&w=3840&q=100)
Beyond Nimisha Priya: 10,000 Indians in foreign jails, 49 facing death sentence
Nimisha Priya, from Kerala's Palakkad district, was arrested in 2017 and later convicted for the murder of her business partner, Talal Abdo Mahdi. Image courtesy X
With over 10,000 Indians currently imprisoned in foreign jails, including 49 facing the death penalty, the harsh reality of overseas legal entanglements continues to challenge Indian diplomacy and test the limits of government intervention. From allegations of petty crimes to serious offences including murder and drug trafficking, Indian nationals abroad face legal systems vastly different from India's, often without adequate legal support or diplomatic recourse.
The case of Nimisha Priya: A stark example
Among the most urgent cases is that of Nimisha Priya, a nurse from Kerala sentenced to death in Yemen for the 2017 murder of her Yemeni business partner, Talal Abdo Mahdi. After reportedly drugging Mahdi to retrieve her passport, which he had seized, the situation escalated fatally. Priya, along with a Yemeni accomplice, allegedly dismembered the body and hid it in a water tank, the PTI reported. Convicted in a trial conducted under Yemen's Sharia law amid a brutal civil war, her appeal was rejected in 2023, and execution is scheduled for July 16, 2025.
The Indian government has admitted its hands are tied due to the lack of diplomatic relations with the Houthi-controlled Yemeni administration. Despite efforts including informal negotiations and engaging influential locals, the situation remains grim. The only remaining hope lies in 'blood money', a provision under Sharia law that allows the convict's life to be spared if the victim's family accepts financial compensation. However, this process is strictly private, and the Indian state cannot directly intervene beyond facilitating contact.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A pattern beyond a single case
Priya's case, while extreme, is not isolated. As of March 2025, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that 49 Indian nationals were facing death sentences in eight countries. This includes 25 in the UAE, 11 in Saudi Arabia, six in Malaysia and others in Kuwait, Indonesia, Qatar, the US and Yemen.
The reasons range from murder, drug trafficking and espionage to economic crimes, and in some cases, even religious violations in highly conservative legal jurisdictions. For example, several Indians executed in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in recent years were convicted of drug-related offences, the MEA informed the Rajya Sabha in March this year.
A legal limbo
Indian diplomatic missions abroad consistently walk a fine line. While they are mandated to provide legal and consular support, including jail visits, arranging interpreters and helping with appeals or mercy petitions, the host country's sovereignty always takes precedence. In cases like Yemen, where the central authority is fragmented and India lacks formal recognition of the de facto rulers — the Houthis — in this case where even these basic interventions become near-impossible.
Moreover, many Indian nationals often lack legal awareness, face language barriers and are unable to afford effective representation. In conflict zones or authoritarian regimes, fair trials and due process are not always guaranteed.
It's disproportionate in the Gulf
The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, which host large Indian migrant populations, particularly blue-collar workers, see a disproportionately high number of legal cases involving Indians. The UAE alone has over 2,500 Indian prisoners, with 25 on death row, the highest among all foreign nations, the MEA said. While the UAE government does not publicly release execution data, Indian authorities rely on informal channels to track developments.
Often, these legal issues arise from labour disputes, identity theft, smuggling or violent altercations under stressful working conditions. In some cases, convictions have stemmed from being at the wrong place at the wrong time or falling into the trap of illegal networks.
Execution: Malaysia to Saudi Arabia
Between 2023 and 2024, multiple Indians were executed in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Malaysia, with at least three executions reported in each of the first two nations in 2024 alone. In 2023, five Indians were executed in both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, highlighting how quickly legal decisions can escalate to capital punishment in these jurisdictions.
While India has a strong record of advocating for its citizens abroad, it has no leverage to overturn criminal verdicts in sovereign countries. The government can support legal appeals, coordinate with NGOs and facilitate mercy petitions, but the final decision lies with the host country's judiciary or head of state.
Accountability of vulnerabile?
These troubling cases underline the precarious situation of Indian nationals abroad, especially migrant workers and low-income expatriates who often lack access to legal resources. Although the government asserts that the 'safety, security, and well-being' of Indians overseas remains a top priority, the sheer scale of cases — over 10,000 prisoners globally — makes individual intervention a monumental task.
In addition to formal diplomatic mechanisms, community-led initiatives, such as the Save Nimisha Priya – International Action Council, have played a crucial role in raising awareness and facilitating on-ground negotiations. These groups help circumvent bureaucratic delays and create direct lines of communication with families, local authorities and even informal power holders like tribal sheikhs in Yemen.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The way forward
To reduce such instances, there is a growing call for stronger pre-departure awareness programmes for Indian migrants, particularly those going to countries with strict legal systems. Educational campaigns about local laws, cultural norms and legal rights could serve as a first line of defence.
Furthermore, there is a need for bilateral legal aid treaties, expedited consular access, and designated legal defence funds to ensure that Indian nationals are not left to fend for themselves. India's expansive diplomatic presence provides the necessary infrastructure to lead such reforms, but political will and sustained funding are crucial.
The plight of Indians like Nimisha Priya reflects the dark underbelly of global migration, where dreams of better lives sometimes end in legal nightmares. While the Indian government continues to assist and intervene where possible, the reality remains that sovereign law takes precedence abroad. As more Indians seek opportunities overseas, equipping them with knowledge, legal support, and institutional backing is not just a diplomatic responsibility, it is a humanitarian imperative.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Explained: What was the Malegaon blast case and why all accused were acquitted
In this edition of India Today Explains, the focus is on several major national and international stories. A special NIA court acquitted all seven accused, including Sadhvi Pragya Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, in the 2008 Malegaon blast case after 17 years. The programme delves into US President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25% tariff on Indian goods, with Trump stating, "they have one of the highest tariffs in the world." The show also revisits the 2009 Sharm El Sheikh joint statement, a diplomatic chapter the BJP calls a blunder. Additionally, it provides an update on Nimisha Priya, the Kerala nurse facing a death sentence in Yemen, and the efforts to save her. Finally, the show examines the deepening humanitarian crisis and famine-like conditions in Gaza, where the death toll, particularly among children, is rising due to conflict and restricted aid access.


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jane Street under I-T scanner in India; probe hits roadblock over non-cooperation
The Income Tax Department 's ongoing verification proceedings against US proprietary trading firm Jane Street have hit a hurdle, with the company allegedly refusing to cooperate with investigators, officials familiar with the matter said. The tax department had sought access to data and servers used by Jane Street, but the firm refused to cooperate claiming that the servers were located outside India, these officials told ET. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Healthcare Technology Cybersecurity Degree Project Management Leadership Management Data Science Design Thinking others Digital Marketing MCA Operations Management Product Management Data Analytics CXO healthcare Others Data Science Artificial Intelligence PGDM Finance Public Policy MBA Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis in Healthcare Financial Management & Investing Strategic Management in Healthcare Process Design & Analysis Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Program in Healthcare Management Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details "Their servers are located offshore, and access is being denied. The books of accounts are also maintained outside India, despite legal requirements under Indian company law to maintain them domestically," said a senior tax official, requesting anonymity. "The company has only skeleton staff in India, and they too have not been cooperating," the official added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Georgetown: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo Jane Street did not respond to an email seeking comment till press time Friday. Given the lack of cooperation, the department on Thursday carried out a survey action at the Mumbai offices of Nuvama Wealth Management , which is Jane Street's on-ground trading partner in India. "Certain documents and electronic evidence have been seized and are being examined," a senior official said. Live Events In a filing with stock exchanges, Nuvama confirmed the department's survey and said it is "extending full co-operation with the authorities". The income tax department is also examining possible violations of the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) and permanent establishment regulations by the company. Under GAAR, the tax department can disregard any arrangement lacking "commercial substance" or structured primarily to avoid tax. It is also probing whether the firm has created a fixed place of business in India, which gives rise to tax liabilities. This development comes in the wake of the regulatory scrutiny of the company's operations in India. The Securities and Exchange Board of India on July 3 barred Jane Street from accessing capital markets, alleging that it made illegal gains of Rs 4,843.5 crore by manipulating trades in Bank Nifty and Nifty Index Options. The regulator also directed it to deposit the gains into an interest-bearing escrow account. Sebi lifted the trading ban on July 21 after Jane Street deposited Rs 4,840 crore in an escrow account while clarifying that this action would not affect or limit its legal rights or remedies. The regulator allowed the firm to resume trading, but under close monitoring. According to Sebi, its investigation found that while Jane Street's Indian entity executed intraday trades in the cash segment, its offshore arms-particularly in Singapore and Hong Kong-booked large profits through index options. Jane Street has denied allegations of market manipulation.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
RSS affiliate slams US' 'coercive tactics'
Synopsis The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM) criticized the United States for employing coercive tactics to penetrate sensitive Indian markets. Urging the government to prioritize national interests, SJM advocated for strategic autonomy and a multipolar trade system. They emphasized the importance of protecting farmers, small industries, and India's long-term economic self-reliance, while advancing 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat'. ANI New Delhi: The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Friday slammed the US for applying "coercive tactics" to gain access to the Indian market in sensitive sectors and urged the government to stay firm on its stance to protect national interest. It also said that India must avoid giving concessions to the US that undermine farmers, small-scale industries, or long-term economic self-reliance. "The Swadeshi Jagran Manch urges the Government of India to maintain its firm stance and to use this moment to strengthen strategic autonomy, protect national interest, and advance a truly multipolar and equitable global trade order, and make decisive move towards 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat," it said.- Our Bureau