After 25 years, Kerala woman cleared of corruption charges that tainted her 34-year government service
That is how long L. Laila, 69, a former assistant director with the Kerala agriculture department, had to wait for justice and be cleared of the 'corrupt' tag that turned her life and career into one running nightmare. When the Special Vigilance Court, Muvattupuzha, acquitted her of the corruption and forgery charges on May 25, 2025, quarter of a century later, it seemed more like the legal maxim, justice delayed is justice denied, taught the hard way.
'Of course, I am relieved, but it does not compensate for all the humiliation and mental anguish I had to go through and which I would not have survived without the support of my husband,' says Ms. Laila, sitting at her house at Piravom.
She was booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC sections for forgery and falsification of accounts for alleged misappropriation of ₹3.47 lakh while serving as assistant director of agriculture, Piravom, for three years from 1993. It came back to bite her later in 2000 when she was due for promotion. Not only was she denied promotion, but she was demoted as an agriculture officer, a post in which she started her service in 1978.
A prolonged period of litigation ensued, initially in the Court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur, and then before the Special Vigilance Court, Muvattupuzha. The case was that she misappropriated funds allotted for distribution to eight Krishi Bhavans under her jurisdiction by transferring them to a bank account in the name of the Assistant Agriculture Director, Piravom.
'An election was round the corner, and there was a direction to ensure that it didn't hamper the allotment of funds to important projects. I transferred the funds to the bank account to avoid a potential treasury ban. The funds were eventually transferred to all Krishi Bhavans,' Ms. Laila says.
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) further investigated the case. A supplementary final report filed before the court on September 28, 2024, absolved Ms. Laila of causing any loss to the State exchequer. It had been 12 years since she had retired when that clean chit came, and her two children, who were school-going kids when her ordeal started, were now settled with good jobs as their mother finally stands vindicated.
In the bargain, Ms. Laila lost two promotions, as deputy director and joint director, and related benefits worth lakhs in salary, increment and retirement benefits. She has already written to the Agriculture department requesting restoration of notional promotion and the related benefits.
She is bracing for another round of litigation if that request is turned down.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ferozepur: Clerk caught red-handed accepting ₹60k bribe
Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) on Thursday arrested a clerk posted at the district development and panchayats office (DDPO) in Ferozepur while accepting a bribe of ₹60,000. A case under the Prevention of Corruption Act has been registered against the accused at the VB police station, Ferozepur range. A VB spokesperson said that the accused was arrested based on a complaint filed by a resident of Lalley village in Talwandi Bhai tehsil in Ferozepur district. The spokesperson said that the complainant had approached the VB alleging that he had applied for an agricultural loan limit from a private bank. In his application, he had mentioned both his land and an area of panchayat land that he had been cultivating after winning it in an auction. The bank declined to sanction the loan limit and informed the DDPO office regarding the panchayat land. According to the complaint, the clerk threatened the complainant regarding the submission of revenue records of the panchayat land to the bank and demanded a bribe of ₹1 lakh to avoid taking any adverse action. The accused later agreed to accept ₹60,000 as the bribe amount. A VB team from the Ferozepur range laid a trap and caught the accused red-handed while accepting the bribe amount from the complainant. A case under the Prevention of Corruption Act has been registered against the accused at the VB police station, Ferozepur range. The accused would be produced before the competent court tomorrow, and further investigation in the case is underway, the spokesperson said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Public servants need to exercise restraint & sensitivity while dealing with citizens: Kerala HC
Kochi: High court has observed that while a citizen approaching a public servant may react in different ways, patience must be the guiding principle in such situations. A public servant can act only in accordance with law, but even so, bureaucrats must conduct themselves with restraint and sensitivity, as this is key to the success of democracy, the court said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice P V Kunhikrishnan made these remarks while quashing a case against Manilal of Thiruvananthapuram, who was accused of using criminal force against a tehsildar and uttering obscene words during a quarrel. According to prosecution, the incident occurred in 2020, when Manilal accompanied his 76-year-old father-in-law to a hearing before the tehsildar (LR) in Kollam in connection with the mutation of three cents of property. When the tehsildar refused to proceed with the matter on the grounds that the opposite party was represented by another person, Manilal questioned the decision, leading to an altercation. The Kollam East police registered a case on the tehsildar's complaint, alleging that Manilal entered his chamber, uttered obscene words, snatched a file from a section clerk, and threw the file and plastic chairs, thereby obstructing the discharge of duty by a public servant. Manilal had earlier filed a discharge petition before a magistrate court, which partly allowed his plea by setting aside the charge under Section 294B IPC (uttering obscene words). Dissatisfied, he approached HC. Upon perusal of records, HC noted that snatching an official file, placing it back on the table, and hitting a plastic chair on the floor could only be seen as sudden gestures of a son-in-law placed in an embarrassing situation with his father-in-law. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Even if the allegations were accepted in full, the court held, they did not amount to the use of criminal force against a public servant. Accordingly, the case against Manilal was quashed. At the same time, HC remarked that Manilal, being a bank manager, ought to have avoided such a situation in a govt office. It also stressed that bureaucratic red-tapism often triggers unpleasant incidents. "A humane touch is necessary in every administrative act. Every decision taken in an office affects a life outside of it. Administrative decisions are not mere papers; they are lives in progress," HC observed. The bench further noted that the success of democracy depends not only on governance by elected representatives but also on the humane approach of bureaucrats in supporting such governance. Without empathy, it said, democratic govts cannot succeed. "Empathy is the bridge between a democratic govt and its people. Bureaucracy has a vital role in this." Concluding, HC observed that the entire incident could have been avoided if the officials had adopted a pragmatic approach. "That is why it is often said that bureaucracy should serve democracy, not be its master," it added.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
J&K HC junks bail plea of narco-terror accused
JAMMU: The High Court of J&K and Ladakh Wednesday dismissed the bail plea of Syed Iftikhar Andrabi (53), who is facing trial in a high-profile narco-terror case for his alleged involvement in a cross-border syndicate engaged in drug trafficking and financing terror in the Union Territory. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now NIA is investigating the case filed in 2020 under relevant sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and IPC. A division bench of Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Sanjay Parihar upheld the order of a special NIA court, Jammu, which had earlier rejected Andrabi's bail petition. HC observed that on the petitioner's disclosure, 3.2kg of heroin and more than Rs 35 lakh cash were seized. Scrutiny of cellphone records indicated that Andrabi had been in touch with terror operatives across the border. Andrabi's counsel submitted that he was a political activist who had been falsely implicated after his release from preventive detention in 2019, and there was no direct evidence against him. Citing that he had been behind bars for around half a decade, the defence sought parity with co-accused persons who were granted bail. Representing NIA, the prosecution — deputy solicitor general of India Vishal Sharma, along with special public prosecutor Chandan Kumar Singh — opposed the bail petition, arguing that Andrabi was found to have direct links with Pakistan-based handlers of terror outfits such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen and was part of the narco-terror syndicate. Despite acknowledging that Andrabi had spent almost five years incarcerated, HC held that the seriousness of the charges and evidence on record outweighed his request for parole. The trial was at an early stage, and it would be premature to conclude that the accusations against him were baseless, the bench noted.
