
It's crystal clear that an unregulated digital world carries far too many risks for the young
Digging a little deeper, Irish people were more sanguine than the average European about how digital rights and principles were applied, with almost half of those questioned in Ireland (49%) being satisfied compared to a European average of 42%. And yet, for those who care for and work for and with children, and have seen the harms that can occur, it is crystal clear that the digital world carries far too many risks for children and young people.
Regulating tech platforms to produce systems and material that do not harm children is an ongoing topic at both Irish government and regulator level, and at EU level too. Now, in this second half of July, some important advances have been made.
After long deliberations, the European Commission issued guidelines on Monday, July 14, to a wide number of tech platforms setting out how they are to apply EU legislation – particularly the Digital Services Act – to better protect children and young people from engaging with illegal and harmful content online.
While the Act was there already, these guidelines are more practical, more precise, with clearer emphasis on ensuring children's human rights and equality are respected. They emphasise that platforms must identify how risky their content is to children, and then take practical and workable steps so that children don't access it.
They will have to ensure that their recommender systems – which control things like the 'For You' function on apps – is stricter for young people on the company's site. They must have practical, effective age assurance systems to stop children from accessing inappropriate content.
In a nutshell, the privacy, safety and security of the child and their best interest is to be central to the platform's consideration.
Meanwhile back at home, the second and final section of Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code comes into effect today. This applies to a smaller number of companies but includes some of the largest social media companies, which have their European headquarters in Ireland.
Those companies have had obligations under the first part of the Online Safety Code since last November which meant that they were obliged to take steps to protect children and young people from content which could "impair their physical mental or moral development".
The second part of the code, going live today, puts specific obligations on companies to effectively prevent children from accessing adult-only content such as pornography and to have good parental control and flagging systems.
While we would want to see the regulators playing a much stronger role in enforcing uniform, high safety standards, rather than each platform setting its own rules, these requirements will mean that there will be better protections for children and young people using these online platforms/services.
At the end of the day, that is progress.
While tech companies, for the most part, will say that they welcome fair regulation, there is some restiveness. Coimisiún na Meán, the Irish regulator, has had to issue a formal notice to X – formerly Twitter - to say that it's not satisfied with the information X has submitted about the protection of young people on its platform.
And the same company is challenging the regulator about whether the entire code should apply to it at all.
A step forward
These regulatory changes come with few fireworks and clashing cymbals, but they need to be acknowledged. They are a step forward. They also need to be widely known.
They will have to be monitored and implemented by Coimisiún na Meán but the rest of us – caregivers, educators, child rights organisations and advocates - will also need to know what's there to highlight discrepancies, to complain about breaches, to require the tech platforms to be a bit more responsible for children's safety.
We will also have to continue to highlight that while technology is with us and brings great benefits to everyone including children and young people, tech platforms and those who are in the business of making sometimes extraordinary profits from selling their digital products and advertising to us, must do it in a way that is decent and fair.
We will need to be a lot less complacent than the recent survey shows we have been about the welfare and rights of our children.
And we will need to continue to insist that our government and our regulators continue to scrutinise the tech industry to ensure the safety and rights of children and young people in Ireland in this, our digital world.
Noeline Blackwell is the Online Safety Co-Ordinator with the Children's Rights Alliance
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
27 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Government has spent €640k on food and alcohol for dignitaries over past 10 years
Almost €640,000 has been spent on catering and hospitality at diplomatic receptions in Iveagh House over the last decade, new figures show. The Department of Foreign Affairs has confirmed it has spent a total of €638,333 on catering services at its main location in Dublin, Iveagh House. Within this, the department has spent €52,940 on alcohol for its reception events during the same period. This refers to the restocking of its house wine, kept in storage on site, and does not include other costs of alcohol if provided at receptions. The costs span between 2014 and 2024. Catering costs were at their highest in 2019, with the department spending €99,753 on events at Iveagh House. Of that, €11,714 was spent on restocking its house wines. The lowest spends were seen in 2021, where just €1,505 was spent on catering. This is likely due to covid-19 restrictions preventing significant gatherings. For three years — 2020, 2021 and 2022 — no funds were spent on restocking house wines by the department. Last year, the department spent €52,753 on catering for events, of which €2,845 was spent on restocking house wines. The figures were provided to Labour TD Conor Sheehan, through a parliamentary question. Events hosted by the Department of Foreign Affairs, whether at Iveagh House or at embassies abroad, typically are accompanied by catering services, with plenty of food and drink for diplomats or guests. At events abroad, guests at Irish embassies can expect to be served with wines and beer, with Guinness typically on offer. Tánaiste and foreign affairs minister Simon Harris said such hospitality events were a 'standard feature of international diplomatic practice and take place in a range of formats that vary in size and scope'. Mr Harris said hospitality events formed 'part of the overall strategy by which the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade seeks to engage with Ireland's international partners'. He added they 'advance Ireland's economic, political, foreign policy and other key national interests, promote Irish culture and increase Ireland's international influence generally'. 'Events hosted by the department at Iveagh House include receptions but also extend to business breakfasts, working lunches and official dinners for visiting high-level foreign dignitaries and/or senior officials, as well as conferences, seminars and networking opportunities,' Mr Harris said, in his response to Mr Sheehan. They seek to showcase the quality and variety of Irish produce wherever possible but are always delivered with value for the Irish taxpayer strongly in mind. Mr Sheehan said he did not dispute the need to use hospitality as part of representing Ireland on the world stage, but questioned the high spend on alcohol. 'We have to ask ourselves: is it really appropriate for alcohol to feature so heavily in that image?' Mr Sheehan said. 'Spending over €50,000 of taxpayers' money on alcohol sends the wrong message. At a time when Ireland is rightly promoting public health, responsible consumption, and a more inclusive image abroad, shouldn't we be reflecting those values in our diplomatic practices. 'This isn't about eliminating hospitality or penny-pinching — it's about asking whether a well-stocked drinks cabinet should still be a fixture of modern diplomacy.'


Agriland
41 minutes ago
- Agriland
Agri committee chair: More funding needed for 'Forgotten Farmers'
The chair of the Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture and Food Aindrias Moynihan has called for increased funding to support Long Established Young Farmers, commonly referred to as 'Forgotten Farmers'. The Fianna Fáil TD for Cork North-West said that the €5 million allocated in Budget 2025 to provide support to this group is 'only a first step in righting historic wrongs'. The so-called 'Forgotten Farmers' are individuals who were under 40 in 2015 and began farming before 2008. Due to the timing of their entry into agriculture, they were excluded from young farmer supports under the 2015 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), missing out on installation aid and other key supports available to their contemporaries. The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) said that the scheme for Forgotten Farmers will open for online applications until 5:30p.m on August 13, 2025. The department said that applicants can avail of a payment of up to €5,000 (depending on application numbers). Commenting on the scheme, Deputy Moynihan said: 'This is about justice and fairness. These farmers were unfairly excluded from critical supports through no fault of their own". "They've been overlooked for far too long, and this scheme is a long-overdue recognition of their contribution to Irish agriculture. 'While I welcome the scheme's introduction, it is only the beginning. Justice must be meaningful. These farmers deserve not just recognition, but adequate compensation. "I'm glad to see the scheme come to fruition, but now we must build on it to ensure those who were left behind finally receive what they are due," he said. Deputy Moynihan said these farmers 'met every requirement, except the cut-off date". "That was the only thing that disqualified them. Despite this, they've kept working hard without the supports others received, placing them at an unfair advantage. "While the scheme offers payments of up to €5,000 per farmer, it won't fully make up for the years of lost support," he added. Deputy Moynihan said that he will continue to raise this issue with the Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine Martin Heydon throughout the upcoming budget negotiations. "If we're going to right a wrong, we must ensure we get it right," he said.


Agriland
an hour ago
- Agriland
TD: 'Huge increases' in agri-food prices must be investigated
Social Democrats TD, Jennifer Whitmore has said the Competition and Consumer Protection Committee's (CCPC) review of the supermarket sector has detailed enormous price spikes in agri-food supply chains that must be investigated. The CCPC released its report today, which revealed an increase in agricultural output prices of 19.3% between 2024 and 2025 – at a time when input costs, in Ireland, actually decreased by 4.6% According to Deputy Whitmore, the "enormous" increase far outstrips price increases in the EU of just 2.6% during the same period. She said: "These huge increases in prices, which are multiples of price rises in the EU, mean these supply chains must now be investigated by the Agri-Food Regulator. 'Regrettably, the regulator is unable to do this work because it does not have the power to compel price and market information from relevant businesses." 'This is despite the fact that the regulator wrote to the Minister for Agriculture (Martin Heydon), nearly a year ago, seeking these powers," Deputy Whitmore added. The Social Democrats TD claimed that the board of the regulator wrote to minister again in March of this year, and expressed "concern and frustration" that additional powers had not yet been provided. She claimed the board are "still waiting", and it is hampering their ability to do their work in this area. Deputy Whitmore explained: "Elsewhere, the CCPC has found 'nothing to see here' in relation to suspected gouging by large supermarkets. This is the same finding as its 2023 report on the same issue. 'However, it has again made this finding without having all of the relevant data available to it – because not all of the large supermarket chains publish their Irish profits." 'It is wholly unsatisfactory for the consumer regulator to be denied information that is necessary for it to do its job – and it is outrageous that the government has not acted to force large supermarket chains to publish their profits," the TD added. According to Deputy Whitmore, the Tánaiste, Simon Harris recently said that supermarkets should publish their profits. The Social Democrats TD asked why the government has "enabled large supermarkets to keep their profits secret at a time when prices are soaring and families are really struggling to put food on the table".