It's not enough for SNP to occasionally say ‘independence'
Independence Forum Scotland's Summer Convention on Scotland's Future will take place in Perth this Saturday. It will be their second this year.
The grassroots took root, sheltered immediately after 2014, and the movement well continued. And thank (supply your own deity or whatever) for that. It's still the same message from across that movement: independence.
It's sad, then, that political parties such as the SNP haven't moved on in tandem with us.
The independence message has been diluted, and looking at the most recent rejection last week, it's more a case that the message was missing, again.
John Swinney is quoted after the latest failure as saying: 'I thought the SNP was best placed to see off Reform because of the scale of collapse in the Labour vote.'
Is it too much to believe (as I have done til now) that the SNP would see off Reform and the other pro-Unionist parties not by asking for a vote just to keep someone else out, but with their laid-out vision for independence? It is their raison d'etre after all. Not heart before head, but by taking the abstract notion of independence and translating that into the positive.
It's not enough for the SNP to occasionally say 'independence' like some now tired mantra. Or expect me to click my heels and wish, Dorothy-like. Where is the plan, the strategy, the tactics? Where, when are we reminded of the changes to date that have had a positive impact? The likes of additional child payments, free bus passes, achieved through our government, our parliament, albeit hamstrung via the clever trap that is devolution. Where, when is the current highway robbery situation explained, as energy flows out of Scotland only to be returned at an increased cost to households? Westminster seems to have imposed a tariff on Scotland, having robbed us first! I think even Trump would be impressed with that one!
There's no room to say that as this was a local election, indy shouldn't feature. These are all 'local' issues across the 'nation'; indy should always feature.
Then to all politicians who say they believe in independence: you need to be connected with the grassroots movement, you have to heed what we say, see what we're doing, realise the strength, the numbers.
You need to be prepared to tell folks if it's change you want, then change you'll get with independence, and here's how, here's the plan. The clock is ticking down to 2026.
Selma Rahman
Edinburgh
WHY oh why can't we have simple literature telling the general public that with INDEPENDENCE we will be THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS better off and rid of THIS, THIS, THIS, THIS and THIS from Westminster that is making us worse off?
Ken McCartney
Hawick
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ex-aide to far-right lawmaker on trial in Germany for China spying
DRESDEN, Germany, Aug 5 (Reuters) - A former assistant to a politician for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) went on trial in a German court on Tuesday, charged with spying for China's intelligence agency. The defendant, identified as German national Jian G. in line with German privacy rules, is suspected of having worked for a Chinese intelligence service since 2002, say prosecutors. Dresden court spokesperson Meike Schaaf said he was charged with gathering documents and files from the European Parliament while working for Maximilian Krah, a former European lawmaker who now represents the AfD in Germany's national parliament. Federal prosecutors argue some documents were partially confidential and they also accuse him of collecting personal information on the leadership of the AfD and of spying on Chinese opposition members and dissidents. The high-profile case has fuelled concern about Europe being a target for Chinese spying. Beijing has denied accusations of espionage in Europe. The Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately respond on Tuesday to a Reuters request for comment on the German case. The case has also put a spotlight on the pro-China and pro-Russia views of some senior members of the AfD, which is currently polling at 25%, level with the ruling conservative bloc, a weekend Forsa survey showed. A woman, identified as Chinese national Jaqi X., is also on trial. She is charged with helping Jian G. between August 2023 and February 2024 by providing information about flights at Leipzig airport related to the transportation of equipment and people with connections to a German arms company. Jian G. has been in detention since his arrest on April 2024 and Jaqi X. since September 2024. The court spokesperson said that if convicted, Jian G. would face a jail term of between one and 10 years due to the serious nature of the intelligence agency activity for a foreign power. Less serious cases could see a fine or up to five years in jail. Court dates have been scheduled until the end of September.
Scotsman
32 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Report for 'doomed to fail' minimum income guarantee cost £1.3m as SNP exercise branded 'waste of time'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers spent £1.3 million on a report into introducing a new welfare system despite knowing the scheme was 'doomed to fail'. The Scottish Government commissioned an expert panel to look at how it might implement a policy of bringing in a minimum income for all Scots. Findings from the Minimum Income Guarantee Expert Group included giving single parents in Scotland up to £28,000 in benefits without working. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh | PA However, sources close to the project insist there is little appetite to introduce the scheme, branded an 'absurd' policy by opposition parties. Now figures, released under Freedom of Information rules, show the costs for the expert group's final report were £280,000. The group was supported by a government secretariat of five civil servants, making their salary costs over the time of generating the report around £260,000 a year. It took from August 2021 to May 2025 - three years and ten months - to develop the findings. This is despite the fact the Holyrood Government does not have devolved all the reserved powers necessary to introduce a minimum income guarantee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A recommendation of the report is the Scottish and UK governments should set up a "co-operation commission" to work out what powers would be needed. An SNP insider said the report was a 'waste of time' and 'doomed to fail'. The source said: 'This report is going to be used as a springboard for charities to lobby government for a minimum income guarantee - despite the fact it is impossible to see how we could afford to pay for it. 'We've paid a significant sum for a report we don't agree with and that was doomed to fail, are now likely to distance ourselves from and now are going to be lobbied to implement it. It's not just a waste of time and money, but also a disappointment for the charities involved.' On publication of the minimum income guarantee report, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the Government would consider the findings after the Holyrood recess. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP Minister Shirley-Anne Somerville hoped to sort housing emergency (Picture: Jeff) Shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy said the report was a 'shocking waste of taxpayers' money'. He said: 'Especially when it was to explore a half-baked policy that everyone knew would be unaffordable and damaging. It's typical that the SNP's reaction is now to try to bury the issue and dodge responsibility. 'They should immediately rule out a minimum income guarantee – an absurd and eye-wateringly expensive policy that they have no powers to introduce. But they also owe Scots an explanation for why they ever devoted public money and civil servants' time to this idea, and a detailed account of how so much taxpayers' cash was wasted on this ridiculous report.' The Scottish Government initially declined The Scotsman's FOI request but, on appeal, gave a partial response. Using the pay bands of each civil servant in the secretariat, the salary costs per year would amount to around £260,000 annually. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A plan to bring in a minimum income for all Scots has been under consideration for several years. Supporters claim it would make for a fairer society with a reduced level of poverty if every Scot had a definite basic income, with the suggestion it would 'would effectively end poverty for those in receipt'. Opponents, however, claim it is too expensive a policy to implement and raise concerns that people would not work if they did not have to earn additional income. The report from the independent expert group, which included representatives from 16 groups such as social mobility organisations, universities and charities, recommended the base income be £11,500 for a single adult. A couple would receive £20,000 while a couple with one child or a lone adult with two children would receive £28,000. As their earnings rose to exceed the minimum income threshold, the payments would taper off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The group laid out a series of plans to be rolled out over the next decade that would pave the way for Scotland to introduce a minimum income guarantee from 2036. At the launch of the report in June, Satwat Rehman, one of the members of the group and chief executive of One Parent Families Scotland, said: 'A minimum income guarantee would provide a lifeline, ensuring no single-parent household falls below a dignified minimum income – whether in or out of work, studying or training – and ensure families and children thrive and not just survive.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan
Last week, the First Minister put forward his plans for Scottish independence, saying getting a second referendum could only be achieved if the SNP win a majority in Holyrood. They are the only party to ever win a majority in the Scottish Parliament, a feat achieved under Alex Salmond in 2011. But the leading pollster poured cold water over the prospect, saying at The Herald's Unspun Live at the Fringe that it is "most extremely unlikely" the SNP will do so at the Holyrood election next year. "What is [John Swinney] doing? He is saying to people: if you want independence, vote [SNP]. Do not vote for Alba, do not vote for the Greens,' Curtice said. READ MORE: Which MPs have received the most donations and from whom? See the full list "[John Swinney] does not want there to be a fragmented list vote. He wants people to vote for the SNP. The challenge facing the SNP — the thing that has not changed in Scottish politics despite the turbulence of the last two and a half years — is support for independence. We are still around 50/50 on the independence question.' He added: "Although you hear a lot of talk of people not being concerned about independence anymore, just tell that to most unionist voters. Most unionist voters are deeply concerned about independence. "Very few people now are willing to vote for the SNP if they are opposed to independence. That is in complete contrast to the position in 2011." When asked about how he believes the 2026 elections will play out, Curtice said it would be "child's play" for Reform UK to win at least 10 seats. "I think Kemi Badenoch is becoming more effective, but it is very much a work in progress. The problem the Tories face is that Reform are not just taking voters, they are taking donors, they are taking people,' he added. "It is very difficult to see any outcome other than the SNP still providing government. What remains highly uncertain is how strong it will be. It could be as low as 45 seats. I think the maximum at the moment is 55 seats. "But 55 seats — you have only got to find one party to make a deal. With 45 you have got to find two, and that becomes much more difficult. "I think at the moment it is a race between Reform and Labour over who comes second, and unless the popularity of the Labour government improves, Labour may find themselves in much the same position as they are at the moment."
