logo
Trump calls for rare mid-decade census to exclude illegal migrants as redistricting battle heats up

Trump calls for rare mid-decade census to exclude illegal migrants as redistricting battle heats up

New York Post3 days ago
President Trump announced Thursday that he ordered a rare, mid-decade census to exclude illegal immigrants — as a gerrymandering war between Republicans and Democrats heats up.
'I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024,' Trump wrote on Truth Social.
'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS.'
Typically, the US Census Bureau 'collects data from all foreign-born who participate in its censuses and surveys, regardless of legal status.'
Censuses are critical for determining how the 435 seats in the House of Representatives are allocated. Every decade after a census is completed, states undergo a redistricting process in which they determine the boundaries of their congressional seats.
3 President Trump wants the Census Bureau to skip over illegal immigrants when doing the next national headcount.
Xinhua/Shutterstock
3 Vice President JD Vance is set to discuss redistricting during his trip to Indiana on Thursday.
REUTERS
The Constitution requires a census every 10 years, but there have been rare occasions, such as the 1970s, when mid-decade national headcounts were pursued. In most cases, such as the 1975 attempt, the effort for a mid-decade count was dropped.
Trump's order for a mid-decade census is likely to face legal challenges from Democrats. In the past, attempts at inter-decennial headcounts were authorized by Congress, not by presidents unilaterally.
During his first administration, Trump attempted to add a citizenship question to the census, but ultimately, his team withdrew it due to legal challenges.
The last census, conducted for 2020, undercounted significantly in many red states like Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas, while overcounting many blue states like Delaware, Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island.
Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon and Texas gained seats during the last census, while California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia lost seats.
That proved to be a slight net boost for Republicans heading into the redistricting process before the 2022 midterm elections.
But now both parties are revisiting the redistricting process — about half a decade earlier than usual — as Trump looks for ways to overcome historical headwinds and cling to the GOP's razor-thin House majority.
Last month, a redistricting arms race erupted after Texas Republicans began taking steps toward reconfiguring the state's congressional map to potentially squeeze out five more seats for the party. Trump endorsed that move.
3 Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has fought to push through a new congressional map to boost Republicans in the 2026 midterms.
AP
Texas Democrats foiled that plan — for now — by fleeing the state in the middle of a special session to block Republicans from passing the new map.
Blue state officials, including those in California, New York, and elsewhere, have since threatened to overhaul their congressional maps in response.
That's led Republicans to float the possibility of redistricting in additional places like Missouri and Indiana, where Vice President JD Vance is set to visit later in the day on Thursday.
Historically, the party that controls the White House takes a political beating during midterm elections.
Trump is desperately looking to avoid that fate, as it will dramatically diminish his power and all but guarantee an onslaught of Democratic investigations during his final two years in office.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash
UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash

A divisive UCSF oncologist has reportedly been reinstated at the FDA less than two weeks after he resigned amid criticism from President Donald Trump's allies. Multiple media outlets on Saturday cited Health and Human Services Department officials confirming the reinstatement of Dr. Vinay Prasad, which was first reported by Endpoints News, a biotech-focused news organization. Spokespeople for HHS, which oversees the Food and Drug Administration, did not immediately respond to inquiries from the Chronicle about the news. Prasad resigned as the FDA's chief medical and scientific officer in late July after right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer and former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., accused him of being too liberal. He also drew backlash for criticizing the FDA's 2023 approval of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a degenerative muscle disease that affects boys, who often do not survive past their 20s. In his role at the FDA overseeing vaccines, Prasad announced in May that the agency would limit updated COVID-19 vaccine access to seniors and people with certain people with certain medical conditions. Previously, the FDA had recommended annual COVID shots for all Americans over 6 months old. On social media, Loomer criticized Prasad's reinstatement, calling him a 'longtime progressive Marxist.' 'In the coming weeks, I will be ramping up my exposes (sic) of officials within HHS and FDA so the American people can see more of the pay for play rot themselves and how rabid Trump haters continue to be hired in the Trump administration,' she wrote. 'Should be a good time.'

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. - 'Acceptable' - "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. - 'endless concessions' - But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." - 'More stability... in the short term' - According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said. mkh-asy-pop/bds/gv/tc

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. - 'Acceptable' - "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. - 'endless concessions' - But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." - 'More stability... in the short term' - According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said. mkh-asy-pop/bds/gv/tc

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store