Australian politician slammed over Kanye praise
This is not a drill. This is not clickbait.
This is a sitting senator in the Australian parliament proudly announcing to his followers that his 'song of the week' is Kanye West's 'Heil Hitler.'
Yes, that song, the one featuring the voice of Adolf Hitler himself.
Let me say that again, because I never imagined I'd have to: An elected federal politician in 2025 has praised a song that glorifies history's greatest mass murderer.
Ralph Babet, who somehow believes this is just a matter of personal taste, has not only applauded a piece of Holocaust-themed propaganda, he's gone further.
In the same rant, he declared he'd rather spend time with neo-Nazis than with what he called 'mentally ill' and 'baby-killing' left-wing Australians.
Just when you think it can't get any worse, he adds that it was all 'tongue-in-cheek.' That he wouldn't really hang out with neo-Nazis because, well, they'd want to deport him for being brown.
And sure, he also claims he was just sharing a 'good song' by a 'great artist' and that attempts to label him a Nazi were 'f**ing bulls**t'.
Be that as it may, this isn't politics. This seems like moral vandalism with a Senate badge.
And the most terrifying part? This wasn't buried in some dark corner of the internet. It was posted on Instagram for all to see.
It was loud, proud, and unrepentant. This was a megaphone, not a mistake.
Let us not lose sight of what this moment represents. Adolf Hitler is not a vibe. He is not a meme.
His name does not belong on a Spotify playlist.
It belongs to the ashes of Auschwitz and Treblinka. It belongs to gas chambers, to mass graves, to tattooed arms and shattered families.
When you celebrate that name, when you call 'Heil Hitler' your favourite song, you are desecrating the memory of six million Jews and every Australian soldier who fought to defeat the regime that name represents.
And when you say you'd rather hang out with members of a neo-Nazi group than with your fellow Australians, you are not making a joke. You are not being edgy.
You are giving the ugliest people in this country a green light.
With songs like this being shared by a senator, you wonder whether the National Socialist Network even needs to promote themselves anymore.
There is a reason these words matter. Because when hate is amplified by power, it spreads faster. Louder. Deeper. The lines blur.
The fringe moves to the centre. And before long, what once shocked becomes routine.
I'm not interested in Senator Babet's denials of being a Nazi. That's irrelevant.
The issue is not his intent. The issue is the impact. His words will be quoted in extremist forums.
Clipped, reposted, celebrated. Kanye's video will become a calling card for white supremacists who now feel they have a friend in parliament.
And what does it say to Jewish Australians? That in 2025, they still have to hear something featuring the name 'Hitler' praised in the public square? That the horrors their grandparents survived are now a punchline for social media engagement?
Enough.
This is not just offensive. This is dangerous.
With these kind of acts, the National Socialist Network, which once had to operate on the fringes of society, doesn't need to market itself anymore.
He claims it was all 'tongue-in-cheek.' He says the neo-Nazis wouldn't want him anyway, because of his background. As if that somehow makes it better.
It doesn't.
You don't joke about Holocaust glorification. You don't wink at songs containing the symbols of mass extermination. You don't casually name-drop Hitler as part of your weekly vibe check.
If a schoolteacher praised this song, they'd be fired. If a corporate CEO did it, they'd be gone before lunch.
But a senator? Still seated. Still empowered.
And that tells us something terrifying: that the old lines—the moral boundaries that once held this country together—are being erased.
That we've grown numb to the rising temperature. This is not political correctness gone mad. This is not a matter of free speech.
That's why I'm calling on Clive Palmer to do what any decent leader would do: disendorse Ralph Babet and denounce this latest act, without spin, without delay.
Because if we allow a song called 'Heil Hitler' to be proudly promoted by someone sitting in our Senate, then we are not just failing the victims of the past—we are failing the future of this nation.
This is not a Jewish issue. This is not a left or right issue. This is an Australian issue.
Dr Dvir Abramovich is Chair of the Anti-Defamation Commission and the author of eight books
Senator Ralph Babet hits back
In a statement to news.com.au, Senator Babet insisted he was not a 'Nazi sympathiser', urging critics to 'read the lyrics of the song before they accuse me of being something I most certainly am not'.
'Kanye West's song, as is obvious to all who have listened to it, is not glorifying Nazis or Adolf Hitler,' he said, claiming the 'entire point of the song.. is that Hitler is bad'.
'The song begins with Kanye West confessing that he is filled with rage and anger. Worse, he is hopelessly addicted to drugs. Then he admits … 'I'm the villain.' It's in THAT context he sings 'Heil Hitler' … not to acknowledge Hitler's desire to kill Jews but in the sense that Hitler, in our culture, has come to mean the devil,' he claimed.
'And Kanye fears that he himself, filled with insatiable rage and his mind screwed up by drugs, has become the devil. Or, if you will, Hitler. He's saying I'm angry, I'm completely messed up in the head. I'm basically Hitler. The reaction to my admission that I liked the song demonstrates how many people in this country flick their mouth to outrage before engaging their brain into first gear.'
Mr Babet added that 'people should be free to listen to whatever they want'.
'I won't be apologising for liking Kanye's song because the song neither endorses Hitler nor promotes Nazis. Far from it. The song, as I have said, depicts Hitler and the Nazis as the personification of evil. That so many people ran to outraged over a song they have either not bothered to listen to or completely failed to understand says a great deal more about them than it says about me.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
40 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
SBS News in Filipino Thursday, 12 June 2025
Filipino-Australians commemorate 127th Independence Day. The future of the AUKUS three-way pact with Australia, the U-S and U-K could be in-doubt, with a new review by the Pentagon - the United States' defence agency. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has welcomed the new trade agreement between the U-S and China, saying he hopes Europe can achieve a similar outcome. 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino 📲 Catch up episodes and stories – Visit or stream on Spotify , Apple Podcasts , Youtube Podcasts , and SBS Audio app.

ABC News
40 minutes ago
- ABC News
Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout
The national anti-corruption body has cleared a settlement paid by the federal government to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins over corruption claims. Ms Higgins received a $2.4 million payout from the Commonwealth in 2022 as it sought to settle a compensation claim. The former staffer had alleged she was not adequately supported by her then-boss, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, after she made allegations she was raped at Parliament House. Multiple figures had called for the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to investigate the compensation payout, including former opposition leader Peter Dutton and Senator Reynolds. Mr Dutton had accused government figures of "duplicity" and "trickery" in organising the government settlement. "I think there are very serious, very serious allegations here. There's a multi-million-dollar payout," he said in mid-2023. Senator Reynolds had reportedly highlighted concerns about the speed of the mediation process and her exclusion from attending mediation. The NACC on Thursday said an "extensive preliminary investigation" found no evidence of corruption. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the statement read. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption body said it made multiple "notices to produce" to various departments and lawyers, and analysed thousands of documents relating to the settlement. It found the initial legal advice on a settlement was provided to the Morrison government before the 2022 election. Advice later obtained by the Albanese government was "not materially different" and there was no difference in the approach taken by either government towards pursuing a settlement. The NACC also took no issue with the mediation conference lasting less than a day, finding that was not unusual given the substantial work done in the lead-up to mediation and efforts to "[avoid] ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins". It also found the $2.4 million settlement amount was "less than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal advice".

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
NSW auditor-general Bola Oyetunji warns NSW failing to reduce harm from gaming machines
The NSW government is failing to reduce harm from the pervasive gaming machines that fill out the state's pubs and clubs, a troubling new report has found, with punters losing a massive pot of $8.4bn in just one year. Auditor-general Bola Oyetunji's Regulation of Gaming Machines report, released on Thursday morning, also reveals that the number of gaming machines across the state has increased in the past two years despite an explicit legislative push to reduce the number of machines. 'NSW had 87,749 gaming machines in operation in clubs and hotels at June 2024,' the report states. 'This means the total number of machines operating in clubs and hotels could increase by almost 8000 and remain within the current legislative cap. 'The total number of gaming machines operating in clubs and hotels has increased in each of the last two financial years by a total of 958 machines.' The push to reduce the number of machines comes from the passage of the Gaming Machines Act in 2001. At that time, there were more than 100,000 machines in operation. Despite the fall to about 88,000 machines today, NSW continues to far outstrip other jurisdictions in the number on offer to punters and the decline rate is slow at about 598 machines per year. 'At this rate, it will take more than 55 years for NSW to reach parity with the national average for gaming machines per 1000 adults,' the report states. In 2023-24, the machines generated $8.4bn in profit for pubs and clubs, with the patron losses 'disproportionately concentrated' in lower socio-economic areas in Greater Sydney. The Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority and the Department of Creative Industries, Tourism, Hospitality and Sport are responsible for regulating machines, and the auditor-general found the agencies were failing to effectively support 'harm minimisation' outcomes. 'The department's strategy for regulating gaming machines is not based on a clear understanding of current levels of gambling harm and it does not set any targets for reducing harm associated with gaming machines,' the report states. 'The department does not have benchmarks, targets or other performance measures in place to assess outcomes against key measures of harm minimisation. 'There have been no evaluations of its compliance programs to measure their impact on harm minimisation outcomes. 'As a result, the department does not know whether its regulatory strategy is effective in minimising gambling harm.' In one example, the auditor-general found regulators had not conducted 'frequent inspections' of regional venues. 'The majority of gaming machines and gaming machine losses are in the Greater Sydney region but there is also a high risk of gambling harm in some regional and rural areas,' the report states. The state has 12 inspectors, all of whom are based in Greater Sydney. Gambling harm levels were not falling, the report also stressed. 'For example, calls to the GambleAware Helpline increased by 8.5 per cent in 2023-24 and gaming machine losses have increased in each of the last three years,' the report states. 'The results of the 2024 NSW Gambling Survey did not indicate a reduction in the level of gambling harm in NSW.' The auditor-general recommends several changes to improve compliance and reduce harm, setting a June 2026 deadline for the government. For the department, the report recommends 'establishing baselines and targets' for gambling harm minimisation. It also calls for a review into the state's gaming machine forfeiture scheme to ensure it is achieving the legislative objective of reducing the number of machines in the state. The scheme requires the compulsory forfeiture of some gaming machine entitlements when they are transferred between venues. For the Liquor and Gaming Authority, the auditor-general recommends it begin periodic reviews of licence conditions for venues that host machines in the highest risk locations to make sure they align with gambling harm minimisation.