logo
LHC larger bench to hear MPO case on 7th

LHC larger bench to hear MPO case on 7th

Express Tribune29-03-2025
The Lahore High Court (LHC) chief justice, Aalia Neelum, has formed a larger bench to hear a plea filed by the government against suspension of a detention law, the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance, 1960.
A day earlier, on Thursday, CJ Aalia Neelum reserved her order while hearing an application for an early hearing of a petition filed against the LHC's last year's order. The CJ unveiled her order on Friday, announcing formation of a larger bench to hear the government appeal.
The LHC on Nov 1, 2024 temporarily restrained the deputy commissioners (DCs) in Punjab from issuing further detention orders under section 3 of the MPO Ordinance 1960.
Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq passed the order while hearing a petition filed by a PTI leader At the last hearing of the case, PTI's counsel Azhar Siddique had raised objection to the bench comprising Justice Neelum, contending that the matter was still pending in the court of Justice Rafiq.
He argued that the bench comprising the CJ did not have the jurisdiction to hear this case. He said Justice Rafiq had already examined the case in great detail.
"Justice Amjad Rafiq had issued a stay order in accordance with the law," he said. The CJ remarked that Justice Rafiq was currently hearing cases at the LHC's Multan Registry.
Siddique argued that the bench of Justice Amjad Rafiq was in Lahore on March 21 and the case cannot be listed before this bench. The CJ, however, rejected his contention, asking him to "keep quiet". She later reserved her order in the case amid protest by the counsel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bahria Town auction: SC bench declines to hear case
Bahria Town auction: SC bench declines to hear case

Business Recorder

time17 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Bahria Town auction: SC bench declines to hear case

ISLAMABAD: A bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, on Wednesday, declined to hear the case of auction of Bahria Town's properties. The chief justice sent the case back to a bench, which had previously heard the case. 'It would be appropriated for the old bench to hear this case,' CJP Afridi said. Farooq H Naek, representing Bahria Town, stated he has no objection if the matter is sent back to the old bench. He; however, told that detailed verdict of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has been announced, adding that he would submit additional objections on the detailed IHC verdict related to business tycoon Malik Riaz, who established the Bahria Town empire in Pakistan. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan and comprising Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb on August 8, 2025, had turned down M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited plea to halt the auction of its properties, but issued notices to the respondents. Justice Naeem questioned what the National Accountability Ordinance says about plea bargain. He noted that if an accused challenges the plea bargain process then it becomes inoperative, adding in the instant matter the accused has challenged the plea bargain, and the applications against them are pending, but the properties are being auctioned. Justice Naeem observed that instead of main petition only the Civil Miscellaneous Applications (CMAs) were fixed for hearing today (Friday), adding how come they can hear the CMAs without hearing the main petition. Naek told that he came to know about this case late at night, adding still the case is not issued on the cause list. The counsel stated thanks God that he was in Islamabad; therefore, appearing before the bench. The case was adjourned for an indefinite time period. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PTI leaders condemn amendments in anti-terrorism law
PTI leaders condemn amendments in anti-terrorism law

Business Recorder

time17 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

PTI leaders condemn amendments in anti-terrorism law

ISLAMABAD: In a fiery backlash, the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Wednesday condemned the amendment to Section 4 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, terming it an outright assault on constitutional freedoms and a flagrant violation of Article 10 – the cornerstone of fundamental rights. Speaking at a press conference following a turbulent parliamentary committee meeting, PTI leaders described the controversial amendment as nothing short of a state-sanctioned instrument for unchecked tyranny. The legislation now permits detention without trial for three months, extendable by a further quarter-year. PTI MNA Latif Khosa criticised the amendment, saying it stripes away the previous safeguard requiring high court approval for custody extensions, instead bestowing unchecked powers upon local police chiefs. 'This is a cynical political weapon, designed to suppress opposition dissent.' He reiterated that detainees must be presented before magistrates within 24 hours – a constitutional guarantee now flagrantly ignored under the new law's sweeping 'suspicious' catch-all criteria, effectively legalising indefinite detention without accountability. 'The government's actions are unforgivable. This regime is brazenly weaponising the law to silence political opposition through brute force.' Another PTI MNA, and Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Junaid Akbar, joined the condemnation, exposing the legislation as a thinly veiled attempt to muzzle political campaigning. He revealed chilling 'state tactics' of sedition charges and terror-tagging of political activities, signalling an unprecedented crackdown in recent memory. Akbar contrasted the incumbent government's arrogance with his party's initial struggles in governance, asserting that those responsible for these draconian laws will ultimately be held to account. He also criticised the establishment's opaque record, questioning the outcomes of over 21 operations. He asked who exerted influence over the Taliban's movements, particularly in relation to Punjab. However, he dismissed allegations linking PTI with the Taliban, affirming the party's unequivocal stance against terrorism. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Convicts can't travel abroad, PHC tells Shibli
Convicts can't travel abroad, PHC tells Shibli

Express Tribune

time21 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Convicts can't travel abroad, PHC tells Shibli

The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday dismissed a petition by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Senator Shibli Faraz against the placement of his name on the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL), ruling that a convicted person cannot be permitted to travel abroad. A two-member bench, comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal, heard the matter. Faraz's counsel, Bashir Khan Wazir, informed the court that while his client's name had been removed from the Exit Control List (ECL), it was subsequently placed on the PNIL. He acknowledged that the petition had been filed before his client's conviction, which had altered the circumstances. Justice Syed Arshad Ali observed that Faraz now had only two legal options, to serve his sentence in jail or seek bail from the court. "We cannot turn a blind eye. How can we allow a convicted person to travel abroad?" the judge remarked. The government counsel submitted a report confirming that Faraz's name had been moved from the ECL to the PNIL. The defense stated that Faraz intended to surrender before the court and requested disposal of the petition. The bench accepted the request and closed the case. Bail extensions for PTI leaders In separate proceedings, the PHC extended the protective bail of PTI Peshawar Region President and MNA Atif Khan, MNA Shahid Khattak, and Senator Mishaal Azam until September 2, barring authorities from arresting them in any registered case. The court also directed the federal government to provide complete details of all cases filed against them. Hearing petitions filed by the three leaders and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Minister Meena Khan, the same bench was told by their counsel that numerous cases had been lodged against them without providing specifics. The Assistant Attorney General admitted the government's report was still pending and assured the court it would be submitted at the next hearing. In Meena Khan's case, the Assistant Deputy Attorney General revealed that three cases were registered against him in Islamabad, with no pending inquiries at NAB or FIA. The court disposed of his petition, advising him to approach the relevant trial courts. Azam Swati moves contempt petition Meanwhile, PTI Senator Azam Swati once again faced a travel ban when stopped at Peshawar Airport. He filed a contempt of court petition through Advocate Ali Azeem against the federal government, FIA, and other authorities, alleging violation of court orders that had directed the removal of his name from all stop-lists. Swati contended that despite the PHC's recent acceptance of his plea to remove his name from the ECL and Passport Control List (PCL), it was added to the PNIL in defiance of the

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store