Wills Week 2025: With NZers Set To Inherit $1.6 Trillion Over The Next 25 Years, A ‘Good Will' Message From Public Trust
This year for Wills Week (14-20 July 2025), Public Trust is calling on New Zealanders to consider how their will can be a powerful tool to support charitable giving.
'Wills aren't just about money or property,' says Public Trust Chief Executive Glenys Talivai. 'They're about people. They're about values we pass on. This Wills Week we're spreading a 'good will' message. In our role we get to see the extraordinary impact of ordinary New Zealanders who choose to leave a gift in their will to benefit others.'
Every year, Public Trust manages hundreds of bequests and charitable grants made possible by New Zealand's will-makers. This has provided vital funding for a wide range of services, including counselling, life-saving health initiatives, environmental projects, education scholarships, marae renovations, animal welfare, food rescue, training for young farmers, and wrap around support for at-risk youth and families in need.
For many charities, bequests are one of the largest single sources of funding they receive.
'Whether it's supporting a local community group or helping a favourite charity, a gift in your will – known as a bequest – can create a ripple effect that lasts for years to come,' says Talivai.
'Wills Week this year is about inspiring New Zealanders to think about what they want to pass on in the future. After caring for whānau and friends, we encourage you to consider leaving a gift in your will to help build stronger communities for generations to come. Even a small gift can make a big difference.'
Released earlier this year in collaboration with Public Trust, JBWere's New Zealand Bequest Report estimated charities receive $320 million annually from gifts in wills.
To realise the full potential of legacy giving, two things need to happen, says Talivai. 'People need to plan for the future by making a will, and make an active choice to leave a gift in their will. This could help unlock billions in future funding for the charities and communities that shape Aotearoa.'
Wills Week is supported by Philanthropy New Zealand. CEO Rahul Watson Govindan says now is a powerful moment for New Zealand to reflect on how it enables generosity.
'We know that approximately $1.6 trillion is anticipated to be transferred from one generation to the next over the course of the next 25 years. For the 'giving generation' it's a wonderful opportunity to continue to make a difference to the country they have worked so hard to build and communities they care so much about. Philanthropy continues to make a meaningful difference to our collective future.'
Visit publictrust.co.nz to learn how to create or update your will online.
New Zealand wills trends
Public Trust data reveals key insights into New Zealanders' approach to estate planning:
Intergenerational inheritances to top $1.6 trillion by 2050: Inheritances are estimated to grow from around the $27 billion passed in 2024, to $1.6 trillion by 2050. (Source: The Bequest Report 2025). Currently, only 1.3% of inheritances will be allocated to charities, below the levels seen in the US and UK.
Good will: Around 7% of wills written with Public Trust in the last three years have a gift to a charity included. The average value of a gift in a will is around $800. The most common types of charities provided for are focused on people's health and wellbeing, ambulance services and animal welfare.
Women 'willanthropists' lead the way: Female will-makers consistently donate more than their male counterparts. In 2024, younger females aged 18-35 showed a notable increase in giving compared to previous years.
Giving grows with age: The largest charitable contributions come from those aged 66-75, followed closely by the 56-65 age group.
Will uptake: Overall, 50% of adult New Zealanders have a will in place, and this percentage grows with age.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
43 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Academic calls out ‘toxic' school
Duncan Connors. PHOTO: PETER MCINTOSH An academic has taken his grievances to Parliament to blow the whistle on the University of Otago's "toxic" Business School. Dr Duncan Connors appeared before a select committee to oppose a law change which would make it easier for employers to sack people. Dr Connors, who was a lecturer in the university's Business School until last year, said his experience showed why the law change was a bad idea. Dr Connors said he departed the institution after reaching a confidential settlement with the university following an 18-month ordeal which had "a serious impact on my health, wellbeing and family life". He had also heard from "many staff members across the Business School and wider university who describe a difficult — and at times, toxic — working environment". "These accounts parallel my own experience and deserve to be heard." The ODT yesterday received calls from three Business School staff, who shared concerns about the culture and alleged bullying. Earlier this year, the Otago Daily Times obtained an inter-department survey of the School of Business' marketing department, which reported low levels of morale as well as bullying and racism. While the sample size was small, the findings were significantly poorer than other departments and the university as a whole when it came to culture and behaviour. Dr Connors has asked for a private meeting with vice-chancellor Grant Robertson to discuss these matters. "It is now at a stage where we need to find a resolution," he told the ODT. "The university is not going to solve these challenges without having the discussion. "This is why I gave evidence — my colleagues deserve to enjoy long, productive careers at an institution of global renown, without feeling compelled to accept a managed exit and settlement as their only way out." The Employment Relations (Termination of Employment by Agreement) Amendment Bill allows for protected negotiations to occur between an employer and an employee to terminate the employee's contract if, for example, the demands of the business means it is imperative to dismiss the employee. Dr Connors urged Parliament not to pass the Bill. "Too many New Zealanders experience difficulties at work not of their own making or choice. The process of redress can become so fraught, so exhausting, that they accept a managed exit or settlement as the only viable option. "This culture of quick redundancies and quiet departures is now embedded in New Zealand's employment landscape. While enabled by the Employment Relations Act 2000, it is not conducive to national productivity or social cohesion. "The proposed Bill would only make this situation worse." Asked about Dr Connors' comments, a university spokeswoman said "the university continues to respect the legal agreement, so will not be making any comment". "The university is committed to reducing risk for all our employees and students and as such has a zero-tolerance policy towards bullying. "Our ethical behaviour policy promotes ethical interactions between members of the university community to provide a safe and respectful environment. "The policy includes the processes for action and where to source advice and support." Dr Connors said despite his ordeal he held no ill will towards the university or his former colleagues. "Otago remains one of the cornerstones of New Zealand's system of higher education, and I continue to value its national contribution."
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
New Zealand abandons international fossil fuel pledge
New Zealand's departure from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance came quietly, but not as a surprise to anyone closely following the Government's fossil fuel policies. Resources Minister Shane Jones says the coalition's fossil fuel plans meant the exit was inevitable. But he also says more formal agreements, like free trade deals with the EU, include wriggle room for matters of sovereign risk, such as national energy supply. Jones saw the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance as a 'women's knitting group' by comparison and said New Zealand's energy needs were significant enough to warrant gas exploration under that 'sovereign risk' provision – meaning other international agreements were not set for some sort of domino effect. As the Government's agenda items began to surface in 2023, chief executive of World Wildlife Fund NZ Kayla Kingdon-Bebb told Newsroom the international community's backlash against its climate policies would be harsher than the Government expected – particularly the National Party. When New Zealand joined the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in 2021, it was only permitted as an associate member. Full membership hinged on a decision to ban onshore oil and gas exploration. Full members include Denmark, Ireland, France and several Pacific countries including Samoa, Vanuatu and Tuvalu. But coalition agreements between all three Government parties committed to reversing the ban on offshore gas exploration, and $200 million was set aside in Budget 2025 to encourage exploration in New Zealand waters. Legal advice later provided to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said repealing the 2018 ban on offshore oil and gas 'would likely be inconsistent with the obligations in several of New Zealand's free trade agreements'. The Green Party warned on Tuesday that, based on the assessment of an independent KC, the move breached another international commitment: the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability. This agreement was celebrated by Trade Minister Todd McClay last year as a 'pioneering' endeavour. On Tuesday afternoon, McClay responded to questions from Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick by doubling down on the nation's commitment to its climate targets: 'What it says about this Government is we will meet our international obligations. When we enter into them, we take them seriously.' The following morning, New Zealand was found to have withdrawn from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance. Swarbrick said the move showed the Government was 'straight up lying to New Zealanders when it talks a big game about renewables'. 'They are handing out subsidies to fossil fuel extraction beginning in a decade, cutting local energy efficiency programmes, breaching our international agreements, and now walking away from long-standing coalitions with historically bipartisan support.' When Simon Watts assumed the position of climate change minister, he said he didn't expect a backlash from the international community as a result of lifting the ban. As recently as November, he told Newsroom that officials assessed New Zealand could stay in the alliance while repealing the offshore ban. But later that month, the co-chair of the alliance, Lars Aagaard, said New Zealand's status would need to be re-evaluated if it repealed the offshore drilling ban. Meanwhile, Jones told Newsroom he'd long thought New Zealand would need to withdraw from the alliance, given the decision to resume oil and gas exploration. A departure had been 'uppermost in my mind' when he spoke to then-energy minister Simeon Brown 'quite some time back'. Jones said 'I would never have agreed for us to join up anyway.' On Wednesday, following New Zealand's withdrawal from the alliance, Watts held his stance about international perceptions, but not about staying in the alliance. Watts said he had received advice that withdrawing from the alliance was 'not going to have any significant impact' on New Zealand's international perception. On June 21, New Zealand's alliance partners were notified the country would be pulling out of the alliance. Watts said these partners had not previously expressed concern over his Government's climate policies. He said the incoming repeal of New Zealand's oil and gas ban was clear government policy, and now he was certain it would pass, withdrawing from the alliance was the right thing. Jones, a longtime advocate for the fossil fuel sector, did not see all obligations as equal. He said the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance was more of a 'women's knitting group' than a firm legal commitment was the climate equivalent of the 'country women's institute'. 'You can go in and out of it.' New Zealand's other commitments were instruments of a different character, Jones said. 'All of these international instruments leave New Zealand with enough wriggle room to address sovereign risks, and we do have challenges towards affordability and security of power.' The Crown Minerals Amendment Bill passed its second reading in November. It was yet to pass its third reading.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Power plan comparison: Electricity Authority to end support for Powerswitch, plans AI service
The way New Zealanders compare and switch power plans and deal with power companies looks set to change. Newstalk ZB understands the Electricity Authority will provide more detail in the coming days about the 'next generation' comparison and switching service it's developing, which uses AI. It's ending its support of
