logo
Social Security Payments May Be Lower This Month: Who's Impacted

Social Security Payments May Be Lower This Month: Who's Impacted

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans will see their Social Security payments shrink this month as the federal government resumes garnishing benefits from borrowers who defaulted on student loans.
The Department of Education and Treasury Department began issuing notices in May warning approximately 195,000 Social Security recipients that their checks would be reduced, with collections starting in early June.
The Trump administration restarted federal collections on defaulted student loans after a five-year pause, marking the first time since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic that recipients have been at risk of losing part of their Social Security income to student loan debt.
"This is the latest effort to eliminate some of the forgiveness efforts under the prior administration and take student loans more seriously in terms of repayment," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "For some Americans, the prospect of seeing smaller checks in the coming months if they fail to start making payments on their own is a very real one.
Why It Matters
The policy shift directly affects older Americans, many of whom rely on Social Security as their main or only source of income.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reported earlier this year that about 450,000 Americans aged 62 and older were in default on their federal student loans and likely receiving Social Security payments. The resumption of garnishments, which were paused for years by emergency pandemic measures, puts financially vulnerable retirees at further risk of poverty.
A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, D.C., March 26, 2025.
A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, D.C., March 26, 2025.
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Who Is Impacted and How Garnishments Work
The U.S. Treasury Offset Program allows the government to withhold up to 15 percent of monthly Social Security benefits from borrowers in default on federal student loans.
Beneficiaries receiving the average Social Security check of $1,976 could see a reduction of $296.40 per month.
Recipients were shielded from collections and negative credit reporting during pandemic-era protections, but those defenses ended as the administration said it sought to restore accountability to the student loan system.
A borrower is typically considered in default after missing 270 days of payments. Once in default, loans are usually transferred to collection agencies authorized to pursue garnishments through tax refunds, wages, and Social Security payments.
Notices and the Scope of Collections
In May, the Department of Education sent 30-day warnings to 195,000 defaulted student loan borrowers that their benefits would be garnished in June.
All 5.3 million defaulted federal student loan borrowers will receive notice that they could later also face wage garnishment before the end of the summer.
Demographic Impact
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found that the number of people aged 62 or older in default on student loans and receiving Social Security has soared, with the affected group growing over 3,000 percent since 2001.
These garnishments primarily pay off accumulated interest and collection fees, with relatively little reducing the original loan principal. Many older Americans facing Social Security offsets rely on these payments for most of their living expenses, and collections often force recipients to choose between paying for basic needs or health care.
Options for Those in Default
Banks and the Department of Education offer borrowers options to return to good standing, but these are often complex and time-consuming.
Borrowers can try loan rehabilitation (making nine on-time payments within 10 months), loan consolidation, or, as a last resort, bankruptcy. Payment plans, deferment, forbearance, or income-driven repayment plans can also be arranged before default to help avoid garnishment.
Financial Risks Beyond Social Security Reductions
Defaulted borrowers may lose eligibility for additional federal student aid and other benefits and may suffer long-term damage to their credit scores. This can affect the ability to access credit, purchase a home, or finance other major purchases.
What People Are Saying
Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, said in a statement, "As we begin to help defaulted borrowers back into repayment, we must also fix a broken higher education finance system that has put upward pressure on tuition rates without ensuring that colleges and universities are delivering a high-value degree to students. For too long, insufficient transparency and accountability structures have allowed U.S. universities to saddle students with enormous debt loads without paying enough attention to whether their own graduates are truly prepared to succeed in the labor market."
Mike Pierce, Executive Director of the Student Borrower Protection Center,said, "For 5 million people in default, federal law gives borrowers a way out of default and the right to make loan payments they can afford. Since February, Donald Trump and Linda McMahon have blocked these borrowers' path out of default and are now feeding them into the maw of the government debt collection machine. This is cruel, unnecessary, and will further fan the flames of economic chaos for working families across this country."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "With the administration removing any pauses on student loan collections, wage garnishments are going to become common practice for some borrowers. If you receive Social Security benefits and having student loans that have default, know this could be a reality for you moving forward."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "This could be detrimental for some beneficiaries, as the payments may be their primary source of income. Not receiving what was anticipated is disheartening. However, it's important to note that these garnishments were originally paused in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, the garnishments are set to resume, affecting millions of borrowers."
What Happens Next
The Trump administration is pursuing further reforms to student loan repayment systems and plans to overhaul federal loan programs, as outlined in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by the House of Representatives last month.
Additional regulatory and legislative changes may affect how collections and relief are administered in the future, granted this change is just ending what was supposed to be a temporary pause in Social Security garnishment due to the pandemic.
"The Trump administration isn't making new changes but rather reinstating policies that were paused in 2020," Thompson said.
"At some point, these payments were bound to resume, though many borrowers may have believed their loans would be forgiven under the Biden administration. That forgiveness effort has largely fallen by the wayside, and the Trump administration is now making it clear that all loans must be repaid regardless of whether the institution attended was later deemed predatory."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil residents can soon expect a nearly 50% water rate increase
Brazil residents can soon expect a nearly 50% water rate increase

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brazil residents can soon expect a nearly 50% water rate increase

BRAZIL, Ind. (WTWO/WAWV) — Brazil residents can soon expect an increase in their water bill as City Council recently approved a 48% water rate increase at the last public hearing at Brazil City Hall. Mayor Brian Wyndham says this has been a conversation even before the COVID-19 pandemic. In recent months, the imposed water rate increase had a main topic at multiple public hearings. This decision was not taken lightly and wasn't made overnight. An increase hasn't happened in the City of Brazil since 2016. 'With progress comes costs,' said Brazil Mayor Brian Wyndham. 'The one thing about this that is different from a lot of things, the increase cost of your water bill, that money is going right back here in this community.' The city has done multiple area studies to come up with a percent that is the most reasonable, and what will ultimately help fund the community. The most recent area study being done by Baker Tilly, an outside company study. 'When you're looking at your water bill, you obviously see a total. And with that includes your water, wastewater, the trash service, storm water utility, all of those other entities. I mean they're listed separately but then there's a total,' said Wyndham. 'So, bear in mind, this just effects your water. The study was done on it based on 4,000-gallon usage per month, which seem to be kind of the median where we're at. It's going to increase your bill about $15 to $16 if you fall in that four-thousand-gallon usage.' The water rate increase will not only affect Brazil residents, but more than 1,000Clay County residents that use the city water. The mayor stated out-of-city limit residents were notified by a letter about the water rate increase. Looking ahead, the money from the increase will help fund a $13 million dollar project that will replace a raw water line that runs Reelsville into the Brazil Treatment Plant. The Mayor of Brazil also emphasized the rate increase is based on water usage only and will not impact other utilities. The newest water rate increase will go into effect in July 2025. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Senate panel votes to tighten rules on big pharmacy firms
Senate panel votes to tighten rules on big pharmacy firms

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate panel votes to tighten rules on big pharmacy firms

BATON ROUGE, La. (LSU Manship School News Service) — A bill aimed at increasing transparency in how pharmacy benefit managers operate advanced out of the Senate Insurance Committee Wednesday, signaling a push to regulate an industry that critics say drives up drug prices and puts local pharmacies at risk. House Bill 264, authored by Rep. Michael Echols, R-Monroe, cleared the committee with amendments that would ban pricing schemes, strengthen oversight and increase transparency in the often-confusing world of drug benefits. PBMs are third-party companies that manage prescription drug benefits for health insurers, large employers and government programs like Medicaid. They negotiate with drugmakers and reimburse pharmacies, all while claiming to lower costs for patients. In practice, critics say they frequently do the opposite. A 2023 New York Times investigation found that the three largest PBMs–CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx–frequently steer patients toward higher-priced drugs, inflate prices and pocket billions in hidden fees. Owned by major healthcare conglomerates like CVS Health, Cigna, and UnitedHealth Group, PBMs operate largely behind the scenes but have significant control over drug costs for more than 200 million Americans. These layers of secrecy are what Louisiana lawmakers are now trying to peel back. But the Louisiana bill does not go as far as a law that took effect in Arkansas last year, which has led to concerns that CVS could close its stores in that state. Echols' bill would prohibit PBMs in Louisiana from engaging in spread pricing, a practice where they charge insurers more than they reimburse pharmacies and keep the difference. It would also require PBMs to pass 100% of manufacturer rebates to insurers or employers. It also would mandate annual certification under oath that they followed state transparency rules and give the Louisiana Department of Insurance power to audit their contracts and compensation programs. 'It creates a broader model nationally for transparent, fair BPM operations,' Echols said. 'It provides robust transparency, prohibits some of the spread pricing games that have been played in the past, and creates a local pharmacy reimbursement that has national standards.' Trump signs executive order aimed at slashing prescription drug costs To some extent, the debate in Louisiana echoes the turmoil in Arkansas, though Echols' bill is not as far-reaching. Arkansas passed a law in the spring of 2024 banning PBMs from owning or operating pharmacies. Last month, a year after the law was enacted, CVS Health sued to block it, warning that the policy would force the company to close 23 CVS Pharmacy locations in the state, eliminate more than 500 jobs and reduce patient access to life-saving medications. CVS Caremark, the PBM arm of CVS Health, manages prescription drug benefits for millions of Americans. Don Caffery, who represented the Louisiana Independent Pharmacies Association, called some of the changes in the Louisiana bill essential. 'Moving to a model prohibiting steering and prohibiting spread pricing, these are things that are going to keep independent community doors open ,' he said. 'This is simply about allowing the pharmacy to recoup the price of the drug and keep their doors open.' The bill drew wide support from local pharmacies, many of whom did not wish to speak publicly. Sen. Rick Edmonds, R-Baton Rouge, said he has heard from constituents struggling to get prescriptions filled. 'We are obligated to take up this issue and not let this happen to our local pharmacies or our constituents,' Edmonds said. 'I just want a fair dollar for dollar for our constituents, for our local pharmacies and our providers.' Sen. Regina Barrow, D-Baton Rouge, pressed Echols on whether the bill would truly benefit independent pharmacies and patients. 'I think 'scheme' is such an accurate word,' she said, referring to current PBM pricing practices. 'This has been one of the biggest schemes I've seen in a long time.' But she questioned whether the bill would keep money in the pockets of consumers and union workers. A representative from a Baton Rouge-based union testified against the bill, raising concerns that parts of the bill might conflict with a federal law that regulates employer-sponsored health plans, but there was testimony that the bill aligns with a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave states limited authority to regulate PBMs, particularly on reimbursement rates. Still, the amendments added to Echols' bill focus less on rate-setting and more on tightening the appeals process for pharmacies and shielding certain proprietary PBM information from public disclosure. Echols said the bill began as a transparency measure in the House but has 'broadened' through its amendments in the Senate. 'At the end of the day, if the money isn't going to the patient, it has to go somewhere,' he said. 'This is an opportunity to lower premiums for our people and help our independent pharmacies.' Louisiana bill inspired by Make America Healthy Again movement heads to governor Musk calls for killing House's 'big, beautiful bill' Trump calls for scrapping debt limit US Education Department to determine funding EBR Schools gets for diversity program California teen stripped of track title after imitating iconic celebration Judge blocks deportation of family of man charged in Boulder attack Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Cuomo rips Hochul for prioritizing tax rebates over NYC child care vouchers
Cuomo rips Hochul for prioritizing tax rebates over NYC child care vouchers

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cuomo rips Hochul for prioritizing tax rebates over NYC child care vouchers

NEW YORK — In a rare direct rebuke of his successor last week, Andrew Cuomo questioned why Gov. Kathy Hochul earmarked $2 billion for inflation refund checks in this year's state budget, but rejected a request for more state funding for a popular child care voucher program benefiting low-income New York City families. 'They shorted the city on voucher funds this year … but they had the money to give back $2 billion in tax rebate checks?' Cuomo, the front-runner in this month's Democratic primary for New York City mayor, said in an interview with the Daily News Editorial Board last Friday. 'How can you give away $2 billion in tax rebate checks, which means you just had money to throw away, but you didn't fund basic services in New York City?' Cuomo's broadside — which offers an early peek into what his relationship with the governor could look like should he be elected mayor — came after The News asked if he has been rubbed the wrong way by any of Hochul's recent city-related policy decisions. The inflation refund checks, which Hochul proposed as part of her executive budget this spring, will start going out to hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers this fall, with joint filers who make $150,000 or less getting $400 and single filers making $75,000 or less getting $200. The voucher program Cuomo referenced provides direct subsidies to low-income city families that they can use to cover the cost of child care for their kids, many under age 5. The program has become vastly popular, but Hochul this spring rebuffed a request from Mayor Eric Adams to pony up more state funding for it, leading the city to shutter new enrollment due to cost concerns. To cover the fiscal shortfall, Hochul and the state Legislature ultimately came to a deal whereby the city must contribute $328 million in annual voucher payments, and then the state kicks in funds for expenditures above that. In response to Cuomo's comments, Hochul spokesman Avi Small said Wednesday that the governor has expanded child care voucher programs 'after a decade of state neglect,' an apparent jab at Cuomo's gubernatorial tenure. 'On the subways or in the grocery store, New Yorkers ask when their inflation relief checks are coming and thank Gov. Hochul for putting money back in their pockets,' Small added. 'New Yorkers win when the mayor and governor work together: Gov. Hochul is ready to get things done, and she hopes whoever wins in November is, too.' Cuomo's swipe at Hochul over the child care issue is notable as he has largely refrained from criticizing her since he resigned as governor in 2021 while facing all but certain impeachment over accusations that he sexually harassed subordinates and mismanaged nursing home policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Hochul critique from Cuomo, who has denied any wrongdoing, also comes after he took a thinly veiled shot at her during an interview with The New York Times this week. In that interview, Cuomo said he regretted resigning and argued he could have accomplished so much more as governor, before musing in apparent reference to Hochul's first elected gubernatorial term: 'Looking back, what has really been done in the last four years, anyway, right?' His shot at Hochul could portend he would, as mayor, be more than willing to use the City Hall bully pulpit to go after her, even though they go way back and have largely enjoyed a cordial professional relationship. That dynamic would mark a total 180 degree change on how former Mayor Bill de Blasio often knocked Cuomo for using his gubernatorial levers to withhold funding from New York City, including for child care programs. While blasting her over the child care issue, Cuomo also said in his sitdown with The News that he and Hochul share similar political sensibilities as moderate Democrats. 'I have a fine relationship with Hochul, I hired her,' he said. 'I worked with her for years, and we have the same agenda.' Cuomo and Hochul go way back. In 2014, as he was seeking a second gubernatorial term, Cuomo tapped Hochul as his running mate to become lieutenant governor. They both went on to win their 2015 elections, and Hochul then served as Cuomo's No. 2 all the way through his August 2021 resignation, at which point she succeeded him, becoming New York's first female governor. _____ (New York Daily News reporter Cayla Bamberger contributed to this story.) _____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store