These strikes look like an Iranian escalation. They're likely the opposite
Eric Tlozek
, ABC
Members of the Mexican Association of Islamic Women and some Iranian women march to the Iranian Embassy in Mexico City.
Photo:
GERARDO VIEYRA/NurPhoto
Analysis -
Iran has decided to retaliate to the US attack on its nuclear sites with a symbolic and overtly telegraphed strike that has caused no casualties.
Iran gave advance notice that allowed the US base to be evacuated and Qatar's air defences to be prepared, with Patriot batteries in the Gulf state shooting down the Iranian missiles.
From the outset Iran specified that it didn't attack "the brotherly nation of Qatar", only the huge US base it hosts at Al Udeid.
In that, Iran may have misjudged Qatar.
It has a very different relationship with Qatar to the near-client state dominance it had over Iraq when it tried the same tactic there in 2020.
"We affirm that Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner equivalent with the nature and scale of this brazen aggression, in line with international law," Qatar's government said.
Other Gulf states were similarly angry, with Saudi Arabia placing "all of its capabilities" at Qatar's disposal.
This is a huge step for a nation that eight years ago was reportedly considering invading its small neighbour (it instead imposed a three-year blockade, along with the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt).
Qatar carefully builds alliances and influence and maintains difficult relationships, even with Israel.
It will not appreciate Iran using it as a theatre for retaliation, even a symbolic one.
Iran may have thought it was demonstrating to Gulf nations that there is a price for hosting US troops, but instead it has angered the countries that had been restoring ties and condemning the US and Israeli strikes.
However, Iran appears to have correctly read the US in choosing this option of symbolic rather than escalatory retaliation - likely because it has done it before.
In 2020 Iran struck US bases in Iraq in retaliation for the US assassination of senior general Qassem Soleimani.
Iraq was given advance warning of the strikes, the Americans were ready (although many US personnel suffered blast trauma) and the US did not strike back.
By avoiding casualties among US personnel at Al Udeid - a criteria Trump gave early in this new conflict for preventing US retaliation - Iran is hoping to signal it doesn't want further conflict with the US.
The US looks like it is going to "take the win", as former president Joe Biden once said about an earlier round of Iranian strikes against Israel.
Iran is clearly looking for an off-ramp and the US wants them to return, significantly weakened, to nuclear control negotiations.
Nothing has so far dissuaded Israel, however, which is expanding its strikes to include Iranian military and security agencies that directly support the clerical regime.
The US might say it wants the conflict to end in negotiations, without regime change, but Israel has given no sign that it is ready to stop.
- ABC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Leaked recording reveals ex-Israeli military intelligence chief calling 50,000 deaths in Gaza ‘necessary'
By Oren Liebermann, Abeer Salman , CNN People search for survivors in the rubble of a building destroyed in an Israeli strike in the northern Gaza Strip. Photo: AFP / Omar Al-Qatta In leaked audio, the former head of Israeli military intelligence can be heard saying the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza are "necessary and required for future generations." "For everything that happened on October 7, for every one person on October 7, 50 Palestinians must die," said Israel Defence Force's (IDF) Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva in the recordings released by Israel's Channel 12 news on Friday. "It doesn't matter now if they are children." "The fact that there are already 50,000 dead in Gaza is necessary and required for future generations," Haliva said in the recordings. It's unclear when he was speaking, but the number killed in Gaza surpassed 50,000 in March. "There is no choice - every now and then, they need a Nakba in order to feel the price," Haliva said. The Nakba, or "catastrophe" in Arabic, is a seminal event in Palestinian history when roughly 700,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled from their homes by armed Jewish groups in 1948 during the establishment of the State of Israel. Haliva was head of Israeli military intelligence on 7 October 2023, when Hamas launched attacks on southern Israel in which 1200 people were killed and 250 more kidnapped. He resigned his position in April 2024 over his "leadership responsibility," becoming the first senior IDF officer to do so. The lengthy recordings appear to be from long conversations with Haliva, but Channel 12 does not identify the person with whom the retired officer is speaking. Haliva's central claim throughout the recordings is that the Israeli military is not the only organisation responsible for the failures that led to the 7 October attacks. He places blame on Israel's political leadership and Shin Bet, the internal security service, for believing Hamas would not carry out an assault. In a statement to Israel's Channel 12, Haliva said the recordings were said in a "closed forum, and I can only regret that." He called the recordings "fragments of partial things, which cannot reflect the full picture - certainly when it comes to complex, detailed issues, most of which are highly classified." Israel is facing mounting criticism over the war in Gaza and its new plans to occupy Gaza City. Last week, New Zealand's Prime Minister Christoper Luxon said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had "lost the plot" and the takeover of Gaza City would be "utterly, utterly unacceptable." On Friday, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said in an interview with the Jyllands-Posten newspaper that "Netanyahu is now a problem in himself." In a statement, Hamas condemned Haliva's remarks and said the audio recording "confirms that crimes against our people are high-level decisions and official policy from the enemy's political and security leadership." A United Nations Special Committee report released last November found Israel's conduct in Gaza "is consistent with the characteristics of genocide." Last month, two Israeli human rights groups also accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. The Israeli military said the conclusion was "entirely unfounded." Israel has repeatedly denied accusations of genocide, saying it is acting in accordance with international law. -CNN Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
21 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hamas accepts new Gaza truce plan: Hamas official
Palestinians inspect the damage after strike in the north of Gaza City on 6 August, 2025. Photo: AFP Hamas has accepted a new ceasefire proposal for Gaza, a senior member from the group said Monday, after a fresh diplomatic push to end more than 22 months of war. Mediators Egypt and Qatar, backed by the United States, have struggled to secure a lasting truce in the conflict, which has triggered a dire humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. But after receiving a new proposal from mediators, Hamas said it was ready for talks. "The movement has submitted its response, agreeing to the mediators' new proposal. We pray to God to extinguish the fire of this war on our people," senior Hamas official Bassem Naim said on Facebook. Earlier a Hamas source told AFP the group accepted the proposal "without requesting any amendments". Egypt said it and Qatar had sent the new proposal to Israel, adding "the ball is now in its court". Israel has yet to respond. A Palestinian source familiar with the talks said mediators were "expected to announce that an agreement has been reached and set a date for the resumption of talks", adding guarantees were offered to ensure implementation and pursue a permanent solution. According to a report in Egyptian state-linked outlet Al-Qahera, the deal proposed an initial 60-day truce, a partial hostage release, the release of some Palestinian prisoners and provisions to allow for the entry of aid. The proposal comes more than a week after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to conquer Gaza City and nearby refugee camps, which has sparked international outcry as well as domestic opposition. Out of 251 hostages taken during Hamas's October 2023 attack that triggered the war, 49 are still held in Gaza including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Earlier, an Islamic Jihad source said "the remaining captives would be released in a second phase", with negotiations for a broader settlement to follow. They added that "all factions are supportive" of the Egyptian and Qatari proposal. US President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!!" "The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be." Last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel "will agree to an agreement in which all the hostages are released at once and according to our conditions for ending the war". Earlier Monday, Netanyahu said he reviewed plans for the upcoming offensive in Gaza while meeting the head of the army and minister of defence and stressed that Hamas was under "extreme pressure". Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, visiting the Rafah border crossing with Gaza on Monday, said Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani was visiting "to consolidate our existing common efforts in order to apply maximum pressure on the two sides to reach a deal as soon as possible". Alluding to the dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people living in the Gaza Strip, where UN agencies and aid groups have warned of famine, Abdelatty stressed the urgency of reaching an agreement. "The current situation on the ground is beyond imagination," he said. Egypt said on Monday it was willing to join a potential international force deployed to Gaza, but only if backed by a UN Security Council resolution and accompanied by a "political horizon". On the ground, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 20 people across the territory on Monday, including six in the south. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it was "not aware of any casualties as a result of IDF fire" in the southern areas reported by the civil defence. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing swathes of the Palestinian territory mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency or the Israeli military. Eyewitnesses later told AFP that residential areas, including Zeitoun and al Sabra neighbourhoods, in Gaza City were under heavy fire, with tanks and heavy artillery targeting the area. Rights group Amnesty International meanwhile accused Israel of enacting a "deliberate policy" of starvation in Gaza and "systematically destroying the health, well-being and social fabric of Palestinian life". Israel, while heavily restricting aid allowed into Gaza, has repeatedly rejected claims of deliberate starvation. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed more than 62,004 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable. -AFP
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Australia cancels far-right Israeli politician's visa ahead of speaking tour
By Jake Evans , ABC Simcha Rothman, a member of the Religious Zionist Party. Photo: LENIN NOLLY / NurPhoto via AFP The Australian federal government has cancelled the visa of Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel's far right Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, just days before he was due to arrive in the country for a speaking event. Rothman, whose party is part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition, has previously advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and denied claims of starvation in the territory. In May Rothman told the UK's Channel 4 that Britain should let Palestinians "run away" from Gaza, and if it did not, "you are aiding and abetting a terrorist organisation using them as human shields". He added those refugees should not be accepted into Israel, however, because "they are our enemies". "And according to international law, treaties about refugees in a time of war, you don't let them conquer your country with refugees," he said. The Israeli politician was due to speak at events in Australia in a matter of days, including a Sydney event next Thursday hosted by the Australian Jewish Association. But his visa has been cancelled, and Rothman has been banned from travel to Australia for three years - a condition that is sometimes applied to a cancellation depending on the grounds it was cancelled on. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not accept people travelling to cause division . "Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division," Burke said. "If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here. "Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe." Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not welcome visitors seeking to create division. Photo: BAY ISMOYO / AFP In a post on social media, Rothman responded to the visa cancellation. "In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian Home Affairs Minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence," he wrote. "I was invited by the community in Australia due to anti-Semitic attacks on synagogues and a strong sense of alienation and hostility within the community. "The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant anti-Semitism that gives a boost to terrorism." Rothman's visa cancellation is the first major action against a member of Israel's Knesset since the federal government's announcement last week that it would recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations meeting. Israeli minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of two government members sanctioned by Australia , accused the federal government on social media of aiding Hamas. "The Australian government's active support for Hamas and terrorists, and the entry ban against MK Simcha Rothman, are a historical stain and a shame for the Australian government," Ben-Gvir said in a post in Hebrew, translated to English. "The cheers of joy by Israeli left-wing activists, Hamas collaborators, and Israel slanderers around the world, are a disgrace that will never be erased from their minds." In June, Australia joined several other nations - including New Zealand - to impose sanctions on Ben-Gvir and another minister, Bezalel Smotrich, accusing the men of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Smotrich is the leader of the Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, of which Rothman is a member. Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who was previously an ambassador to Israel, said he was not aware of Rothman during his time in Israel but that elected representatives should as a principle be granted entry to Australia. "I would say that elected representatives from democratic nations, liberal democracies with friendly relations with Australia, the presumption should always be they are granted a visa, they are entitled to visit Australia, even if we don't always agree with their views," Senator Sharma told Sky News. "I would like to know the basis on which Tony Burke has cancelled this visa because it seems as though it was issued. And what are the comments in particular that he finds so troubling that he think would incite social unrest here in Australia?" - ABC
