
US Justice Department wants no prison time for ex-officer convicted in Breonna Taylor raid
Brett Hankison is the only officer who fired his weapon the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid who has faced criminal charges. His shots didn't hit or injure anyone, though they flew through Taylor's walls into a neighboring apartment. A federal judge will decide Hankison's sentence, which could amount to several years, on Tuesday, July 22, at a hearing. If the judge heeds the Justice Department's request, it would mean that none of the Louisville police officers involved in the botched raid would face any prison time.
The Justice Department, which has changed leadership under President Donald Trump since Hankison's conviction, said in a sentencing memo this week that "there is no need for a prison sentence to protect the public" from Hankison. Federal prosecutors asked the judge to sentence him to time served − which amounts to one day − and three years of supervised probation.
Prosecutors at his previous federal trials aggressively pursued a conviction against Hankison, arguing that he blindly fired 10 shots into Taylor's windows without identifying a target. Taylor was shot in her hallway by two other officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. But in the sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison's "response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else."
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor's family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville, said the Justice Department's recommendation "is an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision. Recommending just one day in prison sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity," Crump said in a statement on social media.
Three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant , but they have not yet gone to trial. None of them were at the scene when Taylor was shot. The death of the 26-year-old Black woman, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice protests nationwide that year.
A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Candace Owens: Who is the US podcaster claiming Brigitte Macron is a man?
01:16 24/07/2025 Vote to subpoena all Epstein-related files from Justice Department Americas 24/07/2025 US President Donald Trump under fire over pedo-criminal Epstein files Americas 20/07/2025 Astronomer CEO announces resignation after viral kiss cam video at Coldplay concert Americas 19/07/2025 Donald Trump escalates war on the press as journalists face mounting pressure Americas 19/07/2025 Donald Trump sues Murdoch, Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over Epstein article Americas 19/07/2025 New searches in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle monitor Americas 19/07/2025 Venezuelan migrants detained in the US returned to Caracas after prisoner swap Americas 19/07/2025 US revokes visas of Brazilian judges over Bolsonaro 'witch-hunt' Americas 17/07/2025 Donald Trump lashes out at MAGA base as Epstein row escalates Americas


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Down to Earth : How does Morocco turn fog into drinking water?
03:04 24/07/2025 Macrons sue Candace Owens over claims that Brigitte Macron is a man France 24/07/2025 Thailand and Cambodia clash with jets and rockets in deadly border row Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Thailand : Cambodian attacks kill at least 11 people as conflict escalates Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Vote to subpoena all Epstein-related files from Justice Department Americas 24/07/2025 Thailand F-16 jet bombs Cambodian targets as border clash escalates Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Thailand and Cambodia border closed after weeks of tensions Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Xi urges deeper China-EU trust as Brussels calls for 'real solutions' Asia / Pacific 24/07/2025 Spain beats Germany in Women's Euro 2025 and will play England on Sunday Europe 24/07/2025 War in Ukraine : Russia agrees prisoner swap but no deal on ceaserfire Europe


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
No woke AI: What to know about Trump's AI plan for global dominance
US President Donald Trump has said he will keep "woke AI" models out of US government, turn the country into an 'AI export powerhouse,' and weaken environmental regulation on the technology. The announcements come as he also signed three artificial intelligence-focused executive orders on Wednesday, which are a part of the country's so-called AI action plan. Here is what he announced and what it means. 1. No Woke AI One order, called 'Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government,' bans "woke AI" models and AI that isn't 'ideologically neutral' from government contracts. It also says diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is a 'pervasive and destructive' ideology that can 'distort the quality and accuracy of the output'. It refers to information about race, sex, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism. It aims to protect free speech and "American values," but by removing information on topics such as DEI, climate change, and misinformation, it could wind up doing the opposite, as achieving objectivity is difficult in AI. David Sacks, a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticising 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator. When asked to show an American Founding Father, it created pictures of Black, Asian, and Native American men. Google quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, US Vice President JD Vance, and Republican lawmakers. 2. Global dominance, cutting regulations The plan prioritises AI innovation and adoption, urging the removal of any barriers that could slow down adoption across industries and government. The nation's policy, Trump said, will be to do 'whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence". Yet it also seeks to guide the industry's growth to address a longtime rallying point for the tech industry's loudest Trump backers: countering the liberal bias they see in AI chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. 3. Streamlining AI data centre permits and less environmental regulation Chief among the plan's goals is to speed up permitting and loosen environmental regulation to accelerate construction on new data centres and factories. It condemns 'radical climate dogma' and recommends lifting environmental restrictions, including clean air and water laws. Trump has previously paired AI's need for huge amounts of electricity with his own push to tap into US energy sources, including gas, coal, and nuclear. 'We will be adding at least as much electric capacity as China,' Trump said at the Wednesday event. 'Every company will be given the right to build their own power plant'. Many tech giants are already well on their way toward building new data centres in the US and around the world. OpenAI announced this week that it has switched on the first phase of a massive data centre complex in Abilene, Texas, part of an Oracle-backed project known as Stargate that Trump promoted earlier this year. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and xAI also have major projects underway. The tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get its computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production, which contributes to global warming. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called on the world's major tech firms to power data centres completely with renewables by 2030. The plan includes a strategy to disincentivise states from aggressively regulating AI technology, calling on federal agencies not to provide funding to states with burdensome regulations. 'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody,' Trump said, 'so you don't end up in litigation with 43 states at one time'. Call for a People's AI Action Plan There are sharp debates on how to regulate AI, even among the influential venture capitalists who have been debating it on their favourite medium: the podcast. While some Trump backers, particularly Andreessen, have advocated an 'accelerationist' approach that aims to speed up AI advancement with minimal regulation, Sacks has described himself as taking a middle road of techno-realism. 'Technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop. If we don't do it, somebody else will,' Sacks said on the 'All-In' podcast. On Tuesday, more than 100 groups, including labour unions, parent groups, environmental justice organisations, and privacy advocates, signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.' Anthony Aguirre, executive director of the non-profit Future of Life Institute, told Euronews Next that Trump's plan acknowledges the "critical risks presented by increasingly powerful AI systems," citing bioweapons, cyberattacks, and the unpredictability of AI. But in a statement, he said the White House should go further to protect citizens and workers. "By continuing to rely on voluntary safety commitments from frontier AI corporations, it leaves the United States at risk of serious accidents, massive job losses, extreme concentrations of power, and the loss of human control," Aguirre said. "We know from experience that Big Tech promises alone are simply not enough".