WV House committee considers ‘Make America Healthy Again' bill restricting SNAP purchases
A West Virginia House of Delegates committee is considering legislation that would prohibit recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, from using their benefits to purchase soft drinks and candy.
House Bill 2350, and similar legislation around the country, is part of an effort promoted by the Trump administration and U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to 'Make America Healthy Again.'
The bill was before the Committee on Health and Human Resources for a hearing on Tuesday.
It would require the cabinet secretary for the Department of Human Services to request a federal waiver to prohibit the purchase of candy and soft drinks with SNAP benefits. If the waiver is not granted, the bill says the secretary would ask for such a waiver annually until the waiver is granted.
Bill sponsor Del. Adam Burkhammer, R-Lewis, said the legislation is meant to promote healthy options for SNAP recipients.
More than 144,000 West Virginia households got SNAP benefits in December 2024, according to the state Bureau for Family Assistance.
Opponents of the bill say the legislation would have a negative effect on the state's grocery stories, particularly in counties that border other states.
Facing restrictions in West Virginia, SNAP recipients who live near the state's borders are likely to drive across state lines to use their benefits, said Seth DiStefano, policy outreach director for the Center on Budget and Policy.
'The direct result — long story short, is that grocery stores close,' he said. 'And grocery stores closing is very bad for the health of an entire community. Food deserts get worse. Options become less.'
Restrictions and 'poverty shaming' won't improve health, he said.
'The only real impact so far as I could tell is that it's going to put a lot of folks in those border counties, it's going to give them a choice,' DiStefano said. 'Do I want to sit in line and be embarrassed when I get into a back and forth with a cashier who may not have coded something correctly with my kid in line? Or do I take my business across the river to Gallipolis or Belpre or Steubenville or Hagerstown or any myriad of towns where folks just simply don't have to deal with the administrative hassle and the increased embarrassment and stigma that a bill like this puts on them?'
Burkhammer responded to concerns about the bill's economic impact by saying that poor health has an economic impact as well.
'I would say that there is a continued economic negative impact if we continue to fuel childhood diabetes, diabetes and so forth with that,' he said. 'So I understand that concept and I understand we're a body that has to consider the financial impact on every decision almost that we make and this is one of those that I was willing to make that financial decision to say the health and the wellbeing of our state and our communities is greater than the financial risk that is potential.'
He added that SNAP recipients still have the option to purchase candy and soft drinks with their own money.
Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, raised concerns about the definition of candy and soft drinks in the bill.
According to the bill, soft drinks are 'nonalcoholic beverages that contain natural or artificial sweeteners. Soft drinks do not include beverages containing milk or milk products, soy, rice or similar milk substitutes or greater than 50% of vegetable or fruit juice by volume.
Candy, according to the bill, means 'a preparation of sugar, honey or other natural or artificial sweeteners in combination with chocolate, fruits, nuts or other ingredients or flavorings in the form of bars, drops or pieces.' It does not include any preparation containing flour and does not require refrigeration.
Burkhammer said a forthcoming committee substitute would allow the cabinet secretary to define candy and soft drinks.
The bill did not include a cost estimate as of Wednesday.
Kennedy suggested banning soda and candy purchases by the SNAP program during an interview last week with Fox News, Forbes reported.
'The one place that I would say that we need to really change policy is the SNAP program and food stamps and in school lunches,' Kennedy told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. 'There, the federal government in many cases is paying for it. And we shouldn't be subsidizing people to eat poison.'
The bill and others like it around the country are supported by the Opportunity Solutions Project, a partner organization to the conservative group Foundation for Government Accountability.
Jeremiah Samples, the former deputy secretary of the state Department of Health and Human Resources who is now a lobbyist for the Opportunity Solutions Project, spoke in support of the legislation.
'[The bill] really starts a dialogue between the states and the federal government, which we now have a partner in the Trump administration to really address these issues to tackle what everyone knows and recognizes is a major problem in what is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,' he said. 'Nutrition. We have lost the nutrition part of the SNAP program.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
5 minutes ago
- Axios
Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs
About 360,000 Illinois residents risk losing SNAP benefits under provisions of the " big, beautiful bill," which could also saddle the state with $700 million in additional SNAP costs previously covered by the feds, according to Gov. JB Pritzker's office. Why it matters: The cuts could have far-reaching effects on hunger as well as spending in the local economy. This year, Pritzker's office says, the new provisions could cost Illinois an additional $80 million just to meet administrative requirements at a time when the state is under intense pressure to bail out basic services. Zoom in: About 15% of state residents, or 1.9 million people, receive SNAP benefits in Illinois. The new rules require Illinois to expand work requirements (proof of 80 hours of work a month) to SNAP recipients who are: Able-bodied adults ages 55-64 Adults with dependents who are over 13 years old Adults who had been exempt under Illinois' 4.8% unemployment rate. New rules restrict the exemption to counties with unemployment of 10% or higher. Between the lines: Illinois can avoid the additional $700 million in SNAP payment responsibility if it reduces its "payment error rate" (PER) from 11% to under 6%. The PER measures underpayment or overpayment usually driven by administrative or applicant mistakes. It does not include fraud. Illinois has the 10th worst error rate in the nation, but is on par with most big states. The intrigue: Alaska has an error rate of 20% but Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski worked out a deal to exempt her state from the requirement to reduce it. What they're saying: "While the state government will be doing everything in its power to lower the so-called error rate, we cannot gloss over the fact that this provision was intentionally designed as a craven mechanism to deny states funding and feed fewer people in need," Pritzker spokesperson Matt Hill said in a statement. The other side: " We are incentivizing states to administer the SNAP program more efficiently and effectively, protecting taxpayers and prioritizing limited resources for those who truly need the benefit," Republican Rep. Darin LaHood tells Axios.
Indianapolis Star
3 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
SNAP cuts will worsen Indianapolis' housing crisis for working families
IndyStar's recent article, "'A gut punch': Indy program that offered parking spots to people living in autos shuts down," reported that Safe Park Indy, a program offering safe overnight parking in addition to food and other resources for people living in their vehicles, closed due to overwhelming demand on Aug. 13. According to founder Elizabeth Friedland, the wait list had over 400 people. A survey of those on the wait list showed that 28% had attended college, 8% had a bachelor's degree and half had at least one job, including social workers, nurses and teachers. It's important to recognize that housing insecurity affects people from all walks of life, including students trying to stay enrolled while living in their cars. It's also vital to recognize that housing insecurity and food insecurity are intimately related. When SNAP benefits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, food insecurity dropped, especially among low-income households. Students stayed in school. Families could breathe. Every $1 in SNAP benefits also generates about $1.50 in economic activity, and in some studies, up to $1.79. Opinion: We can't make Indiana healthy again until we fix our food supply With sweeping federal cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, things will likely get worse for these Indianapolis residents forced to live in their vehicles. Local programs simply don't have the resources to make up for cuts. Slashing $186 billion from nutrition programs and adding work requirements for recipients up to age 64 will only shift costs to emergency rooms, shelters and schools.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
New work rules could deny food stamps to thousands of veterans
Darryl Chavis, 62, served in the U.S. Army for two years as a watercraft operator. He stands outside the Borden Avenue Veterans Residence, a short-term housing facility in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens, N.Y., where he lives. Chavis relies on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and is worried about new work requirements for the program, commonly known as food stamps (Shalina Chatlani/Stateline). NEW YORK — After a year in the U.S. Navy, Loceny Kamara said he was discharged in 2023, because while on base he had developed mental health issues, including severe anxiety and nightmares, and had fallen into alcoholism. Kamara, 23, went to rehab and managed to get sober for some time while living with family in the Bronx, he said. But after he lost his job as a security guard in December, Kamara was kicked out of his home. Now he lives at a veterans homeless shelter in Long Island City, a neighborhood in Queens, New York, and he relies on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — commonly known as food stamps — and odd jobs to make ends meet. Each month, nearly 42 million people receive SNAP benefits to help supplement their grocery budgets. Able-bodied SNAP recipients who are between 18 and 54 and don't have children have always been required to work. Veterans, however, have been exempt from those rules — but that's about to change. The giant domestic policy measure that President Donald Trump signed on July 4 eliminates that exemption. Beginning in 2026, veterans will have to prove they are working, volunteering, participating in job training, or looking for work for at least 80 hours a month to keep their food stamps beyond three months, unless they qualify for another exemption, such as having certain disabilities. Republicans in Congress and conservatives who helped formulate the law say these eligibility changes are necessary to stop people who could be working from abusing the system. But critics say the change fails to take into account the barriers many veterans face, and that the new work rules will cause thousands of veterans to go hungry. 'I'm pissed. I mean, I cannot get a job. Nowhere to live,' said Kamara. As he spoke, Kamara pointed to his collared shirt, noting that he had just dressed up to interview for a job as a security guard. He learned that morning he hadn't gotten the job. 'I've been out of work for eight months,' Kamara told Stateline. 'It's hard to get a job right now for everybody.' Nationally, around 1.2 million veterans with lower incomes, or about 8% of the total veteran population of 16.2 million, rely on food stamps for themselves and their families, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning research group. An analysis by the group found veterans tend to have lower rates of employment because they are more likely to have health conditions, such as traumatic brain injuries, that make it difficult for them to work. They also tend to have less formal education, though many have specialized skills from their time in the military. There has been a work requirement for most SNAP recipients since 1996. But Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, said the rules have 'never really been enforced.' Rector argued that able-bodied people who have been exempt from the work requirement, such as veterans and homeless people, create an unnecessary burden on the system if they are capable of working but don't. 'Most of the people that are in this category live in households with other people that have incomes, and so there really isn't a chronic food shortage here,' Rector said in an interview. 'We have tens of thousands of free food banks that people can go to. So it's just a requirement to nudge these people in the proper direction, and it should no longer go unenforced.' Darryl Chavis, 62, said that view ignores the difficulties that many veterans face. When Chavis left the U.S. Army at 21 after two years of service, he said, he was 'severely depressed.' 'Nobody even came to help me,' said Chavis, who served as a watercraft operator, responsible for operating and maintaining tugboats, barges and other landing craft. Chavis said he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, which has made it difficult for him to keep a job. He just moved back to New York from Virginia after leaving a relationship. He's been at the housing shelter in Long Island City since January. 'What I'm trying to do is get settled in to, you know, stabilize into an apartment. I have the credentials to get a job. So it's not like I'm not gonna look for a job. I have to work. I'm in transition, and the obstacles don't make it easy,' Chavis said. The new SNAP work rules apply to all able-bodied adults between 55 and 64 who don't have dependents, and parents with children above the age of 14. Some groups, such as asylum-seekers and refugees, are no longer eligible for the program. Barbara Guinn, commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, estimates that around 300,000 New Yorkers could lose SNAP benefits due to work requirements. Of those, around 22,000 are veterans, homeless or aging out of foster care, she said. Almost 3 million New Yorkers relied on SNAP as of March 2025. Veterans in other states are in a similar situation. In California, an estimated 115,000 veterans receive SNAP benefits, according to a study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The number is nearly 100,000 in Florida and Texas, and 49,000 in Georgia. Between 2015 and 2019 about 11% of veterans between the ages of 18 and 64 lived in food insecure households, meaning they had limited or uncertain access to food, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees SNAP. 'We know that SNAP is the best way to help address hunger. It gets benefits directly to individuals,' Guinn said. 'There are other ways that people can get assistance if they need it, through food banks or other charitable organizations, but we do not think that those organizations will have the capacity to pick up the needs.' In addition to the work rule changes, the new law reduces federal funding for SNAP by about $186 billion through 2034 — a cut of roughly 20%, according to the Congressional Budget Office, an independent research arm of Congress. The federal government expects the new work requirements to reduce SNAP spending by $69 billion as people who don't comply are dropped from the rolls. SNAP has historically been funded by the federal government, with states picking up part of the cost of administering the program. Under the new law, states will have to cover between 5% and 15% of SNAP costs starting in fiscal year 2028, depending on how accurately they distribute benefits to people who are eligible for the program. 'This has been a strategic agenda to dismantle SNAP and to blame states for doing so, because they knew they are making it so incredibly burdensome to run and operate and unaffordable,' said Gina Plata-Nino, SNAP deputy director at the Food Research & Action Center, a poverty and hunger advocacy group. 'States are going to have to cut something, because there's no surplus. There are no unlimited resources that states may have in order to be able to offset the harm.' Guinn said New York expects to see a new cost burden of at least $1.4 billion each year. In California, new state costs could total as much as $3.7 billion annually, according to the California Department of Social Services. Kaitlynne Yancy, director of membership programs at Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said many veterans with disabilities will not be able to fulfill the work requirements or find resources elsewhere. And it's unclear whether states will be able to provide their own relief to people who are no longer exempted from work requirements or will be excluded from the program. 'It is a frustrating thing to see, especially for those that have been willing to put everything on the line and sacrifice everything for this country if their country called them to do so,' she said. Yancy, 35, served in the U.S. Navy from 2010 to 2014. She began to use food stamps and the Medicaid program, the public health insurance program for people with lower incomes, as she navigated life's challenges. They included going back to school to pursue her bachelor's degree, becoming a single mother, and a leukemia diagnosis for one of her children. Frequent trips to the hospital made it hard for her to work steadily or attend school for 20 hours each week, she said. Guinn said the new rules will create significant administrative challenges, too; even SNAP recipients who are working will struggle to prove it. 'Maybe they're working one month, they have a job, and then their employer cuts their hours the next month,' Guinn told Stateline. 'There are mechanisms for people to upload documentation as needed to demonstrate compliance with the program, but from an administrative standpoint, right now, we don't have any super-high-tech automated way of doing this.' Stateline is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@ Solve the daily Crossword
