Nigel Farage says he has forgiven Zia Yusuf for resignation
Businessman Mr Yusuf returned to the party over the weekend, just 48 hours after he quit his position, saying he had made an 'error'.
Speaking in Port Talbot on Monday, Mr Farage said: 'Let's be clear, I think Zia's done a great job.
'Under enormous pressure, and by the way, a level of abuse – racist abuse online – unlike I think anybody in modern politics has ever had to put up with.
'He made a mistake, he got it wrong. It plunged us for a few hours into a difficult place.
'He expressed his regret to me, I forgave him. I did say 'don't do it again', but I forgave him.'
Mr Farage went on to say that Mr Yusuf is coming back 'into a very very big job'.
'Would I rather those couple of days hadn't happened? Yes. But look how quickly and effectively we have dealt with it,' he added.
Mr Yusuf's departure followed an internal row, in which he described a question asked to the Prime Minister by the party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, about banning the burka as 'dumb'.
Announcing his resignation on Thursday afternoon, he said: 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.'
Mr Yusuf said at the weekend that his decision to stand down had been due to 'exhaustion' after working for 11 months 'without a day off'.
He said he had been left feeling undervalued by some in the party and drained after being subjected to relentless racist abuse on X, and made the comments in 'error'.
'I spoke to Nigel and said I don't mind saying I made an error. It was a function of exhaustion,' he told the Sunday Times.
Asked about the row over talk of banning the burka, Mr Yusuf said he 'certainly did not resign because I have any strong views about the burka itself' but felt blindsided by Ms Pochin's question to Sir Keir Starmer.
Mr Farage told the same newspaper that Mr Yusuf will now effectively be doing 'four jobs' for the party, although his title is yet to be decided.
Mr Yusuf will lead Reform's plans to cut public spending – the so-called 'UK Doge', based on the US Department of Government Efficiency, which was led by tech billionaire Elon Musk.
The former chairman will also take part in policymaking, fundraising and media appearances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
It's not enough for SNP to occasionally say ‘independence'
Moving from local to national, there was a call for a constitutional convention from Councillor Murray in The National on Saturday. On the same day in the same paper, Gordon Macintyre-Kemp (Believe in Scotland) called for a new national conversation through a citizens convention. Independence Forum Scotland's Summer Convention on Scotland's Future will take place in Perth this Saturday. It will be their second this year. The grassroots took root, sheltered immediately after 2014, and the movement well continued. And thank (supply your own deity or whatever) for that. It's still the same message from across that movement: independence. It's sad, then, that political parties such as the SNP haven't moved on in tandem with us. The independence message has been diluted, and looking at the most recent rejection last week, it's more a case that the message was missing, again. John Swinney is quoted after the latest failure as saying: 'I thought the SNP was best placed to see off Reform because of the scale of collapse in the Labour vote.' Is it too much to believe (as I have done til now) that the SNP would see off Reform and the other pro-Unionist parties not by asking for a vote just to keep someone else out, but with their laid-out vision for independence? It is their raison d'etre after all. Not heart before head, but by taking the abstract notion of independence and translating that into the positive. It's not enough for the SNP to occasionally say 'independence' like some now tired mantra. Or expect me to click my heels and wish, Dorothy-like. Where is the plan, the strategy, the tactics? Where, when are we reminded of the changes to date that have had a positive impact? The likes of additional child payments, free bus passes, achieved through our government, our parliament, albeit hamstrung via the clever trap that is devolution. Where, when is the current highway robbery situation explained, as energy flows out of Scotland only to be returned at an increased cost to households? Westminster seems to have imposed a tariff on Scotland, having robbed us first! I think even Trump would be impressed with that one! There's no room to say that as this was a local election, indy shouldn't feature. These are all 'local' issues across the 'nation'; indy should always feature. Then to all politicians who say they believe in independence: you need to be connected with the grassroots movement, you have to heed what we say, see what we're doing, realise the strength, the numbers. You need to be prepared to tell folks if it's change you want, then change you'll get with independence, and here's how, here's the plan. The clock is ticking down to 2026. Selma Rahman Edinburgh WHY oh why can't we have simple literature telling the general public that with INDEPENDENCE we will be THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS better off and rid of THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS from Westminster that is making us worse off? Ken McCartney Hawick
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision
Sir Iain Duncan Smith said response by the Government to the proposed embassy near the the capital's financial district had become 'Project Kowtow', as he criticised the Government for 'one denial after another (and) one betrayal after another'. Sir Iain referred to the warnings reportedly issued by the White House and Dutch government to Downing Street over the plans, which is set to be scrutinised by ministers. The worries stem from the close proximity of the proposed embassy's Royal Mint Court site to data centres and communication cables. The Sunday Times said the US was 'deeply concerned' about the plans, quoting a senior US official. In response, planning minister Matthew Pennycook said he could not give a full response as the matter was still to come before the department for a decision, and any verdict could be challenged by the courts. Sir Iain said: 'Beijing has a recent history of cutting cables and confirmed infrastructure hacks, including embedding malware capable of disabling all that infrastructure. 'Minister Peter Kyle yesterday on television said surprisingly that this was in the planning process and could be managed. Will the minister correct this record? The planning inquiry has concluded, no changes can be made to the Chinese planning application at all. 'I'll remind him the application contains nothing about cabling. Indeed to the inquiry, the Chinese have rejected only two requests, which he referred to actually, made by the Government in the letter from the foreign and home secretaries, despite ministers regularly saying that this letter, and I quote, should give those concerned, 'comfort'.' The Conservative MP said rerouting the cables would cost millions of pounds, and asked Mr Pennycook why the Government had denied the existence of cables until the White House confirmed it. He asked Mr Pennycook to deny reports by Chinese state media, saying the UK had given the Chinese assurances that it would allow a development 'no matter what'. He added: 'I see this as Project Kowtow, one denial after another, one betrayal after another. No wonder our allies believe that this Chinese mega embassy is now becoming a walk of shame for the Government.' Mr Pennycook replied because of the 'quasi-judicial nature' of his role, he could not comment on details of the application. He also said it would not be 'appropriate' for him to comment on the cabling or national security issues. He said he did not 'recognise the characterisation' by the Sunday Times of the embassy being raised in talks between the UK and China on trade. 'It is important to also emphasise that only material planning considerations can be taken into account in determining this case,' he said. 'But, as I say, I cannot comment in any detail on a case and it is not yet before the department.' Tory shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Parliament had been treated with disdain by the Government. Mr Hollinrake said: 'Question after question, letter after letter, the Government has consistently treated Parliament with complete disregard on this matter. Stonewalling legitimate inquiries about national security, about ministerial discussions, and warnings about security bodies.' He added: 'Why won't the Government follow the examples of the US, Australian, and Irish governments which veto similar embassies that threaten their national security? 'The Government is on the verge of making a decision that will lead to huge risk, that will persist for decades. Will they change course before it is too late?' Mr Pennycook replied: 'No decision has been made on this case. No application is yet before the department.' Marie Rimmer, Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, said: 'China has a track record of aggressive state-backed espionage, and surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of what risk if this would go ahead?' She added: 'We cannot not say anything in this House. We must comment on what we see, and please understand that we must do so.' Meanwhile, former security minister, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, asked whether the Government believed the Chinese would treat a similar application in the same way. He said: 'Do you honestly believe that thr minister thinks that the Chinese would look at this proposal in the same way? 'Do we actually in this House believe that our economic security being threatened, as highlighted by the Americans and the Dutch, would go through a bureaucratic planning process with no ability to vary it because, frankly, them's the orders? 'I don't think that's the way China would do it, and it's certainly not the way we should.' Mr Pennycook replied: 'I'm very glad that we have a different and more robust planning system than the People's Republic of China.' Later in the session, Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) asked if the officer considering the case is 'cleared to receive top secret information'. Mr Pennycook replied: 'A planning inspector is assessing the case as part of a public inquiry. 'And I'm afraid, while I recognise why (Mr Jopp) has asked the question, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on national security matters.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Bigger and better person than Farage? Nigel thinks you're wrong
Relax chaps, Reform is back under control. 'We did hit a speed bump,' Nigel Farage told a press conference in Wales: 'Zia lost his rag, he put out an intemperate comment or two,' but the former party chairman 'expressed his regret' and 'I forgave him.' So, where is he now? Not with us today. But any worry that Zia isn't answering his phone, or that his car was found abandoned in a pond, is misplaced. 'I'm loyal to people all the while they are loyal to me,' said Nigel - who I'm told laid a new patio in the middle of the night - and 'if anybody talks behind my back or betrays my trust, I'll never speak to them again.' Silence across the room. Message received. In that spirit, let me be the first to say, thank you Nigel for pushing the Government to reverse its winter fuel cut, rescuing millions of pensioners from certain death. Proof that you don't have to be in power to make a change - a principle tested with equal courage by Greta Thunberg and her net-weirdo flotilla - till they were 'kidnapped' by the IDF. Conditions in the Israeli prison are described as sub-human - I'm told they only have one flavour of ice-cream - and got worse when the PM rang Tel Aviv to demand that they 'release the sausages'. Imagine Greta's horror when confronted with a buffet of kosher hot dogs and told that there is no vegetarian option. 'Attention-seeking narcissist,' Piers Morgan called her - naked on a giraffe in Trafalgar Square - and it occurred to me that we live in an era of rolling self-owns. Zia quit after a Reform MP floated a burka ban, then returned saying he'd probably ban it himself. Greta's boat claimed it was sprayed with a 'white irritant substance' - when it was crewed by white irritants. And the Government, having banked everything on 'clearing up the Tory mess', reverses a winter fuel cut it previously said was necessary to avoid economic Armageddon. 'When should the City of London… expect the run on the pound?' asked Conservative Simon Hoare in the Commons. The minister sent on the suicide mission to defend this U-turn, a child soldier called Torsten Bell, oozed oily self-confidence, yet his hands trembled. He has only two modes of performance: bemused and angry, the latter red-faced and nose-twitching as he declared the opposition has 'no plan'. Prior to being in government, Torsten ran a think tank of the 'Paddington loves a wealth tax' variety and made popular videos about how one could abolish poverty by taxing Pimms – so watching him struggle with the realities of power (like Greta trying to explain the dangers of carbon to an Israeli interrogator) is a joy. If you can throw money at pensioners, asked Left-wing MPs, why not benefits for poor parents and the disabled? 'All levers are on the table,' Bell replied. Does the boy dream in meaningless cliches, too?! No wonder Wales is flirting with Reform, a land that values language and big characters. 'There are people,' said Farage, 'who think they are bigger and better than me.' Well, they're not. And proof is that if you ring Zia's number, Nigel's patio plays La Cucaracha.
