Some people didn't know they had a bird flu infection, study of veterinarians suggests
A new study shows that bird flu has silently spread from animals to some veterinarians.
The study published Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention echoes two smaller ones that detected evidence of infection in previously undiagnosed farmworkers. In those studies, several of the infected workers remembered having symptoms of H5N1 bird flu, while none of the veterinarians in the new paper recalled any such symptoms.
The new study is more evidence that the official U.S. tally of confirmed human bird flu infections — 68 in the last year — is likely a significant undercount, said Dr. Gregory Gray, an infectious disease researcher at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston.
'This means that people are being infected, likely due to their occupational exposures, and not developing signs of illness and therefore not seeking medical care,' Gray said. He said it shows that officials cannot fully understand bird flu transmission by only tracking people who to go to medical clinics with symptoms.
CDC researchers went to an American Association of Bovine Practitioners veterinary conference in September 2024 in Columbus, Ohio. They recruited 150 vets from 46 states to fill out a questionnaire and agree to have their blood drawn. None said they had suffered red eyes or other symptoms associated with bird flu.
Testing found three of the vets, or 2%, had evidence of antibodies to H5N1 infection. All three worked with dairy cattle, as well as other animals. None said they'd worked with a herd that was known to be infected, although one had worked with a flock of infected poultry.
Gray and some colleagues did a study last year of 14 dairy farmworkers and found two, or 14%, had evidence of past infections. Both had experienced symptoms but were never diagnosed.
Another study published last year by the CDC checked 115 dairy workers. The researchers found that eight of them, or 7%, had evidence in their blood of recent infection. Half recalled feeling ill.
The studies were far too small to use as a basis to provide a solid estimate of how many undiagnosed human infections are out there, Gray said. But even just a very small percentage could translate to hundreds or thousands of Americans who were infected while working with animals, he noted.
That's not necessarily a reason to be alarmed, said Jacqueline Nolting, an Ohio State University researcher who helped CDC with the latest study.
Available studies suggest people who are infected mount antibody responses and may develop natural immunity, which is 'good news,' she said.
However, if the virus changes or mutates to start making people very sick, or to start spreading easily from person to person, that would be 'a completely different story,' Nolting said.
Experts urge caution around animals
The H5N1 bird flu has been spreading widely among wild birds, poultry, cows and other animals. Its escalating presence in the environment increases the chances people will be exposed, and potentially catch it, officials have said.
Right now the risk to the general public is low, the CDC says. But officials continue to urge people who have contact with sick or dead birds to take precautions, including wearing respiratory and eye protection and gloves when handling poultry.
'No one's really questioning that the virus has been moving around the country more than has been reported,' said Keith Poulsen, director of the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory.
He said he expected to see stepped-up information reminding veterinarians across the country to protect themselves with gloves, masks and other equipment to halt infection.
___
Associated Press writer JoNel Aleccia contributed to this report.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US experts fear all vaccines at risk as Trump officials target mRNA jabs
As top US health officials turn against some mRNA vaccines, experts fear for the country's preparedness for the next pandemic and worry that other vaccines will be targeted next. Donald Trump's administration recently canceled a $766m award to Moderna on the research and development of H5N1 bird flu vaccines, and officials have announced new restrictions and regulations for Covid mRNA vaccines – actions that signal a move away from the breakthrough technology. These changes add to other vaccine-related shakeups at health agencies, including layoffs and resignations of top vaccine officials and the abrupt termination of HIV vaccine research. On Monday, Robert F Kennedy Jr, secretary of health and human services, announced he was disbanding the independent advisory committee on vaccines for the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 'I think mRNA vaccines are particularly at risk, although I think all vaccines are at risk,' said Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. 'I think that this administration will do everything it can to make vaccines less available, less affordable and more feared.' Messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines heralded a major breakthrough in battling the Covid pandemic, building on three decades of scientific work and earning a Nobel prize. The Covid vaccines, some of which were co-developed by US government scientists, were taken by millions of people around the globe, and international scientists and officials closely monitored their side effects and effectiveness. mRNA vaccines and therapeutics show promise for treating or preventing certain cancers, rare conditions and infectious diseases – including, potentially, the next pandemic, experts said. 'We don't know what the next pandemic virus is going to be,' said Jennifer Nuzzo, professor of epidemiology and director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health. With mRNA, she said, 'you can pivot faster when you find a new virus to make a vaccine that's tailored to that virus'. The mRNA vaccines also don't need to be incubated in eggs, which is time-consuming and potentially difficult if there are egg shortages from bird flu outbreaks. In 2009, the US didn't have enough vaccines to battle the swine flu pandemic, Nuzzo said. 'It seems like we're determined to repeat those mistakes.' Despite their promise, mRNA vaccines have been plagued by misinformation. Some skeptics believe the vaccines affect fertility or cause birth defects, though research shows no link – and, in fact, studies show that the vaccines reduce these risks by preventing infections with Covid, which can be especially dangerous to pregnant people and newborns. Because mRNA sounds similar to DNA, some people mistakenly think it interferes with their genes. Conspiracy theorists also claim the vaccine causes people to die suddenly, or that the shots implant microchips or impart 5G connectivity. Meghan McCain recently endorsed, in a now-deleted social media post, an unregulated supplement company's 'spike detox' for those who 'regret' getting vaccinated. Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, called the mRNA Covid shots the 'deadliest vaccine ever made,' incorrectly claiming the vaccines cause more illnesses and deaths than they prevent. Kennedy rose to greater prominence through the pandemic as previously fringe conspiracies about vaccines began dominating more mainstream narratives. 'Anti-vaccine sentiment goes back to the first days of vaccines in the 1700 and 1800s,' said John Moore, professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medical College. 'It's been a perpetual theme in society for 200-plus years, but it has been turbocharged by the Covid pandemic.' Some states are now considering laws against mRNA vaccines, and US health officials have taken several steps to limit Covid shots in recent weeks. Officials with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced plans to limit boosters to older people and those with certain health conditions, as well as plans to conduct placebo-controlled clinical trials again. The CDC removed the vaccination recommendation for pregnant people and softened the recommendation for children's shots. About 165,000 Americans were hospitalized and 40,000 died in the previous year because of Covid, the CDC said at an April meeting. About 6,700 of those hospitalizations were among children, especially young children, and 152 children died from Covid in that time, the data showed. About 5% of children under five are vaccinated against Covid – rates much lower than other age groups. 'That's why, if you look at the numbers of hospitalizations and deaths for children now, especially young children less than four years old, it's really not much different than the beginning of this pandemic,' Offit said. There's also 'extensive evidence' for benefits to pregnant people and their babies, he said. While the FDA recently approved Moderna's 'next generation' Covid vaccine, which was even more effective that their current shot in clinical trials, the agency limited the new shot only for older adults and for people aged 12 to 64 with health conditions putting them at higher risk. The FDA also announced new requirements for mRNA Covid vaccine makers to add additional warnings about the risks of myocarditis, or heart inflammation, based on data the FDA has not made public. During the Biden administration, Moderna received two awards totaling $766m to develop potential bird flu vaccines. Despite the changeover in administrations, Moderna's work continued as normal – until February, when health officials said in an article that the funding was being reviewed. Moderna hadn't received any notification of this review, which recently culminated in having the funding cancelled. Halting the H5N1 vaccine research, which was in phase 3 trials, leaves the US vulnerable in a potential flu pandemic, Nuzzo said. It also means other countries could build upon US investments to procure the vaccines for themselves. mRNA has shown promise in treating pancreatic cancer and other cancers, as well as rare conditions and hard-to-treat infectious diseases. Moderna, for instance, is working on vaccines for melanoma, lung cancer, norovirus, flu, and CMV, or cytomegalovirus, a fairly common infection that can cause lasting health problems for infants. The company also has an RSV vaccine, currently approved for older adults, that could be expanded for other age groups. But those efforts could be hampered by the administration's moves against mRNA and terminations of vaccine scientists and independent advisors who offer vaccine recommendations. 'We don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth Covid booster shot,' Marty Makary, head of the FDA, said in a recent interview. Yet no states require Covid vaccination for school attendance. Pushing back against mandates is a common tactic from anti-vaccine activists working to dismantle all vaccine mandates, Offit said. In addition to claiming the Covid vaccines are deadly, Kennedy has 'also said no vaccine is beneficial', he said. Kennedy recently unveiled a sweeping and controversial $50m research project on autism, including an autism research database. If that effort somehow links autism to vaccines – despite decades of studies showing no connection – it could open lawmakers up to lawsuits, Offit said. 'He could manipulate the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,' Offit said. If Kennedy adds autism to the compensable list of injuries, 'it would break the program'. That would mean the people who experience very rare severe side effects from vaccines may then face challenges getting compensated. And it could prompt vaccine makers to stop producing routine childhood immunizations because of legal liability. 'It's a fragile market,' Offit said. Kennedy 'is an anti-vaccine activist, science denialist and conspiracy theorist', he continued. 'I think that he will continue this onslaught against vaccines.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Popular supplements everyone takes that raise the risk of Alzheimer's
One in two Americans are now expected to develop dementia in their lifetime, with the number of new cases soaring at an alarming rate. Many of us already know that making simple healthy choices such as eating well and staying active can help stave off the disease. Your browser does not support iframes.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
The cost of staying alive could become a lot more expensive for millions of Americans because of Trump drug tariffs
Americans would likely pay more for necessary everyday prescription drugs, such as insulin, painkillers, chemotherapy, or antibiotics, if President Donald Trump were to enact tariffs on pharmaceuticals, experts warn. In an effort to incentivize drug manufacturers to bring production back to the United States, Trump has proposed tariffing pharmaceuticals made overseas – which account for an overwhelming majority of everyday medicine used in the U.S. 'We're going to be doing that,' Trump said of pharmaceutical tariffs in April. 'That's going to be like we have on cars. You know we have a 25 percent tariff on cars, we have a 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminum, and that's what the [pharmaceutical] category fits right now.' 'The higher the tariff, the faster they come,' Trump said. But experts say that's not necessarily true and there would be tangible consequences to such action, from higher brand-name drug prices to generic drug shortages. 'If tariffs were applied to prescription drugs, one of the most immediate consequences could be price increases — on prices that we already pay way in excess of other countries,' Dr. Mariana Socal, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said. The U.S. imports a majority of its branded prescription drugs – or medications that are patented with a brand name such as Viagra, Wegovy, or Zoloft – from high-income countries. Dr. Jeromie Ballreich, an associated research professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said much of the manufacturing comes from Ireland, Germany, and Switzerland because they have favorable tax policies for companies. As a result, adding a tariff would only make it more expensive for pharmacies and insurance companies to keep them in supply. 'We would expect pharma to pass the costs onto the insurers and we would expect insurers to pass the cost onto the individual patients,' Ballreich said. 'So, if there is a 50 percent tariff on your insulin product because it's coming from Ireland, patients in Mississippi who get insulin – they will either be faced with a higher cost when they go up to the pharmacy to fill their insulin or they're going to face a higher indirect cost because the premiums of the insurance plan are going to go up,' he said. Ballreich said a tariff on countries that produce high quantities of branded drugs would put 'pressure' on public insurers like Medicare or Medicaid and private insurers. However, branded drugs only account for roughly 10 to 15 percent of prescriptions. A majority of Americans, up to 90 percent, use generic drugs, often manufactured in India and China, because they're cheaper. Making branded drugs less accessible through tariffs would only increase reliance on generic drugs, which could exacerbate shortages that already impact millions of Americans. Generic drugs would become less available '[Shortages] can have very significant implications in day-to-day clinical practice,' Socal said. 'For example, if you are administering chemotherapy for an oncology patient, that may have significant consequences even for the prognosis of that case moving forward.' In 2024, the U.S. experienced a shortage of more than 300 drugs – 70 percent of which were generic prescriptions. Socal said that when patients are not able to access a more affordable version of their prescription, it means they may put their health at risk by skipping a dosage, taking a lower dosage, or not filling their prescription at all. Otherwise, they're forced to turn to the more expensive branded version. 'Those more expensive drugs are not always the best,' Socal said. 'Very frequently, and we saw this with chemotherapy shortages, the available drugs are second-line drugs.' Tariffs won't necessarily increase domestic manufacturing The president has indicated that any negative impact from tariffs may be temporary and worth it to bring manufacturing and jobs back. 'We're doing it because we want to make our own drugs,' Trump said. But Ballreich and Socal are more skeptical. 'Tariffs are a very blunt instrument to incentivize domestic U.S. manufacturing of the branded drugs we use,' Ballreich said. Given pharmaceutical companies have moved outside of the U.S. for tax purposes, Ballreich says tax policy may be a better way to incentivize them, especially since many of those drugs are more difficult to manufacture. 'It's not just a very simple chemical plant; these tend to be very complex,' he said. Socal suggested a better strategy would be to understand where drugs are being manufactured and which ones would make more sense to bring to the U.S. — since even those manufactured locally often rely on certain imported ingredients and materials. 'Having tariffs on pharmaceutical products coming from abroad can actually also hurt our domestic manufacturers,' he says. While the president has not officially implemented any tariff policy on pharmaceuticals yet, he said, in April, that the plan would take effect in the 'not too distant future.'
