DGCA rejects MP's claim on flight safety after Air India flight to Delhi gets diverted
Flight AI2455 landed safely in Chennai at 10.39 pm after circling the airport for 43 minutes to burn extra fuel and reduce the weight of the aircraft, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) said. During its initial approach, the Airbus A320 aircraft was told by Air Traffic Control to go around as a departing Gulf Air flight had reported debris on the runway and it was cleared to land after an inspection determined there were no such debris, DGCA said.
The DGCA statement came on the heels of a post on X by Congress leader K.C. Venugopal, one of five MPs, that the captain of the Air India flight pulled up to avoid 'another aircraft was reportedly on the same runway.'
'During engineering inspection no deficiency was observed. However, as a precautionary measure, the weather radar trans receiver was replaced with a serviceable one,' DGCA said.
Venugopal had described the journey, that started 43 minutes later than the scheduled departure of 7.15 pm, as 'harrowing', and said the passengers were saved by 'skill and luck'. 'Passenger safety cannot depend on luck. I urge @DGCAIndia and @MoCA_GoI to investigate this incident urgently, fix accountability, and ensure such lapses never happen again,' he appealed in his post.
Responding to the MP, Air India said the diversion was precautionary due to a suspected technical fault and poor weather en route to Delhi.
It clarified that no emergency was declared while the aircraft had circled Chennai.
'We would like to reiterate that the decision to divert to Chennai was taken in the best interest of the safety of our passengers and crew. Our crew are well trained to handle such situations, and in this case, they followed the protocols during the entire flight. All the affected passengers were accommodated on alternate flights to Delhi and the said aircraft has also resumed commercial operations. Air India deeply regrets any inconvenience caused by the diversion and consequent delay,' the airline said in a statement on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘No foreign backing, no arms' for Hezbollah, Lebanon tells Iran's security chief
Lebanon's president warns against foreign-backed armed groups as his cabinet approves a US-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah amid Iranian assurances of respect for sovereignty and renewed debate over the group's weapons. No group in Lebanon is permitted to bear arms or rely on foreign backing, its president told a visiting senior Iranian official on Wednesday after the cabinet approved the goals of a U.S.-backed roadmap to disarm the Iran-aligned Hezbollah group. During a meeting in Beirut with Ali Larijani, secretary of Iran's top security body, Joseph Aoun warned against foreign interference in Lebanon's internal affairs, saying the country was open to cooperation with Iran but only within the bounds of national sovereignty and mutual respect. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Larijani said the Islamic Republic supports Lebanon's sovereignty and does not interfere in its decision-making. 'Any decision taken by the Lebanese government in consultation with the resistance is respected by us,' he said after separate talks with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, whose Amal movement is an ally of Hezbollah. By 'resistance', Larijani was alluding to the Shi'ite Muslim militant Hezbollah, which was founded in 1982, grew into a 'state-within-a-state' force better armed than the Lebanese army and has repeatedly fought Israel over the decades. 'Iran didn't bring any plan to Lebanon, the U.S. did. Those intervening in Lebanese affairs are those dictating plans and deadlines', said Larijani. He said Lebanon should not 'mix its enemies with its friends - your enemy is Israel, your friend is the resistance'. 'I recommend to Lebanon to always appreciate the value of resistance." The US submitted a plan through President Donald Trump's envoy to the region, Tom Barrack, setting out the most detailed steps yet for disarming Hezbollah, which has rejected mounting calls to disarm since its devastating war with Israel last year. Hezbollah has rejected repeated calls to relinquish its weaponry although it was seriously weakened in the war, with Israel killing most of its leadership in airstrikes and bombings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It was the climax of a conflict that began in October 2023 when the group opened fire at Israeli positions along Lebanon's southern frontier in support of its Palestinian Islamist ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war. Aoun also said recent remarks by some Iranian officials had not been helpful, and reaffirmed that the Lebanese state and its armed forces were solely responsible for protecting all citizens. Last week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran supported any decision Hezbollah makes, adding that this was not the first attempt to strip the group of its weapons.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Mountbatten, Midnight & Ramadan: The Story Behind India & Pakistans Independence Dates
As India gets ready to be 79 years young on its Independence Day on August 15, it is a question that often pops up: why does neighbouring Pakistan celebrate the country's independence a day before, on August 14? The disparate dates, driven by historical contexts and logistics of the 1947 Partition, are representative of distinct narratives for the countries' birth. The Original Plan And Mountbatten's Speed Early in 1947, Lord Louis Mountbatten was appointed as the final Viceroy of India and was entrusted with the job of transferring power from British to Indian hands. The target date for the transfer of power was fixed as not later than June 1948. But due to growing communal violence and worsening law and order situation, Mountbatten was forced to bring the date forward to August 1947, pushing for a faster withdrawal of the British. The Indian Independence Act was adopted by the British Parliament on July 4, 1947, and it established that the authority of the British would cease on August 15, 1947. That very same day was the formal establishment of two new nations, India and Pakistan. It is interesting to note that the actual boundaries between the nations were not disclosed until August 17, a step taken in order to avoid instant upheaval. Mountbatten subsequently revealed that his selection of August 15 was partly sentimental, the second anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender on August 15, 1945. It represented the end of imperial wars to him. Pakistan's Change To August 14 Even though the Indian Independence Act had designated August 15 for both countries, and Pakistan's founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, had initially made use of this date, Pakistan officially changed its Independence Day to August 14 by 1948. This was due to practical as well as symbolic reasons. Practical Transfer Of Power The main practical justification for the change was the timing of the formal transfer of power ceremonies. Lord Mountbatten conducted the ceremony in Karachi for Pakistan on 14 August 1947 during the daytime. This enabled him to subsequently go on to New Delhi to conduct the midnight ceremony marking India's independence as 15 August began. Religious Significance Another important reason for Pakistan's selection was that August 14, 1947, coincided with the 27th day of Ramadan in the Islamic calendar. This is a holy night, and thus great religious significance attaches to Pakistan's selection of its independence date. Pakistan has ever since celebrated August 14 as its Independence Day, whereas India still marks August 15 as its independence day from colonial rule.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Par-Tapi-Narmada linking project has not been revived: Gujarat minister
Ahmedabad, Aug 13 (PTI) The Gujarat government on Wednesday said it deferred the implementation of the Par-Tapi-Narmada river linking project in 2022, and there has been no change in its stand since then. The clarification came days after tribal leader and Congress MLA Anant Patel threatened to launch a fresh agitation, claiming that a Detailed Project Report or DPR has been prepared by the Union government which indicated that the project was under fresh consideration. Following protests by tribals fearing displacement, Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel had in May 2022 announced that the project had been scrapped. Talking to reporters after a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Health Minister and government spokesperson Rushikesh Patel said the state government was firm on its stand. 'This project was proposed when Congress was in power at the Centre. It was then revived by then prime minister Manmohan Singh. A DPR was prepared and submitted by the concerned ministry in 2017. DPRs are never tabled in Parliament or legislative assemblies (as claimed by Congress)," Patel told reporters. 'This project was postponed in 2022 by our CM and we are firm on our stand since then. From 2022 till today, neither the state nor Centre has taken any decision to revive the project. After the last DPR, no new DPR has been prepared," he said. Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Paatil has already clarified on August 10 that neither the state nor the Centre had any plans to go ahead with the project, Patel said, alleging that some people are doing politics 'by inciting innocent tribal people." Congress MLA Anant Patel alleged a few days ago that the Ministry of Jal Shakti, in a reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha, admitted that the project's DPR has been completed and tabled in Parliament. Rushikesh Patel, however, said the Jalshakti ministry mentioned the 2017 DPR, and there was no new DPR. The Congress, meanwhile, is going to organise a mega-gathering of tribals at Dharampur in Valsad district on August 14 to protest against the project and seek further clarification from the government, said Valsad district Congress president Kishan Patel. State Congress president Amit Chavda will also attend the gathering, he said. The Par-Tapi-Narmada linking project proposed to transfer water from the water surplus regions of the Western Ghats to deficit regions of Saurashtra and Kutch. It involves the construction of seven reservoirs in north Maharashtra and south Gujarat. PTI PJT PD KRK view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 20:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
