logo
Sam Altman's brain chip venture is mulling gene therapy approach

Sam Altman's brain chip venture is mulling gene therapy approach

Time of India21 hours ago
The brain chip company that has drawn interest from Sam Altman and his artificial intelligence business OpenAI is exploring the idea of genetically altering brain cells to make better implants.The company, which has been referred to as Merge Labs , is looking at an approach involving gene therapy that would modify brain cells, according to people familiar with the plans who weren't authorised to speak publicly on the matter. In addition, an ultrasound device would be implanted in the head that could detect and modulate activity in the modified cells, these people said.It's one of a handful of ideas and technologies the company has been exploring, they said. The venture is still in early stages and could evolve significantly.'We have not done that deal yet,' Altman told journalists at a dinner Thursday in San Francisco, referring to a question about a brain-computer interface venture. 'I would like us to.'Altman said he wants to be able to think something and have ChatGPT respond to it.Merge Labs is Altman's latest foray into the brain-computer interface field. He is facing off against his longtime rival, Elon Musk, whose company Neuralink is building brain implants with the short-term goal of treating disease and the long-term ambition of improving human abilities.OpenAI declined to comment.Brain-computer interface companies aim to build devices that connect computers to brains and augment peoples' cognition. Implants are currently enabling paralysed patients to control electronics and helping people communicate who are unable to talk. Technology billionaires and investors are also optimistic that noninvasive devices worn outside of the head could treat mental health conditions.The Financial Times reported this week that Merge is aiming to raise $250 million at an $850 million valuation. Much of that support will come from OpenAI's ventures team, according to the report. Altman is co-founding the company but not personally investing in it, according to the Financial Times.Altman has also invested in Neuralink, Elon Musk's brain implant startup. Neuralink, along with several other companies, is developing chips that communicate with the brain using electrical signals, not ultrasound.For years, researchers have been studying how to genetically change cells to make them respond to ultrasound, a field called sonogenetics . The idea Merge is considering to combine ultrasound with gene therapy could take years, some of the people said.Ultrasound has attracted significant attention recently as a possible brain therapy. Other companies are exploring the idea of using ultrasound transmitters outside the brain to massage brain tissue, with the goal of treating psychiatric conditions. That kind of technology has shown promise in research studies. Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam's company Nudge, which is aiming to build a helmet that beams low-intensity focused ultrasound into the brain, recently raised $100 million. LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman is leading a $12 million funding round in a similar company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Friendly And Warm: OpenAI Is Changing How GPT 5 Behaves Amid User Complaints
Friendly And Warm: OpenAI Is Changing How GPT 5 Behaves Amid User Complaints

News18

time27 minutes ago

  • News18

Friendly And Warm: OpenAI Is Changing How GPT 5 Behaves Amid User Complaints

ChatGPT 5 launch came with a lot of excitement and hype but OpenAI has been forced to make some changes after complaints. ChatGPT 5 could soon become warm and friendlier than its current version, something that many people have criticised about. OpenAI released GPT 5 with a lot of fanfare but the early excitement died down when people got to use the AI chatbot and realised that GPT 4o was much better in conversations and more personalised with them. OpenAI confirmed the news via a post on X which says, '"We're making GPT-5 warmer and friendlier based on feedback that it felt too formal before. Changes are subtle, but ChatGPT should feel more approachable now." OpenAI has taken the complaints seriously and these feedbacks will ensure the new chatbot is less formal than before. The company says changes will come into effect in a day's time and more updates will be shared soon. Sam Altman, CEO, OpenAI claimed GPT 5 is scary good and performs at PhD level but that intelligence seems to have come at the cost of likability as a profile and people clearly didn't like that side of GPT 5 while using the AI chatbot. The conversational tone of GPT 4o was a hit with the users and it is good that Altman is reverting GPT 5 to this state without taking away its intelligence and other upgrades. ChatGPT 5 comes in three variants: GPT 5, GPT 5 Mini which is a lighter version and the GPT 5 nano that is claimed to be faster and cheaper to run on devices. ChatGPT 5 comes to free users as well but they can only use the GPT 5 and the Mini versions. The company has already made it possible for GPT 5 to work with Microsoft products and GPT 5 Pro tier users will soon be able to connect with Gmail, Google Calendar and more. OpenAI's new ChatGPT Pro version costs $200 per month which lets you unlock the GPT 5 Pro model and use other premium tier features. view comments First Published: August 18, 2025, 08:52 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Fuel Fill-Ups in Space? Musk and Bezos Are Working on It
Fuel Fill-Ups in Space? Musk and Bezos Are Working on It

Hindustan Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Fuel Fill-Ups in Space? Musk and Bezos Are Working on It

Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are trying to figure out how to pump gas in space. The billionaire space rivals are working on ambitious missions to the moon or Mars, and a crucial design element for each venture is using spacecraft that take on additional fuel while orbiting Earth. Vehicles that could grab propellants in orbit would be less weighed down at liftoff, letting planners design missions to travel farther from Earth with more cargo, scientific gear or crew members, advocates say. Having depots or in-orbit refueling that give spacecraft something like a truck stop to pull into may sound like science fiction. It is also a concept that engineers have been working on for years. One of the biggest challenges to making it a reality: moving and storing massive amounts of supercold propellants that are prone to boil off in the void of space. Both SpaceX and Blue Origin have much to prove. Some space-industry officials are skeptical that either will have moon landers that depend on orbital fueling ready to meet National Aeronautics and Space Administration timelines. The agency has worked closely with contractors to understand the challenges of in-space refueling, a NASA spokesman says. SpaceX conducted a fuel-transfer demonstration inside a Starship spacecraft during a 2024 test flight and next year is aiming to move propellants between two vehicles. That test has been delayed as the company has faced setbacks with the massive rocket, including an explosion during a ground test in Texas in June. Blue Origin is developing a transporter vehicle that would take on propellant near Earth. Then, it would fly to a lunar orbit, where the transporter would prepare a lander that would take astronauts arriving on a different ship down to the surface of the moon. That mission depends on the company's New Glenn rocket, which the company launched for the first time in January. Engineers have long built rockets and spacecraft to take on all the fuel they need while still on the ground. Those designs have proven their value. They also have their limitations. Take NASA's Apollo missions to the moon. Saturn V, the rocket that sent agency astronauts there, weighed 6.5 million pounds at liftoff, and around 5.5 million of those pounds were fuel. Combined with reusable rockets, fueling in space could make deep-space flights cheaper over time and ease mission logistics, supporters say. 'It has got to be done,' says Dallas Bienhoff, who formerly studied setting up a low-Earth-orbit propellant depot for Boeing and now works for Pasadena, Calif.-based robotic-mining company OffWorld. 'Otherwise, we're going to be limited with what we can achieve in space.' Musk put it this way during a conference talk in 2017. Starship, which then went by a different name, was expected to loft a spacecraft carrying a large amount of mass to low-Earth orbit. The ship wouldn't be able to travel farther without more fuel, he said. 'If you send up tankers, and refill in orbit, you can refill the tanks all the way to the top,' Musk said then. That would allow the ship to continue out to Mars, he added. From Apollo to the present Orbital refueling isn't a new idea. In the early 1960s, NASA officials considered such operations as they tried to figure out how to land astronauts on the lunar surface before the Soviets. The idea didn't go forward then, but it didn't go away. A range of in-space fueling experiments or operations have been conducted over the years, including by Russia. In 2007, the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and partners conducted more than a dozen fuel transfers between two satellites. But no U.S. company has put in-space propellant transfers at the center of their deep-space plans as SpaceX and Blue Origin have. Part of the reason is making it all work is difficult. Spacecraft will need to rendezvous in orbit, connect with each other and flow large amounts of propellants from one vehicle to another. The nature of the propellants SpaceX and Blue Origin have proposed using makes transferring them especially tricky. The fuels are chilled to supercold levels to keep them liquid, and have a tendency to boil off. 'It wouldn't be easy to do on Earth. But now you have to do it in space, pumping it from one big refrigerator to another,' says Thomas Cooley, formerly chief scientist for a space-vehicles group at the Air Force Research Laboratory who now has a space-consulting business. Dave Limp, chief executive at Blue Origin, said in a social-media post in July the company had made major progress maturing technologies that aim to prevent propellants from boiling off in space. Fuels also behave in odd ways in space. When you pump gasoline into your car's tank, the gas flows in a predictable manner but that isn't necessarily the case in orbit. There, companies will contend with what William Notardonato, chief executive of Eta Space, calls 'liquid-acquisition issues.' 'You don't know where your liquid is stored. The propellant might be up at the top of the tank. And it brings up the question, what is the top in microgravity?' says Notardonato, whose Rockledge, Fla.-based company is developing an in-space propellant depot and working on a mission where it will track how a supercold propellant behaves in a satellite tank using a camera. Launching, time and again Another unknown for in-orbit refueling: the number of launches it will take SpaceX and Blue Origin to fuel up vehicles for deep-space missions. SpaceX has shown launches can be conducted much more frequently than in the past, but rockets are still a long way from flying as easily as commercial jets. Meanwhile, Starship, the company's vehicle that will use orbital fueling, remains in an experimental phase and Blue Origin is still ramping up New Glenn. During a presentation earlier this year, a Blue Origin executive didn't specify how many refueling flights the company may need for a NASA mission that has it transporting astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. For its NASA astronaut moon missions, SpaceX has been planning to conduct multiple launches of a tanker variant of its Starship spacecraft to fuel up a Starship depot in low-Earth orbit, according to NASA officials. Then the company would send a moon-lander Starship to the depot to take on fuel. After that, the lander would fly out to the moon. An executive at SpaceX early last year estimated a moon mission for NASA could take around 10 flights, while a different leader at the company last fall predicted around 16. Some current and former space-industry officials say the number of launches needed may be higher. One former NASA leader during a congressional hearing in February said as many as 20 could be required. A technical paper that has circulated among some industry officials and was viewed by The Wall Street Journal suggests it may take up to 40. Musk, during a recent presentation about SpaceX's plans for Mars, didn't discuss the number of flights that would be needed to send a Starship to the red planet. Staff at the company have talked about trying to send a basic, uncrewed ship out there next year with as few as three refueling flights, the Journal has reported. In a recent post on his social-media site X, Musk said a Starship flight to Mars in 2026 would be tough, giving it just a slight chance of happening. Micah Maidenberg is a reporter in the Chicago bureau of The Wall Street Journal. Email him at

Apple rejects Elon Musk's claim of App Store bias
Apple rejects Elon Musk's claim of App Store bias

The Hindu

time33 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Apple rejects Elon Musk's claim of App Store bias

Apple last week rejected Elon Musk's claim that its digital App Store favours OpenAI's ChatGPT over his company's Grok and other rival AI assistants. Musk has accused Apple of giving unfair preference to ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman this week. "The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias," Apple said in reply to an AFP inquiry. "We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria." Apple added that its goal at the App Store is to offer "safe discovery" for users and opportunities for developers to get their creations noticed. But earlier this week, Musk said Apple was "behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," without providing evidence to back his claim. "xAI will take immediate legal action," he said on his social media network X, referring to his own artificial intelligence company, which is responsible for Grok. X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India. DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI. Altman called Musk's accusation "remarkable" in a response on X, charging that Musk himself is said to "manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." Musk called Altman a "liar" in the heated exchange. OpenAI and xAI recently released new versions of ChatGPT and Grok. App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free app for iPhones on Thursday, with Grok in seventh place. Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads. Grok was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension, which followed multiple accusations of misinformation including the bot's misidentification of war-related images, such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, Grok triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologised "for the horrific behavior that many experienced." A US judge has cleared the way for a trial to consider OpenAI legal claims accusing Musk, a co-founder of the company, of waging a "relentless campaign" to damage the organisation after it achieved success following his departure. The litigation is another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI start-up and the world's richest person. Musk founded xAI in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store