Malema slams National Dialogue, says people are tired of talking
Malema was speaking at the weekend on the sidelines of a rally in Seshego in Limpopo, where the red berets were celebrating the party's by-election win at ward 13.
His criticism of the first National Convention comes after repeated concerns about the hefty price tag to convene a series of talks in an attempt to address the country's challenges.
"It was disorganised, and it was just a government elite that was all over the place that did not serve any purpose. If anything, it was serving the egos of certain people and therefore it was a waste of money."
Malema said that the pulling out of legacy foundations and red flags raised by NGOs about the lack of preparedness in the build-up to the convention should have been heeded to.
"We don't support this convention, we don't support the National Dialogue. We know the demands of our people, we cannot spend R700 million of money we don't have. Our people don't need talks, they are tired of talking."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Call for people-driven National Dialogue
Former leaders and foundations must step back, say experts, urging citizens to take control of South Africa's National Dialogue. The National Dialogue is in the wrong hands and should not be led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, former president Thabo Mbeki or the legacy foundations, according to two experts. Rather, they should all back off because it's time for ordinary citizens to take control and be heard. It was time for the VIPs to take a back seat and let the people speak. Time for VIPs to take a back seat in National Dialogue Prof Lesiba Teffo and Dr Levy Ndou say the current stayaway by seven legacy foundations and leading political parties will open space for civil society and grassroots people to take over the process. They said the state should just provide resources, such as logistics and funding, and take a back seat to let people talk among themselves about the kind of South Africa they want. Teffo said the country is facing so many crises because leaders across the board have failed the country. ALSO READ: National Dialogue: Ramaphosa urges citizens to embrace differing views There is poverty, landlessness, immigration chaos, crime, unemployment and no economic growth. The policies they jointly approved in the pre-1994 talks are directly responsible for the current state of the country, he said. Teffo said the current immigration and land crises were due to the failure to address the issues at the multiparty constitutional talks at the Convention for a Democratic South Africa. Leaders came with no solution for SA's problems 'We are in this because of these leaders, some of them were presidents, but they came with no solution for the country's problems. 'Now they want to sit at the front table and tell us that they have a solution,' Teffo said. Politicians must open up the space for ordinary people and civil society to lead the process. ALSO READ: 'No different to an EFF rally or Joy of Jazz' – iPhupho L'ka Biko leader after National Dialogue performance According to Teffo, the National Dialogue should be facilitated by external individuals with no vested interest in the issue. Also, there were many local experts who could play a role and do a better job, so the process is not mired in the political battles of the elite, as it was turning out to be at the moment. The Thabo Mbeki, FW de Klerk, Desmond and Leah Tutu, Steve Biko, Albert Luthuli, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo foundations have pulled out of the dialogue, citing rushed processes and exclusion of citizens. Foundations and parties pulled out Parties within the government of national unity have also boycotted the dialogue, leaving Ramaphosa to handle the issue with his backers and a few civil society organisations. It is not clear where the Nelson Mandela and the Ahmed Kathrada Foundations stand on the issue. Neither have publicly stated whether they will participate or not in the dialogue, despite fellow struggle stalwarts' foundations staying clear of the process. ALSO READ: National Dialogue has big gaps in it Ndou said the National Dialogue is supposed to be people-driven, not top town. 'The people who have pulled out are the people who have had an opportunity to lead and we have heard them. But now it is time to hear ordinary citizens. 'It could be a blessing in disguise. Maybe the voice that is unknown could have been suppressed,' Ndou said. Dialogue should be people-driven 'I don't think that we need to be led by people that we know or for the National Dialogue to be blessed by people that are known.' Ndou said that as it was the first such forum that involved ordinary people, it could not be expected to be the best executed. 'Therefore, we should take advantage of the fact that the government has given it the go-ahead and assisted in providing logistics, but their role is just to listen and not to lead,' Ndou said. NOW READ: Pull the plug and start dialogue over
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Marikana resembles ANC's shameful legacy
The National Prosecuting Authority is set to reinstate charges against the police officers who were acquitted for the Marikana Massacre. Image: Leon Sadiki / Independent Newspapers Archives SATURDAY marked the 13th anniversary of the Marikana massacre, a commemoration that carries no significance for the ANC and its current President Cyril Ramaphosa. It's no wonder that South Africans no longer trust the party with the responsibility of leading this country. It cannot own up to the tragedy that befell the miners at the time they were demanding fair pay and improved working conditions, issues upon which the ANC's foundation was built. This year's commemoration came a day after Ramaphosa addressed the opening of the so-called National Dialogue in Pretoria on Friday. Among the important questions he said need to be answered is why were the majority of the black population still trapped in abject poverty. One assumes the president knows the answer to this question, but was just playing to the gallery. Perhaps the families of the slain Marikana miners would have all the answers to that question. Only if he had visited them and apologised for the massacre, as any caring government should have long done. They would have told him that their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands embarked on strike precisely because of the poverty they were subjected to despite the long hours underground. They would have also informed him that their children were robbed of their breadwinners by the very state that was supposed to protect them. They would have painted a picture of struggles they are confronted with to make ends meet in an economy that is characterised by the alarming cost of living. But these are the answers that Ramaphosa and his current ANC are not prepared for. They are the enablers of these struggles, directly or indirectly. That is why the Marikana massacre has become a taboo topic in the former liberation movement. Ramaphosa confirmed what many have long believed; that the ANC he leads is so detached from the realities confronting poor South Africans. If it was not, it would not waste millions from the public purse debating issues that all of us are aware of. Instead, that money could have been spent towards the education of the children of the miners the government killed in Marikana.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Will the National Dialogue really cost R400m?
Ramaphosa recently announced that he refused to accept the R700 million budget for the dialogue. By touting a lower figure than the amounts suggested by other stakeholders as the cost for the National Dialogue, President Cyril Ramaphosa is trying to outsmart the ANC stalwarts, particularly Thabo Mbeki. This is the view of former ANC and Cope MP Dennis Bloem, from the Activists and Citizens Forum. Claims of political manoeuvring He claims Ramaphosa is being misled by his rich business handlers to exclude others. Ramaphosa, who said the state would spend R400 million on the dialogues, wanted to steal the limelight from other leaders so that he appeared as a champion of the process, he said. The president announced recently he refused to accept the R700 million budget for the dialogue, saying he has dropped it to R400 million. ALSO READ: National Dialogue: Ramaphosa urges citizens to embrace differing views Motlanthe Foundation breaks ranks Six foundations pulled out, protesting that it should be led by citizens and opposed the rush of the process by the state. However, the Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation is not among the dialogue boycotters. In a statement, the foundation patron, Motlanthe, expressed support for the dialogue, saying he did not attend the first national convention at Unisa on Friday due to other commitments. Accuracy of figures questioned Political analyst Sandile Swana said the figures being bandied about could never be accurate unless a proper costing calculation is made, that takes into account the extent and enormity of the dialogue process. Swana suggested there should be a cost audit and that the costs should be shared between the state and private sector.
