logo
Ohio Republicans introduce 'Natural Family Month' bill, excluding LGBTQ families

Ohio Republicans introduce 'Natural Family Month' bill, excluding LGBTQ families

Yahoo17-05-2025
More than two dozen Ohio lawmakers are supporting a bill that would designate the weeks between Mother's Day and Father's Day 'Natural Family Month.'
Though the bill, introduced by Republican state Reps. Josh Williams and Beth Lear, doesn't define 'natural family' in its text, critics say it is intended to exclude LGBTQ families and promote marriage and childrearing between heterosexual, monogamous couples only.
When asked whether 'Natural Family Month' will also recognize gay couples and parents with adopted children, Williams said in an emailed statement to NBC News that 'the purpose of the month is to promote natural families—meaning a man, a woman, and their children—as a way to encourage higher birth rates.'
He added, 'This is not about discriminating against other family structures, but about supporting the one most directly tied to the creation and raising of children.'
Lear did not return a request for comment.
After introducing the bill earlier this week, Williams and Lear said in joint statements that the initiative is intended to promote child rearing.
'At a time when marriage is trending downward and young couples are often choosing to remain childless, it's important for the State of Ohio to make a statement that marriage and families are the cornerstone of civil society, and absolutely imperative if we want to maintain a healthy and stable Republic,' Lear said.
As of Friday, the bill had 26 additional Republican co-sponsors.
Dwayne Steward, the director of statewide LGBTQ advocacy group Equality Ohio, told a local queer news site that the bill is both bad policy and a 'calculated act of strategic erasure.'
'It not only invalidates the existence of single parents and countless other caregivers, but it takes direct aim at LGBTQ+ families across our state,' Steward told the Buckeye Flame. 'The so-called 'Natural Family Foundation,' the group pushing this legislation, has made their ideology clear: if you're not a heterosexual, monogamous couple with children, you don't count as a family at all.'
Steward, who did not immediately return NBC News' request for comment, added, 'As an adoptive parent, myself, I feel this erasure personally. This bill is not just offensive; it's dangerous.'
Several local news websites, including the Buckeye Flame, reported that the Natural Family Foundation, a conservative advocacy group that is against same-sex marriage and promotes families with a 'clear male leader,' was involved in lobbying for the bill. The foundation did not immediately return a request for comment.
Last year, Ohio considered eight bills targeting LGBTQ people, according to a tally by the American Civil Liberties Union. Two of those — a provision that requires school personnel to notify parents of 'any request by a student to identify as a gender that does not align with the student's' birth sex, and a measure that prohibits certain transition-related medical care for minors — became law.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement
Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement

President Trump's Republican allies are putting pressure on him not to entangle the U.S. militarily in Ukraine after he signaled an openness to helping craft security guarantees for the embattled nation in its war against Russian aggression. Trump and the White House on Tuesday insisted the U.S. would not put boots on the ground in Ukraine, but floated the idea of providing air support using U.S. pilots and warplanes. That came after a meeting on Monday at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven other European leaders, during which they discussed security guarantees for Kyiv in lieu of allowing it into NATO, a red line for Russian President Vladimir Putin. While the summit resulted in few specifics about what those security guarantees would entail, at one point a reporter asked Trump if the U.S. would send troops to Ukraine. Trump didn't answer directly but said the U.S. would 'help them out.' That, combined with special envoy Steve Witkoff saying the U.S. could participate in ' Article 5-like protections ' for Ukraine, has set off alarm bells for some of Trump's 'America First' supporters. Top allies are warning him not to go too far, citing a key MAGA tenet of not getting involved in any lengthy conflicts or 'forever wars.' 'I'd have to look at what the responsibilities would be. We don't want another war,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday. 'People in this country, they can't fathom that after 20 years of war over in the Middle East and then getting into another. I know the president's not into that, but we don't want anything to happen in terms of having to fight and lose more lives.' When asked how big of an ask that would be to constituents and voters, the Alabama senator — a top MAGA supporter — was blunt. 'It would be an impossible sell,' said Tuberville, who is currently running to become governor of his home state. 'The American people aren't going to go for it, I'm just going to tell you that right now. The people in Alabama would be definitely against it. … I know President Trump's trying to do the right thing, but people in Europe have to take responsibility for this.' 'President Trump enjoys taking over and trying to help, but he knows he can only go so far with all this. … [He's] trying to do what's right for us,' Tuberville added. 'But there's no appetite for war or us getting involved with this anyway with troops on the ground that would actually fight. We're talking about security, which might be different.' Pressed during a phone interview with 'Fox & Friends' Tuesday morning about any 'assurances' he could make that there will not be any U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of any deal, Trump sought to quell any eruption by supporters. 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president,' he said, suggesting that France, Germany, and Great Britain might do so instead. Trump's latest remarks came a day after marathon meetings with the European cohort, during which Zelensky specifically referenced progress towards a deal on security guarantees. They are among the most prominent Ukrainian demands for any deal that may include ceding territory to the Russians. Zelensky also noted that as part of a potential security guarantee agreement, Kyiv would purchase $90 billion in American weapons, including sophisticated systems for air-defense support and war planes. The U.S. would buy Ukrainian drones in return. Some of Trump's top supporters almost immediately warned him against getting involved militarily. 'Right now, it's all predicated on American cash, American arms, and now they're going to need American involvement,' former White House strategist and conservative firebrand Steve Bannon said on his radio show Monday, adding that European leaders and Senate GOP hawks cannot be trusted on this issue. Bannon said the group is 'trying to get America sucked into a deep involvement' in the region. 'These are tripwires,' Bannon said. 'This is where things go from regional conflicts to world wars.' The battle also marks the latest one where Trump has had to straddle the concerns of key MAGA figures. He has had to manage similar situations in Iran after the U.S. struck against their nuclear capabilities and backed Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist and editor at Human Events, also pressed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt about the questions about the security guarantees being discussed. 'The president understands the security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace,' Leavitt said at Tuesday's press briefing. 'He has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe, and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.' The Ukrainians are seeking security guarantees akin to those afforded to NATO nations via Article 5, which Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the Middle East and Ukraine, floated over the weekend. That would potentially draw the U.S. into a larger conflict if Moscow attacked the peacekeeping effort. Russia has vociferously objected to security guarantees even though Trump indicated recently that Putin would be open to the idea of a peacekeeping force by NATO nations in eastern Ukraine. 'We reiterate our longstanding position of unequivocally rejecting any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO military contingents in Ukraine, as this risks uncontrollable escalation with unpredictable consequences,' said Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry. Trump and European leaders are expected to continue discussion in the coming days in a bid to keep up the momentum. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to head up a U.S.-European-Ukrainian commission to draft a proposal of potential security guarantees as part of a final accord, and Trump is seeking a meeting with both Putin and Zelensky.

Trump's ‘Chinese Model' Is Making the US a Corporate Stakeholder
Trump's ‘Chinese Model' Is Making the US a Corporate Stakeholder

Bloomberg

time26 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's ‘Chinese Model' Is Making the US a Corporate Stakeholder

Donald Trump may be the leader of the Republican Party, but when it comes to the free market—the very economic foundation of the modern GOP—he appears to be headed in the opposite direction of long-held doctrine. Trump is now directly intervening in corporate matters, ostensibly to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. This includes demanding a government cut of AI chip sales to China from Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. He's also said to be in talks to grab a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker Intel. And last month, the Pentagon snapped up a $400 million preferred equity stake in a rare earth mining company.

THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE: Sen. Eric Schmitt Breaks Down The Necessity of Beating the Left's Lawfare
THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE: Sen. Eric Schmitt Breaks Down The Necessity of Beating the Left's Lawfare

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE: Sen. Eric Schmitt Breaks Down The Necessity of Beating the Left's Lawfare

Senator Eric Schmitt, Republican of Missouri and author of the brand new book The Last Line of Defense: How to Beat the Left in Court (out today), joined The Guy Benson Show today to discuss why it is both good and necessary for the right to challenge the left's overreach in court. He explained why their continued grasp for control must be reined in and why true leadership requires people to stand up and fight. Schmitt also said indictments are the next step in the Russiagate collusion scandal. Finally, Sen. Schmitt stressed that Republicans must have the 'courage' to redistrict Democrats who, in his words, 'set the rules' with their gerrymandering efforts. Listen to the full interview below! Listen to the full interview below: Listen to the full podcast below:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store