The Future of Autonomous Trucking Is Being Tested Today
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
There are millions more jobs driving trucks than there are drivers for those trucks. According to IRU, an organization representing 3.5 million mobility and logistics services globally, there are 3.6 million unfilled positions in 36 countries. Those 36 countries represent 70 percent of the global GDP.
Technology that can help ease the problem is on the way. Many companies are testing driverless tractor-trailers on highways, including U.S. Interstates 35 and 45. Among those companies gearing up for an autonomous future is Volvo Group.
Volvo Trucks currently sells 25 different types of trucks, from gasoline-powered long-haul transporters to the Volvo FM Low Entry, a high-capacity truck for urban work like garbage hauling or construction work.
"At Volvo Group, our Volvo autonomous solutions are currently focused on hub-to-hub freight transport and mining, however the benefits of autonomy extend across multiple industries including construction and public transport," Lars Stenqvist, chief technology officer of Volvo Group, told Newsweek.
Face of the Volvo VNL Autonomous truck.
Face of the Volvo VNL Autonomous truck.
Volvo Trucks
More than just workforce shortages, Stenqvist views autonomous driving technology as safer for roadside workers and public transit riders. "Autonomous technology is already helping to address some of the logistics industry's most urgent challenges, such as driver shortages, growing freight demand, and long transit times. In construction, autonomy can deliver many of the same benefits, mitigating the shortage of skilled operators, enabling continuous operations, and improving site safety by removing people from hazardous environments. Similarly, in public transport, autonomy can help ease driver shortages, improve safety, and add much needed capacity," he said.
Rather than replace drivers, Stenqvist envisions autonomous trucks as being able to perform "specific tasks on routes where autonomy can add the most value."
The Volvo VNL heavy-duty truck was launched with autonomous operations in mind. "The Volvo VNL Autonomous is built on the all-new Volvo VNL, launched in January 2024. This truck model represents a 90% redesign from the ground up, with significant improvements in fuel efficiency, aerodynamics, and safety, making it the ideal platform for autonomous operations.
"At Volvo Group, we made a deliberate choice to develop a new truck platform specifically for autonomous use. The Volvo VNL Autonomous is purpose-designed and purpose-built from the start, ensuring that every aspect of its design caters to the unique requirements of driverless operation—there are no afterthoughts, upgrades, or retrofitting involved," Stenqvist said.
Each VNL Autonomous is equipped with redundant safety technology and equipment including brakes, steering, communication systems, power and energy storage, vehicle motion management operations and lights. The VNL Autonomous also has Aurora's self-driving technology, Aurora Driver, integrated into it.
"We view autonomy as a fully integrated system, not as an add-on. From redundant harnessing to protected sensor mounts, every component is engineered for durability, safety, and scalability. Autonomy is embedded, not bolted on, and every design choice reflects our commitment to this principle," Stenqvist said.
Volvo manufactures the truck at the company's New River Valley plant in Dublin, Virginia.
Autonomous driving operations are enabled by artificial intelligence (AI). "AI is not just at the heart of autonomous transport, it enables intelligence across the entire solution stack. At Volvo Group, we view AI as the critical layer that empowers perception, decision-making, and intelligent vehicle control while always being anchored in safety, reliability, and operational integrity," the CTO said.
"Our Volvo VNL Autonomous in its first application is powered by the Aurora Driver, which incorporates Aurora's carefully engineered approach known as Verifiable AI. In parallel, we also have a partnership with Waabi. The Waabi Driver brings a next-generation approach using generative AI trained in advanced simulation. Their system is designed to learn quickly, adapt across regions, and smoothly integrate."
There isn't one particular area of autonomous driving that stands out to Stenqvist as being the most challenging."Autonomy is a systems challenge," he said.
Stenqvist continued: "Autonomy presents a multifaceted challenge that goes far beyond perception and control. It demands system-level safety, full redundancy, large-scale validation, and seamless integration into complex operational environments.
"Building an autonomous truck is particularly demanding. It's not just about software or retrofitting sensors—it involves adding over 200 components, including advanced sensors and redundant systems for all safety-critical functions. These must be integrated from the ground up into a cohesive, fail-operational architecture that performs reliably at highway speeds and across a wide range of weather and lighting conditions.
"Sensor fusion, redundancy design, and robust autonomy stack performance are major engineering challenges. Delivering this capability on a scale, with OEM-grade quality and consistency, is equally critical. This is where Volvo Group has a distinct advantage, drawing on decades of experience in vehicle safety, industrialization, and high-quality manufacturing to make autonomy viable at scale."
And the company sees autonomy not just as a next step but as a game-changing solution for the trucking industry. "Autonomy is more than a technological leap—it's a critical enabler for meeting growing freight demand, improving safety, and addressing labor shortages. At Volvo Group, we see autonomy as a key driver of long-term efficiency and progress, paving the way for a more resilient future for the transport industry," Stenqvist said.
Daimler Truck's Freighliner Cascadia being tested in an autonomous driving scenario by Torc.
Daimler Truck's Freighliner Cascadia being tested in an autonomous driving scenario by Torc.
Daimler Truck
Volvo isn't the only company in the throws of autonomous truck testing. Torc, a subsidiary of Daimler Truck, is testing its driverless trucks along routes in New Mexico, Texas and Arizona. Like Volvo, the company has built redundancies into its fifth-generation Freightliner Cascadia, which is used for the tests.
Torc and its parent company aim to enter the U.S. market with an SAE Level 4 autonomous truck by 2027, it said in April. SAE Level 4 autonomous trucks can operate without a driver under limited conditions. The companies plan to market the truck for use between freight hubs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Truck manufacturers sue CARB over zero-emission vehicle plan
This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo Group North America sued the California Air Resources Board in federal court Monday, seeking to invalidate an emissions reduction deal from 2023, the Clean Truck Partnership. The agreement, signed by the four companies and others, called for OEMs to move away from traditional trucks and toward zero-emission vehicles. But Congress under the Trump administration has since rolled back Environmental Protection Agency policy that previously gave the state leeway in its environmental goals. 'Plaintiffs are caught in the crossfire: California demands that OEMs follow preempted laws; the United States maintains such laws are illegal and orders OEMs to disregard them,' the lawsuit said. 'Accordingly, Plaintiff OEMs file this lawsuit to clarify their legal obligations under federal and state law and to enjoin California from enforcing standards preempted by federal law.' Dive Insight: California and the federal government are clashing over who has authority to set emissions standards for manufacturers. California's Clean Truck Partnership, which the plaintiffs signed onto in 2023, called for phasing out legacy engine production from 2024-2026 with more stringent restrictions each year, while giving truck manufacturers some flexibility on how to do so. Despite that deal between California and OEMs, Congress rolled back EPA policy through a joint resolution in June. But according to the suit, California has since threatened the OEMs with civil sanctions if state standards are unmet. Meanwhile, the federal Justice Department has issued cease and desist letters to CARB stating that California's 'enforcement of its standards is contrary to federal law.' 'The OEMs are in an impossible position,' the lawsuit says, adding that California is mandating the companies to follow CARB's standards or be excluded from the California market, subject to civil penalties and excluded from state purchasing and incentive programs. A provision in the deal said that the businesses commit to meet those regulations, 'irrespective of the outcome of any litigation challenging the waivers or authorizations for those regulations or of CARB's overall authority to implement those regulations.' At the same time, California is challenging the congressional policy rollback in court. The state eventually wants 100% ZEV sales of heavy-duty trucks by 2045 wherever possible. The truck manufacturers' lawsuit, which also names CARB Executive Officer Steven Cliff and Gov. Gavin Newsom as defendants, further alleged that the deal was meant to 'harmonize compliance with state and federal law.' The suit seeks relief by having a court declare federal precedence over the rules and asks for several declaratory judgments, including that the Clean Truck Partnership is unconstitutional and also violates the federal Clean Air Act based on the federal supremacy clause. "Against this backdrop, Plaintiff OEMs urgently need clarity regarding the law and emission standards that apply to its vehicles and engines for model year 2026," the suit said, adding that the companies "must know which vehicles they are authorized to sell, and where, well in advance of the start of a model year on January 1." Recommended Reading ATA urges manufacturers to leave California Clean Truck Partnership
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘Impossible position' cited by truck manufacturers in lawsuit against California
Truck manufacturers are 'in an impossible position' under the California Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) mandate, and several of them have asked a federal court to get them out of it. In a lawsuit filed Monday in the U.S District Court for the Eastern District of California, Daimler Truck (OTC: DTRUY), PACCAR (NASDAQ: PCAR), Volvo Group North America and International Motors (owned by Volkswagen), the companies are asking the court to immediately halt the California Air Resources Board (CARB) from enforcing the ACT against them, using the 'impossible' term to describe their predicament. In the summary of that position, the manufacturers spell out the squeeze that many people in the industry saw coming as soon as the federal government, following this past spring's Congressional action and a Presidential approval of that action, invalidated the waiver granted by the Environmental Protection Agency to CARB that allowed the ACT and other California regulations to proceed. Groundwork for squeeze laid in 2023 The road to that squeeze began when the companies' trade group, the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA), signed the Clean Truck Partnership (CTP) in 2023 that gave the manufacturers more leeway to meet the ACT requirements in exchange for greater alignment between California and EPA rules. That deal also included restrictions on what the engine manufacturers could do to challenge the ACT going forward. On one side of the squeeze is California, insisting that the federal action to overturn the waivers is illegal and that the engine manufacturers must abide by the rules of the CTP. (California has filed suit against the federal action, with its key argument being that EPA waivers are not subject to the Congressional Review Act that Congress used to overturn them. The engine manufacturers' lawsuit says there is a conference on the California suit September 16 and that nothing else has occurred with it since the state filed the suit. ) On the other side is the federal government, which the lawsuit says sent a letter August 7 to a Daimler executive, Sean Waters, telling him that signatories to the CTP must 'cease and desist your compliance with both the Clean Truck Partnership and its preempted state vehicle emissions regulations.' The letter was sent by Adam R.F. Gustafson, acting assistant attorney general of the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice, and is an attachment in the engine manufacturers' lawsuit. The lawsuit says the engine manufacturers, along with the EMA, 'sought clarification from CARB regarding OEMs' legal obligations under the Clean Truck Partnership and CARB's underlying emission standards,noting that the Clean Truck Partnership's requirements were invalid for several reasons, including that they were preempted under the Clean Air Act.' CARB has not responded to that request, according to the lawsuit. California seen as threatening action But the lawsuit points to a Manufacturers Advisory Correspondence issued by CARB on May 23 that says the engine makers 'must continue to follow CARB's preempted standards, including the certification requirement, to ensure 'lawful' sales of vehicles and engines in California.' That was followed by an executive order from Gov. Newsom that, the lawsuit says, threatened the manufacturers with 'unfavorable regulatory treatment, as well as exclusion from government purchase and incentive programs,' if the companies didn't adhere to the ACT mandates. CARB has made some changes in the ACT since the preemption. In a July 24 press release that announced the changes, CARB chair Liane Randolph was quoted as saying that they provided 'flexibility.' But she also referred to 'commitments made in the Clean Truck Partnership.' EMA signaled last month, in a comment to CARB during the process that led to the changes, that it was unhappy with the situation it faced. It was the first public declaration of its views since the federal action set the grounds for the current dispute. Given the pushes coming at them from two sides, according to the lawsuit, 'the OEMs are subject to two sovereigns whose regulatory requirements are irreconcilable and who are openly hostile to one another. Each wields a hammer to enforce its will on industry, leaving OEMs—who simply seek to sell heavy-duty trucks in compliance with the law—unable to plan with the necessary certainty and clarity where their products need to be certified for sale and by which regulatory authority.' But it is only one side of the divide that is the target of the lawsuit: California. 'California has taken the position that Congress's waiver-disapproval resolutions were 'reckless, politically motivated, and illegal attacks on California' (citing wording in a Newsom press release) and has made clear that it will continue to attempt to enforce the requirements included in Advanced Clean Trucks, Omnibus Low NOx and Advanced Clean Cars II.' For the trucking industry, a softening of the California Omnibus Low NOx rule and aligning it with federal law was a key part of the deal. The federal waivers that allowed the ACT to proceed also permitted the Omnibus NOX rule (which tightened rules on emissions of nitrogen oxide) and the Advanced Clean Cars II rule, which affects passenger vehicles. CTP didn't impact ZEV rules One thing that didn't change under the CTP: the ACT schedule for truck manufacturers to sell an increasing percentage of zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) into the state. But the lawsuit notes that another conundrum the engine manufacturers have is that the matching mandate to buy ZEVs that was built into the now largely defunct Advanced Clean Fleets rule has disappeared, with CARB killing the rule when it didn't think it was getting an EPA waiver for it. 'In other words, CARB has removed the buy-side requirement corresponding to the sales mandates imposed on manufacturers by Advanced Clean Trucks, thereby making manufacturer compliance with Advanced Clean Trucks even more challenging,' the lawsuit says. The engine manufacturers 'urgently need clarity regarding the law and emission standards that apply to its vehicles and engines for model year 2026,' the suit says. 'To adequately plan product production and allocation, Plaintiff OEMs must know which vehicles they are authorized to sell, and where, well in advance of the start of a model year on January 1.' The legal charges in the lawsuit are that California, with the waivers gone, is violating the preemption provisions of the Clean Air Act that prohibit a state–absent a waiver–from creating stricter standards than in the act. It also challenges a provision in the CTP–which the EMA signed–that prohibited challenges to steps CARB might have taken in connection with the partnership.'Government officials cannot, without violating the First Amendment, require their citizens to follow unlawful standards,' the suit says. The suit also says the CTP violates various California state regulations. The manufacturers are seeking court injunctions that would bar the state from enforcing 'or attempting to enforce' not only the ACT but other regulations that the state had approved and sought–and in most cases–received a waiver from the EPA. That includes the Advanced Clean Fleets rule, which was withdrawn before a waiver decision was made by EPA. A spokeswoman for CARB declined comment, citing the pending litigation. Groups make their voices heard But other comments came rapidly. The Clean Freight Coalition is a group of carriers and other trucking related businesses that has mostly pushed back against some emission technologies while backing others. Its executive director (and former FMCSA administrator) Jim Mullen said the group 'commends the truck OEMs for bringing this lawsuit against CARB.' 'It is an absolute disgrace that this action is necessary.' CARB is holding the trucking industry hostage by its refusal to acknowledge the obvious: that the actions by Congress and the President nullified the CTP. ' On the other side of the divide, Craig Segall, former deputy executive officer and assistant CARB chief counsel, asked whether the manufacturers 'have any idea how to sell their own products?' 'Imagine being a truck company, working for years towards an agreement with the world's fourth largest economy that helps you sell electric trucks and finance infrastructure despite federal uncertainty… and then burning your regulators and destroying shareholder value by blowing up that agreement,' he said in a prepared statement. 'Red flags abound.' More articles by John Kingston First legal steps taken, this time by WSTA, to untangle the legal knot of the Clean Truck Partnership In brief comments, Trimble CEO introduces new product for matching capacity with shippers Truck sales in the second quarter might have been the worst performing metric of all The post 'Impossible position' cited by truck manufacturers in lawsuit against California appeared first on FreightWaves. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
05-08-2025
- Yahoo
Caterpillar, Komatsu, and Volvo Dominate with Global Reach, Autonomous Tech, and Sustainable Machinery Innovations
Discover the latest insights in the Heavy Construction Equipment Companies Quadrant industry analysis, spotlighting top global players, cutting-edge innovations, and emerging trends. Recognized leaders include industry giants like Caterpillar, Volvo Group, and Komatsu, who are driving advancements in autonomous and sustainable technologies. This market analysis categorizes over 100 companies, with focus on machinery type, application, propulsion, and end-use industry such as mining and construction. Stay informed on the key developments in heavy machinery, crucial for sectors providing raw materials worldwide. Dublin, Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Heavy Construction Equipment - Company Evaluation Report, 2025" report has been added to Heavy Construction Equipment Companies Quadrant is a comprehensive industry analysis that provides valuable insights into the global market for Heavy Construction Equipment. This quadrant offers a detailed evaluation of key market players, technological advancements, product innovations, and emerging trends shaping the industry. The publisher's 360 Quadrants evaluated over 100 companies, of which the Top 12 Heavy Construction Equipment Companies were categorized and recognized as quadrant construction equipment refers to large-scale machinery, typically weighing over 12 metric tons, designed to perform specific tasks in construction, demolition, and mining operations. These machines - whether transportable, semi-permanent, or permanent - are primarily utilized for earthmoving, lifting heavy materials or containers, drilling into soil or rock, and carrying out concreting and paving work. Additionally, heavy construction equipment plays a crucial role in mining and construction activities that supply raw materials to various industrial market is segmented based on several criteria, including machinery type, application, propulsion type, power output, engine capacity, end-use industry, and geographic region. By end-use industry, the market includes sectors such as mining, infrastructure development, building & construction, forestry & agriculture, and other specialized applications. Based on machinery type, the equipment is categorized into excavation & demolition, heavy lifting, material handling, recycling & waste management, transportation, and tunneling machinery - each serving distinct functional requirements across construction and industrial PlayersKey players in the Heavy Construction Equipment market include major global corporations and specialized innovators such as Caterpillar, Volvo Group, Komatsu, Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., Terex Corporation, Liebherr Ag, Sany Group, Hd Hyundai, Xcmg Group, Cnh Industrial N.v., Wacker Neuson Se, and Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. These companies are actively investing in research and development, forming strategic partnerships, and engaging in collaborative initiatives to drive innovation, expand their global footprint, and maintain a competitive edge in this rapidly evolving 3 Companies CaterpillarCaterpillar stands as a leader, recognized for its broad range of heavy machinery, including excavators and loaders. This company excels in enhancing its Company Product Portfolio, emphasizing autonomous and sustainable technology. With a strong presence in over 500 locations worldwide, Caterpillar harnesses a vast dealer network to sustain its Company Positions globally. Its approach to integrating advanced technologies, like autonomous CAT 777 trucks, illustrates its forward-thinking strategy in Company thrives with extensive operations in the Asia-Pacific and American regions. Known for developing innovative machinery, Komatsu enhances its Company Ranking through strategic acquisitions, such as GHH Group GmbH, reflecting its commitment to expanding its Company Product Portfolio. Operating through various segments such as Construction, Mining, and Utility Equipment, Komatsu continues to gain traction by exploring electric and autonomous machine GroupVolvo Group is another pivotal player, renowned for its construction-related products. The company's focus on innovation in electric and hybrid machinery exemplifies its dedication to sustainable development. With a global footprint in multiple regions, Volvo's strategic expansions reflect its robust approach toward improving its Company Positioning. The group's advanced technology ensures efficiency and high performance, reinforcing their stronghold in the heavy construction equipment Topics Covered: 1 Introduction1.1 Market Definition1.2 Stakeholders2 Executive Summary3 Market Overview3.1 Introduction3.2 Market Dynamics3.2.1 Drivers3.2.1.1 Increasing Investments and Developments in Construction and Infrastructure Sectors3.2.1.2 Rapid Urbanization and Population Growth3.2.1.3 Technological Advancements and Upgradation of Equipment3.2.1.4 Government Investments and Supportive Policies for Sustainable Solutions3.2.2 Restraints3.2.2.1 Substantial Capital Investment3.2.2.2 Socio-Economic Effects of Heavy Construction Activities3.2.3 Opportunities3.2.3.1 Demand for Autonomous Heavy Construction Equipment3.2.3.2 Electrification and Digitization of Equipment3.2.3.3 Renting or Leasing Equipment3.2.4 Challenges3.2.4.1 Development of Alternative Optimized Solutions3.2.4.2 Lack of Skilled Labor Force and Maintenance and Repair-Related Issues3.3 Porter's Five Forces Analysis3.3.1 Threat of New Entrants3.3.2 Threat of Substitutes3.3.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers3.3.4 Bargaining Power of Buyers3.3.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry3.4 Supply Chain Analysis3.4.1 Raw Material/Component Analysis3.4.2 Final Product Analysis3.5 Value Chain Analysis3.6 Ecosystem Analysis3.7 Technology Analysis3.7.1 Key Technologies3.7.1.1 Autonomous Heavy Construction Equipment3.7.2 Complementary Technologies3.7.2.1 Connected Technologies3.7.2.2 Grade Control System3.8 Impact of Ai/Gen Ai on Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.1 Top Use Cases and Market Potential3.8.2 Best Practices in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.3 Case Studies of Ai Implementation in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.4 Interconnected Adjacent Ecosystem and Impact on Market Players3.8.5 Clients' Readiness to Adopt Generative Ai in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.9 Patent Analysis3.9.1 Introduction3.9.2 Methodology3.9.3 Document Type3.9.4 Insights3.9.5 Legal Status of Patents3.9.6 Jurisdiction Analysis3.9.7 Top Applicants3.9.8 List of Patents by Volvo Group3.9.9 List of Patents by Doosan Infracore Co., Ltd.3.9.10 List of Patents by Korea Ind Tech Inst.3.10 Key Conferences and Events, 2024-20253.11 Trends and Disruptions Impacting Customer Business4 Competitive Landscape4.1 Overview4.2 Key Player Strategies/Right to Win4.3 Revenue Analysis, 2019-20234.4 Market Share Analysis, 20234.5 Brand/Product Comparison4.5.1 Excavators (Caterpillar)4.5.2 Excavators (Komatsu)4.5.3 Excavators (Xcmg Group)4.5.4 Excavators (Volvo Group)4.6 Company Evaluation Matrix: Key Players, 20234.6.1 Stars4.6.2 Emerging Leaders4.6.3 Pervasive Players4.6.4 Participants4.6.5 Company Footprint: Key Players, 20234.6.5.1 Company Footprint4.6.5.2 Region Footprint4.6.5.3 Machinery Type Footprint4.6.5.4 Application Footprint4.6.5.5 Propulsion Type Footprint4.6.5.6 Power Output Footprint4.6.5.7 Engine Capacity Footprint4.6.5.8 End-Use Industry Footprint4.7 Company Evaluation Matrix: Startups/Smes, 20234.7.1 Progressive Companies4.7.2 Responsive Companies4.7.3 Dynamic Companies4.7.4 Starting Blocks4.7.5 Competitive Benchmarking: Startups/Smes, 20234.7.5.1 Detailed List of Key Startups/Smes4.7.5.2 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Startups/Smes4.8 Company Valuation and Financial Metrics4.9 Competitive Scenario4.9.1 Product Launches4.9.2 Deals5 Company Profiles Caterpillar Volvo Group Komatsu Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Terex Corporation Liebherr Ag Sany Group Hd Hyundai Xcmg Group Cnh Industrial N.V. Wacker Neuson Se Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. Jc Bamford Excavators Ltd. Manitou Group Escorts Kubota Limited Deere and Company Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Hiab Hidromek Doosan Bobcat Mahindra Construction Equipment For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
