Trump budget would cut ocean data and leave boaters, anglers and forecasters scrambling for info
Capt. Ed Enos makes his living as a harbor pilot in Hawaii, clambering aboard arriving ships in the predawn hours and guiding them into port.
His world revolves around wind speeds, current strength and wave swells. When Enos is bobbing in dangerous waters in the dark, his cellphone is his lifeline: with a few taps he can access the
Integrated Ocean Observing System
and pull up the data needed to guide what are essentially floating warehouses safely to the dock.
But maybe not for much longer. President Donald Trump wants to eliminate all federal funding for the observing system's regional operations. Scientists say the cuts could mean the end of efforts to gather real-time data crucial to navigating treacherous harbors, plotting tsunami escape routes and predicting hurricane intensity.
Continue to video
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
"It's the last thing you should be shutting down," Enos said. "There's no money wasted. Right at a time when we should be getting more money to do more work to benefit the public, they want to turn things off. That's the wrong strategy at the wrong time for the wrong reasons."
Monitoring system tracks all things ocean The IOOS system launched about 20 years ago. It's made up of 11 regional associations in multiple states and territories, including the Virgin Islands, Alaska, Hawaii, Washington state, Michigan, South Carolina and Southern California.
Live Events
The regional groups are networks of university researchers, conservation groups, businesses and anyone else gathering or using maritime data. The associations are the Swiss army knife of oceanography, using buoys, submersible drones and radar installations to track water temperature, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, wave speeds, swell heights and current strength.
The networks monitor the Great Lakes, U.S. coastlines, the Gulf of Mexico, which Trump renamed the Gulf of America, the Gulf of Alaska, the Caribbean and the South Pacific and upload member data to public websites in real time.
Maritime community and military rely on system data Cruise ship, freighter and tanker pilots like Enos, as well as the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard, use the information directly to navigate harbors safely, plot courses around storms and conduct search-and-rescue operations.
The associations' observations feed into National Weather Service forecasts. The Pacific Northwest association uses tsunami data to post real-time coastal escape routes on a public-facing app. And the Hawaii association not only posts data that is helpful to harbor pilots but tracks hurricane intensity and tiger sharks that have been tagged for research.
The associations also track toxic algal blooms, which can force beach closures and kill fish. The maps help commercial anglers avoid those empty regions. Water temperature data can help identify heat layers within the ocean and, because it's harder for fish to survive in those layers, knowing hot zones helps anglers target better fishing grounds.
The regional networks are not formal federal agencies but are almost entirely funded through federal grants through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The current federal budget allocates $43.5 million for the networks. A Republican bill in the House natural resources committee would actually send them more money, $56 million annually, from 2026 through 2030.
Cuts catch network administrators by surprise A Trump administration memo leaked in April proposes a $2.5 billion cut to the Department of Commerce, which oversees NOAA, in the 2026 federal budget.
Part of the proposal calls for eliminating federal funding for the regional monitoring networks, even though the memo says one of the activities the administration wants the commerce department to focus on is collecting ocean and weather data.
The memo offered no other justifications for the cuts. The proposal stunned network users.
"We've worked so hard to build an incredible system and it's running smoothly, providing data that's important to the economy. Why would you break it?" said Jack Barth, an Oregon State oceanographer who shares data with the Pacific Northwest association.
"What we're providing is a window into the ocean and without those measures we frankly won't know what's coming at us. It's like turning off the headlights," Barth said.
NOAA officials declined to comment on the cuts and potential impacts, saying in an email to The Associated Press that they do not do "speculative interviews."
Network's future remains unclear Nothing is certain. The 2026 federal fiscal year starts Oct. 1. The budget must pass the House, the Senate and get the president's signature before it can take effect. Lawmakers could decide to fund the regional networks after all.
Network directors are trying not to panic. If the cuts go through, some associations might survive by selling their data or soliciting grants from sources outside the federal government. But the funding hole would be so significant that just keeping the lights on would be an uphill battle, they said.
If the associations fold, other entities might be able to continue gathering data, but there will be gaps. Partnerships developed over years would evaporate and data won't be available in a single place like now, they said.
"People have come to us because we've been steady," Hawaii regional network director Melissa Iwamoto said. "We're a known entity, a trusted entity. No one saw this coming, the potential for us not to be here."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Ecostani: Dying, melting glaciers have served a warning. Do we care?
A glacial collapse buried part of a village in Birch, Switzerland, on May 28. Many miles away, in Nepal, Yala glacier was declared dead on May 12. A new study by an international team of researchers, published on May 30, warned that if global warming targets under the Paris climate deal exceed, the non-polar glacial mass would diminish significantly — by almost half. The Himalayas, which is termed as the third Polar glacial mass on the planet, is no less affected. According to studies by the Geological Survey of India (GSI) and the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), the majority of glaciers in the Himalayan range are melting at a faster rate than it was prior to 2010. A study in April 2025 by International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) said that annual winter snow in Himalaya in the past four years has been lowest in decades and in May it declared Yala glacier to be dead, the first for Nepal, and a rare glacial event. To add to this, a new study by Climate Trends released on May 31 showed that concentration of black carbon (BC) emissions in the mountain range, especially Eastern and Central Himalayas, was increasing, which could have implications for water supply for 2 billion people in South Asia. According to the report, the average snow surface temperatures in the Himalayan snow peaks have increased by more than 4°C over the last two decades, from an average of -11.27°C (2000–2009) to -7.13°C (2020–2023). Over the 23-year period, the overall mean temperature increase was -8.57°C, meaning faster melting of snow. Black carbon, whose deposits have increased, acts like a heat lamp on snow, it darkens the surface, accelerates melting, and triggers a dangerous feedback loop. The latest World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) report has warned that there is an 80% chance that a year between 2025 and 2029 will be warmer than the record-breaking 2024 and an 86% likelihood that another year will exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, the threshold beyond which climate change will make human life more difficult. The WMO said the 1.5°C (and 2°C) level specified in the Paris Agreement refers to the long-term level of warming inferred from global temperatures, typically over 20 years. Temporary exceedances of such levels are expected to occur with increasing frequency as the underlying rise in global temperature approaches the level. The report concluded that any additional 'fraction of a degree of warming' drives more harmful heatwaves, extreme rainfall events, intense droughts, melting of ice sheets and glaciers, and heating of the ocean. In South Asia, it would mean more water in the Indus, Ganga and Brahmaputra, for some decades, which might eventually turn dry. Around 40% of India's Gross Domestic Product is dependent on people and industry in these river basin regions. The landslide that buried most of a Swiss village this week is just one of the several examples across the world how global warming was causing glacier collapses. Officials said that in Switzerland, the mountainside gave way on May 28, 2025, near the village of Blatten, in the southern Lötschental valley, because the rock face above the Birch Glacier had become unstable after mountain permafrost melted, causing debris to fall and cover the glacier in recent years. No one was injured. In 2016, a glacier in Tibet's, Aru mountain range suddenly collapsed, killing nine people and their livestock, followed a few months later by the collapse of another glacier. There also have been collapses in Peru, including one in 2006 that caused a mini tsunami; most recently, a glacial lagoon overflowed in April, triggering a landslide that killed two. The Glacial Lake OutBurst FLow (GLOF) caused by faster melting of glaciers caused massive flooding in Rishi Ganga and Dhauli rivers in Chamoli district of Uttarakhand in February 2021, killing 80 people. Two hydro power projects were badly damaged due to the heavy flow of debris. The study by ETH Zurich told us what could happen to glaciers with the present pace of global warming with 54% of the non-polar glaciers likely to 'diminish significantly'. However, if warming is limited to 1.5°C, at least 54 per cent could be preserved—more than twice as much ice as in a 2.7°C scenario. The findings, published in the prestigious journal Science, said even if global temperatures were stabilised at today's level of 1.2°C, an estimated 39% of global glacier mass would still be lost compared to 2020 levels — contributing over 10 centimetres to global sea-level rise. The study is the work of an international team of 21 scientists from 10 countries using eight glacier models to calculate the potential ice loss from more than 200,000 glaciers outside Greenland and Antarctica. The team evaluated a wide range of global temperature scenarios, assuming that temperatures would remain constant for thousands of years in each scenario. In all scenarios, glaciers lose mass rapidly over decades and then continue to melt at a slower pace for centuries — even without additional warming. This long-term response means glaciers will continue to feel the effects of today's heat far into the future, gradually retreating to higher altitudes before reaching a new equilibrium. Glaciers are good indicators of climate change because their retreat allows scientists to measure impact of climate change. But, since they adjust over longer timescales, their current size vastly understates the magnitude of climate change that has already happened. 'The situation for glaciers is actually far worse than visible in the mountains today,' said the study's co-lead author Lilian Schuster from the University of Innsbruck. Beyond contributing to sea-level rise, glacier loss has far-reaching consequences. It threatens freshwater availability, increases the risk of glacier-related hazards such as floods and landslides, and jeopardises glacier-fed tourism economies. These cascading impacts will be felt across regions and generations. A high-level meeting on glacial melt was held this week in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, to discuss the impact of global warming on glaciers, which have already melt around 40% since the last ice age and most of it has happened in the past 400 and 700 years. At the meeting, which is a welcome step, there was a discussion on an action plan to reduce glacial melt. Whether it would fructify remains a big future question like several other environmental agreements. Although there has been a lot of science and research of glacial melt, negligible policy action has been seen from the global community to protect mountain biodiversity and forests. There is no incentive for hill communities to protect the mountains, no additional prohibitive taxes are being imposed on pollution vehicles entering ecologically fragile mountainous regions and heavy use of pesticides have already polluted ground water in several mountain regions of the world. Unlike people's movements against air pollution, there is no collective voice to protect glaciers and mountains that provide water and life to billions. Civil society bodies and so-called climate champions have failed glaciers the most. Saving glaciers needs a new trans-continental approach with active people participation on preserving local ecology and controlling emissions. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hindustan Times
30-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
Hindu Kush Himalaya could loss 75% of its glaciers by 2100, warns new study
The Hindu Kush Himalaya could lose up to 75 per cent of its glaciers by the year 2100 if global temperatures rise by 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, revealed a study published by the Science journal. Glacier loss, also known as glacier melt or glacial retreat, refers to the reduction of ice mass in glaciers and ice sheets. This loss primarily results from increased temperatures causing melting, sublimation (water evaporating directly from ice), and icebergs breaking apart. The study named 'Social impacts of glacier loss' notes that the critical water source which nourishes more than 2 billion people in the Indian subcontinent could lose its glacier cover. Such a loss of glacier cover could cause far reaching consequences for the water security across Asia. Also Read: Swiss glacier collapses, destroys nearly all of Alpine village. Watch wild video If countries succeed in limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as outlined in the Paris Agreement, the study estimates that 40-45 per cent of glacier ice in the Himalayas and the Caucasus could be preserved. Globally, this would mean retaining 54 per cent of current glacier mass, compared to just 24 per cent if the world continues on its current trajectory toward 2.7 degrees Celsius of warming by the end of the century. Also Read: Research finds glaciers far more vulnerable to global warming than earlier estimates Other regions with high glacier mass such as the European Alps, the North American Rockies and Iceland, are at risk as well, increasing water insecurity across the globe. At 2 degrees celsius of warming, these areas could lose nearly all their ice, with only 10-15 per cent of their 2020 glacier levels remaining. At such a level, the entirety of Scandinavia could loss their glaciers. Also Read: Glaciologists, local communities mourn loss of Nepal's Yala glacier The study shows that glacier mass will decline rapidly for decades, even if temperatures stabilize, with long-term impacts persisting for centuries. 'Our study makes it painfully clear that every fraction of a degree matters. The choices made today, scientists warn, will determine the future of the world's glaciers—and the billions who depend on them," said co-lead author Dr Harry Zekollari. The study also states that the loss of glaciers will increase stress on food chains and microbiomes vital to human life on Earth. The research paper notes, 'Melting raises sea levels, and affects water resources downstream including their ecosystemic biodiversity. In addition, melting glaciers can compound other natural hazards such as increasing the formation of icebergs and accelerating permafrost erosion. They can also harm economic systems such as the tourism industry and damage cultural heritage. As impacts to the cryosphere accelerate, so, too, do social repercussions.'
Time of India
30-05-2025
- Time of India
Smelling the impossible: How scientists are bottling the lost scents of extinct flowers
Imagine spritzing on a fragrance that no living human has ever smelled—a scent lost to time, reborn through the marvels of modern science. This is not science fiction, but the bold reality crafted by Future Society , a US-based biotech fragrance company that's turning the impossible into a wearable experience. The Jurassic Park of Perfume Partnering with Harvard University Herbaria , which houses over five million plant specimens, Future Society has sequenced the DNA of plants extinct for more than a century and a half. Using fragments from these long-lost blooms, their team has managed to reconstruct six unique perfumes—each a tribute to a vanished floral world. Take orbexilum stipulatum , for example—a flowering herb that last bloomed in 1881 on Rock Island in the Ohio River. Its extinction followed the disappearance of buffalo, which once spread its seeds, and was sealed when dams flooded its habitat. Now, thanks to DNA extracted from preserved specimens, its scent—green, lush, and tinged with watery notes—has been reimagined for the modern nose. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo 'We utilized this technology… to offer a glimpse into the fragrances that these extinct flowers may have produced,' said Jasmina Aganovic , CEO of Future Society. 'Our goal was to create scents that have never been experienced before, fragrances that were previously unattainable.' The process is part genealogy, part olfactory detective work: DNA is extracted, genes linked to scent molecules are identified, and then perfumers interpret the data, blending natural, synthetic, and bioengineered notes. Aganovic is clear: 'We are not fully reviving these flowers… The human connection to our environment cannot be replicated or easily restored'. Yet, with each bottle, Future Society invites us to time-travel through scent—reminding us that, with enough curiosity and ingenuity, even the fragrances of the extinct can bloom again. Live Events The resulting fragrances are described as 'tributes' rather than exact replicas. Each is a creative leap—a blend of what science reveals and what artistry imagines. Perfumer Olivia Jan , for instance, designed 'Grassland Opera' to evoke the lush, wet environment where orbexilum once thrived. Others, like 'Solar Canopy' and 'Invisible Woods,' draw on extinct flowers from South Africa and India, layering earthy, herbal, and fruity notes to tell the story of loss and rediscovery.
