logo
Matilda Green on reality TV, 10 years of The Bachelor and misconceptions with Paula Bennett- Ask Me Anything

Matilda Green on reality TV, 10 years of The Bachelor and misconceptions with Paula Bennett- Ask Me Anything

NZ Herald17-05-2025
'And that was the moment where I was like, 'Oh no, it has been 10 years, because you are an adult and you were watching in primary school'.'
As the only couple from The Bachelor franchise in New Zealand to make it work, that's already a win for the two, but they have turned their reality TV experience into a successful marriage and family, complete with three children.
For Green, she has also developed a successful media career, with brand deals, podcasts, and recently debuting as the co-host on The Hits Drive show with Matty MacLean, while PJ Harding is on maternity leave.
Green said there are a lot of reasons why they are both still working 10 years after the show.
'I often see comments on news sites and whatever being like, 'Oh, still, still riding the wave, trying to be relevant, when's it gonna end?'
'And it does irk me a little bit because I think, sure, The Bachelor gave me a start, and I wouldn't have a social media career without it, but I also think that I have skills and I have built on that myself.
'Because I wouldn't be doing a lot of the things that I'm doing now if I wasn't the type of person that I am. So I think, absolutely, I have The Bachelor to thank for a lot of that stuff, but not all of it.'
She said that it never ceases to amaze her what people think they can say to people, just because they have a public profile, and often feels like they are being reduced to a character rather than a human being.
While her life has been on public display for a decade now, Green said that she is careful what she puts on social media as things can be misinterpreted, or things can be used against someone later on.
And she has found a lot of misconceptions with how people view her, including thinking that her and Art must have a perfect marriage due to the setting in which they met.
'Our marriage is just like anybody else's. You know, we have ups and downs and we have arguments and whatever, and sometimes we have to work at our marriage just like anyone else. And so that misconception I think is the main one that people think we're in this fairytale.'
Green said that a lot of that comes down to not having time for each other, and negotiating parenting together.
'Probably the main thing we've argued about over the last five years is when we have different approaches or different perceptions of a scenario, how we should deal with something that's been really tricky to navigate of, [and] when to let go and to think, actually you are allowed to take this one, and when to push back and think, actually I feel strongly about this, I think we should do it this way.'
And the other major misconception is that people see her as a 'vacuous influencer'.
'You know, you hear the word influencer and you instantly just think like skinny tea, flogging products, just self-indulgent, self-promotion, whatever.
'And sure, there's a lot of that in the influence industry, but we are all also complex human beings with a lot of different facets of our life that we don't show.
'And so I think it's unfair to judge people on the however many squares on Instagram that they have, because ... you are never going to understand a whole human being from what they share on social media.'
Listen to the full episode for more from Matilda Green about her experiences on reality TV, and the show she still wants to do, and how she plans to tackle telling her kids about how they met.
You can listen to Matilda weekdays on The Hits Drive show.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music
Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music

The Spinoff

time23-07-2025

  • The Spinoff

Big international stadium tours are cannibalising local music

The calls are growing louder and more desperate for the world's biggest pop stars to include Aotearoa on their global tours. We ought to be careful what we wish for, writes Ben Howe. Recently, many have been asking why so many global blockbuster music acts venture no further south than Australia. Major artists such as Taylor Swift, Oasis and Billie Eilish have caused much fan angst – how could they pass us by? This has coincided with much discussion on large-scale events, among them competing stadium proposals for Auckland's Western Springs and Green MP Tamatha Paul advocating for an arena venue in Wellington. Music journalist Chris Schulz has been a zealous voice, writing passionately on the perceived shortage of global hitmakers visiting our shores. An arena show can be a memorable experience. I still recall, as a child, attending Bob Marley's legendary 1978 Western Springs show with my parents. However, too many international events coming down here can also have a hidden cost for local music, one which is not healthy for our industry and the overall economy. But, let's begin with one thing arena event campaigners and myself do agree on; that live music is important. A recent study by my colleagues at Massey University, Measuring and Articulating the Value of Live Performance in Aotearoa, found that live events benefit individual and community well-being. It estimates the economic, social and cultural value of the live performance sector at a hefty $17.3 billion. The research, however, also identifies that cost is the primary barrier preventing people from attending more live events. Simply put, individuals have limited disposable income. Gigs are expensive and we can't go to everything. A big night out, including parking, dinner, babysitters, stopping off at a bar in Kingsland before Coldplay, for example, means those same dollars can't be spent at a different restaurant, in another town, on a different day. This is why regions around Aotearoa seek to capture a greater share of the events market. They compete internally by subsidising various fixtures, hoping to encourage domestic tourism and boost local businesses. Crucially though, this substitution of the dollar also affects local music. If fans don't blow their entertainment budget on an epic rock night with Pearl Jam, then they'll get sweaty with Wellington's DARTZ instead. Hirsute metalheads might appreciate swords and sorcery with Auckland's Princess Chelsea, in place of Metallica. Imaginative perhaps, but my overall point is we know these sort of exchanges do happen. When the borders were closed (but we could still attend events) during Covid, people tried different things; local live music thrived. International arena events also don't grow the overall entertainment dollar, because they don't bring in overseas fans. In the 2024/5 financial year the international tourism spend was $12.2 billion, of which 9% was on 'entertainment'. Only 6.2% of visitors to this country said an event brought them here, but this includes personal occasions such as weddings. In this study, sport captures 2.5% and music isn't even mentioned. Instead, if we bring in more big arena shows, this will capture a greater share of our finite live music market. Most of these shows are promoted by the major multinational companies such as Live Nation and TEG. These businesses' primary focus is maximising market share. In order to achieve this, they consolidate vertical integration and venue ownership – clipping your dollar from the ticketing fees to the beer at the bar, along with everything in between. Among the live music infrastructure controlled or owned by these companies is Ticketek (TEG), Ticketmaster (Live Nation), Spark Arena (very convoluted but ultimately Live Nation), Laneway Festival (TEG), Rhythm & Vines (Live Nation) and many others. Overseas, this market dominance has resulted in accusations of anti-competitive behaviour. In addition to stadium tours cannibalising local music, a large proportion of the income and profits generated from stadium events in Aotearoa flows offshore. This extraction can happen via the sizeable artist fees, the international promoter's cut, ticketing companies and in many other ways. In contrast, with local artist shows and events, most economic benefits circulate internally. Riding this recent wave of arena show flag waving – or possibly generating it – some major international music promoters have started calling for tax incentives and government support. They say help is needed to assuage the challenges landing the desirable but slippery big fish. Apparently, we need to start pumping more megastars through the pipeline. How else will we fill all the stadiums we've built or are building? While public funding and support for arts, culture, and music is important, it must be used in ways that generate value for the local music community and economy – ones that support grass roots music and develop our own global success stories. We could also learn from our cousins across the ditch. They are developing intelligent ways to safeguard Australian music. One of these is called 'Michael's Rule', a self-regulating system where all international tours must have a local support artist. While international mega-gigs do have their place, to ensure things are fair for local artists, we need to cultivate more policies such as 'Michael's Rule'. In the arena show discussion, it is important to consider the interests of the Aotearoa music community.

The secret diary of . . . David Seymour
The secret diary of . . . David Seymour

Otago Daily Times

time27-06-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

The secret diary of . . . David Seymour

There's a lot on the agenda for David Seymour. PHOTO: RNZ MONDAY — Attend my first press conference as deputy prime minister and speak solemnly about international affairs to strengthen the perception I am a world statesman worthy of respect. — Name some worthy academic no-one has ever heard of and hold them to ridicule. — RSVP to the birthday party for a child of an influential donor from the Atlas Project. TUESDAY — Take credit for the budget cuts to Radio New Zealand to strengthen the perception that Act is a powerful enemy of state-funded left-wing propaganda that attacks Act at every opportunity and gives Labour, the Greens and old scribble face a free ride. — Increase state funding of Act's comms department. — Confirm that I will be happy to play pin the tail on the donkey at the Atlas Project birthday party. WEDNESDAY — Ridicule Labour MP Willie Jackson for his comments that the Regulatory Standards Bill is set up for my mates from powerful corporations who are following their manifest destiny to despoil the countryside in exchange for massive profits which ought not be subject to tax. — Meet mates for a drink. — Draw a line in the sand and decline an invitation to actually play the donkey that gets a tail pinned to it at the Atlas Project birthday party. THURSDAY — Give Act's comms department the hard word to find someone who has made ridiculing remarks about me so I can whine and complain about it to strengthen the perception I am constantly under attack by the intelligentsia. — Find a way to undermine Luxon. — Find a way to undermine someone who votes Green and hugs trees. — Find a way to undermine someone who can be described as a Māori fanatic. — Find a way to undermine someone who performs selfless acts for the betterment of society and gives hope to families doing it hard but who is associated with Labour. FRIDAY — Seek private medical treatment for multiple puncture wounds inflicted by rich little brats wielding really sharp pins who seemed to take great pleasure in pinning a donkey's tail all over my body at the Atlas Project birthday party. Their parents seemed to enjoy it too. I can still hear their mocking laughter. By Steve Braunias

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store