Trump rules out US troops but eyes air power in Ukraine deal
Shaun Tandon
, AFP
Photo:
AFP / Mandel Ngan
President Donald Trump has ruled out sending US troops but envisioned extending US air power as Western nations began hashing out security guarantees for Ukraine before any potential summit with Russia.
Trump, in a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European leaders to the White House on Tuesday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Trump said President Putin, whom he called in the middle of Tuesday's talks, had agreed to meet Zelensky and to accept some form of Western security guarantees for Ukraine against Russia -- promises met with extreme caution by Kyiv and European leaders.
Putin proposed holding the summit with Zelensky in Moscow, three sources familiar with the Trump call told AFP. One source said Zelensky immediately said no to the Russian capital.
Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, said that European nations would take the lead by sending troops to secure any settlement - an idea that has been mulled by France and Britain.
"When it comes to security, they're willing to put people on the ground," Trump said in a Fox News interview.
"We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air, because no one has the kind of stuff we have. Really, they don't," Trump said.
He added his "assurance" that no US ground troops would deploy to Ukraine, and he again categorically ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance NATO.
Trump has sided with Putin in describing Kyiv's NATO aspirations as a cause for the war, in which tens of thousands of people have died.
European leaders, Ukraine and Trump's predecessor Joe Biden called the issue a pretext and pointed to Putin's statements rejecting the historical legitimacy of Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European leaders met US President Donald Trump on Tuesday.
Photo:
AFP
Following the Trump talks, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine's allies known as the "Coalition of the Willing" for virtual consultations.
Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to discuss security guarantees and "prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended", a Downing Street spokesperson said.
"The leaders also discussed how further pressure -- including through sanctions -- could be placed on Putin until he showed he was ready to take serious action to end his illegal invasion."
Macron, speaking to reporters before leaving Washington, also called for additional sanctions if Putin does not show a willingness for peace.
Britain's military chief, Admiral Tony Radakin, will travel to Washington on Wednesday for the talks on reassurances.
The military chiefs of staff of all NATO's 32 member countries will also meet by video to discuss Ukraine, officials said.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (L) and French President Emmanuel Macron.
Photo:
AFP / Getty Images / Win McNamee
Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own interests.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told state television channel Rossiya 24 that any deal must ensure the rights of "Russian-speaking people who live in Ukraine", another issue cited by Moscow for the offensive launched in February 2022.
Moscow would surely be seen as a provocative location for a summit, with suggestions it would amount to a surrender by Ukraine.
Macron told French news channel LCI he wanted the summit to take place in Geneva, a historic venue for peace talks.
Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said the government would be ready to offer immunity to Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to abuses in the war.
Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have both said the summit could take place in two weeks.
Trump also is seeking a three-way summit involving him, while Macron has called for a four-way meeting to involve Europeans who will be vital to Ukraine's security.
On the streets of Kyiv, there was skepticism about whether the latest talks can end the grinding conflict.
"The main problem is Putin himself doesn't want it," said Anton, 32, who works in a warehouse.
"They can meet as many times as they want but Putin doesn't need it and Donald Trump doesn't really know what to do."
But in Moscow, some people were more optimistic. "I hope we can agree on mutually beneficial terms," said Vyacheslav, 23, who works for the government.
- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
US to screen for ‘anti-Americanism' in immigration applications
By Jessie Yeung, CNN People wave US flags to celebrate becoming US citizens after taking the oath of allegiance during a naturalization ceremony . Photo: AFP / Joseph Prezioso People applying to live or work in the United States will now be screened for "anti-Americanism," including having their social media checked, authorities announced on Tuesday, in a tightening of restrictions that has alarmed immigration advocates and lawyers. Immigration officers will be able to look at whether applicants have had "any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations," or whether there is any "evidence of antisemitic activity," said the policy update by US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS). Social media vetting, already introduced into immigration screening in June by the Trump administration, will be expanded to include searches for any "anti-American activity," it said. It's the latest step in the administration's crackdown on immigration regulations, with many new actions likely to deter immigrants and international students from coming to the US. The State Department has revoked more than 6000 student visas this year, an official said on Monday. And in June, the State Department said embassies and consulates must vet student visa applicants for "hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles". "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser in a news release on Tuesday. He added that the immigration agency was "committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible." The policy update did not give a specific definition for "anti-Americanism," only saying this included those who supported "antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organizations, and antisemitic ideologies". But it pointed to a section of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) for examples of "anti-American" ideologies. The section in the Act, the US' overarching legal framework for immigration, bans certain people from becoming naturalized citizens - including members of various Communist parties, those who advocate for "world communism," those who write or distribute materials opposing "all organized government," or those who wish to overthrow the US government by force or violence. The announcement immediately stoked confusion and alarm, with online forums debating what counted as "anti-American." Many worried that the vague wording and lack of clear definition would give immigration officers the power to crack down further on immigration, regardless of a genuine threat. "Is being against the recent strike in Iran or being in favor of a cease fire in Gaza anti-American or antisemitic?" read one Reddit post in an immigration discussion. "What if you personally don't like Trump as a President or you shared a post on the recent South Park episodes making fun of him (and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi) Noem?" "The term (anti-Americanism) has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump (administration)," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, in a post on X. He added that the move was reminiscent of McCarthyism - the period of the 1950s also known as the Red Scare, when authorities prosecuted left-wing individuals amid a widespread public panic over communism and its influence on American institutions. Steven Brown, an immigration attorney based in Houston, also posted on X that so-called American values were "a subjective standard not found in the INA." "For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, according to the Associated Press. "It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards," Lopez said. - CNN
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sarah Shaw describes traumatic ordeal in US detention
refugees and migrants world 32 minutes ago New Zealand mother Sarah Shaw has described her traumatic ordeal in United States immigration detention, where she and her son were held for three weeks after a visa mix up at the US-Canada border. She's finally made it back to her home state of Washington, but is required to wear an ankle monitor and still faces further court appearances. She said she's full of gratitude to the friend who relentlessly publicised her case and pressured US authorities. Kate Green reports.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
China and India attempt to warm up frosty relations
Asia correspondent Adam Hancock spoke to Lisa Owen about China and India trying to warm up relations after years of frosty tensions, as well as a Peruvian woman who has been accused of smuggling drugs into Bali via a sex toy and could face the death penality if found guilty. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
