Tesla upgrades its Model S and X cars in US, raises prices by $5,000
Tesla said on Thursday it upgraded its Model S and Model X cars in the US and raised their prices by $5,000, according to the electric vehicle maker's post on X and its website.
Prices were hiked for all configurations of the two models by $5,000, Tesla's website showed.
Tesla to build battery plant in Shanghai
The all-wheel drive version of Model X costs $89,990, while its plaid variant is priced at $104,990.
The model S all-wheel drive now costs $84,990 and its plaid variant is $99,990.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Tesla Model Y fails self-driving test, hits child-sized dummies 8 times: Why Elon Musk should be worried
At a recent demonstration in Texas, a Tesla Model Y operating in Full Self-Driving (FSD) mode was shown failing to stop for a stationary school bus and striking child-sized dummies. The tests, organised by advocacy groups The Dawn Project, Tesla Takedown, and ResistAustin, replicated the scenario eight times, each time with the Tesla Model Y ignoring the bus's flashing lights and stop signs. Video footage from the demonstration showed the vehicle driving past the bus and colliding with the mannequins intended to represent children. The demonstration has raised fresh concerns about the readiness of autonomous vehicle technology. Tesla's system—officially named Full Self-Driving (Supervised)—requires active driver supervision and issues escalating warnings if the driver does not respond. The company has repeatedly cautioned users that failure to comply could lead to serious injury or death. While Tesla was not involved in the demonstration, this is not the first time its autonomous technology has drawn scrutiny. In April 2024, a Tesla Model S using FSD was involved in a fatal accident in Washington State, in which a motorcyclist was killed. The Dawn Project, whose founder Dan O'Dowd also leads a company developing competing driver-assistance software, has previously run campaigns highlighting perceived flaws in Tesla's FSD system. The incident comes amid anticipation surrounding Tesla's new Cybercab, an all-electric, fully autonomous vehicle initially set for rollout on 22 June. Chief Executive Elon Musk has since hinted at a delay, saying the company is 'being super paranoid about safety' and suggesting the first vehicle to autonomously drive from the factory to a customer's home could launch on 28 June. Tentatively, June 22. We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift. First Tesla that drives itself from factory end of line all the way to a customer house is June 28. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 As the debate around autonomous vehicle safety intensifies, the industry continues to face questions about whether current technology can meet the expectations—and responsibilities—of full autonomy.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Trump-Musk feud exposes new realities of US politics
On the political stage of Donald Trump's ever-expanding theatre, the Elon Musk affair began like a swaggering bromance destined for longevity — two outsider moguls, both mythmakers in their own right, momentarily aligned in ambition and spectacle. But as with so many Trumpian plots, it ended not with grace or even drama, but with the pettiness of a playground spat. What began in mutual admiration curdled into a bitter, adolescent feud — one whose theatrics have told us far more about the state of American power than either man intended. But not too long ago, when Musk stepped into the national limelight alongside Donald Trump — a MAGA cap perched atop his famously unruly hair — it felt like the opening scene of a grand political union. Then Musk's high‑profile appointment as co‑head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) positioned him, at least symbolically, as the next chapter in the disruption of Washington. His presence on the cabinet stage, dressed in casual gear and flanked by pizza‑fuelled staff, sent a clear message — here was the billionaire outsider, ready to 'cut a trillion dollars' from the federal budget. But the very theatricality that made the pairing so arresting proved to be its undoing. At its height, the alliance was a spectacle of spectacle-makers – Trump, the reality-TV president with a flair for soundbites and theatrics, and Musk, the tech-pop star whose every move was pre-scripted for social media audiences. Together, they promised a new era of anti-establishment governance. The combination was irresistible to journalists, political strategists, and television cameras alike — yet it was always designed for the spotlight, not for sober policy implementation. The unravelling began with Trump's signature legislative project — the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Conceived as a sweeping, populist package, it was a Republican policy masterpiece — only it came with a sting in its tail. The bill slashed clean‑energy subsidies and EV incentives, cut taxes, and expanded deficit spending — a move that triggered Musk's ire. Speaking on CBS, he called it 'a disgusting abomination' and a betrayal of the efficiency agenda he had been installed to advance. But his public rebuke was more than a policy critique — it was episode four of the Trump‑Musk reality show. The tension had been building; now it burst into public view. Trump responded in kind. On Truth Social, he accused Musk of 'ingratitude' and threatened to yank federal contracts and subsidies tied to Tesla and SpaceX — threats with real economic force behind them. Suddenly, this was no orchestrated photo op — it was a headline‑grabbing feud deserving of its own prime‑time billing. Overnight, Tesla stock plunged 15 per cent — one of its worst-days ever — and Musk's fortune took a $90 billion hit. SpaceX's vital NASA and Pentagon contracts fell under immediate review — not by sleepy bureaucrats, but by White House fingers ready to pull strings. For anyone paying attention, it was raw theatre, complete with streaming platforms (X vs. Truth Social), soundbites, dramatic reversals, and fiscal consequences. But for all the entertainment, serious governance, if any, was taking a hit. Analysts warned that politically motivated interference in critical space and defence infrastructure carried national-security risks. The spectacle masked its stakes behind the shimmer, but the scoreboard was bloodied. What fuelled this sudden collapse was not just policy difference — it was a power grab between two large egos. Trump, the master negotiator, thrives on loyalty and control. Musk, by contrast, is a self-styled disruptor, menacing timelines and bureaucracies with layoffs and dismissals, as he had done at Twitter. Their clash, experts argue, was not merely about policy, but symbolic – part of a broader trend in the 'mafia‑state' dynamics of loyalty and authoritarian imprinting within Trump's inner circle. As the drama played out, media and public alike were gripped. Cable channels looped clips — pundits called it 'popcorn politics' (MSNBC's Nicole Wallace advised, 'Buckle up and pop some popcorn'). This was not analysis – it was entertainment — by design and by outcome. Washington became Wembley Arena, and global coverage spun imagery faster than facts. Musk, for his part, added to the plotline. After his critique, he reportedly floated a new 'America Party,' polling X followers on whether he should launch one. It was a plot twist worthy of any reality-franchise season — his move away from MAGA signalling yet another potential storyline — billionaire insurgent becomes ideological kingmaker. Trump seized on this. On Truth Social, he explicitly warned Musk: support Democrats, and he'd face 'very serious consequences'. It was a resurfacing of the personal stakes of their public feud. When the dust began to settle, Musk issued a mea culpa — 'I regret some of my posts' — though signs were clear that the bromance had left the building. Sources close to Trump described interactions as 'pure avoidance' and warned 'Trump doesn't forget'. The alliance had evaporated, leaving behind a collapsed set piece, disrupted constituencies, rattled markets — and a cratering of public trust. To frame this as merely a feud is to mischaracterise what took place. This was politics as entertainment, parody as praxis. The ingredients were familiar – billionaire ego meets political celebrity, stitched together by social media platforms that thrive on outrage. But the consequences were real — agencies destroyed overnight, market valuations shifted by billions, and vital contracts placed in jeopardy — all for the sake of headlines and media attention. But this spectacle reflects a decade-long evolution in American political culture. Trump's first term was built on theatre, from flashy announcements that never materialised to summit photo‑ops with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. As analysis from Foreign Affairs noted, his style has been a perpetual cliffhanger — teasers without resolutions. Musk, with his half-truths, meme‑stoned publicity, and controversial layoffs, fit naturally into this mould. They are both public performers on global stages. In this, the Trump‑Musk debacle captures not just a broken friendship but also a political turning point. It lay bare how deeply entertainment-driven impulses have invaded the halls of power. Gone are the days when legislation was debated – now amendments are broadcast as monologues. Governance in America is reduced to co-starring roles. The deeper risk, as one expert cautioned, is not that Trump and Musk lost interest in one another — but that their ideology remains embedded in the system despite the spectacle's end. Under the veneer, despoliation continues — budget cuts, contract swaps, regulatory rollbacks. Watching two titans fight may feel like watching gladiators — but the bloodshed is institutional, not just personal. All that said, we're left asking – what now? Musk, bruised, may retreat or launch his America Party — but he remains too tethered to the infrastructure of American life. He still holds significant sway – Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, X. Government contracts, investor confidence, public goodwill — these are his fragile assets. Trump, meanwhile, proved that loyalty is conditional, and criticism of him invites retaliation. Lots of CEOs got that memo — a chilling one for anyone tempted to cross him. What's at stake is bigger than their feud. It is the normalisation of spectacle in every corner of governance. It is a democracy saturated with drama, where policy outcomes are overshadowed by sound and fury. Real governance demands debate, deliberation, accountability — but this was all bargain-basement theatre designed to go viral, even at the expense of substance. And yet, public appetite remains insatiable. Newsrooms and channels peddle reactions – social feeds fawn over every twist — Republican and Democratic operatives spin furiously. The attention economy thrives on this. But the currency of democracy doesn't – it depends on informed citizenship. In the end, the Trump‑Musk showdown will pass. Contracts will be restored — or not. Tesla may rebound. DOGE may vanish from the collective memory. But the season finale won't stop the next appropriation of spectacle. Someone else will before long step into the lead role — seeking screens, scores, and public influence. A new billionaire, a new platform, a new headline. So what remains? A cautionary tale – when governance is capitalised as content, citizens become the audience. Democracy is not served by ratings. Facts, institutions, ideas — they become afterthoughts to spectacle. For now, the Trump-Musk show is over. Critics will analyse, journalists will fact-check, markets will stabilise. And somewhere behind the lights, the next episode is already in production. The question we face is not how stage-ready leaders can be, but whether we — viewers — can reclaim the authorial seat.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Tesla upgrades its Model S and X cars in US, raises prices by $5,000
Tesla said on Thursday it upgraded its Model S and Model X cars in the US and raised their prices by $5,000, according to the electric vehicle maker's post on X and its website. Prices were hiked for all configurations of the two models by $5,000, Tesla's website showed. Tesla to build battery plant in Shanghai The all-wheel drive version of Model X costs $89,990, while its plaid variant is priced at $104,990. The model S all-wheel drive now costs $84,990 and its plaid variant is $99,990.
