James Cameron warns of ‘Terminator-style apocalypse' if AI weaponised
Speaking to Rolling Stone to promote the publication of Ghosts of Hiroshima, an account of the first atomic bombing by bestselling author Charles Pellegrino which Cameron intends to adapt for the big screen, the film-maker behind three of the four highest-grossing films of all time (Titanic and the first two Avatar films), said that although he relies on AI professionally, he remains concerned about what might happen if it was leveraged with nihilistic intent.
'I do think there's still a danger of a Terminator-style apocalypse where you put AI together with weapons systems, even up to the level of nuclear weapon systems, nuclear defence counterstrike, all that stuff,' Cameron said. 'Because the theatre of operations is so rapid, the decision windows are so fast, it would take a super-intelligence to be able to process it, and maybe we'll be smart and keep a human in the loop.
'But humans are fallible, and there have been a lot of mistakes made that have put us right on the brink of international incidents that could have led to nuclear war. So I don't know.'
He added: 'I feel like we're at this cusp in human development where you've got the three existential threats: climate and our overall degradation of the natural world, nuclear weapons, and super-intelligence. They're all sort of manifesting and peaking at the same time. Maybe the super-intelligence is the answer.'
Cameron's original 1984 Terminator film starring Arnold Schwarzenegger is set in a world in which humanity is ruled by an artificially intelligent defence network called Skynet.
Cameron's films, Avatar in particular, are actively engaged with AI in their execution, and the director has been positive about how the technology could help reduce production costs. Last September, he joined the board of directors of Stability AI and earlier this year said the future of blockbuster film-making hinges on being able to 'cut the cost of [VFX] in half'.
He clarified that he hoped such cost-cutting would come not from human layoffs but speed acceleration.
However, Cameron has also expressed scepticism about the capacity of AI to replace screenwriters. In 2023, he said: 'I just don't personally believe that a disembodied mind that's just regurgitating what other embodied minds have said – about the life that they've had, about love, about lying, about fear, about mortality – and just put it all together into a word salad and then regurgitate it … I don't believe that's ever going to have something that's going to move an audience. You have to be human to write that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
Google Finance gets AI reboot
Google is giving its financial data, news and analytics service an artificial intelligence makeover. 0 From this week, Google Finance users will be able to toggle between the old and new AI-supercharged version, says a blog. The new version lets users ask detailed questions about the financial world and get a comprehensive AI response. Rather than looking up individual stock details, people can ask complex research questions in one go. New charting tools will also help users visualise financial data beyond asset performance, letting them view technical indicators, like moving average envelopes, or adjust the display to see candlestick charts. Finally, a new live news feed promises up-to-the minute headlines and tracking on the latest market intelligence.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Tim Rice: I would ‘consider' using AI to help write songs
The award-winning songwriter, 80, is best known for writing the hit musicals Evita and Jesus Christ Superstar alongside Andrew Lloyd Webber, now Lord Lloyd-Webber. Speaking to Jane Mulkerrins on Times Radio, Sir Tim said he has not yet used AI to help write music but is not opposed to it. Sir Tim said: 'I'd certainly consider it. I hadn't ever used it. Perhaps I should. 'I was doing a cricket speech at lords, and AI had only just come to the attention of the public, and I asked it to write a quick Shakespeare sonnet on cricket, which was really quite good. 'So, perhaps I should try it for one or two songs. I've never used it seriously.' When asked whether he had concerns around the use of AI in the arts, he said: 'If I'm honest, no, I'm not sure. 'Nobody quite knows what it will do. I mean, it might create more jobs. Don't ask me how, but these things could happen. It's a bit like saying in 1979, do you think the mobile phone will cause a lot of hassle? And it's got great benefits but also great disadvantages and I wouldn't begin to know that. 'The other thing is, I'm getting on a bit, and I'm not going to (be here) in 20 years' time. I'm not gonna be too worried about AI unless they can bring me back to life.' The lyricist also praised actress Rachel Zegler for her performance of Eva Peron in the West End production of Evita, a musical which follows the story of Peron as she rises from poverty to become the most powerful woman in Latin America. The 24-year-old has made headlines this summer for singing the musical's most popular number, Don't Cry For Me Argentina, from a balcony outside the London Palladium theatre. Directed by Jamie Lloyd, the artistic choice means passers-by are able to be part of the production and witness the live rendition while ticketed audience members watch the number from a screen inside the theatre. Sir Tim said: 'The cast are excellent. Rachel Zegler is a force of nature, I believe is the cliche best applied. 'She sings it beautifully and the idea of having her going out onto the balcony, into the real street, is a work of genius, and also great work of PR and I enjoyed it.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I spent 30 years in the Defence Force. Here's how Australia could easily be CUT OFF from the rest of the world - but embracing AI may save us
Australia risks an internet and communications blackout if it fails to embrace the opportunity of becoming one of the world's major data centre hubs at the forefront of the AI revolution, a former ADF Brigadier turned academic has warned. Professor Ian Langford said Australia relies on just 15 undersea cables for 99 per cent of its international data traffic for things like banking, markets, emergency services, defence communications and even streaming Netflix. But a malicious foreign actor, such as China, could easily cripple this crucial infrastructure, plunging the country into digital darkness and wiping billions from the ASX in the process. To counter this threat, Professor Langford, who served in the ADF for over 30 years, has called on the government and tech leaders to build AI data centres to bolster Australia's sovereignty and resilience by offering a back-up option. 'With the PLA (China's People's Liberation Army) cutting some military undersea cabling in Taiwan this year it forces us to think how vulnerable are we in terms of the same threat vector, and I think the answer is highly vulnerable,' Prof Langford said. 'We need to onshore a lot of our critical data and therefore we need to build sovereign data centres here so that we have the ability to effectively have a redundancy in the event of some sort of disruption to our critical infrastructure.' 'But also from a regional perspective to house data from south-west Pacific nations and other countries in the southern hemisphere which would allow this part of the world to survive in the event of a massive disruption which could occur should conflict break out between the US and China over Taiwan, for example.' Prof Langford explained that a data centre was 'essentially a hothouse that converts energy into intelligence, into information'. 'Energy goes in and information comes out,' he said. 'And so you need power, you need access to infrastructure as in the site where you're situated, you need security, you need people and it needs to be cost sensitive.' Australia is perfectly poised to provide all of these things, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers recently boasting that Australia is among the top five global destinations for data centres. But many technology firms within the field have complained about red tape preventing them from building data centres on Australian soil. Dan Roberts, a former Macquarie banker who co-founded Bitcoin mining and data centre-building firm IREN back in 2018, has said he would 'love' to build them in Australia but that it is 'just not practical'. He compared Australia's position now with AI to the one it faced during the resources boom of the early 2000s, where instead of building up its own manufacturing industry, Australia simply shipped its commodities overseas. 'We're in the same position now, where the fourth industrial revolution is essentially energy as your input and a digital good as your output,' Mr Roberts told Capital Brief. 'Given the abundance of land, wind, solar, etcetera, we've got the same opportunity now, but all this red tape that gets in the way of actually doing it.' His comments come a week after Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquhar called for Australia to harness the AI revolution by becoming a world leader in data centres. The rich-lister claimed data centres could allow to 'export megawatts as megabytes (and get paid megabucks)'. 'This is a multi-billion-dollar, multi-decade opportunity,' Mr Farquhar told the National Press Club. Prof Langford argues that this is borne out in the figures: at the moment, data centres account for 1.5 per cent of global energy production. But by 2030, that figure is predicted to rise to 13 per cent, with most of the energy used to cool the computer chips processing the data. Prof Langford said that Australia was at a crossroads. 'If Australia wants to be a leader in all forms of emerging technology, such as AI, quantum computing and others, then we need to build critical infrastructure here to have sovereignty over those opportunities,' he added. 'And if we don't do it, we're going to be left behind. It's as simple as that.'
