The Entrepreneur Who Helped Redefine Mobile App Distribution in Southeast Asia
Before TikTok went global and before Google Play had total control in Southeast Asia, one Chinese founder quietly rewrote the rules of mobile app distribution — not with code, but with logistics.
Calvin Cai, a former mobile executive at NYSE-listed NQ Mobile, launched Dofun Technology in 2015 with a deceptively simple idea: if many Southeast Asian users couldn't afford mobile data, and local phone retailers were struggling to add value, why not combine the two problems into one solution?
The result was a bold bet on a hybrid model: offline app distribution via preloaded tools.
The Rise of a Low-Bandwidth Empire
While app developers across the world were focused on app stores, Dofun introduced a compact offline installer device to thousands of smartphone dealers across Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines. These dealers — often the last-mile point of sale — were now able to preload apps directly into phones before handing them to customers, saving consumers data charges and earning themselves commissions.
'It wasn't just about technology,' Cai explains. 'It was about understanding behavior — how people access the internet in low-bandwidth environments, and how trust is built at the local level.'
Within a year, Dofun achieved over 6 million preloads, making it the largest app pre-installation player in the region. The company signed major advertising deals with ByteDance, Shopee, Cheetah Mobile, and Baidu, helping Chinese and local brands gain instant mobile presence in emerging markets.
The Hidden Infrastructure of App Monetization
At the heart of Dofun's growth was what Cai calls the 'shadow rail' of mobile: the infrastructure no one talks about, but everyone relies on.
Dofun built a vast ecosystem of over 200+ distribution partners and 500+ ad networks, acting as a bridge between global advertisers, OEM phone makers, and last-mile retailers.
'We weren't building flashy front-ends,' Cai says. 'We were wiring the pipes of the mobile economy — in places where pipes didn't exist.'
He also launched monetization apps like Cashify, which rewarded users for completing ad tasks, and built regional lending apps like Pinjiamee in Indonesia, earning a regulated license to operate in the P2P space.
Dofun's innovations helped shape how mobile content reached tens of millions of users in emerging markets, long before TikTok and e-commerce giants saturated the region.
Leadership Across Borders
With a footprint across China, Indonesia, and the Philippines, Cai scaled his international team to over 130 employees — building what one investor called 'a culturally fluent company that understands scale and scrappiness equally.'
He presented Dofun at the Global Mobile Internet Conference (GMIC) in 2017, becoming one of the earliest Chinese tech founders to bring frontier-market distribution to a global stage.
Legacy and Lessons
Though Dofun later evolved and Cai transitioned to other industries (including Agri-FinTech and AgTech), his early work in mobile distribution set the tone for how platforms and products can be localized beyond app stores.
'If you want to grow in markets like Southeast Asia, you have to work with friction, not around it,' Cai reflects. 'You build channels, not just clicks.'
Today, as he leads Huida Tech's U.S. expansion in precision agriculture, Cai's earlier lessons in distribution, localization, and partnerships remain deeply relevant.
In a world where digital infrastructure often feels invisible, Cai's early bet reminds us that the future is not just in apps — but in the hands that deliver them.
Media Contact
Company Name: Asian Creative Foundation
Contact Person: Jemma Wu
Email: Send Email
City: New York
State: New York
Country: United States
Website: http://www.asiancreativefoundation.org
Press Release Distributed by ABNewswire.com
To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: The Entrepreneur Who Helped Redefine Mobile App Distribution in Southeast Asia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
More And More Chinese Factories Are Going 'Lights Out.' Should We Be Worried?
While America has its sights on re-sparking a manufacturing flame, in China, it's already lights out. Meaning, literally—the lights in warehouses across the country are dimming, as more and more factories there are operating independent of human intervention. These 'lights out factories' speak to the ever-widening chasm in robotic manufacturing. It's China—and everyone else. But it doesn't necessarily mean manufacturers here in America should be hustling to flip their own switches. Our path to competitiveness looks different—and more human. What Is Lights Out Manufacturing? As factories introduce increasingly robust automation into their operations, some have their sites set on a new goal: Going fully automated, to the point that humans can walk out and cut the lights behind them. In a recent video, the Wall Street Journal dug into how automation is allowing Chinese electric vehicle-maker Zeekr to pump out up to 300,000 cars a year—more than 800 a day—just four years after it was founded. It has taken Tesla more than a decade to reach similar levels. And indeed, inside Zeekr's operation, there's a portion where robots work under dimmed lights, un-aided by human workers. It's 'an area of the plant so automated, and with so little human presence, that, in theory, the lights could be completely shut off,' the WSJ says. In China, labor costs have been going up for years, the WSJ notes, and automation is seen as an important strategy to blunt the impact. The speed at which China is deploying robotics inside its manufacturing plants is unmatched. In 2023, the country installed 276,000 industrial robots, six-times that of next-best, which was Japan at 46,000, according to the International Federation of Robotics. The U.S. installed 38,000 industrial robots that year. The Manufacturers That Can—And Can't—Go 'Dark' It's one thing for a highly repetitive shop to go 'dark.' Plenty of the manufacturing operations that American companies outsourced to China require the same tasks done hour after hour, day after day. If you're simply stamping the same part over and over, and you look around and everything is working as it should, then sure, you could walk out. At that point, nobody needs to be there to program the CNC. Nobody has to change the job or move anything around. And in most cases, supervisors can monitor and modify from a remote control room as needs arise. That said, while there may be a few opportunities here in the U.S. to get to that fully automated benchmark, the vast majority never will. Even with tariffs, the most repetitive factories likely aren't coming back—and that's OK. Companies here generally have higher SKU volumes, which means they're consistently switching from making one product to another, rarely doing the same thing repetitively for hours on end. There's room for robotics to make these operations more efficient and faster, but they won't do so without some level of human assistance. That is to say: American manufacturers must start introducing robotics at a higher rate—it's the only way we'll compete globally long-term—but our north star shouldn't be lights-out manufacturing. In fact, U.S. manufacturing is likely to enter an era in which the rate of change and technological evolution inside our factories will render a lights out strategy simply impractical. In the ideal future state of the industry, upgrades—both to the products themselves and how we make those products—will be constant. Even at Zeekr, outside of the 'lights out' portion of the operation, human workers are needed for a variety of additional tasks, like assembling internal cables. 'Workers also go into the factories to perform tasks like robot maintenance,' WSJ says. Competing Globally—While Growing The Manufacturing Workforce The conversation about automation isn't just about feasibility—it's also about consequences, particularly for the American manufacturing workforce. We can and should be automating aggressively. Our path to regaining our position as the top manufacturing industry in the world runs through technology. America possesses the ingenuity to rebuild a thriving industry and reshore much of what went overseas. We must build new, highly advanced and automated factories to compete with China. But in our case, that doesn't mean displacing workers. That happened already—some 2.8 million manufacturing jobs were lost from 2001 to 2018, as the trade deficit with China grew. And yet, our industry still faces a shortage: close to 2 million manufacturing roles could go unfilled over the next eight years, as the Manufacturing Institute and Deloitte found. Will we bring back every job that left? Of course not, but that's not the goal. Instead, we're going to use robotics to make human jobs safer, cleaner, higher tech, and more appealing. Robotics will help American manufacturers cut production costs and improve quality and competitiveness. It can also help us close the talent gap and keep production humming along in the face of such a steep talent gap. We can and should be filling our industry with higher-tech, higher-impact jobs, evolving any of the few remaining repetitive roles so they better fit the future workforce. That will require investments in reskilling. They'll be worth it. Lights-out manufacturing may be part of China's playbook—but it shouldn't be ours. America's manufacturing future doesn't hinge on building factories that run without people. It hinges on building smarter factories, where automation and human ingenuity work side-by-side to empower a state of constant evolution. We must invest in robotics not to eliminate jobs, but to unlock better ones: jobs that are safer, more technical, and more resilient to global pressures. The goal isn't darkness—it's a brighter future for American manufacturing.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy
China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy originally appeared on TheStreet. Nvidia was blindsided earlier this year when the US government enacted tougher restrictions on selling artificial intelligence chips to China. The restriction prevented Nvidia from selling its H20 chip within the Middle Kingdom, forcing CEO Jensen Huang to take a shockingly large $4.5 billion write-off for unsold chip inventory in the fiscal first quarter. Nvidia wasn't the only one impacted. AMD, Nvidia's closest competition for graphic processors used to train and operate AI chatbots and agents, was forced to stop selling its Instinct MI308 AI chip in China, costing it $800 million in Q2. Unsurprisingly, CEO Huang has been vocal in pleading the case for encouraging the adoption of US tech in AI globally to prevent China from gaining a greater foothold. Those efforts weren't in vain, given that Huang's argument helped Nvidia and AMD ink a new deal with the US government in August to resume exports, but that deal, which requires stiff payments to the US, has raised concerns over "pay to play," with some more bluntly calling it a "shakedown." The backlash has put US officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, on the defensive, causing them to push back against criticism. Those comments haven't sat well with China, which responded with harsh restrictions on Nvidia. Nvidia-AMD China deal 'really weird' and 'crony capitalism' The US government's rescission of Nvidia () and AMD's () export licenses was justified by concerns that providing next-gen AI chips to companies there could be a threat to national security if systems running on them ever targeted America. Despite those concerns, the US reversed course this month after negotiations with Nvidia and AMD provided a framework for the companies to pay money to the US government based on China's chip sales. Specifically, Nvidia and AMD agreed to fork over 15% of their China sales to the US government in exchange for the ability to market their chips there again. In a CNBC interview on Aug. 13, Ray Wang, the founder and chairman of Constellation Research, called the surprising deal "bizarre" and "really weird." Others have gone further. 'The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," wrote six Democratic Senators, including Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, in a letter to President Trump on Aug 15. Tulane University's Walter Isaacson said in a CNBC interview on August 21: "State capitalism often evolves into crony capitalism, where you have favored companies and industries that pay tribute to the leader, and that is a recipe for not only disaster, but just sort of a corrupt sense of messiness.' Bessent pushes back on Nvidia-China deal chatter While the deal may not pass the sniff test with some, the White House believes agreements like this could provide much-needed money for America's coffers. 'I said, 'listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country," said President Trump in a press conference after the deal with Nvidia and AMD was made public. Trump says Nvidia eventually convinced him to lower it to 15%, and that he wasn't concerned about the national security aspect as much because it is an 'old chip" and 'obsolete.' The H20 is based on Nvidia's Hopper architecture rather than its current Blackwell. It is essentially a throttled-down version of the H100 and H200 chips preceding Blackwell and was launched in early 2024 as a successor to Nvidia's A100 chip. More Nvidia: Nvidia earnings face high bar on data-center demand, China deal Nvidia quietly buys more stock in AI infrastructure favorite Soros supercharges Nvidia stake, loads up on AI plays In an interview with CNBC, Secretary Bessent doubled down on the fact that the deal only covers H20, which is less of a security threat than Blackwell chips. When asked by host Joe Kernan if this was akin to a shakedown, Bessent responded: "H20s are pretty far down the Nvidia stack. It's not a national security risk," said Bessent. "The last thing we want is Huawei belt and road where Huawei is selling chips to the rest of the world and the US is excluded." Bessent went on to say that he and those in the industry want US technology to be the global standard. That doesn't apply, however, to the latest technology - at least not yet. Bessent said that any next-gen chips built on the Blackwell architecture would require another export license. China fires back at U.S. over Nvidia deal Bessent wasn't the only US Cabinet member to make comments on the matter. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, the former CEO of Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald, suggested the Nvidia deal makes sense because it still keeps our latest technology out of Chinese hands. "We don't sell them our best stuff, not our second best stuff, not even our third best. The fourth one down, we want to keep China using it," said Lutnick on CNBC. The comments drew the ire of Chinese officials. According to the Financial Times, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) are telling buyers to press pause on H20 orders. Specifically, the CAC instructed tech companies, including ByteDance and Alibaba, to avoid buying H20 chips until a national security review is complete or they'll face fines, reports Engadget. The NDRC similarly asked Chinese companies not to buy Nvidia chips. China officials have been pushing for Chinese companies to buy more homegrown technology, rather than technology made in the West, particularly America. How we got here: AI gold rush makes GPUs hot commodities The sheer size of activity in AI is staggering, and there's a lot of money at stake. According to Grand View Research, the total AI ecosystem will enjoy 35.9% compound annual growth through 2030, reaching $1.8 every industry is exploring potential use cases, including: Manufacturing: Quality control and supply chain efficiency Retail: Just-in-time inventory, anti-theft, and marketing Financials: Money management and loan evaluation Healthcare: Drug development, patient outcomes The rush of activity is requiring tremendous computing power, and that's taxed legacy server networks heavily reliant on central processing units, or CPUs, less suited to handling AI workloads. As a result, enterprises and cloud network providers, including hyperscalers Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, are plowing hundreds of billions of dollars into servers run on GPUs and software from Nvidia, primarily, that can do the work efficiently. For perspective, Amazon's capital expenditures, or Capex, totaled $32.2 billion and Alphabet's totaled $22.4 billion in the second quarter, up from $17.6 billlion and $13.2 billion, respectively, in the same quarter last year. Much of those dollars have flowed to Nvidia for its AI chips. In Q2, Nvidia's sales rose 69% to $44.1 billion. Here is Nvidia's revenue over the past three years: 2025 $130.5 billion. 2024 $60.9 billion 2023: $27 billion Most sales have been from US AI activity, but China has contributed to demand. Nvidia estimated that restrictions on the H20 cost it $8 billion in the second quarter alone. The company is scheduled to report its fiscal Q2 results on August 27. Todd Campbell owns Nvidia shares. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰💵 China pushes back after Nvidia deal sparks controversy first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 principles to invest by, whatever comes next
I recently opened a second-quarter investment account statement, not to euphoria—but relief. Let's not forget, US equities flirted with a bear market earlier this year. There were concerns that China's DeepSeek artificial intelligence would bring down US technology titans. There were the tariffs. Yet, here we sit in the third quarter of 2025 with the Morningstar US Market Index up nearly 8% for the year and the Morningstar US Core Bond Index having returned more than 3%. Ahead of us lie multiple pathways. Economic data and earnings announcements will provide direction, but there are also 'unknown unknowns' that could alter our course. Here are three investment principles to keep in mind. Principle 1: Where the market goes, nobody knows Coming into the year, how many pundits talked about AI out of China challenging US tech stocks? Did anyone expect tariffs to be such a factor? Though 2025 has had its plot twists, changes in market direction are hardly unusual. Consider thatstocks came into summer 2024 on a tear, beforesentiment turned. A series of releases—jobs, inflation, and earnings—compounded fears of a narrow and pricey market. Somehow, both an unexpected interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan and an expected rate cut by the Fed triggered selloffs. But markets recovered. Election results in November sparked a powerful rally. So, w here we go from here is anyone's guess. But I'll cite a story about how dead investors outperform living ones because they don't trade. Buy-and-hold has been a great strategy for long-term investors. Principle 2: Global investing can pay off Some think you don't need to own anything other than US equities. But I'llnote that the Morningstar Global Markets ex-US Index has trounced its US equivalent so far in 2025. What's behind the turnaround? The dollar weakening against many other currencies is part of the story. But markets in many regions—Europe, Latin America, and India—have roared to life this year. To me, global investing is about casting the net as widely as possible. So, just as some argue that US-based multinationals provide American investors with global exposure, you could also argue that they're not fully exposed to the US, from a revenue perspective, with a purely domestic portfolio. Principle 3: Bonds aren't broken The equity market's extreme volatility in 2025 makes bonds look like steady-Eddies. While US stocks were in free fall from late February through early April, the Morningstar US Core Bond Index gained 1.3%. Bonds diversified equities, serving as portfolio ballast. Bonds face a lot of 'headline risk.' There are debt and deficit concerns. And the shadow of 2022's ' worst bond market ever ' lingers. While the risks are undeniable, fixed income is also the victim of fearmongering. Not only have bonds diversified stocks, they're also providing above-inflation income streams. Thanks to the painful interest rate hikes of 2022-23, yields on fixed income are at levels not seen since the mid-2000s. The road ahead We're likely to see more twists before 2025 is out. Short-term asset-price fluctuations are driven by a complex interplay of variables—macro and micro, fundamental and technical. Longer term, valuation can be a useful guide. According to my Morningstar Equity Research colleagues, the US stock market looked a bit pricey coming into the second half of 2025—not in dangerous bubble territory, but 'trading at a slight premium.' The bargains cluster on the value side of the market and in smaller-cap stocks. Meanwhile, my colleagues in Morningstar Investment Management continue to see upside in bonds and international equities. As always, a buy-and-hold mindset and a diversified portfolio remain sensible investment tactics. ____ This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more markets content, go to Dan Lefkovitz is a strategist for Morningstar Indexes. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
