JD Vance's NIGHTMARE round at Donald Trump's golf course: US Vice President mocked after committing ultimate sin during UK holiday
At his fearless leader's Trump Turnberry golf course no less, Vance produced a display that should have him fearing for his position as Donald Trump 's right-hand man during his much-publicised UK family getaway.
After his eventful stop in the Cotswolds to go fishing with the 'unlicensed' Foreign Secretary David Lammy, Vance ventured north, to surrounds he presumed would be more comforting, given the owner of the luxury Ayrshire resort he had chosen to pitch up at.
But, as one user on X remarked, his touch on the Scottish greens were revealed to be akin to his flair as a politician.
A golf fan, though, on the evidence of his play, still lacking the requisite ability to cite it among his many strengths, Vance was seen toiling on the Turnberry course, first attempting to recover from a shot placed in a bunker and later seriously struggling to get the ball in the hole.
The Ohio native will hope that the news of activists waving Palestinian flags and placards upon his arrival in Scotland on Wednesday or the major policing operation due to further planned protests, overshadows his disappointing effort.
His boss, perhaps the world's finest player, who completes every round with the upmost integrity, does not suffer losers.
Carnell Estates, situated in Ayrshire - an area the VP claims his ancestors left in the 17th century to help found the USA - includes a 14th century tower and luxurious mansion house hidden within its gardens and more than 2,000 acres of parkland.
It is popular with VIPs, with Brad Pitt and his then wife Angelina Jolie having stayed at the estate when Pitt filmed World War Z in 2011.
Mr Vance is a self-proclaimed 'Scots-Irish hillbilly at heart'.
Ahead of Mr Vance's trip, a spokesman for the Scottish Government said: 'The Scottish Government continues to work collaboratively with partners, including the UK Government and Police Scotland, to manage the impact of a potential visit by the US Vice President to Scotland.'
His visit follows a recent trip by President Trump, who spent five days in Scotland, splitting his time between his golf courses at Turnberry in Ayrshire and the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire, and meeting the First Minister and Prime Minister.
On Friday, Mr Vance had left the Cotswlds to travel to Chevening House retreat in Kent, where he joined David Lammy at a lakeside - only for it to later emerge that the Foreign Secretary was in breach of the law as he had no rod licence.
In another shocking development, Van's trip to these isles has seen him strike up a very unlikely friendship with a UK Apprentice star - which has left many fans open-mouthed. The 41-year-old is pals with none other than Thomas Skinner, 34, and even invited him to hang out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's astonishing gamble may pay off spectacularly
After speaking with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders overnight, Donald Trump changed the dial on what at first seemed like a lacklustre summit. The American president announced that he would be pursuing a peace settlement instead of a ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump justified this shift by highlighting the potential fragility of a Ukraine ceasefire deal. Historical evidence shows that Trump's concerns are well-placed. While the February 2015 Minsk II Accords halted Russian territorial expansion in eastern Ukraine, ceasefire violations by Putin's brutal regime were rampant. By March 2016, the US department of defence estimated that 430 Ukrainian soldiers died after Minsk II's signing and warned that Russia was 'pouring heavy weapons' into Donbas. Despite the inherent logic in Trump's push for a grand bargain solution to the Ukraine War, the devil is ultimately in the details. After Trump's meeting with Putin, there are concerns that he might see the legitimisation of Russia's annexation of nearly one-quarter of Ukraine as the fastest route to further imperialism. This worst-case scenario would tempt Russia to rearm and encourage further aggression against Ukraine, Moldova or the Baltic States. There are reasons to believe that these concerns are overly pessimistic. Tragically, any end to the war would almost certainly require Ukraine to make some territorial this is a bitter pill for Ukraine to swallow, frustrations could be tempered by Trump offering the besieged nation ironclad security guarantees. Even though Trump launched a tirade against Zelensky when he mentioned the need for security guarantees at the Oval Office in February, he has apparently come around to the necessity of these assurances. Trump has offered Ukraine Article 5 Nato-style security guarantees in the event of a peace deal. Ukraine would still be nominally a neutral country and not become a full Nato member; yet it will have most of the protections that are afforded to countries within the alliance bloc. This proposal could gain traction within the US foreign policy community and rare bipartisan support. Based on my past engagements with American experts familiar with the Biden administration's thinking on a peace settlement, a plan consisting of territorial concessions and Nato-style security guarantees was under consideration back then. The main disagreement pertains to the legal status of the Russian-annexed regions. Biden's team was firmer about the need to avoid official recognition of these territories and inclined to support Ukraine's claims to their future reintegration. Trump's team, meanwhile, is more willing to torpedo the principle of Westphalian sovereignty and recognize the regions as Russian to stem Putin's aggression. If the US settles on this formula, Europe and Ukraine are unlikely to mount a fierce resistance campaign against it. Its chances of success hinge on its implementation, and there are two issues that need to be resolved for it to be effectively adopted. The first challenge pertains to settling Ukraine's new de facto borders. These involve extremely difficult decisions for Zelensky. In exchange for abandoning Donbas, Ukraine will almost certainly want a land swap deal that guarantees control over the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and the occupied half of Kherson. It is unclear whether Putin will accede to these demands, as Russia has officially annexed these areas, but a compromise is possible as they have less resonance to Russian ultra-nationalists than Donbas. Regardless of whether a land swap deal transpires, Ukraine will be forced to tragically dismantle its civilian institutions in Donetsk and potentially integrate hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons. It will also have to respond in a measured fashion to Putin's imposition of Russian culture on all remaining Donbas residents and the subjugation of more Ukrainians to the totalitarian nature of Russian occupation. Once these challenges are achieved, Ukraine will need to ensure that its new borders are defensible. The 1994 Budapest Memorandum security guarantees unravelled due to a lack of will amongst signatories and denialism about the evil threat of Russian neo-imperialism. While these sources of complacency are much less striking now, there are still reasons for concern. The varying paces of arms deliveries to Ukraine and heated debates about escalation risks suggest that Nato does not have a united post-war plan. Therefore, it will be incumbent on Ukraine's strongest supporters within the alliance to quickly provide security assistance and steer as many of their more reluctant counterparts to follow suit. Britain's pledge to deploy ground troops to Ukraine within a week of a ceasefire and use Royal Air Force jets to patrol Ukraine's skies provides a positive example for its like-minded Nato allies. The US's active participation in the post-war peacekeeping coalition is critical. While Americans are evenly divided on the acceptability of peacekeeper deployments and military retaliations against Russia if peacekeepers are attacked, Trump must transcend politics for the cogency of the Nato alliance. Aside from the deployment of peacekeepers and integration of Ukraine into Nato's military technology supply chains, post-war reconstruction investments are a further guarantor of peace. If Ukraine's economy can attract large-scale capital infusions from both Western powers and Russia-friendly Global South stakeholders, such as the Gulf monarchies and China, the costs of further Russian aggression would rise precipitously. Putin's appalling wars have been driven by his false confidence in easy victories and a belief in Russian impunity. These assumptions need to be unequivocally put to rest. The Alaska summit failed to live up to its billing as a stepping stone for peace in Ukraine right now. Despite this, Trump's newest proposals suggest that it might just be around the corner.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
We must speak up for old British values before they are destroyed by our elites
Rose Docherty is a woman of few words. You'd never have heard of the 75-year-old if it wasn't for what she didn't say. She's the activist who staged a silent protest outside the abortion clinic in Glasgow last February, holding a sign reading: 'Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want'. Hers was a simple offer of conversation, made without a sound. You know what happened next. The septuagenarian was arrested under Scotland's 'buffer zone' laws, which prevent anybody engaging in harassment or intimidation in the vicinity of abortion facilities, or influencing a woman's decision to use them. Are there parallel laws protecting women from being pressured into terminating their unborn babies? Surely that would be a more sinister scenario, one that would fall more obviously under the purview of the police. There are not. Scotland's police are on the lookout for anybody offering support to women who may be doubting their decision, not those encouraging them to go ahead with it. The message is clear. There is no mistaking where the state, and the culture it grimly cultivates, now stands on the question of ending unborn life. We see it reflected in the legalisation of euthanasia. We see it in the depravity of full-term abortions. Welcome to modern Britain, where convenient death is prized higher than life. This past week, however, Scotland's Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service changed tack and decided that the case would be dropped. This was announced quietly and without fanfare, presumably in the hope that the matter would slip conveniently under the rug. So much so understandable. After all, the silent woman of Glasgow had drawn Britain's creeping authoritarianism to the attention of the world when her case caught the eye of Donald Trump. That can't have been comfortable for Scotland's Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. In May this year, the president sent a White House delegation to meet Ms Docherty and other pro-life campaigners. Afterwards, she told the press that it was 'heartening that others around the world, including the US government, have realised this injustice and voiced their support'. A few months earlier, in a speech at the Munich Security Conference, vice-president JD Vance lambasted Scotland's buffer zone laws, under which Ms Docherty had been arrested. Without these American interventions, she may still be facing conviction today. This episode draws together a number of intertwining concerns. Firstly, there is the question of freedom of speech in a Britain where citizens may be visited by the police on suspicion of a 'non-crime hate incident', and 30 arrests are made every day for offensive posts on social media. After she was detained, Ms Docherty was apparently told that she could avoid prosecution on condition that she acknowledged her actions were unlawful, accepted a warning and did not repeat them. She declined, insisting that she had not broken the law and that she was protected by her fundamental rights to free speech. 'I simply stood there, available to speak with love and compassion,' she pointed out. So much, surely, should be obvious. The fact that it took Donald 'grab 'em by the p---y' Trump, who even to his supporters is hardly the paragon of purity, to bring Scotland's Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to its senses is an embarrassing sign of how far we have drifted from our morals. The second, deeper concern is the disdain for religious faith and traditional values which is so relentlessly advanced by our rulers. Ms Docherty embodied an older Britain that the elites have sought to tamp down for decades. It is the Britain of faith, flag and family; of a belief in borders, a love of tradition, an affection for our history and pride in our armed forces; of hard work, fair play and modest patriotism. Ever since the end of the Cold War, those at the top of society have smeared such a sensibility as the root of fascism. Whether voting for Brexit, flying the George cross or demonstrating against migrant hotels, ordinary people who refuse to respect the new taboos are immediately defamed as quasi-Nazis. What values have been imposed in their place? Moral relativism; multiculturalism; diversity; secularism; appeasement; sybaritic complacency; Israelophobia. To this we can now add an enthusiasm for death for the elderly and the unborn. This suffocating ideology, which Sir Roger Scruton described as the cult of 'down with us', seems to be imposed upon every corner of society. In some quarters it is no longer permissible, for instance, to say 'merry Christmas' or 'happy Easter', but only 'happy holidays'. No such restrictions are applied to 'Ramadan Kareem' or 'Eid Mubarak'. In the United States, so sick had people become of this dogma that they considered the outlandish proposition of Donald Trump – the obnoxiousness, the braggadocio, the allegations of racism and financial irregularities, the misogynistic audio tapes, the claims of Russian collusion, the lack of political experience and total disregard of the norms of professional society – and decided he was worth a go. Anything, they felt, would be better than this. Will it really take Trump to save Britain from itself? Maybe. But there is a better source of hope: Rose Doherty, who takes her place alongside Lucy Connolly as a martyr to old Britain, and the thousands like her who comprise the silent majority. We must be silent no longer.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Secret dossier detailing Trump's meeting with Putin found
Donald Trump's mystery woman has been plunged into scandal after a secret dossier detailing his summit with Vladimir Putin was found by guests at an Alaskan hotel. Eight pages of official government documents were left behind on printers at the four-star Hotel Captain Cook on Friday, NPR reports. The hotel is located 20 minutes from the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. The documents, which were produced by the Office of the Chief of Protocol, revealed the precise locations and times of the meetings between US and Russian officials. The president's Chief of Protocol, former Fox News analyst Monica Crowley, was responsible for creating the detailed program for Putin's visit, including arranging the vital meeting between the two countries to discuss a potential ceasefire in Ukraine. Details of the schedule contained in the papers included phone numbers of three US government employees and pronunciation guides for the names of Russian attendees — including 'Mr. President POO-tihn'. Trump also intended to offer Putin a ceremonial gift during Friday's summit, the documents showed, though it is unclear if he did. In the aftermath of the summit, Trump has urged Ukraine to make a deal with Russia to end the war and allegedly told Volodymyr Zelensky that Putin offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv's forces ceded all of Donetsk. Zelensky reportedly rejected the demand. Trump has also indicated that he agrees with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies, until now with US support, have demanded. Trump met with Putin in Anchorage Friday to discuss a peace proposal, though few details were disclosed about the pair's meeting. But papers found at the Hotel Captain Cook around 9am Friday revealed exactly what rooms the Russian and US leaders convened in at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. Page one of the pack showed that Trump and Putin met near the 'American Bald Eagle Desk Statue' at the base, NPR reports. Three pages in the document included names of US and Kremlin officials, including phonetic pronunciation for all the Russians expected to attend the summit. The sixth and seventh pages in the document stated that a luncheon would be held in 'honor of his excellency Vladimir Putin'. It featured the expected menu of green salad with a champagne vinaigrette dressing for the starter and a main of filet mignon or halibut, with potatoes and asparagus on the side. Guests would be served crème brûlée for dessert. The included seating chart placed Trump across from Putin, alongside senior US officials. Putin was meant to be seated with senior Russian officials, but it is understood that the luncheon was cancelled. It is unclear who left behind the documents, but political analysts warn the mishap demonstrates 'sloppiness and the incompetence of the administration'. Although the documents and summit itinerary were marked as being produced by Crowley's team, there has been no official information tying her specifically to the leak. Crowley took center stage as she charmed Vladimir Putin at the Alaska summit on Friday, making the Russian leader beam as they shook hands shortly before he took off from Elmendorf Air Force Base. As Chief of Protocol, her role is to ensure diplomatic proceedings run smoothly. Trump's three-hour meeting with Putin was the first US-Russia summit since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up,' Trump said of the summit. Before the meeting, Trump had said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. Afterwards, he suggested a follow-up meeting with Putin could happen if talks with Zelensky went well. Russia's forces have been gradually advancing for months, with the war — the deadliest in Europe for 80 years — killing or wounding well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of Ukrainian civilians. Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, and Ukraine's military reported 139 front-line clashes in 24 hours. Trump told Fox he would hold off on imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil after making progress with Putin. He ended his remarks to Putin by saying, 'I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.' Putin replied, 'Next time in Moscow.' Trump said he might 'get a little heat on that one' but could 'possibly see it happening.'
