Elon Musk launches all-out attack on US President

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Without me, Trump would have lost election': Elon Musk launches all-out attack on US President

After Elon Musk criticised US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination", he launched another brutal attack on him. Elon Musk said that without his support Trump would have lost 2024 Presidential election. This came after Trump said he was very disappointed with Musk. The war of words between Donald Trump and Elon Musk intensified on Thursday, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO responding bluntly to the US president's criticism over his opposition to Trump's signature economic bill. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Elon Musk vs Trump intensifies Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads After Elon Musk's continuous attack on Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', the tech billionaire launched an all-out attack on the US President, saying without his support Trump would have lost the election."Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," the Tesla CEO said in a post on X. In comment section, he wrote, "Such ingratitude".This comes after US President questioned his relationship with the tech billionaire- indicating their close alliance may be no more. Trump said Thursday he doesn't know if he and Elon Musk will still have "a great relationship" after the former DOGE head has spent days blasting the GOP's spending bill."Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office before his bilateral sit-down with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed … I've helped Elon a lot.'The tight relationship between Trump and the Tesla CEO has been fracturing on public display. Asked about Musk's ongoing criticism, Trump said he was "very surprised."The president noted that Musk hasn't said anything "about me that's bad" but added he'd rather the billionaire "criticize me than the bill." Trump argued Musk was upset because "we took the EV mandate," in reference to the electric vehicle tax credit the legislation would kill.'I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon…I'm very disappointed with Elon. He knew this bill better than anyone and he only developed a problem when he found out I would cut the EV mandate… When he left he said the most beautiful things about me, he hasn't said anything bad yet but I'm sure that will be next…I've helped Elon a lot… Elon worked hard at DOGE and I think he misses the place…I think he got out there and he's no longer in this beautiful Oval Office…it's not just Elon, I think when some people leave they miss it so badly they develop a type of TDS…some embrace it and some become hostile," the President war of words between Donald Trump and Elon Musk intensified on Thursday, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO responding bluntly to the US president's criticism over his opposition to Trump's signature economic bill. 'Whatever,' Musk posted on X. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.'Musk's post followed Trump's remarks from the Oval Office, where he said he was 'very disappointed' in the billionaire. 'I've helped him a lot,' Trump said. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate.'Musk hit back quickly, saying, 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!'Musk also ridiculed Trump's description of the legislation as 'big and beautiful,' quipping, 'In all of human history, no bill has ever been both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! It's either big and ugly or slim and beautiful. Slim and beautiful is the way.'The legislation, Trump's flagship tax and energy reform proposal, slashes incentives for electric vehicles and solar energy—measures Musk has openly criticized. Their public disagreement has sparked speculation that the once-amicable relationship between the two may now be unravelingThe former DOGE head departed the Trump administration in May, and has since bashed the "one big, beautiful bill" as a "disgusting abomination." Since then, Musk has urged his followers on X to call their representatives to "KILL the BILL." Some House Republicans have privately revealed their frustration with Musk, including criticism of his competence in the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store