Trump says 2028 Olympic athletes will be tested to prevent transgender competitors
President Donald Trump said athletes hoping to compete in the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles will be tested to prevent transgender athletes from participating.
Asked during an Aug. 5 press conference focused on the Olympics if he would consider genetic testing to stop transgender competitors, Trump said "there will be a very, very strong form of testing, and if the test doesn't come out appropriately they won't be in the Olympics."
Trump signed an executive order in February aimed at barring transgender student athletes from participating in women's sports. The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee later changed its rules to prevent participation by transgender women, citing Trump's executive order.
USOPC president Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland sent a letter to the Olympic community saying the change came after "a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials" following the executive order.
On Aug. 4, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued policy guidance preventing trans women from receiving 'extraordinary ability' visas to compete in women's sports.
Trump's comments about testing athletes came after he signed an executive order to create a White House Olympics task force to handle security and other issues related to the 2028 games.
The games are expected to draw 11,000 Olympic and 4,500 Paralympic athletes.
Contributing: Nancy Armour, Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Mandates University Data To Ensure Race-Neutral Admissions
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order requiring colleges to prove they do not consider race in admissions by submitting detailed racial and academic data to the federal government. The order, which was issued on Thursday, mandates that colleges and universities provide data, including race, GPA, and standardized test scores of applicants, admitted students, and enrollees, according to a news release from the U.S. Department of Education. Trump stated in the order that Education Secretary Linda McMahon must force colleges and universities 'to provide adequate transparency into admissions.' 'The persistent lack of available data — paired with the rampant use of 'diversity statements' and other overt and hidden racial proxies — continues to raise concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice,' continued the memo, as reported by The AP. This move seeks to further enforce the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling that banned affirmative action based on race in college admissions but allowed consideration of race only through applicants' personal disclosures. Trump has now alleged that colleges have been using indirect methods like personal statements and diversity proxies to circumvent the ban. Universities will be expected to submit data on a website called the Postsecondary Education Data System, which had previously only asked for racial information on enrolled students. Moving forward, this website will collect information regarding both applicants and enrollees, with the Department of Education writing that this change will 'enable the American public to assess whether schools are passing over the most qualified students in favor of others based on their race.' McMahon supported the directive in the Department of Education release, writing that universities will now be 'required to provide this data directly to us through an existing data system.' 'We will not allow institutions to blight the dreams of students by presuming that their skin color matters more than their hard work and accomplishments. The Trump Administration will ensure that meritocracy and excellence once again characterize American higher education.' Despite the call for action by the President and the Education Secretary, some have raised concerns about the ability of the Department of Education to accomplish this goal, pointing to the recent budget and staffing cuts that the department has undergone in recent months. Jason Cottrell, the former data coordinator for the Education Department's Office of Postsecondary Education, said that collecting the data will prove difficult due to the lack of employees. 'This isn't flipping a switch or typing something up and saying, 'Just do it,'' he explained, per NPR. Currently, there is no indication about when Trump expects these numbers to arrive. Still, there remain concerns about whether the Department of Education will be able to complete the task in a short timeframe.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: If Trump's trade target is a customs union, Canada will have a big decision to make
The Canadian government failed to reach a trade deal with the United States before the Aug. 1 deadline. As a result, U.S. President Donald Trump increased the blanket tariff on imports of Canadian goods from 25 per cent to 35 per cent, while tariffs on steel, aluminum and some automotive imports have remained unchanged. Crucially, the so-called 'CUSMA exemption' on goods that are compliant with the existing Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement has also remained in place. Many have pointed out that the lack of a deal makes Canada an outlier among U.S. trading partners. The EU, the U.K., South Korea, Japan and many others managed to clinch a deal before the deadline. Even Mexico, which did not reach a deal, was given a formal 90-day extension. But looking at the U.S. agreements with other countries, one can genuinely question whether Canada could have successfully lowered its effective tariff rate, even with a deal. So far all the trade deals reached by the U.S. include some tariffs. More importantly, no country has escaped the 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum, except for the U.K., which faces 25 per cent tariffs. With little chance that Canada could have avoided tariffs on steel and aluminum, reducing the effective tariff rate would have been a tall order. Moreover, the extreme focus on the state of current negotiations and the need for an immediate deal to avoid tariffs overlooks a much bigger threat to Canada: The CUSMA renegotiation scheduled for Summer 2026. Considering that, any deal reached now might only be a band-aid that will be ripped off next year — and it may hurt. The importance of CUSMA for Canada cannot be overstated. Canada's effective tariff rate on exports to the U.S. is one of the lowest in the world, primarily due to the CUSMA exemption. What if CUSMA changes drastically following the renegotiation next year? President Trump is likely to use this opportunity to tackle the trade irritants that have been bothering him, notably Canada's supply management. However, I think Canadian negotiators need to consider that the U.S. approach to the negotiations could be much broader. The Trump administration has referred in the past to the idea of creating a 'Fortress North America' as a means of counteracting the threat from China. As such, a major trade irritant for the U.S. has been third countries' use of Canada and Mexico to circumvent tariffs, with China, for example, making significant investments in manufacturing in Mexico, evidenced by the foreign direct investment data. With that in mind, one of the aims of the U.S. administration with the CUSMA renegotiation could be to move from a Free-Trade Agreement to something that more closely resembles a customs union. Such an arrangement would mean that Canada and Mexico would have to commit to match the tariffs the U.S. imposes on every other country, potentially leading to a difficult choice for Canada. In addition, further integration between Canada and the U.S. is likely still an objective for President Trump, even though he has stopped referring to Canada as the 51st State. Nevertheless, it's important to remember that the European Customs Union, established in 1968, was a cornerstone in the creation of what is now the European Union. A customs union would mean further integration with the U.S., guaranteeing access to its market, but it would come at the expense of lost independence. As such, Canada's current free-trade agreements with other countries, such as CETA, the TPP and others, would no longer be valid. Moreover, Canada would lose its ability to negotiate free trade deals with other countries, and would likely face retaliatory tariffs from international partners, similar to the ones China has imposed on canola after Canada matched U.S. tariffs on the imports of Chinese electric vehicles. If the government chooses this option, Canada would be doubling down on its reliance on the U.S. and forgoing the opportunity to diversify trade away from the Americans. On the other hand, if Canada rejects a customs union, we would remain in control of our trade destiny, with the ability to pursue free trade deals with other countries. However, that freedom would likely come at the cost of facing the same kind of blanket U.S. tariffs that other countries are facing, leading to a sharp rise in our effective tariff rate. With exports to the U.S. representing about 20 per cent of Canadian GDP, the economic impact would be significant. Basically, the choice boils down to either 'short-term gains for long-term pain' or 'short-term pain for long-term gains.' In the current context of tensions with the U.S., it is unclear where the general opinions, whether from politicians, business leaders or voters more generally, would be on the subject: further integration or increased diversification. Does Canada still deserve to be considered a 'trading nation'? William Watson: A lament for the postwar trading system There are likely to be strongly opposed views across provinces and industries. Charles St-Arnaud is the chief economist at Alberta Central. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Bauer, South Carolina's former lieutenant governor, ends GOP primary challenge to Sen. Graham
WASHINGTON — Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer is suspending his GOP primary challenge to Sen. Lindsey Graham , shuttering his effort to oust the four-term incumbent after just more than a month and eschewing a 'political climate that rewards deception over honesty, or ambition over unity.' In posts on social media, Bauer wrote Friday that he had decided to shutter his campaign 'after deep prayer and reflection,' saying he believed 'we must stop tearing one another down with lies and division.' He stopped short of endorsing any of the remaining candidates in the race to challenge Graham, who already has backing from President Donald Trump . In a statement, Graham said he wished Bauer well. Graham campaign spokesperson Abby Zilch called it 'abundantly clear' that South Carolina stood behind reelecting the incumbent. Bauer, a wealthy developer and longtime Trump backer, launched his effort 38 days ago, arguing that Graham isn't conservative enough to represent South Carolina. In a pre-launch interview with The Associated Press , Bauer described himself as 'a real, America First conservative' intent on representing what he sees as South Carolina conservatives' true values, and he said 'Graham's been there too long, and he votes like it.' Republicans dominate South Carolina's statewide-elected positions, meaning that the most intense political competition takes place in GOP primaries. Official filing for the June primary doesn't open until March. Graham — whose relationship with Trump has undulated through the years — has faced previous primary challenges from the right, with opponents accusing him of kowtowing to Democrats on issues from immigration to climate change. But Graham also hews to Republican priorities on national security. Ahead of the U.S. strike on Iranian facilities in June, Graham called for Trump to 'go all-in' in backing Israel and destroying Iran's nuclear program. For this cycle, Graham kicked off his reelection campaign in February and quickly secured Trump's endorsement, and Chris LaCivita, a co-campaign manager of Trump's 2024 bid, is serving as a senior adviser. Bauer has backed Trump since before his win in South Carolina's 2016 GOP primary. At his 2024 campaign's South Carolina launch event, Trump called Bauer, who served on his state leadership committee, 'a friend of mine, somebody that could, I think, run for almost any office and win.' Bauer served in the South Carolina legislature before, at age 33, he was elected the youngest lieutenant governor in the country in 2002. After two terms, he mounted an unsuccessful 2010 gubernatorial bid, finishing last in a four-way GOP primary ultimately won by Nikki Haley. Two years later, Bauer ran for Congress, losing a GOP runoff to eventual Rep. Tom Rice in South Carolina's newly created 7th District. ___ Kinnard can be reached at .
