logo
Brooklyn Bridge ship crash investigation underway today by federal, local agencies

Brooklyn Bridge ship crash investigation underway today by federal, local agencies

CBS News18-05-2025

New York City and federal officials have begun their investigation into the deadly crash of a Mexican tall ship into the Brooklyn Bridge Saturday night.
Two people were killed in the incident, and at least 19 others were hurt, including two critically, officials said.
The collision took place as the Mexican navy training ship Cuauhtémoc was departing the South Street Seaport for Iceland with 277 aboard.
Sailors were standing on the ship's yards as part of a ceremonial departure when it apparently lost power and began drifting backward, ultimately crashing into the Brooklyn Bridge. The tops of the ship's three masts snapped off, and sailors were left dangling by wires from the top. The main mast of the ship was some 160 feet high.
Officials said the bridge wasn't structurally damaged.
The damaged masts of the Cuauhtémoc, a Mexican Navy training ship that crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge, are seen as it sits docked at Pier 36 in lower Manhattan on May 18, 2025 in New York City. The ship, which snapped all three of its masts as it collided with the New York City landmark bridge, killed at least two people and injured dozens of others.Federal and local teams investigating the crash
On Sunday morning, the National Transportation Safety Board said it was dispatching a go-team to investigate the crash.
New York City Emergency Management held an interagency meeting regarding the crash Sunday morning that included the mayor's office, FDNY, NYPD, the U.S. Coast Guard, the New York City Economic Development Corporation and the MTA.
Officials are also restricting access to Pier 36, where the Cuauhtémoc was moved to after the crash. The Coast Guard is providing guidance to the ship's crew on repairs and how to move it safely.
In a statement on social media, the Coast Guard called it a "devastating tragedy."
"We will ensure a robust investigation and support for those impacted while maintaining the safety and security of the Port of New York," the Coast Guard said.
Rigging hangs from a snapped mast on the Cuauhtémoc, Sunday, May 18, 2025, in New York, a masted Mexican Navy training ship that collided with the Brooklyn Bridge the night before.
Yuki Iwamura / AP
Sen. Schumer questions whether federal cuts played a role
In his weekly Sunday morning press conference, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer questioned whether cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, may have played a role in the incident.
"Our hearts go out to the people of Mexico and those who lost their lives and who were injured in last night's Brooklyn Bridge vessel crash," Schumer said.
The senator said a tugboat was not being used to assist the vessel as it departed, and that one arrived after.
"We know that the Trump administration has been meddling in U.S. Coast Guard operations, from staffing to command and comms, and I have the general sense of a DOGE dysfunction in parts of the Coast Guard, to put it mildly," Schumer said. "After being fully briefed on last night's Brooklyn Bridge accident, one thing is very clear. There are many more questions than answers as to how the accident occurred and whether it could have been prevented."
People look at the Cuauhtémoc, a Mexican Navy training ship that crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge, as it sits docked at Pier 36 in lower Manhattan on May 18, 2025 in New York City. The ship, which snapped all three of its masts as it collided with the New York City landmark bridge, killed at least two people and injured dozens of others.Schumer said the Coast Guard has a system called vehicle traffic service, or VTS, that's similar to how the FAA handles air traffic control.
"There are indications that this service called the VTS may not have been fully or adequately functional in light of that hiring freeze. We don't know the answer to that question. We need answers. If this were the case, Brooklyn Bridge accident could be a national harbinger, demanding immediate attention," Schumer said.
Schumer pointed to Admiral Linda Fagan's being relieved of her duties as commandant of the Coast Guard on Jan. 21.
"In the time since the post of commandant have been vacant without a permanent commandant nominee. Furthermore, the current hiring freeze at the Department of Homeland Security, DHS, which the Coast Guard is part of, may have limited the ability of the Coast Guard to fully staff up at the VTS, the vehicle traffic service, the shore-wide system that provides quote air traffic control for the seas, especially in congested areas and restricted waters like New York Harbor," Schumer said.
Schumer said that while the bridge itself wasn't structurally damaged, a monitoring system beneath it that operates as part of the bridge's inspection system was damaged.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter
Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter

Dear Eric: My husband and I have been estranged from our 17-year-old granddaughter for eight years. We were loving, supportive grandparents but after the mother of our granddaughter broke up with our son, the father, she stopped our granddaughter from seeing us as well. For eight years, I have tried to keep contact with our granddaughter with gifts and cards on her birthday, Christmas and other times. I do not receive a response of any kind from her. We believe her mother forbids her from contacting us. My question is should I continue to send cards and gifts to her? I'm ready to stop. I don't want her to forget us but I'm very tired of attempting to reach out to her with no response. — Estranged Gramma Gramma: Eight years is a long time to go with no response. I'm sorry; I know that's hard. If you're ready to stop — or modify this practice — I think it's OK to do so. Sending cards and gifts hasn't had the desired effect thus far and if it's just contributing to your grief and sense of loss, it might be best to take a pause. Consider, however, that your granddaughter is about to be a legal adult and therefore will be able to make different choices about who gets to contact her. And also consider that the gifts may have had a positive impact on her, even if they didn't result in a closer relationship with you. There are a lot of unknowns. As such, don't feel obligated to keep up a tradition that's wearing you down. You might, for instance, take a few years off, and then reach out with a letter asking if she's open to reconnecting. You'll have to respect whatever she chooses, but there are other paths forward. They'll just take a little more time. Dear Eric: I have been dating my girlfriend for one and a half years now, and we have a really strong relationship. I care about her a lot, and our relationship means a lot to me. However, recently our relationship has been missing the spark it used to have, and it just isn't as exciting anymore (although I still very much enjoy spending time with my partner and our relationship is fine). Additionally, I have started finding someone at work attractive and have found myself looking at them a lot and trying to be around them often. I have already told my partner that I find this person attractive, but I said it didn't amount to much (sort of like thinking a movie star is attractive) and so my partner was not too upset. However, I feel very guilty about my feelings of attraction and am worried that it could be a sign my girlfriend may not actually be right for me. I'm hesitant to just break up with my current partner and begin talking to the person I'm attracted to as I feel it would hurt her greatly and I also don't want to lose such a good relationship. Furthermore, I haven't spent much time with this co-worker whom I'm attracted to, and don't wish to spend any time with them as it feels like cheating. So, I don't know much about their personality, and they could end up being someone that I actually dislike. Is it a bad idea to throw away a perfectly good relationship just for a 'crush?' Is it immoral to have these feelings and stay with my partner? Are these feelings a sign that maybe our relationship isn't meant to be? — Confused Lover Confused: Bad idea? Yes. Immoral? No. A sign? Reply hazy, ask again. Your relationship with your girlfriend is changing, as is natural. Things won't always have the sizzle and spark of your early attraction. That can be jarring, but it's often an opportunity for you both to reinvest in the relationship, to make some adjustments, and to light new sparks. Relationships aren't ever static. Try to communicate openly about what you miss, what you're hoping for, and ways — big and small — that you can keep building the relationship. I don't know what the inside of this crush looks like. But I know that it's often easier to look at something that's new and mostly unknown and start to construct an idealized narrative. It's easier to imagine that everything will be perfect with some other person — without even really knowing that person — than to accept that 'perfect' with the person we do know takes work. Most of the time, a crush is just a crush. If you want to get to know your co-worker outside of the office and see if reality matches your imagination, that's fine (presuming she also wants to get to know you). But I think your first step should be spending some time working on your relationship with your partner. (Send questions to R. Eric Thomas at eric@ or P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at 2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store