St. Paul Ward 4 council race: Forums scheduled, endorsements roll in
St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter and the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce's political action committee are backing nonprofit founder Molly Coleman for the open Ward 4 seat on the city council, as are a series of labor unions. Members of Starbucks Workers United plan to knock doors alongside Ward 4 candidate Cole Hanson, who has drawn endorsements from City Council Member Nelsie Yang and the Twin Cities Democratic Socialists of America.
Chauntyll Allen, a leader of Black Lives Matter Twin Cities, has received the support of a number of elected officials, including Ramsey County Commissioner Rena Moran, fellow school board members Halla Henderson, Carlo Franco and Jim Vue, and City Council Member Anika Bowie. Carolyn Will, a former television journalist turned marketing specialist, is the latest candidate to jump in the race for Ward 4.
With early voting opening Friday, political endorsements are rolling in for the four candidates, who will meet in at least six candidate forums leading up to the Aug. 12 special election.
Voters in the city's Ward 4 neighborhoods — Hamline-Midway, Merriam Park, St. Anthony Park and parts of Macalester-Groveland and Como — will choose their next council member by ranked-choice ballot, which means they may rank all four candidates by order of preference.
The candidates include Allen, who serves on the St. Paul Board of Education; Coleman, the founder of the nonprofit People's Parity Project, which seeks progressive court reform; Hanson, a statewide online education coordinator who teaches nutrition to recipients of federal food assistance, or SNAP; and Will, founder of CW Marketing and Communications.
With the St. Paul DFL not hosting caucuses or endorsing conventions for Ward 4 this summer or in this year's mayor's race, other endorsements could gain more prominence, as could candidate forums. The position is officially non-partisan but typically draws strong partisan interest.
'I was kind of disappointed that the St. Paul DFL wasn't going to have an endorsement process,' said Al Oertwig, chair of the St. Paul chapter of the DFL Senior Caucus. The Senior Caucus will convene a Ward 4candidate forum from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday in the meeting room at Mississippi Market, 740 East Seventh St.
The St. Paul Historic Preservation Political Committee, which advocates for historic building preservation in the, will host its July 14 forum at Hamline Methodist Church, 1514 Englewood Ave. Doors open at 6 p.m. and the forum is expected to conclude at 8 p.m. There is no admission charge. For more information, visit the organization's website at tinyurl.com/StPreserveW425. Questions from the audience will be accepted, time permitting.
Additional forums will be hosted by the Metropolitan Interfaith Council on Affordable Housing, or MICAH, on July 17; the League of Women Voters on July 22; and the Senate District 64 DFL on July 30.
Unidos MN held an hour-long climate forum with the candidates on May 27, and video of the forum is online at tinyurl.com/UnidosSTP25.
Allen, who was born and raised in Rondo, is the founder of Love First Community Engagement, which connects volunteers to work with Black youth. In addition to counting on the support of Moran, Henderson, Franco, Vue and Bowie, her endorsements include the Stonewall DFL, the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund and civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong. Her campaign website is chauntyllforward4.com.
'From my family's displacement from Rondo to seeing my former students on the streets to difficulty finding affordable housing for me and my wife, I know what fellow residents are facing because I live it everyday,' said Allen, in a recent statement.
She was not immediately available for comment Monday, but she publicly listed her core priorities as 'housing options for all,' community safety, economic stability and workforce and youth development.
Coleman, daughter of former St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman, lives in Hamline-Midway with her husband and 1 1/2-year-old son. Her major endorsements include the mayor, former Council President Amy Brendmoen, state Sen. Clare Oumou Verbeten, DFL-St. Paul, Ramsey County Commissioner Garrison McMurtrey, Council Member Saura Jost and interim Council Member Matt Privratsky. Her campaign website site is coleman4council.com.
Coleman also has the support of Sustain St. Paul, gun control advocates Moms Demand Action, the St. Paul Building Trades, the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters, the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 82 and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 110.
'It's helpful, especially in an election without a DFL endorsement, to know there have been real screenings,' said Coleman, who is running on the platform of economic and social justice and inclusivity. 'But ultimately, it will be up to the voters.'
Hanson lives near Snelling and University avenues in the Midway and has a young child. In addition to receiving the backing of Nelsie Yang and the Twin Cities DSA, he's received an official endorsement from Minneapolis City Council Member Robin Wonsley and a series of everyday Ward 4 residents he features prominently on his website. His campaign website is coleforward4.org.
The International Association of Firefighters Local 21 and the St. Paul Federation of Educators Local 28 have not made official endorsements in the race, but both organizations gave Hanson letters of recommendation. In July, he plans to go door knocking alongside Starbucks Workers United using the campaign banner 'St. Paul is a Union Town.'
'I'm really proud of that one,' said Hanson, a former president of the Hamline-Midway Coalition, whose platform includes advocating for a downtown municipal grocery and city-owned affordable and market-rate housing. 'They're scrappers. They're really fighting for what they want to win. They're retail workers, and they're organizing against billionaires who own Starbucks.'
Will spent Monday in Bemidji helping her parents clean up after storm damage and was not available for comment. She has lived in four wards in St. Paul for 33 years, and has two adult children and one grandchild.
Will, who has been active in efforts to oppose the Summit Avenue bikeway and force changes to the city's prospective tree preservation ordinance, said in a recent campaign statement she is a politically-moderate independent who believes in 'safety that starts with accountability and neighbors helping neighbors, budgets that respect taxpayers, and a city that welcomes growth without forgetting its roots.'
Former Ward 4 Council Member Mitra Jalali stepped down from office in February, citing health concerns, and interim Council Member Matt Privratsky was later appointed by the mayor's office to fill her role until voters elect a new member to complete the four-year term, which ends in 2028. In November, voters will choose between three candidates for mayor — Carter, Yan Chen and Mike Hilborn — and determine whether to give the city council the option of imposing non-criminal fines, or administrative citations, on rule-breakers.
Watch this space for updates to this story.
Down to one board member and short on cash, St. Paul DFL goes on hiatus
Four candidates file for Ward 4 seat on the St. Paul City Council
Letters: St. Paul should take care of what it has before spending on new things
West Seventh garbage truck depot wins City Council's OK
Climate action group schedules first Ward 4 candidate forum
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans' mega-bill could make Americans hungry again
This is a large country, and people in different states embrace different customs, cultural preferences and political beliefs. But for all our diversity, every person in every state needs to eat. In recognition of this, America has long treated hunger as a national concern. Unfortunately, a little-understood provision in the budget reconciliation legislation speeding through Congress would change that. Within a few years of its passage, we would likely see a significant number of states with no family food assistance program at all for Americans unable to buy enough food. In the middle of the 20th century, the U.S. Department of Agriculture purchased surplus commodities from farms and distributed them to people in need, wherever they were. When this became unworkable, Congress began converting commodity distributions into food stamps that low-income households could spend in regular supermarkets to buy food for their families. President Richard Nixon saw the benefits of this program and pushed through legislation that made the Food Stamp Program nationwide. In the following decades, the Food Stamp Program was expanded to help more of the working poor and reduced when Congress was trying to cut the deficit. Some of its biggest supporters were Republicans like Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.), Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) as well as Rep. Bill Emerson (R-Mo.). As technology advanced, electronic debit cards replaced the old paper food stamps and the program changed its name to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. But even when Congress has felt the need to cut back on food stamps, it has never departed from the principle that hunger is a national concern. Budget cuts that took effect in New York also took effect in Arkansas. The pending reconciliation bill, however, would change that, making it likely that some of the states that most need food assistance would drop out completely. Both the House-passed bill and the one pending in the Senate would, for the first time, require states to contribute to the cost of food assistance benefits. The percentages in the two versions vary, but the hit would be large. If the final legislation requires states to pay 10 percent, the 10-year cost to states would be almost $90 billion. Poorer states would be especially hard-hit: Alabama would have to pay $1.64 billion, Arkansas would need to come up with $521 million and West Virginia would have to find $536 million in its budget. Because the provision prohibits the federal government from paying its share unless the state pays the required amount, states that are unwilling or unable to produce the required match would have to drop out of SNAP altogether. This is a real possibility. The Federal Reserve and many private forecasters are seeing signs that economic growth is slowing, with a full recession a distinct possibility. Even if we avoid a recession, a slowing economy will reduce states' revenues and drive up the number of people losing their jobs and needing food assistance. At a time when states will be cutting important programs and contemplating unwelcome tax increases just to keep their heads above water, few will have room to absorb tens or hundreds of millions of dollars of new costs to maintain existing food assistance programs. Once food assistance ceases to be available in some states for families regardless of need, we will have lost something important about what makes us a country. The consequences will be severe indeed. Copious research shows that children growing up with inadequate diets do worse in school and have lower lifetime earnings. As some states terminate federal food assistance, voices in neighboring states will advocate for dropping the program as well. Members of Congress from states lacking federal family food assistance will have little reason to support funding for a program operating only in other states. The effects will extend well beyond food assistance. SNAP, along with unemployment insurance, is one of our most important 'automatic stabilizers' that puts more money into the economy as the nation tips into a recession. This is crucial because Congress often takes months to enact stimulus legislation — or fails altogether. A shrunken SNAP will mean less effective stimulus to pull the country out of a downturn, and a SNAP that operates only in some states could contribute to an uneven recovery across the country. Indeed, because all states must balance their budgets even in recessions, declining revenues may force some states to drop out of SNAP at the very moment when families most need help and when the economy most needs a boost. No good reason exists for shifting the costs of SNAP benefits to states. States already spend large amounts to meet human needs ignored by the federal government and even more matching federal contributions for efforts such as Medicaid and child care subsidies. States' revenue streams are less efficient and far more vulnerable to regional and national economic downturns. Suddenly increasing states' costs in federal-state programs is precisely the kind of 'unfunded mandate' that prompted congressional Republicans to enact the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act in 1995 and that led Republicans to criticize the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Dumping federal fiscal shortfalls on the states is antithetical to the values of federalism. It is a shameful practice contemplated by policymakers lacking the courage to get the federal government's own fiscal house in order. Congress should drop this cost-shifting provision altogether. At a very minimum, it should ensure that the federal share of food assistance benefits remain available even in states that are unwilling or unable to put up hundreds of millions of dollars of their own. David A. Super teaches at Georgetown Law.
The Hill
12 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans' new SNAP proposal prompts GOP concern
A GOP-backed proposal that would shift some of the cost of food assistance to states for the first time is drawing renewed concern in the party, as critics argue the effort could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. Republicans are pushing to pass the proposal — which could see states with higher payment error rates covering a greater share of benefit costs — as a part of the broader spending cuts and tax package in the coming days. But that doesn't mean some Republicans aren't concerned about the measure. 'Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,' Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday. 'So, that's important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you're judging as possible.' Numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed Alaska's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — hit above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit at 11.68 percent. Sullivan noted the state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on a path to improving those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, 'It's still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.' According to the Alaska Beacon, the state's error rate hiked after state officials said they violated federal rules in order to continue feeding people amid a significant backlog in applications. Under the initial plan crafted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Republicans sought to require states to cover some of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. However, Senate Republicans tweaked the plan after facing a setback when their 'state cost-share' proposal was rejected by the chamber's rules referee as part of a megabill the party hopes to pass in the coming days. A release from the agriculture committee said the updated plan would allow states to choose the payment error either fiscal year 2025 or 2026 to 'calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.' For the following fiscal year, the 'state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the committee said, adding a 'state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent.' Asked about further potential changes to the plan, Agriculture chairman Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Friday that negotiators 'worked really hard to try and get a situation that worked for as many people as we could, and I think we've achieved that.' 'Alaska is a unique state, unique situation, so I know that everybody's trying to work hard to accommodate situations that don't fit,' Boozman said Friday afternoon. 'So, I haven't heard of any changes, and I'm sure that, you know, [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune [(R-S.D.)] will grab me if that comes about.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) also expressed concerns about the proposal, telling reporters earlier on Friday that she's raised them with others in the party, according to Politico. Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposal later, Murkowski told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.' 'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said. Republicans say the states' cost-share proposal would incentivize states to improve their error rates. But Sullivan and Murkowski aren't the only Republicans who have voiced concerns about the effort in recent weeks. Originally, the House plan called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its initial version of Trump's megabill, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent and 25 percent. However, the proposal was dialed back after concerns from other Republicans, including Sens. Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Jim Justice (W. Va.) over the measure. Asked if he's meeting with Boozman or Thune on the matter, Sullivan also told The Hill on Friday evening that he's 'meeting with everybody.' 'For me, it's just important to get the data as close to the date that you're judging,' Sullivan said, adding that he expects Alaska to see a notable drop in its error rate in a coming report.
Axios
13 hours ago
- Axios
Melissa and Mark Hortman to lie in state Friday at the Capitol
Melissa and Mark Hortman will lie in state with their golden retriever, Gilbert, at the Minnesota Capitol on Friday afternoon. The big picture: The slain former House speaker is the first woman — and one of fewer than 20 Minnesotans — to ever receive the honor. The last person to lie in state in Minnesota was former Gov. Al Quie, who died in 2023. Catch up fast: The influential DFL legislator and her husband were shot and killed at their home on June 14 in what authorities have called a politically motivated assassination. Gilbert was gravely injured in the attack and later euthanized. The man authorities have charged in the slayings, Vance Boelter, is also accused of shooting another DFL senator and his wife in their nearby home and plotting to attack others. What to expect: Public viewing hours at the Capitol will be from 12-5pm. Members of the public can enter through the main doors atop the Capitol front steps and pay their respects in the Rotunda. A growing memorial outside the House chamber will also be accessible to those visiting the building. If you go: While there are several lots nearby, parking is limited. Officials encourage visitors to take public transportation if they can. Those in line by 5pm will be allowed into the building.
