Yeovil Hospital's maternity unit temporarily closing amid 'concerns over safety of care of babies'
The maternity unit at Yeovil District Hospital will be closed down temporarily due to concerns for the safety of care for babies and children.
In a statement the hospital trust said it 'cannot currently safely run the unit' or 'safely provide care during labour and birth'.
Staff members say they were told in an emergency meeting on Tuesday, 13 May and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust has confirmed it will close from 5pm on Monday.
The hospital trust has said the care of pregnant women will now be transferred to Musgrove Park Hospital or maternity units in Dorchester or Bath.
The temporary closure comes after maternity services at the hospital were rated inadequate by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), last year.
According to the CQC's report, there was not enough emergency equipment in the unit to safely care for babies, and the service didn't always have enough medical staff.
It also found not all staff followed infection control principles, like washing their hands before administering care.
Maternity services at Taunton's Musgrove Park were similarly rated inadequate and bosses of both hospitals were sent warning notices of the need to improve. The report found staff had failed to complete mandatory training, with knowledge gaps including how to manage when unborn babies had reduced movements or growth restrictions.
Bridgwater was found to need improvement, with issues around leadership, waiting times and how equipment was maintained. The CQC report also found lessons were not always learned following incidents.
In a statement the trust's Chief Medical Officer, Dr Melanie Iles, said: 'This is a very difficult decision that we have not taken lightly.
"We have made it after careful consideration, and a clinical assessment of those services, in discussion withNHS partners. I want to personally say sorry to local people who are affected by these temporary closures.'
'These temporary closures have come about as a result of concerns about our care for babies and children at YDH.
"The Care Quality Commission inspected our paediatric services in January and issued a Section 29A warning notice because it assessed that the paediatric care we provide at YDH requires significantimprovement.
"We also currently have high levels of sickness amongst senior paediatricians which has caused big gaps in our rota.
'Senior paediatricians from Musgrove Park Hospital are supporting the service at YDH, to ensure that paediatric inpatient and outpatient services at YDH are open for those who need them. However, we are not able to support the SCBU in the same way and therefore we must close it temporarily on safety grounds.
"This directly impacts on the YDH inpatient maternity service because we cannot care for any newborns who require care in a Special Care Baby Unit or safely provide care during labour and birth at the Yeovil Maternity Unit.
'Most services remain open, and we are working with neighbouring NHS trusts and the Somerset Maternity and Neonatal Voices Partnership to ensure that pregnant women, birthing people and their newborn babies receive the care and support they need.'
'We are committed to providing safe, high quality and sustainable services for those who need them, but we must address these concerns and need the time and space to do this. I apologise again to anyone who is affected by these changes.'
'Families in Yeovil deserve more'
Adam Dance, The MP for Yeovil, said in a statement the sudden closure was "deeply unsettling and unacceptable".
'I am extremely concerned by the decision to close Yeovil Maternity Unit — even if the Trust says it is temporary", the statement read. Like many people across our community, I find this deeply unsettling and unacceptable."
"I have directly asked senior figures at the Trust for reassurance that the service will reopen after six months — and they have been unable to give it. That's simply not good enough.
"Families in Yeovil deserve more than vague promises — they deserve answers, action, and proper access to care.
"Moving all services to Taunton, where staff have already raised concerns about not having enough capacity to manage their own patient load, is deeply troubling.
"Expecting that overstretched service to safely take on additional cases from Yeovil is not realistic, and it risks putting even more pressure on dedicated staff already at breaking point.
"I've also been contacted by constituents raising serious concerns about longstanding problems within Yeovil Maternity Unit: poor management, unsafe working conditions, and how staff have been treated.
"These cannot be swept under the rug — they must be addressed openly and urgently. This isn't just about buildings and services.
"It's about trust — and right now, that trust has been badly damaged. I will keep pushing for a full explanation from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust and NHS Somerset, and I won't stop demanding a clear plan to restore safe, local maternity care in Yeovil. Our community cannot afford to lose this service for good.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
'Unsafe' Weymouth care home placed in special measures
A care home that failed to follow safety rules has been rated "inadequate" by inspectors and placed in special House, in Weymouth, Dorset, was previously judged to be "good" at its last Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection in CQC said the service was praised by residents, families and professionals, but poor record-keeping and regulation breaches made it Peter Fry, of Friary Care Ltd, apologised and said issues were being rectified. The CQC, which visited in February and March, said 16 older people were living at the home, some with dementia.A health professional told inspectors the home was "welcoming and homely" while a resident said: "I could not be in better hands."However, the CQC identified numerous system were insufficient risk assessments, care plans and incident reviews, inspectors home did not provide consistent staff training or background checks, although turnover was low and agency workers were not used, the CQC deputy director Neil Cox said: "We discovered that water hygiene risks, including those related to harmful bacteria such as legionella, hadn't been assessed."A risk assessment was only carried out after our visit, uncovering urgent actions."However, inspectors said residents were treated with "kindness, empathy and compassion". 'Taken immediate action' One resident became mobile enough to spend Christmas at home with their family after asking to be taken to a weekly slimming club and given special meals, the CQC was report added: "Professionals generally told us that the provider works well with them, contacts them and follows the advice they provided."While people and relatives expressed a general satisfaction with the care, our assessment found elements of care did not meet the required standards."In a statement, Mr Fry said: "At Friary Care we pride ourselves on delivering the best possible care to our residents."That is why we would like to sincerely apologise that, as an outcome of a recent CQC inspection, Friary House has been rated as inadequate."Please be assured that Friary Care has already taken immediate action to rectify issues highlighted by CQC."We would like to thank all of the residents, their families, staff, and all professional bodies for their words of encouragement and continued support." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Gravesend care home rated inadequate for second time by CQC
A care home in Kent has been rated inadequate by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) for the second in Gravesend received the rating following an inspection in February which the CQC said found five breaches of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staffing, recruitment and how the service was managed. In response to these findings, CQC imposed urgent conditions on the home to restrict them from taking on new residents without prior agreement from the which was also rated inadequate in a report published in September 2024, has been contacted for a comment. Inspectors found staff were supporting people with unsafe techniques, medicines were still not being managed or stored safely, people's care records and plans were not updated and lacked detail, and incident management and safeguarding systems were report also said staff were not always recruited safely and there were gaps in employment checks. Areas of the home - including people's bedrooms - remained difficult to keep clean and in need of updating, and the environment continued to be potentially disorienting for people with dementia.A new manager was in post since the last inspection, but the provider had not given them a clear induction or action plan, the CQC the watchdog added that staff reported the new manager had made some positive changes, such as acting quickly on a concern about a lack of equipment. Serena Coleman, CQC deputy director of operations in the south, said staff did not take action when people's health was at risk."We also saw detail was missing from notes about what staff did when someone had choked on their food, and staff didn't support people who had wounds on their skin to regularly change positions to prevent further injury," she deputy director said in the watchdog's previous inspection it found people were at risk of sexualised behaviour from other residents and this was still the case. Ms Coleman added: "During the inspection, we saw a 20-minute period where no staff were present in a room with six residents. "Incident reports showed 80% of falls happened during the night shift, but staffing levels hadn't been reviewed." The deputy leader said the care home had been told where "immediate and widespread" improvements were CQC explained that the home remained in special measures, meaning it was being closely monitored to ensure people were kept safe whilst improvements were made.


BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Royal Surrey NHS Trust recognised for 'outstanding' leadership
Royal Surrey NHS Trust has been awarded an outstanding rating for its leadership by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in its latest report. "This is a proud moment of recognition for the entire Royal Surrey family and for leaders at every level," said Louise Stead, Group Chief Executive of Royal Surrey and Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts. "From those guiding wards, administrative teams, and services, to those providing strategic direction at Board," she added. The Royal Surrey was praised for its processes in place for staff to raise concerns and noted 'staff feel supported to speak up without fear of detriment'. Joss Bigmore, chair of the trust, said: "I am honoured to work among these dedicated colleagues and proud of our achievement" adding that it is a "good place to work".The award also recognises outstanding leadership at community hospitals in Milford, Haslemere, and Cranleigh, along with other community and satellite services which make up the trust. The CQC undertook a thorough inspection from 11 June until 20 June last year.