Thousands replace divisive Aussie product with NZ alternative: 'Should've changed earlier'
A major food delivery app is ditching a controversial Aussie product and switching to a New Zealand alternative. Box Divvy, which supplies close to 13,000 households with fresh produce, announced it will no longer be selling Tasmanian farmed salmon due to concerns about sustainability and transparency.
It's been a horror month for the local salmon industry, with over 1 million dying following a bacterial outbreak, and pictures showing dead salmon rotting inside pens and washing up on beaches. The RSPCA has also dropped its accreditation of Huon, one of the three major companies that operate around the island state, due to ethical concerns over 'inhumane' handling of live, sick and injured fish.
Box Divvy facilitates online sales of food co-ops across NSW and ACT, and markets itself to consumers who want to avoid the major supermarkets and support farmers. Co-founder Anton van den Berg told Yahoo News the company had been feeling 'uncomfortable' about the industry for years, and after suppliers visited salmon farms across the ditch it was impressed with their methods.
'The industry has been promising to improve its sustainability and impact on the environment but the reality has been it's not really happening,' he said.
Related: Is farmed salmon safe to eat?
Conservationists have long warned about the impact of the industry on Tasmania's waterways, and the potential for it to harm the state's clean, green food image. In Macquarie Harbour, on the west coast, the industry's impact on water quality has been directly linked to the near extinction of the native Maugean skate. Although Coles and Woolworths market salmon farmed in this area as 'sustainable'.
In Australia, wild salmon is not widely available in stores because all commercial species are native to the Northern Hemisphere.
Last week, Uni Melbourne aquaculture expert Professor Giovanni Turchini told Yahoo there are few environmental differences in the farming of salmon in Australia or New Zealand, both of which are locally available.
'They are fundamentally farmed in similar ways and fed with the same feed. But please note as usual, the environmental impact of any farm activity, including salmon, is fundamentally determined by how the farm is managed,' he said.
Box Divvy's supplier was impressed with the sustainability focus of the specific farms in New Zealand it visited. Another factor it considered is that Monterey Bay Aquarium's internationally renowned Seafood Watch program recommends the product.
Dropping Australian salmon, rather than slowly migrating away came with some risk, as the product had been its biggest seafood seller. But the decision proved to be immediately beneficial for its bottom line, indicating it was what its customers wanted.
'Our sales are up over 15 to 20 per cent even though the New Zealand product is slightly more expensive,' van den Berg said.
❌ Call for US tourist to 'leave' Australia after 'distressing' act with baby wombat
🐊 Aussie fisherman searches for three-metre crocodile after spear attack
🐣 Once common Aussie bird among 21 new species facing extinction
Now that the company has moved away from Australian grown salmon, it's unlikely to buy it again without major change. Another factor informing its decision is that the major farming operations are now owned by large foreign companies.
'With hindsight we probably should have changed earlier,' he said.
'How they run the industry in the end is up to them. That's how the market functions.
'But if consumers are voting with their feet, then I think they're going to reach a point where they're going to have to decide what they're going to prioritise. If they're simply going to chase the dollar, then they might find in the long run, they are not going to have a viable business.'
Industry peak body Salmon Tas declined to comment on Box Divvy's decision.
In a statement released on social media overnight, Huon's general manager of stakeholder relations said the disease outbreak was unprecedented.
'It's really important to understand that this mortality is not caused by farming practices, it is the result of a disease outbreak,' she said.
Addressing its loss of RSPCA accreditation, she said the incident was 'not reflective of the high standards' of which Huon usually operates.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon to review AUKUS submarine deal with Australia and Britain
The Pentagon is reviewing the AUKUS agreement on sharing nuclear-powered submarine technology with Australia and the United Kingdom — a decision immediately condemned by congressional Democrats and one that may cause angst among U.S. allies. 'The Department is reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous Administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda,' a Pentagon spokesperson wrote in a statement Wednesday. The spokesperson did not say who was involved in the effort, when it would conclude or why it was initiated — except to say that the Pentagon was concerned about the readiness of its forces and the U.S. defense industry. 'This review will ensure the initiative meets these common sense, America First criteria,' the statement continued. AUKUS countries update rules on sharing defense kit The Financial Times first reported news of the review. As part of the trilateral defense pact, Britain and Australia will build a nuclear-powered submarine, with the United States selling Virginia-class boats to Canberra in the interim. The agreement also includes a separate goal for the three countries to develop advanced technology together, such as quantum computing and hypersonic missiles. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth traveled to Singapore just over a week ago, where he met with his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, multiple times. In a major speech on the Trump administration's Asia policy, Hegseth didn't mention AUKUS, something Marles dismissed in an interview with Defense News later. 'We've spoken extensively about AUKUS — both of our countries, including Secretary Hegseth himself. We don't feel a need to keep reiterating it on every single occasion,' Marles said, arguing the program was 'on track.' In his March confirmation hearing, Pentagon head of policy Elbridge Colby expressed some hesitancy about AUKUS — in particular, America's difficulty increasing its own production of nuclear-powered submarines, which would conceivably make it harder to sell extra boats to Australia. 'If we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great. But if we can't, that becomes a very difficult problem because we don't want our servicemen and women to be in a weaker position,' Colby said. 'It should be the policy of the United States government to do everything we can to make this work,' Colby continued. Colby has also argued that Australia, which is increasing defense spending to around 2.4% of GDP by the mid-2030s, should raise its defense budget far faster. In a Pentagon readout after Hegseth and Marles met, the U.S. said it wanted that number to be 3.5% of GDP. In April, the head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Adm. Samuel Paparo, defended the initiative's value in testimony before the House and said the effort on nuclear submarines was 'meeting every milestone' operationally. 'AUKUS delivers something to INDOPACOM that is critical and could be a key advantage, and that is a Indian Ocean submarine base. This gives us faster response time to the South China Sea than in Hawaii, in Washington, in San Diego,' Paparo said. To help America build more submarines, Congress has spent billions of dollars in recent defense bills targeted at the effort. Australia, too, has pledged $3 billion in its own funding to help the U.S. build more of the boats, which Marles referenced in his interview with Defense News. 'It is a challenge, but I think it's a challenge we can meet,' he said. The Australian embassy didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for the British embassy, meanwhile, responded to the news with reassurance. 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the U.K. did last year.' Senate Democrats criticized the White House for casting doubt on the future of the AUKUS agreement. 'If this administration is serious about countering the threat from China — like it has said as recently as this morning — then it will work expeditiously with our partners in Australia and the U.K. to strengthen this agreement and ensure we are taking steps to further boost our submarine industrial base,' Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said in a statement. 'Anything less would play directly into China's hand.' Fellow Senate Armed Services Committee member Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said the news that Trump may abandon AUKUS 'will be met with cheers in Beijing' and further weaken America's standing in the world. 'At a moment when we face mounting threats from [China] and Russia, we should be encouraging our partners to raise their defense spending and partnering with them on the latest technologies — not doing the opposite,' she said. Military Times reporter Leo Shane III contributed to this story.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
High Growth Tech Stocks in Australia for June 2025
As the Australian market flirts with fresh intraday records, particularly with the ASX200 hovering around 8,650 points, investor sentiment appears cautiously optimistic despite recent volatility in the tech sector. In this environment, identifying high growth tech stocks requires a keen eye for companies that can navigate market fluctuations and capitalize on emerging opportunities, making them potential standouts amidst broader economic uncertainties. Name Revenue Growth Earnings Growth Growth Rating Gratifii 42.14% 113.99% ★★★★★★ Pro Medicus 22.19% 23.49% ★★★★★★ WiseTech Global 20.15% 25.52% ★★★★★★ Wrkr 57.01% 116.83% ★★★★★★ AVA Risk Group 29.15% 108.15% ★★★★★★ BlinkLab 65.54% 64.35% ★★★★★★ Echo IQ 61.50% 65.86% ★★★★★★ Immutep 70.42% 42.39% ★★★★★☆ Adveritas 52.34% 88.83% ★★★★★★ SiteMinder 19.81% 70.04% ★★★★★☆ Click here to see the full list of 47 stocks from our ASX High Growth Tech and AI Stocks screener. We'll examine a selection from our screener results. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Energy One Limited offers software solutions, outsourced operations, and advisory services for wholesale energy and environmental markets across Australasia and Europe, with a market cap of A$468.08 million. Operations: Energy One Limited generates revenue primarily from its energy software industry segment, amounting to A$55.81 million. The company operates within the wholesale energy, environmental, and carbon trading markets in Australasia and Europe. Energy One, recently added to the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Index, showcases robust growth dynamics within Australia's tech sector. With a remarkable 273.3% earnings increase over the past year, significantly outpacing the software industry's average of 5.6%, Energy One demonstrates strong market performance and potential for sustained growth. This is further underscored by its forecasted annual earnings growth of 42%, which eclipses the broader Australian market's expectation of 11.6%. However, it is crucial to note significant insider selling in recent months which may warrant cautious optimism among investors. Despite this, with a solid return on equity projected at 15.5% in three years and positive free cash flow status, Energy One stands as a compelling case of a company leveraging high-quality earnings and strategic market positioning to potentially shape future industry standards. Click here to discover the nuances of Energy One with our detailed analytical health report. Review our historical performance report to gain insights into Energy One's's past performance. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Infomedia Ltd is a technology company that develops and supplies electronic parts catalogues, service quoting software, and e-commerce solutions for the automotive industry globally, with a market cap of A$471.74 million. Operations: Infomedia generates revenue primarily through its publishing segment, specifically in periodicals, amounting to A$142.41 million. The company focuses on providing digital solutions for the automotive industry worldwide. Infomedia, navigating the competitive tech landscape in Australia, has demonstrated notable financial agility with a significant 61.3% earnings growth over the past year, outperforming the software industry average of 5.6%. This growth trajectory is supported by an aggressive R&D investment strategy, crucial for maintaining its edge in innovation and service delivery in automotive software solutions. The company's revenue is also on an upward curve at 6.9% annually, surpassing the broader Australian market's growth rate of 5.6%. Despite recent executive changes that saw Joanne Hawkins resign as Company Secretary and Jon Brett step down as Chair due to health reasons, Infomedia's robust forecasted annual earnings growth of 19.9% and a promising return on equity projection of 21.7% position it well for future expansion within this dynamic sector. Navigate through the intricacies of Infomedia with our comprehensive health report here. Evaluate Infomedia's historical performance by accessing our past performance report. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: SiteMinder Limited develops, markets, and sells online guest acquisition platforms and commerce solutions for accommodation providers globally, with a market cap of A$1.32 billion. Operations: The company's primary revenue stream comes from its software and programming segment, generating A$203.65 million. SiteMinder, a trailblazer in the Australian tech scene, is capitalizing on the global shift towards digital hospitality solutions. With an impressive 19.8% annual revenue growth and a projected earnings surge of 70% per year, the company is strategically investing in R&D to innovate further and stay ahead in the competitive market. This focus on development has led to significant advancements in their platform, enhancing user experience and efficiency for hotel operators worldwide. Despite not yet being profitable, SiteMinder's robust growth metrics and future profitability projections underscore its potential as a key player in transforming how hotels engage with technology. Dive into the specifics of SiteMinder here with our thorough health report. Understand SiteMinder's track record by examining our Past report. Click this link to deep-dive into the 47 companies within our ASX High Growth Tech and AI Stocks screener. Invested in any of these stocks? Simplify your portfolio management with Simply Wall St and stay ahead with our alerts for any critical updates on your stocks. Join a community of smart investors by using Simply Wall St. It's free and delivers expert-level analysis on worldwide markets. Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:EOL ASX:IFM and ASX:SDR. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Powerful' superannuation trick to save $150,000 in tax: 'Don't know until it's too late'
If you inherit your parents' superannuation fund, there's a good chance you'll lose a big chunk of it to the ATO in tax. In some cases, this tax can be up to 30 per cent of their hard-earned retirement savings, which can have a big impact on how much is left over for your family. This is a tax that most people don't understand, or even know exists, until it's too late. The rules are a little technical and complicated, but this tax is completely avoidable if you get the right strategies in place early. If you're a parent wanting to leave money to your family, or someone likely to receive an inheritance that doesn't want to donate more to the ATO unnecessarily, the super inheritance tax rules are something you should be aware of. $1 million superannuation retirement myth busted Major RBA interest rate call set to give homeowners $250 per month win $400 cash boost available for thousands of Aussies in new energy rebate In Australia, super inheritance payments don't automatically pass to your family tax-free. There's often a hidden tax that's applied when your super money is passed down to a 'non-dependent', which includes most adult children. Under the laws that apply to super death benefit payments, a 'dependent' includes your spouse or partner, children under the age of 18, or someone who is financially dependent on you. The good news here is that a dependent can inherit super tax-free. Non-dependents include adult children, parents, siblings, or anyone else who isn't financially dependent on you. This is where the super death benefits tax of up to 30 per cent kicks in, and when the ATO will come knocking for their slice of your gets a little complicated, but essentially your super fund is made up of different 'components' based on how the money has come into your super fund. These components are referred to as 'taxable (untaxed)', 'taxable (taxed)', and 'tax-free', and each different component is treated slightly differently when it comes to super death benefits tax: Taxable (untaxed) is taxed at 30 per cent when paid to a non-dependent Taxable (taxed) is taxed at a rate of 15 per cent when paid to a non-dependent Tax-free is able to be received tax free, even by non-dependents The biggest component of most people's super funds is the 'taxable (taxed)' element, because this component is made up of any compulsory employer super contributions, salary sacrifice or tax deductible contributions, and all of the growth and earnings on these funds inside your super fund. This means if you inherit a $1 million super benefit, you're likely to pay tax of around $150,000 - money that could have stayed in your family. The good news here is that this tax can be significantly reduced, or eliminated altogether with a simple strategy. It's called the 'withdrawal and recontribution' strategy, and it's one of the most powerful (and underrated) strategies in Australian financial planning. This strategy will give some tax benefits to your parents while they're drawing an income from their super, but also goes a long way to cutting out the super death benefits tax. This strategy works once your parent is over the age of 60, and has met a condition of release (like retirement) they can withdraw part of all of their super, completely tax-free. To put this strategy into place, you withdraw super money and then put the same money back into your super fund as an after tax, 'non-concessional' contribution. When the non-concessional contribution goes back into your super fund, no tax applies on the way into the super fund - but more importantly, the money goes into the 'tax free' component of your super. This means that when the money is eventually inherited, no super death benefits tax applies. In this case it's essentially a simple swap. You take taxable money out of super, and put tax-free money back in. The key here is doing this while your parents are still around and while they're eligible to be making super contributions. It's worth noting that the rules around withdrawing and contributing to your super fund, as well as how much you can put in and when are complicated. If you're thinking about putting this strategy into place, it's crucial you get some quality advice from a professional. Over the next two decades, Australia is going to see the biggest intergenerational wealth transfer in our history, with billions of dollars moving from one generation to the next. Most of this money will be transferred via superannuation and property assets. Without the right strategies in place, a bigger piece of your inheritance pie will be taken up with tax. And while this is important at some level, if you want to maximise the wealth that's actually retained within your family, you don't want the tax to be any bigger than it needs to be. If your parents have super and they're planning on passing this on to adult children or other non-dependents, don't wait until it's too late to understand this tax and how to manage it. If you don't, you could be looking at a six-figure hit to your inheritance, and worse - knowing it could have all been avoided through some conversations and smart planning. Ben Nash is a finance expert commentator, podcaster, financial adviser and founder of Pivot Wealth. Ben's new book, Virgin Millionaire; the step-by-step guide to your first million and beyond is out now on Amazon | Audiobook. If you want some help with your money and investing, you can book a call with Pivot Wealth here. Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it, and where appropriate, seek professional advice from a finance in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data