Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material
In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports.
The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab video-sharing site.
'When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services,' eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement.
'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.'
Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material. Meta - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - says it prohibits graphic videos.
The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia.
The report on their responses so far found a 'range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services'.
Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms.
It said platforms were also not using 'hash-matching' technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence.
The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years.
'In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff,' Inman Grant said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain
Apple is suing another fruit-named company — Apple Cinemas — in an attempt to get the small theater company to change its name. Apple Cinemas has reportedly signed a lease to take over a historic cinema and a retail space in San Francisco that had previously been operated by AMC Theaters and CGV Cinemas. The purchase is part of Apple Cinema's overall goal of expanding to 100 locations across the country over the next 10 years. Apple entered a lawsuit on Friday in Massachusetts alleging that the theater company is infringing on its trademark and using its brand to trick consumers into thinking they're attending a cinema operated by the tech company. Apple does have a cinema division — Apple Studios — which it began in 2019, but Apple has been offering movie-adjacent entertainment since 1999 via its QuickTime Movie Trailers. The tech company also held cinema events, including some in connection with the Tribeca Film Festival. The cinema company began its operations in 2013 when it opened its first theater in Massachusetts. The company says its name is from it's initial plans to open its first theater in the Apple Valley Mall in New England, according to the Hollywood Reporter. The company primarily operated in the northeast until it laid out its plans to expand to San Francisco and other parts of the country in 2024. Sand Media — Apple Cinema's parent company — filed an application for the name "Apple Cinematic Experience" but was denied. A trademark examiner ruled that the name might cause confusion between Apple Cinemas and the tech company. Apple responded to that branding attempt by sending Sand Media a cease and desist letter. It further claims that Apple Cinemas began using a stylized apple for its logo and began focusing its expansion on malls and shopping centers where Apple Stores were already present. According to the lawsuit, the similar names resulted in landlords at these locations assuming that Apple Cinemas was affiliated with the tech brand. Apple alleges that Apple Cinemas was given favorable deals to open in some areas as a result of the presumed connection. Further driving the tech giant's lawsuit are claims that some customers have had negative experiences with Apple Cinemas. Some customers have complained that the theaters are "greasy," "dirty" and "grungy" and are at times beset by technical issues. 'Consumers should not go to an 'Apple Cinemas' theater thinking it is connected to the famous Apple brand, with all its goodwill and brand equity,' Miranda Means, an attorney representing Apple, stated in the lawsuit. Apple's goals with its lawsuit are to force the theater chain to stop using the word "Apple" in its name. It is also seeking damages, though the amount was unspecified.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Lib Dems call for urgent regulation of YouTube ads after wave of scams
The Liberal Democrats are calling for urgent regulation of YouTube advertising after scams including deepfakes, impersonated public figures and fraudulent investment claims were found to be spreading on the platform with little oversight. The party said YouTube's adverts remain largely unchecked by independent regulators, despite new data from Ofcom showing the platform has overtaken ITV in weekly UK viewership and continues to dominate children's media consumption. Among the recent scams onYouTube was a series of ads using an AI-generated voice and likeness of the consumer champion Martin Lewis to promote a cryptocurrency scheme, despite Lewis having no involvement. The videos, which have drawn thousands of complaints on Reddit and X, mislead users into thinking they are receiving financial advice from a trusted source. Other viewers have reported false product claims, scam diet pills and fake competitions. In one Reddit thread users reported being targeted with ads impersonating UK media figures or pretending to offer government-backed grants, with little clarity over how to report or block such content. YouTube adverts fall under the same Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) rules as TV, but unlike broadcasters, there is no pre-approval, real-time scrutiny or independent enforcement unless someone complains. The ASA has previously warned of a rise in 'celebrity deepfake' and 'impersonation' scams on online platforms, particularly for financial services. The lack of mandatory pre-approval or independent enforcement means that many of these adverts remain online for days before action is taken, if any is. Max Wilkinson, the Liberal Democrats' spokesperson for culture, media and sport, said the system leaves the public exposed. 'We cannot allow a two-tier system where traditional broadcasters face robust scrutiny, while a digital giant like YouTube is allowed to mark its own homework,' he said. The party is calling for YouTube advertising to be brought into line with the system used for TV and radio, including tougher oversight, clearer accountability, and the power for Ofcom to levy fines on platforms that repeatedly allow harmful or misleading ads. It also wants revenues from those fines used to support victims of online scams. YouTube ads are served through Google Ads and are regulated under a voluntary framework created by the tech industry. This contrasts with the ASA's co-regulatory model for broadcast advertising, where Ofcom retains backstop powers and many adverts must be pre-cleared before airing. Privately, some Labour MPs acknowledge that online ad regulation is 'behind the curve', but there is little appetite for major change. Others have warned that new restrictions could make it harder to target voters aged under 35, many of whom are disengaged from traditional media. Last month the Guardian revealed that Ofcom is preparing to push for new legal powers to require platforms like YouTube to give greater prominence to public service content, amid concerns that trusted news, children's programming and UK-produced shows are becoming 'invisible' to younger viewers. The Lib Dems argue that the same logic should apply to advertising, especially given the rise in misleading financial content and impersonation scams. 'YouTube is no longer a niche platform – it's one of the main ways people of all ages consume news, entertainment and information,' said Wilkinson. 'The government needs to act now to ensure that consumers are properly protected.' A YouTube spokesperson said: 'YouTube is not a broadcaster and it should not be regulated like one. 'We have strict policies that govern the ads on our platform which we enforce rigorously. When we find ads that breach our policies we take immediate action, including removing the ads and suspending the account when necessary.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tech's trillion-dollar binge, Palantir's empire and women's privacy under attack
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. This week, tech companies are spending amounts of money that stretch the limits of the imagination. Donald Trump's administration is spending more money with data analytics and surveillance firm Palantir. And women on both sides of the Pacific face the extreme difficulty of keeping intimate moments private online. In last week's edition of the newsletter, my colleagues wrote about the upshot of Google's earnings call: lots of money earned, but, more importantly lots of money spent on AI. Even more money shelled out than previously expected: Google revised its predictions for how much it would invest in building up its AI capacity upwards by billions. Investors loved it. Shares up. In the ensuing week, three more tech giants reported their quarterly earnings – Meta, Microsoft and Amazon – and disclosed that they have collectively spent $155bn. Investors expressed elation at the colossal sums. Meta's market capitalization shot up by more than $130bn. Microsoft's valuation soared past $4tn, making the software giant the second publicly traded company to reach that stratospheric milestone. Amazon's financial outlook was murkier, and its shares went down. What a bummer to miss out on the AI stock party. The $155bn sum represents more than the US government has spent on education, training, employment and social services in the 2025 fiscal year so far. One economics research firm claims AI spending has contributed more to the US economy over the past two quarters than consumer spending, traditionally the biggest factor in economic growth. For the coming fiscal year, big tech's total capital expenditure is slated to balloon enormously, surpassing the already eye-popping sums of the previous year. Microsoft plans to unload about $100bn on AI in the next fiscal year, CEO Satya Nadella said. Meta plans to spend between $66bn and $72bn. Alphabet plans to spend $85bn, significantly higher than its previous estimation of $75bn. Amazon estimated that its 2025 expenditure would come to $100bn as it plows money into Amazon Web Services, which analysts now expect to amount to $118bn. In total, the four tech companies will spend more than $400bn on capex in the coming year, according to the Wall Street Journal. Read more about the gargantuan sums of money being spent on AI. Last week, the US army announced a new agreement with Palantir, the Peter Thiel-founded, Alex Karp-run technology company. The agreement combined 75 separate, existing contracts between the army and Palantir into one, and allows for the possibility to purchase goods and services up to $10bn. It's just one of dozens of agreements between the company and the US, a relationship that's only been growing rapidly in the second Trump administration, though it had been on the rise before then. Palantir brought in $373m in revenue from US government contracts in just the first quarter of 2025 – $151.6m more than a year prior. The vast majority of that increase – $148.7m – came from government customers who were already working with the company, according to its earnings reports. Department: Defense Worth: The Department of Defense lists its 'obligations' to Palantir as $1.66bn in the government, which can encompass current and future spending, according to the US government's database of its own spending. Financial analysts estimate Palantir earns $400m in annual recurring revenue from the DoD. The details: The DoD remains Palantir's biggest and oldest customer within the US federal government. The first contract between the two dates back to 2008. The army has made no commitment and is under no obligation to purchase anywhere close to the $10bn figure listed as the value of its new agreement with Palantir, which represents the 'maximum potential value of the contract', according to the press release the government published. The number is not exactly money in hand for Palantir, but analysts seem encouraged it could represent a major source of revenue and more business from the US government. 'It's no obligation but we believe the army will spend billions with Palantir with this contract,' said Dan Ives, managing director at the wealth management firm Wedbush Securities. Department: Homeland Security Worth: $256.7m in obligations Details: The company has been working with the homeland security department since 2011. The vast majority of Palantir's contracts with DHS are to provide services to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or Ice. These amount to $248.3m in obligations. The company's most recent contract with Ice was for $30m to make the deportation process more efficient. Department: Health and Human Services Worth: $385m in obligations Department: Treasury Worth: $140.9m Department: Justice Worth: $204.5m Department: Energy Worth: $91m Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Department: State Worth: $56.1m Department: Transportation Worth: $55.92m In the UK, Palantir has won a £330m contract with the National Health Service. On both sides of the Pacific Ocean, women are being confronted with the difficulty of keeping their most personal moments private online. In the US, an app that pledged to make IRL dating safer has suffered a breach that may imperil its users. In China, hundreds of thousands of men are sharing explicit pictures without the consent of the women in the photos. The app in the US, Tea, offered a forum for women who subscribed to share past experiences with men so that other women could conduct DIY background checks on their prospective dates, highlighting negative 'red flags' and positive 'green flags'. Tea's owners bill the app as 'the safest place to spill', in reference to the English slang term for gossip. It has topped US download charts in recent weeks, and the company has boasted about a user base of 1.6 million women. It is only available in the US. The app promised 'dating safety tools that protect women'. but in late July, the company discovered that hackers had breached its systems and leaked users' driver's licenses, direct messages and selfies. Users of the noxious message board 4Chan screenshotted and spread Tea users' personal information, according to NPR. A second breach exposed more than a million messages sent by Tea's users, including ones about sensitive topics like abortions or cheating, per 404 Media, which first reported both breaches. The company claimed in a statement that the first breach only affected users who had signed up before February 2024, but the second one was much more recent, 404 reported. In response to the hack, the app has suspended messaging entirely, the BBC reported. Most data breaches inspire little public uproar. The exposure of an email address here, a birthday there can feel commonplace. The breach of Tea is different. The app promised safety as a core feature. It delivered the opposite. The sine qua non of a whisper network like Tea is privacy, the ability to share damning information in secret, which the app failed to protect. Exposing users' identities and messages is the most basic type of failure, one that can be fatal to a product's reputation. To make matters worse, the breach offers red meat to the male-dominated 4Chan forum, a node of incel culture and men's rage in the US. 'Our team remains fully engaged in strengthening the Tea app's security, and we look forward to sharing more about those enhancements soon,' the company said in a statement to the BBC. 'In the meantime, we are working to identify any users whose personal information was involved and will be offering free identity protection services to those individuals.' In China, women are facing down an online legion of men dedicated to invading their most private moments with spy cameras and sharing the results on the internet. My colleague Amy Hawkins reports: Anger is growing on Chinese social media after news reports revealed the existence of online groups, said to involve hundreds of thousands of Chinese men, which shared photographs of women, including sexually explicit ones, taken without their consent. The Chinese newspaper Southern Metropolis Daily published a report last week about a group on the encrypted messaging app Telegram called 'MaskPark tree hole forum'. It said it had more than 100,000 members and was 'comprised entirely of Chinese men'. Men reportedly shared sexually explicit images of women either in intimate settings or with so-called 'pinhole cameras' that can be hidden in everyday items such as plug sockets and shoes. Read the full story. In an influential 2014 essay, 'Why women aren't welcome on the internet', the writer Amanda Hess said that receiving countless graphic death and rape threats in response to her work did not make her exceptional: 'It just makes me a woman with an internet connection.' Events of the past week indicate that Hess's headline still holds true. Tim Berners-Lee, credited with inventing the world wide web, told the Guardian in 2020 that the internet 'is not working for women and girls'. The same year, a Unesco report found that 73% of women journalists endured online threats to their safety. Other UN reports have found that significant portions of women across the world, somewhere between 16% and 58%, face threats of gender-based violence online.
