&w=3840&q=100)
Electricity bills of Delhi consumers to be hiked by 7-10% in May-Jun period
The power purchase adjustment cost (PPAC) refers to rise in fuel (coal, gas) costs incurred by the generation companies which is recovered by discoms from the consumers
Press Trust of India New Delhi
The electricity bills of power consumers in Delhi will be hiked by 7-10 per cent in the May-June period due to revision of PPAC charged by the discoms, officials said on Sunday.
The power purchase adjustment cost (PPAC) refers to rise in fuel (coal, gas) costs incurred by the generation companies which is recovered by discoms from the consumers.
It is calculated as percentage of fixed charge and energy charge (units consumed) components of the electricity bill.
The Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) in its separate orders earlier this month allowed the three discoms to recover the PPAC of third quarter of 2024-25 in the May-June 2024 period.
The PPAC allowed are 7.25 per cent for BRPL, 8.11 per cent for BYPL and 10.47 percent for TPDDL.
No reaction was available from the discoms on the increase in PPAC allowed by the DERC.
The United Residents of Delhi (URD), an umbrella body of residents welfare associations in the city, slammed the move as "arbitrary".
"The process under which PPAC charges have been imposed on the people of Delhi by DERC is legally wrong," said a statement from URD general secretary Saurabh Gandhi.
No reaction was immediately available from the DERC over the allegation.
"For the last several years, the Commission has been benefiting the power companies from other items. Now we had great hope from the Commission that has been formed that it will complete the work of tariff determination by following the prescribed procedure, but this Commission conducted a virtual public hearing where not enough time was given to the stakeholders to state their case," Gandhi claimed.
It is also a fact that the PPAC claimed by various discoms and the PPAC awarded by DERC is different. For BRPL it is 7.25 per cent, for BYPL it is 8.11 per cent and for TPDDL it is 10.47 percent, he said.
"Since the cost of fuel surcharge under u/s 64(4) is almost the same for all discoms, the percentage differential tariff should have been the same," Gandhi added.
Discom sources defended the PPAC and said that it was in line with the DERC's regulations orders issued in different time periods for different discoms.
"The PPAC is recovered to ensure timely pass through of power purchase cost, which is dependent upon the coal and gas prices, to the consumer. It is a statutory mandate and the process is very transparent and validated by the regulator," they said.
Without PPAC, discoms will have liquidity stress and they will have no money to pay the power generation companies, sources added.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi's attack on EC doesn't match poll data, officials say bid to ‘defame'
LEADER of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's attack on the Election Commission, in a piece in The Indian Express Saturday, reiterates allegations he has made in the past and contradicts Maharashtra Assembly election data the poll panel has released. A scrutiny by The Indian Express of his allegations and data around each shows that Gandhi's criticism selectively cites records, ignores crucial context and, in one case, even draws a connection where none exists. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was unavailable for comment. However, a senior EC official said: 'After losing the match, blaming the referee has become standard practice. These allegations are absurd and a bid to defame the poll body. ECI has responded to INC on 24 December 2024 on the same issues. It seems like the party has not shared the reply with him (Gandhi).' Consider: 🔴 Appointment of Election Commissioners: Gandhi questioned the government's decision to replace the Chief Justice of India (CJI) with a Cabinet Minister on the panel responsible for appointing Election Commissioners—over-riding a 2023 Supreme Court ruling and raising concerns about the neutrality of the selection process. The fact is that successive governments across party lines—including the UPA—had opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism but failed to do so. For instance, in 2007, the Administrative Reforms Commission, chaired by Congress leader M. Veerappa Moily, recommended a collegium system for appointing Election Commissioners, citing the 'far-reaching importance' of the EC. The ARC proposed a selection panel comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Leader of the Opposition, Law Minister, and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman. However, this recommendation was never implemented. Nor was a similar proposal made by the 20th Law Commission, headed by Justice A.P. Shah, which submitted its report to the NDA government in 2015. 'Now for the first time, a law made by Parliament under Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is better—the earlier system or the new one? Now, there is consultation, there is transparency and there is a concept of majority,' a senior EC official said. 🔴 Increase in new voters: Gandhi flagged what he called an 'incredible leap' of 41 lakh new voters added in Maharashtra within five months between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections—almost equal to the number added over the previous five years—suggesting possible manipulation of the voter rolls. However, under election laws, political parties are involved at every stage of preparing the final electoral roll. Election authorities regularly hold meetings with political parties, provide them free copies of draft and final rolls, and publish these on official websites. During the summary revision period, weekly lists of additions and deletions are shared to allow objections. Ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election, 1,03,727 booth-level agents (BLAs) were appointed by political parties, including 27,099 from the Congress. These agents are responsible for interacting with election officials to flag any discrepancies at the polling station level. Yet, during this revision, fewer than 100 appeals pertaining to additions or deletions were filed by party agents across all parties. 🔴 Voter turnout: Gandhi questioned the reported voter turnout jump from 58.22% at 5 pm on November 20, 2024, to 66.05% the following morning—an increase of 7.83 percentage points, or about 76 lakh voters. He called the rise unprecedented, noting that in the 2019 Maharashtra polls, the difference between provisional and final turnout was only 0.64 percentage points. The fact is that the poll watchdog has always treated turnout figures released on polling day as provisional—and for good reason. Polling officers prioritise the integrity of the voting process over real-time reporting, and delays in updates are common. Before the Voter Turnout app, the EC would brief media around 6 pm on polling day, with officials consistently stating that the 5 pm figures were tentative, as voting often extended beyond the official deadline. In this context, the gap between the provisional turnout reported at 5 pm and the final figure released the next morning is not unusual—especially when compared to previous elections. On Saturday, the Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer's office clarified that the difference between provisional and final voter turnout figures in 2024 was not unusual when compared to 2019. In 2019, turnout rose from approximately 54.43% at 5 pm to 61.10% final; in 2024, it rose from 58.22% to 66.05%. The CEO's office said final figures are based on official records (Form 17C), provided to polling agents for verification. It also pointed out that Gandhi's data comparison was flawed: for 2019, he used provisional turnout figures recorded at the actual end of polling—which may have extended beyond 6 pm—alongside the final figures. But for 2024, he compared the 5 pm provisional turnout (before polling had ended) with the final numbers. Further, EC officials said that in 2024, an average of 58 lakh voters cast their votes every hour in Maharashtra. Based on this, 116 lakh voters could have voted in the last two hours alone—making the increase of 76 lakh voters completely plausible. 🔴 'Bogus' Voting: Gandhi further alleged that the surge in voter turnout was concentrated in 12,000 booths across 85 constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and connected this to gains made by the BJP in the Assembly polls. He cited Kamthi Assembly seat as an example, claiming BJP's votes rose from 1.19 lakh in the Lok Sabha election to 1.75 lakh in the Assembly poll, while Congress figures remained mostly stable. However, the EC allows candidates and their polling agents full access to all polling booths to raise objections in real time. Even after results are declared, candidates may challenge the outcome by filing election petitions in High Court. Congress candidate Suresh Yadavrao Bhoyar, who contested from Kamthi Assembly seat, has not filed such a petition. Of the 112 election petitions filed across Maharashtra, only 28 are from Congress—and Kamthi is not among them. When asked about Gandhi's claim, a Maharashtra CEO official said it was factually incorrect. Kamthi falls under the Ramtek Lok Sabha seat, which was contested by Shiv Sena in the general election—not the BJP. 'Therefore, the question of the BJP receiving 1.19 lakh votes in Kamthi during the Lok Sabha polls does not arise,' the official said. The officer also pointed out that Bhoyar received 1,07,064 votes in 2019 and 1,34,033 in 2024, an increase in support. 🔴 'Concealing' evidence: Accusing the Election Commission of responding with 'silence and even aggression,' Rahul Gandhi said requests to access voter rolls from the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were denied, and that the poll watchdog has also refused to provide videography and CCTV footage of the polling process in Maharashtra. Electoral rolls—lists of registered voters—are already available to political parties. What cannot be shared is the list of those who actually voted, as this would violate the 'secrecy of voting,' a foundational principle in ensuring free and fair elections, a top official said. It's for this reason the EC provides private voting compartments for each voter. Disclosing post-poll attendance could expose voters to intimidation or pressure. On CCTV footage, it is a fact that in December 2024, the EC—after consultations with the Centre—amended the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to restrict access to electronic records. This followed a Punjab and Haryana High Court directive ordering the EC to share footage with advocate Mehmood Pracha. The Commission has argued that providing CCTV footage would amount to violation of secrecy of vote and open it up to potential misuse using artificial intelligence. Asked about this, an official in the State CEO office said, 'In case of any grievance or objection related to the election process, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, under Section 80, provides a legal option in the form of an Election Petition, which may be filed before the Hon'ble High Court. If the Court deems it necessary during the proceedings of such a petition, the relevant electronic or documentary evidence related to the election process is produced before the Court as per its directives.'
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
He should visit Bengal, see democracy under Mamata Banerjee: Sukanta Majumdar on Rahul Gandhi's claim
Kolkata (West Bengal) [India], June 7 (ANI): Reacting to Rahul Gandhi's allegations that Maharashtra Assembly elections in 2024 were a blueprint for rigging democracy, Union Minister Sukanta Majumdar stated that he should visit West Bengal to see democracy under the Mamata Banerjee government. Sukanta Majumdar said, 'The problem with our Opposition is that wherever they win, they say EVMs are right, and where they lose, they say EVMs are faulty and there is match-fixing. Some kids do not know how to play the match then they blame the pitch and umpire. Rahul Gandhi does not know how to play. I wish that his prediction that the states in which there is no BJP government will have a BJP rule should come true. In Bengal, also BJP government should be formed according to his prediction.' He further alleged that Rahul Gandhi should visit West Bengal to understand democracy under the TMC rule. 'Rahul Gandhi never visits Bengal. He should come to Bengal to see how the match is played here. He should see how Congress workers are beaten here often. Rahul Gandhi should visit West Bengal to see democracy under the Mamata Banerjee government,' he added. Earlier, Rahul Gandhi had alleged that the Maharashtra Assembly election held in November 2024 was 'rigged', and claimed that the same will be repeated in Bihar Assembly polls due later this year. In a post on X, Gandhi shared his article published in a newspaper, explaining the 'rigging' in the Maharashtra assembly polls.' Maharashtra assembly elections in 2024 were a blueprint for rigging democracy. My article shows how this happened, step by step,' Gandhi said on X. The former Congress President explained a five-point process. He said that step one includes rigging the panel that appoints the Election Commission, followed by adding fake voters to the electoral roll. He further claimed that the next steps include inflating the voter turnout, targeting the bogus voting exactly where the BJP needs to win and hiding the evidence. 'Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission; Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll; Step 3: Inflate voter turnout; Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where the BJP needs to win; Step 5: Hide the evidence,' Gandhi said. (ANI)
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Election Commission of India says absurd to defame us after electoral loss in Maharashtra
On a day when the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, levelled allegations of irregularities in the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election yet again, the Election Commission (EC) said it was completely 'absurd' to 'defame' the poll body after 'any unfavourable verdict by the voters'. In articles published in different languages in various publications on Saturday, the Congress MP claimed that the outcome of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election was 'glaringly strange', and the 'scale of rigging' was so desperate that, despite all efforts to conceal it, tell-tale evidence has emerged' from official statistics. He also claimed he was 'not talking about small-scale cheating but of industrial-scale rigging involving the capture of our national institutions'. The Leader of the Opposition had raised the issue earlier in the Lok Sabha as well as at a joint press conference with other Opposition parties, and during his tour to the United States. The poll body, on December 24, 2024, wrote to the Congress explaining its position. In April also, it had rebutted similar allegations made by Gandhi in the U.S. EC sources on Saturday said that the poll body has already elaborated the procedure behind the updation of electoral rolls. Any deletion and addition in the electoral roll is strictly as per the given framework under Article 324 of the Constitution, provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and the Registration of the Electors Rules, 1960, as well as the extant instructions issued by the commission from time to time. The process was undertaken in the full glare of 1,03,727 booth-level agents appointed by the political parties, including 27,099 agents by the Indian National Congress (INC) themselves. After the finalisation of the electoral rolls during the Maharashtra election, out of the 9,77,90,752 electors, only 89 appeals were filed before the first appellate authority (District Magistrate) under Section 24(A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and only one appeal was preferred before the second appellate authority (Chief Electoral Officer) under Section 24(B) of the same Act. Section 24 of the Representation of People Act, 1961, says that appeals can first be filed with the District Magistrate (DM) and then with the Chief Electoral Officer. As per Rule 27 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, the first appeal to the District Magistrate can be filed within 15 days of the order of the Electoral Registration Officer, and the second appeal to the Chief Electoral Officer can be filed within 30 days of the order of DM. However, the delay in filing appeals can be condoned by the DM and/or Chief Electoral Officer as per the proviso of Rule 27. Partners should understand India's zero tolerance for terror policy, not put India and Pakistan on par, says Jaishankar India expects its partners to understand its 'policy of zero tolerance' on terrorism, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar told visiting British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, adding that the country could not 'countenance' equating 'perpetrators of evil' with their victims. The stern statement from the External Affairs Minister came at the beginning of talks during Lammy's one day visit to Delhi on Saturday, and follows a few weeks after Lammy's visit to Pakistan, where he said that the U.S. and the U.K. were working with India and Pakistan to ensure 'an enduring ceasefire', dialogue, and Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs) between India and Pakistan. The comments, in an interview to Reuters in Islamabad on May 17, had ruffled feathers in New Delhi as India has repeatedly denied any third country's role in the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack. 'We practice a policy of zero tolerance against terrorism and expect our partners to understand it, and we will never countenance perpetrators of evil being put at par with its victims,' Jaishankar told Lammy, while thanking the U.K. government for its condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack, and support for India's fight against terrorism. In a statement ahead of the visit, the U.K. High Commission had said that Lammy would address the 'recent escalation in tensions following the Pahalgam terrorist attack and how welcomed sustained period of peace can be best supported in the interests of stability in the region'. Jaishankar's strong words are part of a diplomatic pushback by the government against other countries over what is seen as India's 'hyphenation' with Pakistan in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, where many countries expressed concern and offered to help stop the military escalation during the four-day conflict. The government has faced criticism from the Opposition over U.S. President Donald Trump's claim that he mediated the crisis, a claim seemingly bolstered by Russian Presidential Aide Ushakov and Lammy in their respective statements. In addition, the Opposition has claimed that the government has failed diplomatically to stop Pakistan, which is a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), from becoming the Chair of the Taliban Sanctions Committee and the Vice-Chair of the Counter Terrorism Committee for the year, despite India's ties with permanent members the U.S., the U.K., France, Russia, and others on the council. Official sources said that 'India will be working closely with its friends' in the UNSC to keep a watch on Pakistan's activities on the council, given that Pakistan will also assume the Presidency of the UNSC in July. The sources said that Pakistan had requested Chairpersonship of four committees dealing with terrorism, and had only been nominated to the top of two, and Co-chair of some informal working groups (IWGs) due to a move by the Council to 'reign in Pakistan'. They added that at least 50 of 343 individuals and entities that have been designated by the UNSC as terrorists are linked to or reside in Pakistan, and many globally wanted terrorists, including Osama Bin Laden had lived and trained there. The Ministry of External Affairs did not respond to requests for a comment on whether the issue of Pakistan's role in the UNSC terror committees had been discussed between Jaishankar and Lammy. Lammy met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday morning, the second time he was accorded the meeting, after his previous visit in July 2024. He is also meeting Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal to take forward discussions on the India-U.K. Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that was finalised in May, and discussions over signing could be held between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the U.K. PM Keith Starmer when they meet in Canada in mid-June on the sidelines of the G7 summit, where India is a special invitee. In his opening remarks, Jaishankar also referred to the India-U.K. FTA, as a 'milestone' in ties, and the potential of other bilateral agreements, including the Technology Security Initiative (TSI) for Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Strategic Exports and Technology Cooperation Dialogue to 'propel' ties forward. 'Signing a Free Trade Agreement is just the start of our ambitions — we are building a modern partnership with India for a new global era,' Lammy said in a statement ahead of his visit to India, pointing to cooperation in growth, technology, tackling the climate crisis, delivering 'migration priorities', and security issues. Musk deletes post claiming Trump 'in the Epstein files' Tech billionaire Elon Musk has deleted an explosive allegation linking Donald Trump with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein that he posted on social media during a vicious public fallout with the U.S. President this week. Musk, who exited his role as a top White House advisor just last week, alleged on Thursday that the Republican leader is featured in secret government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos and investigative material that his 'MAGA' movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files,' Musk posted on his social media platform, X, as his growing feud with the President boiled over into a spectacularly public row on Thursday. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' he said. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He initially doubled down on the claim, writing in a follow-up message, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' However, he appeared to have deleted both tweets by Saturday morning. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's 'Make America Great Again' base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, although not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the President appears in any of the material. Trump knew and socialised with Epstein but has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. 'Terrific guy,' Trump, who was Epstein's neighbour in both Florida and New York, said in an early 2000s profile of the financier. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' Just last week, Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship imploded within days as Musk described as an 'abomination' a spending bill that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington and riveted social media users alike stunned by the blistering break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful. With real political and economic risks to their row, both then appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, but the White House denied reports they would talk. India central to key supply chains; must be part of G7 discussions: Canadian PM Carney India is the fifth largest economy in the world, and it is central to a number of critical global supply chains, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said, arguing that the leadership of the country must be part of discussions at the upcoming G7 summit. Carney's comments came after some of his political opponents in Canada criticised him for inviting Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in view of a probe into allegations of Indian links to the killing of a Khalistani separatist in 2023. Prime Minister Modi accepted Carney's invitation to attend the G7 summit during a phone conversation on Friday. Canada is hosting the G7 summit in the Alberta province from June 15 to 17 in its capacity as the current chair of the grouping. To a specific question on the case of killing of pro-Khalistan separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in 2023, Carney told reporters that it is not appropriate for him to comment as the legal process in the case is underway. The Canadian Prime Minister said the G7 summit will deliberate on a range of key issues including energy security, digital future, critical minerals and on partnerships in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world. Carney suggested that he extended the invitation to Modi after talking to other G7 member countries. 'There are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions,' he said when asked why PM Modi was invited when there have been allegations of Indian links to the Nijjar case. 'India is the fifth largest economy in the world; effectively the most populous country in the world. [It is] central to a number of those supply chains; [it is] at the heart of a number of those supply chains, so it makes sense,' he said. Without elaborating, Carney noted that India and Canada have agreed to continue law enforcement dialogue. 'Bilaterally, we have now agreed importantly to continue law enforcement dialogue. There has been some progress on issues of accountability,' he said. Canada's NDP party slammed Carney for extending the invitation to Modi. 'This decision is profoundly troubling,' it said. The India-Canada relations hit rock bottom following then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's allegations in 2023 of a potential Indian link to the killing of Nijjar. In October last year, India recalled its High Commissioner and five other diplomats after Ottawa attempted to link them to the Nijjar case. India also expelled an equal number of Canadian diplomats. However, Liberal Party leader Carney's victory in the parliamentary election in April triggered hopes for reset of the relationship. In the last few months, the security officials of India and Canada resumed contacts and both sides were looking at the possibility of appointing new high commissioners. India had accused Trudeau's government of allowing pro-Khalistani elements to operate from Canadian soil. After Trudeau's exit, New Delhi said it hoped to rebuild ties with Canada based on 'mutual trust and sensitivity'. Five Maoists gunned down in encounters in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur district Five Maoists were killed in two encounters with security forces in an ongoing operation in the Indravati National Park area of Chhattisgarh's Bijapur district, police said on Saturday. With the latest casualties, seven Maoists, including top leaders Sudhakar and Bhaskar, were neutralised in the operation in the last three days, they said. 'Security forces have recovered the bodies of seven Maoists during the ongoing anti-Naxal operations in the Indravati National Park area of the district,' a senior police official said. On Saturday, two bodies were recovered following a gunfight, while three were found after the exchange of fire on the intervening night of Friday and Saturday, he said. The official said the operation involving personnel from the state police's Special Task Force (STF) and District Reserve Guard (DRG) as well as the CRPF's specialised unit CoBRA, was launched on June 4 based on input about the presence of Maoist leader Sudhakar, Telangana State Committee member Bandi Prakash, Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee (DKSZC) member Pappa Rao, and a few other armed cadres. On Friday, security forces neutralised Bhaskar, alias Mailarapu Adellu, a special zonal committee (SZC) member of the Telangana State Committee (TSC) of Maoists who carried a reward of Rs 45 lakh in Chhattisgarh and Telangana, and Maoists' central committee member Narasimha Chalam, alias Sudhakar, who had a bounty of Rs 40 lakh in Chhattisgarh, was killed on Thursday, he said. The official said the identity of five more killed Maoists, two of them women, is yet to be ascertained. A huge cache of arms and ammunition, including two AK-47 rifles, has been seized in the operation, he said, adding that search and area domination operations were underway in the surrounding forested terrain to track remaining Maoist cadres and ensure complete sanitisation of the region. A few security personnel have suffered injuries due to snakebite, honeybee sting, dehydration and other operational injuries during the operation and were provided medication, the official said. The outlawed CPI (Maoist) general secretary Nambala Keshav Rao, alias Basavaraju (70), was neutralised in the Bastar region on May 21, 2025. In brief: At least 76 army personnel were on Saturday airlifted from Chaten in north Sikkim, where road connectivity has been snapped due to multiple landslides triggered by heavy rain, officials said. This marks the 'completion of coordinated evacuation efforts', which included the rescue of all stranded tourists earlier, they said. 'Altogether 76 army personnel were airlifted by three MI-17 helicopters. The air evacuation operation from Chaten has concluded today with the helicopters transporting army personnel from Chaten to Pakyong Greenfield Airport,' an official said. The state government continues to closely monitor the overall situation and remains committed to providing all necessary support in the disaster-hit region and assistance to those affected by natural calamities, another official said. Evening Wrap will return tomorrow.
