logo
Will rich Rhode Islanders flee because of a millionaires tax? Don't believe it, advocates say.

Will rich Rhode Islanders flee because of a millionaires tax? Don't believe it, advocates say.

Yahoo05-03-2025

Will a progressive income tax cause millionaires and billionaires to flee Rhode Island in search of tax-friendlier pastures elsewhere? No, according to a new analysis from the Economic Progress Institute. (Getty image)
Advocates and lawmakers burst into applause and cheers as labor organizer Pat Crowley pulled open the lapels of his blazer to reveal his T-shirt emblazoned with 'Eat the Rich.'
The crowd's reaction at a State House event Tuesday was much more subdued when Alan Krinsky narrated a set of projected slides filled with text and charts. The findings might not be as crowd-rousing as Crowley's shirt slogan, but Krinsky, director of research and fiscal policy for the Economic Progress Institute (EPI), hopes the data will be equally effective in persuading lawmakers to finally approve a higher tax on the state's richest residents.
The 26-page policy briefing refuted arguments that a progressive income tax will cause millionaires and billionaires to flee the state in search of tax-friendlier pastures.
'The evidence clearly shows that the fear of substantial migration out of Rhode Island as a result of increasing the top tax rate on millionaires and other high-income filers is just that, a fear, and a completely unwarranted fear, as such a mass exodus in response to changes in top marginal tax rates is without historical precedent,' the report states.
And separating fact from fiction has never been more important as state leaders stare down a projected $220 million deficit for the upcoming fiscal 2026 budget, combined with grave federal funding cuts.
'We're living during times where there's a lot of fear,' Weayonnoh Nelson-Davies, EPI's executive director, told the standing room-only crowd gathered in the Senate lounge Tuesday. 'This myth has been held over our heads in Rhode Island for quite a while. Stop spreading the myth.'
The myth busting comes on the heels of companion bills introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly last month by Rep. Karen Alzate, a Pawtucket Democrat, and Sen. Melissa Murray, a Woonsocket Democrat, seeking to tax the state's top earners more.
A 3% surtax on the 5,700 state income tax filers who earn above $625,000 a year (based on 2025 data) would bring in $190 million annually for the state, according to EPI's analysis.
Murray and Alzate have unsuccessfully floated similar tax proposals in previous years, with business leaders insisting the policy will cost the state more than it brings in while forcing rich residents to move, taking their wealth, and their economic contributions to the state, with them.
But high earners across the country, including in Rhode Island, are far less likely to move than their lower-income counterparts. From 2016 to 2022, Rhode Island has grown its share of residents who earn above $200,000 a year. The numbers of residents who earn less than $200,000 have declined in that same time.
Historically, the state's population rarely fluctuates up or down more than 1% a year, including pre-2010, when Rhode Island lawmakers reduced the top income tax rate from 10% to 5.99%, the report found.
The few rich residents who move don't necessarily head for states that have lower income taxes. In general, state tax policies have little sway over where top earners decide to live; instead, their migrations are influenced more by work, family and climate, according to research by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities cited in the EPI report.
'The difference in the top marginal rates of state income taxes is not a significant impact on their standard of living,' Krinsky said. 'They can afford to live where they want to.'
Just look at Rhode Island's northern neighbor. Massachusetts voters in 2022 approved a ballot measure adding a 4% surtax on income over $1 million. Since the millionaires tax, also known as the Fair Share Amendment, took effect in 2023, the Commonwealth has brought in more than $2 billion in revenue from the tax each year — exceeding estimates even by tax supporters.
We're living during times where there's a lot of fear. This myth has been held over our heads in Rhode Island for quite a while. Stop spreading the myth.
– Weayonnoh Nelson-Davies, executive director, Economic Progress Institute
'It is quite possible that a few Massachusetts millionaire filers have left the state, and for these people, the state would indeed lose the tax revenue they would have paid on their taxable income below a million dollars,' the report acknowledges. 'However, the state would not be collecting over $2 billion in additional revenue annually if the departure of a few millionaires was causing a serious loss of revenue.'
And that windfall of extra cash has helped pay for crucial programs in Massachusetts that many Rhode Island lawmakers would like to replicate: free breakfast and lunch for public school students, regardless of income; free fare on public transportation; money for critical road and bridge repairs and scholarships for higher education, to name a few.
'These are all the things we know we need, all these great proposals we would love to fund, but have to look our constituents in the eye year after year after year and say 'I'm sorry, this is such a great proposal and we know we need this so badly, but we just don't have the money,' said Murray. 'The $190 million is not going to solve all our problems, but it would go a long way.'
Not only does the tax create a new, sustainable source of revenue, it also may prevent the state from losing a far more mobile segment of its population: the working class.
Rhode Island, like much of the Northeast, has seen its population shrink in recent years, in part because more people are leaving the state than moving in. But it's not millionaires who are on the move so much as young working class families being priced out of housing, transportation, and other costs, said Andrew Farnitano, former spokesperson for the Raise Up Massachusetts campaign that rallied support for the 2022 ballot question in Massachusetts.
'I hate to break it to you, but multi-millionaires are not renting U-Haul trucks to move out,' Farnitano said at the event Tuesday, referencing commercial moving data from U-Haul often cited by income tax detractors.
The bills have also received the backing of the Revenue for Rhode Islanders Coalition, which represents more than a dozen state labor, education, child care, and policy groups.
House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi has remained noncommittal on the income tax bills, though he noted the budget challenges the state is facing this year in an emailed statement Tuesday.
Senate President Dominick Ruggerio previously indicated he would not support any tax increases, a position which remains generally unchanged though he will consider the specifics of the bill during the hearing process, Greg Paré, a Senate spokesperson, said in an email Tuesday.
Murray, however, remained optimistic, noting the attendance of Senate Majority Leader Valarie Lawson at the policy event Tuesday.
Hearings on the companion bills had not been scheduled as of Tuesday.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stanhope's first female mayor passed away — and then won re-election in Tuesday's primary
Stanhope's first female mayor passed away — and then won re-election in Tuesday's primary

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stanhope's first female mayor passed away — and then won re-election in Tuesday's primary

Voters in Stanhope gave Republican nominations to two incumbent council members in Tuesday's primary — including Diana Kuncken, a longtime public official in the Sussex County borough who died a week before the election. Kuncken, 83, died on June 3. The longtime Stanhope resident was first elected to the council in 1997. In 2004, she became Stanhope's first female mayor, serving eight years. In 2012 she returned to the council, serving continuously until her death last week, according to her obituary. Kuncken "passed away peacefully," according to the obituary from Leber-Lakeside Funeral Home, which did not list a cause of death. Unofficial results from the June 10 primary show Kuncken gathered 201 votes in the Republican primary while fellow council member Scott Wachterhauser received 233 votes. The third candidate in the race for two nominations on the November ballot was Najib Iftikhar, who received 85 votes, according to the county clerk's Democrats sought council nominations. According to County Clerk Jeff Parrott, the Republican party will select someone to fill Kuncken's unexpired term on the council. He said he expected the party will also select a candidate to replace her on the November ballot. The only other contested municipal primary in the county was a Republican race in Ogdensburg, where four candidates vied for two nominations to the borough council. More: Ciattarelli, Sherrill win NJ primaries for governor. Check our live blog for all results That race was led by Kristopher Gordon with 173 votes, followed by incumbent Brenda Cowdrick with 169. Councilwoman Caren Ruitenberg had 136 votes and Michael Nardini 160, according to preliminary results. Parrott said there were write-ins which could decide candidates in some Democrat races. Those must be tallied and the county must verify that the winner wants to be on the November ballot. This article originally appeared on New Jersey Herald: Sussex County councilwoman wins GOP primary - a week after her death

Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic primary for NJ governor, AP projects
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic primary for NJ governor, AP projects

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic primary for NJ governor, AP projects

TRENTON - Rep. Mikie Sherrill will win the Democratic primary race for New Jersey governor, AP projects, claiming victory over a crowded and competitive field of prominent current and former officeholders. The moderate congressional Democrat will fight to keep the Garden State blue as she faces Republican winner Jack Ciattarelli in the November general election. Because the New Jersey gubernatorial race is one of the first major elections since Donald Trump's return to the White House, there's a tremendous amount at stake simply through public perception. This is a breaking news update. Watch live election coverage in the media player above, and stay with us as this story develops. Sherrill, a former federal prosecutor and U.S. Navy helicopter pilot, was the establishment, left-of-center candidate in a crowded field of Democratic contenders. Most of her campaign messaging had leaned on her military experience and being able to handle conflict. "I learned early on: In a crisis, the worst thing you can do is freeze," she said. "You have to choose to lead," Sherrill has represented the 11th District, which includes parts of Essex, Morris and Passaic counties, since her 2018 election during President Donald Trump's first administration's midterm. Sherrill flipped the district from Republican control with former Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen's retirement and has been reelected three times since. Sherrill raised $2.8 million during the primary election, placing her among the top House fundraisers in the country. Before getting elected to Congress, she was a prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey. She served in the Navy from 1994 to 2003. Born in Alexandria, Virginia, the 53-year-old now lives in Montclair, New Jersey with her husband. She is also a mother of four. During an interview with NJ Now, she said she would address the state's affordability issues by building more housing, investing in community solar to lower utility costs, and holding the grid operator PJM accountable.

Newsom Slams Trump as ‘Stone-Cold Liar' Over Phone Call
Newsom Slams Trump as ‘Stone-Cold Liar' Over Phone Call

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom Slams Trump as ‘Stone-Cold Liar' Over Phone Call

California Gov. Gavin Newsom slammed Donald Trump as a 'stone-cold liar' in an MSNBC interview on Sunday, insisting the president's angry public posturing doesn't match the tone he struck during a Friday phone call. Trump has been attacking the Democrat on Truth Social after deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles—against the governor's wishes—to intervene in protests in the city. The troops arrived Sunday, and clashes between protesters and law enforcement grew increasingly fraught throughout the day. Newsom said he and Trump spoke late on Friday night—about 1.30 a.m. Saturday in D.C.—but Trump never brought up the National Guard. The protests broke out on Friday after a series of federal immigration raids on workplaces across Los Angeles. 'We talked for almost 20 minutes and he barely, this issue never came up,' Newsom said on MSNBC. 'I tried to talk about L.A., he wanted to talk about all these other issues. We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard. He's a stone-cold liar,' he added. 'He said he did. Stone. Cold. Liar. Never did.' 'There's no working with the president. There's only working for him, and I will never work for Donald Trump,' he said. 'You're creating the conditions that you claim you're solving,' he later added. The governor said he's suing the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard and the lawsuit will be filed tomorrow. The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment. Earlier, Newsom had slammed Trump's order to deploy the troops as unlawful and formally called for it to be rescinded. He has said the move was 'purposefully inflammatory.' It's been about six decades since a president last sent in the National Guard without a governor's request or approval. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty—inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed,' Newsom wrote on X earlier Sunday. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that sentiment, saying that the situation had been under control before the federal intervention sparked a 'chaotic escalation.' 'Angelenos — don't engage in violence and chaos. Don't give the administration what they want,' she posted on Sunday night. Ignoring calls for de-escalation from local leaders, Trump amped up the rhetoric throughout Sunday, even calling the protesters 'insurrectionists' on Truth Social. He said he'd directed administration officials to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' The president, who in January pardoned hundreds of rioters who took part in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, also attacked Newsom and Bass and called on them to 'apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store