logo
SQA interim chief says politics will not halt reform

SQA interim chief says politics will not halt reform

Officials say the formal changeover to Qualifications Scotland will happen in December 2025.
Despite this, the SQA's interim chief executive John Booth has said that work reforming the SQA is already underway. Furthermore, although he has confidence that MSPs will work together to pass the legislation, he said no political roadblocks will stop the organisation from changing.
'We are spending a lot of time rebuilding our relationships and trying to win back people's trust where we have lost that trust. The shift to the use of more digital technology to deliver qualifications and assessments will continue.
'The reform that we are doing of qualifications, looking at the balance of assessments, looking at the portfolio of qualifications and making sure that that is fit for purpose and giving young people and other learners the skills they need to thrive in the modern workplace.
'All of that work can and will continue. This is a transformation journey.
'The transformation activity will happen regardless of the passage of the bill.'
The bill's progress through Holyrood is looking like an increasingly rocky road, however.
As reported in The Herald, MSPs submitted more than 350 amendments to the bill, and there have been other reports that the Education Reform Programme Board has concerns about the cost of reform and the 'tight timeline' for delivering changes to the exam body.
The Education (Scotland) Bill promises a restructuring of some aspects of the current SQA, including making dedicated roles for teachers and students and siloing the organisation's awarding and accreditation duties.
Currently, the SQA serves two main functions: awarding qualifications such as National 5s Highers, vocational and more; and regulating all qualifications providers in Scotland.
What to do with these powers and where to house them has become a major point of contention.
SQA officials currently describe a system in which the organisation's awarding and accreditation functions are already separate and operate independently.
However, opposition MSPs and voices outside of Holyrood maintain that awarding and accreditation powers cannot be fully separate as long as they are under the same roof. A government-commissioned report explicitly argued that the two functions should be formally separated and carried out by separate bodies.
Three major amendments to the current bill, one lodged by the Scottish Conservatives, one by Scottish Labour, and one by the Liberal Democrats, sought to strip Qualifications Scotland of its accreditation powers and move them to another organisation.
It is unclear what will come of these, however. At a recent meeting of Holyrood's Education, Children and Young People's Committee, committee members who had lodged these amendments were met with resistance from Cabinet Secretary Jenny Gilruth who pointed to a series of challenges in splitting the SQA's powers.
The debate eventually circled around to discussions of finding a solution involving the "least worst" options and warnings from Ms Gilruth that spending too much time finding alternatives could delay reform.
While the details are debated in Holyrood, work is underway to reshape the SQA, how it operates and, more importantly for some officials, where it fits in the education system.
Many early critics of the education bill worried that it did not go far enough in forcing changes in the ways the SQA operates. For instance, the apparent total rollover of staff and retention of its key powers do not address the NASUWT's concerns about the SQA's 'over-emphasis on assessment and bureaucracy which is disempowering teachers.'
The bill does, however, leave room for the new qualifications body to self-police and to address its problematic relationships with teachers and students.
As unions, the government, education experts and SQA leadership have all warned, however, it is not possible to legislate a change of culture and much of the crucial work of reform will need to come from within the organisation.
In an exclusive interview with The Herald, Mr Booth said that reforming the country's qualifications body – whether it is called the SQA or Qualifications Scotland – cannot wait for legislation to be passed or for an official name change.
Mr Booth joined the SQA in 2021 as the director of communications. He said that one of the reasons he believes that the transformation work will continue with or without any changeover is because he feels there is a 'huge appetite for change' in the SQA and that transformation might have come sooner without the setbacks to relationships obstacles in delivery that were caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
'If Covid had never happened, I think a lot of the things I'm describing now in terms of transformation would be happening anyway. We are an awarding body that needs to always move with the times.
'There is a huge appetite for change in this organisation, and it frustrates me sometimes that I think there is a sense that somehow the SQA is acting against the interests of the education system.'
Recent scandals have illustrated this. Following the release of the 2024 exam results, the SQA was engulfed in a controversy over the declining pass rates in Higher History.
Beyond the results themselves, however, emails and parliamentary hearings revealed evidence that SQA officials had told a group of history teachers to recall a teacher survey critical of the SQA's culture and that the organisation was serving as an intermediary between an SQA employee and concerned teachers on behalf of the employee's union.
Since then, there has been a change in leadership but stakeholders are still waiting to see how the next few months will unfold. The latest exam season has already seen hiccups, with the SQA accidentally releasing incorrect files to prospective markers and a late change to the schedule sparking controversy among some subject teachers and students.
In December, however, there should be a new system in place and Mr Booth said that there will need to be a new way of working regardless of the name above the door.
'Seven months today, subject to Parliament passing the education bill, Qualifications Scotland comes into existence.
'Seven months sounds like a long time, but it is not. We have got to make sure that we move successfully and change from the SQA to Qualifications Scotland and everything that entails.
'But that does not stop on day one of the organisation. Trust is hard won but it is easily lost. So, you cannot stop for a minute in terms of continuing to ensure people have trust in you.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'
Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'

John Swinney has vowed to give 'absolutely every fibre of my being' to helping the SNP win a majority of seats in next May's Scottish elections – insisting that is necessary for a second vote on independence to be held. He dismissed as 'laughable' claims from critics that this strategy for getting a second referendum is 'punting' independence 'into the long grass'. However, while opinion polls have the SNP in the lead in the run-up to the crucial Holyrood vote, none has indicated Mr Swinney's party could win an overall majority. The Scottish Parliament's proportional representation system makes it harder for any single party to win more than half of the seats, with only former SNP leader Alex Salmond having achieved this in 2011. That victory led to the 2014 independence referendum, with Mr Swinney now relying on this 'precedent' as he seeks to secure a second vote on Scotland's place in the UK. His comments came as he indicated independence supporters are 'frustrated' that despite the 2016 and 2021 Holyrood elections both returning majorities of MSPs supporting independence, successive Westminster governments have refused to allow a second ballot to be held. Mr Swinney, speaking at an event organised by think tank Enlighten in Edinburgh on Tuesday, also noted that while Scots voted to stay in the UK in 2014 there were now 'various polls' with a majority for independence. Pressed on his strategy of using a Holyrood majority to achieve another referendum, the Scottish First Minister insisted that the idea this was 'punting it into the long grass is laughable for me'. Instead, he insisted independence as an 'urgent necessity', claiming decisions by the Labour Government at Westminster will make it harder for him to achieve his 'mission' of eradicating child poverty. However, he insisted he has 'got to be realistic' about how a second referendum could be brought about. Mr Swinney said: 'An independent Scotland will only come about if it carries domestic and international legitimacy, ie the rules of how it becomes independent are accepted by all parties.' He stressed this had been the case in 2014, as he added: 'If we want to advance on this issue there has got to be a means of breaking the log jam that we are currently in. 'Two successive elections, the majority of members of the Scottish Parliament supporting holding a referendum on independence and the Westminster government just folds its arms and says 'no'.' The First Minister noted that 'in 2011, when the SNP won a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament, that led to a referendum in 2014'. And he added: 'If we want independence to happen we have got to rely on that precedent.' He rejected suggestions from Enlighten director Chris Deerin that returning a majority of SNP MSPs to Holyrood next May was a 'bold ambition', as he called on independence supporters to make the issue a 'priority' in that election. 'Then we can turn this into reality,' Mr Swinney said. Polls currently indicate the SNP could still be the largest party at Holyrood after the next election, but have so far failed to show Mr Swinney's party winning more than half the 129 seats. However, Mr Swinney recalled that in the run-up to 2011 election, his party was 'miles behind' in the opinion polls but 'then we won a majority four months later'. And he said: 'Today, nine months out from the election, I am ahead in the opinion polls. 'When I took over as SNP leader we were behind. I have brought the SNP back into the lead, a commanding lead in the opinion polls, and on the opinion polls today, we still would be the largest party by a country mile in the Scottish Parliament.' However he insisted: 'That's not good enough for me. 'I have set out what we have got to do to clear a pathway to win Scottish independence and I am going to give absolutely every fibre of my being from now until May 7 next year to make sure it happens.'

Banning Kate Forbes was just 'idiotic', insists venue founder, as he blames 'cancel culture way of thinking'
Banning Kate Forbes was just 'idiotic', insists venue founder, as he blames 'cancel culture way of thinking'

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Banning Kate Forbes was just 'idiotic', insists venue founder, as he blames 'cancel culture way of thinking'

Bosses at the Edinburgh Fringe venue that tried to ban Kate Forbes have been branded 'idiotic' as they face demands to explain themselves. Creative Scotland, which awarded Summerhall Arts £608,000 of public funding in January, said it was 'in dialogue' with the venue after the high-profile censorship row. It came as the founder of the arts centre denounced the episode and said Summerhall had been 'stupid'. The Deputy First Minister, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP 's gender self-ID plans, was effectively banned after she took part in a political discussion at the venue. After performers reported being 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in MSP, the arts charity apologised and said the booking was an 'oversight' which would not happen again. Bosses even set up a 'safe room' for artists and staff when Ms Forbes was in the building. 'We have work to do to repair the damage from this oversight,' Summerhall Arts said. 'At this stage, we can guarantee that we will be writing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again.' But the organisation climbed down after the Scottish Tories accused it of breaking the law by stifling free speech and called for its funding to be clawed back. Chief executive Sam Gough went on to say: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages.' The venue's founder Robert McDowell, who is no longer involved with the former Edinburgh University vet school building, has blamed a 'cancel culture way of thinking' for the row. He told the Herald: 'I've not been able to find out who issued that apology. It was nonsense. 'What are the arts if they don't allow freedom of speech? If somebody has an objection to something, you don't ban it. 'You turn up and ask a question. It's an opportunity to say what you think. Whoever compiled that statement was just addressing their friends. It's part of a cancel culture way of thinking.' He added: 'The idea you could ever construct a way of doing this is idiotic. It would be impossible. There's no way you could second guess artists or shows. 'I could see how the apology happened, but it was silly and stupid. It's what happens when people rush to judgment.' Mr McDowell said he had 'sat in' on Kate Forbes' session, adding: 'I think she is a lovely person. 'It's important for freedom of speech to question people in public, and to have discussion and debates in public.' Creative Scotland said: 'We are in dialogue with Summerhall Arts to understand recent events and the steps they are taking to address concerns that have been raised. 'There's been a verbal meeting and that may lead to a more formalised meeting.' John Swinney last night joined the criticism of Summerhall Arts. The First Minister said: 'There's no reason Kate Forbes shouldn't be able to speak at any venue in Scotland.' Asked about a taxpayer funded facility banning her, he said: 'I don't think that's appropriate.'

Schoolchildren in occupied Ukraine forced to take ‘Russian patriotism' lessons
Schoolchildren in occupied Ukraine forced to take ‘Russian patriotism' lessons

Telegraph

time43 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Schoolchildren in occupied Ukraine forced to take ‘Russian patriotism' lessons

Schoolchildren in occupied Ukraine will be forced to attend 'Russian patriotism' lessons from this autumn, the Kremlin announced on Tuesday. At least 100 nurseries across Russia and the occupied territories in Ukraine will start pilots of classes known as Conversations about Important Things, which were introduced in high schools in 2022 after the full-scale invasion. Russia's education ministry said children aged three to seven would take the classes in 19 Russian regions as well as the partially occupied Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia in September. Pupils will be taught about 'the importance of family and friendship', 'development of moral qualities', 'respect for Russian culture and love for the motherland' and Kremlin-friendly history, according to Vedomosti, a Russian business daily. 'It is at pre-school age that a strong foundation of a child's personality, his values and attitude to the world, is laid,' Sergey Kravtsov, the Russian education minister, told Vedomosti, adding that the classes would take an 'understandable and entertaining form'. Dressed in military uniforms At some of the first lessons at a pilot school in the Vologda region of north-western Russia, teachers dressed children in military uniforms, handed them toy guns, pretended to put bandages on them and made them listen to patriotic music, according to a report by Meduza, an independent media outlet . They also learned about Russia's Second World War heroes, military professions, war memorials and medals. Every Monday before classes, the nursery children involved in the first pilot gathered to raise the Russian flag and sing the national anthem, according to Novaya Gazeta. In October last year, Vladimir Putin urged educators to include nursery-age children in the classes to instil patriotism and 'core values' in young people. The Russian president said then: 'At the earliest age, of course, we must lay down certain basic things for the child… we need to talk to specialists, to child psychologists, we need to understand what a child is like at three, four, five years old. 'One might say at the age of five, 'I want to be a soldier', and take a toy gun and play. Others might behave differently.' Fate unknown Almenda, a Ukrainian NGO, has claimed 16 per cent of school-age children in Ukraine are currently studying in the temporarily occupied territories. The fate of many of these children is unknown, with the Institute for the Study of War estimating that almost 19,500 have been deported or forcibly removed from their homes. Kyiv has said this constitutes a war crime and genocide under a definition by the United Nations. Last week, Melania Trump wrote a private letter to Putin telling him 'it is time' to act to protect children. Although the note does not mention Ukraine or the abduction of Ukrainian children, she told the Russian president that he could 'single-handedly restore' their laughter 'with a stroke of the pen today'. On Monday, Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, gave Donald Trump a letter for Mrs Trump from his own wife, Olena Zelenska, which he says was to thank her for raising awareness about the abduction of Ukrainian children.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store