logo
FTL fixation cannot be stalled, encroachments not regularisable: Telangana high court

FTL fixation cannot be stalled, encroachments not regularisable: Telangana high court

Time of India13-05-2025
Hyderabad:
Justice CV Bhaskar Reddy
of the
Telangana high court
has clarified that irrigation and revenue authorities have full legal authority to determine the full tank level (FTL) of water bodies and that no individual or group can obstruct this process.
Those aggrieved by the FTL determination may raise formal objections and, if found valid, are entitled to compensation—but cannot halt the process, he said. Importantly, the judge emphasised that even the state govt has no power to regularise encroachments on tank beds.The ruling came while hearing a petition filed by Sri Sai Cooperative Housing Society, which objected to the ongoing
FTL fixation
exercise concerning Amber Cheruvu near Pragati Nagar in Bachupally, close to JNTU.
The society feared that approximately three acres of its land would be affected by the finalised FTL.The society contended that the authorities issued a preliminary notification without giving them an opportunity to submit documents or raise objections, despite their ownership of 10 acres, allegedly acquired via an arbitration award in 1990.
They also claimed a portion of their land was already submerged in the tank.In its response, the govt said that the society did not file objections during the preliminary notification stage, but assured the court that it could still do so before the final notification is issued.The judge directed the authorities to issue a notice to the society, consider its objections, and complete the final notification process within six weeks. However, the judge was clear that ongoing FTL determination cannot be obstructed and is being conducted in compliance with an earlier division bench order in a public interest litigation related to the protection of lakes.Justice Bhaskar Reddy reaffirmed that under the
Telangana Irrigation Act
, officials are empowered to fix FTL boundaries and remove encroachments, and while affected pattadars may receive compensation, encroachments cannot be legalised under any circumstances.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State govt has no land even for public toilets: Telangana High Court
State govt has no land even for public toilets: Telangana High Court

New Indian Express

time08-07-2025

  • New Indian Express

State govt has no land even for public toilets: Telangana High Court

HYDERABAD: The Telangana High Court on Monday made sharp observations about the lack of government land availability, despite once holding thousands of acres. The court remarked that the indiscriminate allocation of government land over the years has led to a situation where even space for the construction of public toilets is not available now. Justice C V Bhaskar Reddy, while hearing a petition filed by one MD Khaleel, commented that government land had been allocated arbitrarily, favouring the affluent and regularising unauthorised occupations. He observed that vast tracts of land were originally granted by the Nizam's government, including 'gairan' lands meant for grazing goats and sheep, and spaces reserved for community needs such as burial grounds and other requirements. Now, such government land has virtually disappeared, the judge noted. The court cited the Supreme Court's directions, stating that land should be allocated only to eligible individuals as per guidelines. However, in contradiction to these principles, land was allotted to ineligible individuals, and illegal occupations were regularised by successive governments. This led to discriminatory and unplanned distribution of land, leaving nothing for essential public infrastructure today. The petition was filed by Khaleel, who challenged the inaction on his request for the allotment of six acres of land in Survey Nos. 32 and 82 of Antharam village in Darrur mandal, Vikarabad district, for setting up a poultry hatchery. Representing the petitioner, advocate Mummaneni Srinivas Rao argued that the application for land allotment had been submitted to the district collector in 2022 but was not forwarded to the state government for necessary action. He cited GO 571, which outlines the guidelines for land allotment to private entities and requested the court to issue directions accordingly. Justice Bhaskar Reddy questioned the basis on which the land could be allocated and asked the petitioner to clarify how the hatchery project would benefit the public. He stated that no interim orders could be passed without first seeking a response from the government. The matter has been adjourned to July 22 for further hearing after seeking the state government's explanation.

Compensate farmers for KLIP land: HC to Telangana
Compensate farmers for KLIP land: HC to Telangana

Time of India

time06-07-2025

  • Time of India

Compensate farmers for KLIP land: HC to Telangana

HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court has directed the state govt and the irrigation department to compensate farmers under the Land Acquisition Act , 2013, if private patta land parcels are getting submerged due to the Kaleshwaram lift irrigation project in Rajanna Sircilla district. Justice CV Bhaskar Reddy has issued the directions while hearing petitions filed by farmers from Malkapet village in Konaraopet mandal, alleging that their agricultural land and crops were being inundated due to water being diverted into the village tank (Pedda Cheruvu) through the right canal of package 9 of the Kaleshwaram project. Despite a representation submitted on May 9, 2025, requesting the authorities to halt the water flow and protect their livelihoods, there was no response, the farmers claimed. The govt counsel argued that the canal serves a larger public purpose, catering to an ayacut of over 25,000 acres across three mandals and claimed that the petitioners' land parcels fall under the full tank level (FTL) of the village tank area that traditionally get submerged during water storage and hence, the farmers cannot claim compensation. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad However, the court observed that if the affected land parcels were Shikam (private) land and the names of the petitioners reflect in revenue records, authorities must follow due process under the Act and compensate the owners before utilising their land. The court also clarified that if the said land was Shikam Sarkari (govt), the authorities could continue canal works without such acquisition.

Banjara Hills land row: Telangana HC declines to intervene in dispute over 7 acres in Hyderabad; cites title complexities, directs parties to seek civil court
Banjara Hills land row: Telangana HC declines to intervene in dispute over 7 acres in Hyderabad; cites title complexities, directs parties to seek civil court

Time of India

time25-06-2025

  • Time of India

Banjara Hills land row: Telangana HC declines to intervene in dispute over 7 acres in Hyderabad; cites title complexities, directs parties to seek civil court

HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court has dismissed a batch of writ petitions related to a long-standing land dispute over seven acres of prime property on Road No. 4, Banjara Hills. Justice CV Bhaskar Reddy declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, citing serious tripartite title disputes and directed all parties to seek remedies through the civil court. The land in question, in survey No. 396 (now survey No. 225) in Shaikpet village, was originally owned by Maharaja Kishen Pershad, the former PM (dewan) of the erstwhile Hyderabad state. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The petitioners, legal heirs of the maharaja, claimed the land was orally gifted (hiba) to him in 1930, but was fraudulently sold in 1980-82 by descendants of his son, Nawab Khaja Asadullah Khan, allegedly without obtaining the clearances under the Urban Land Ceiling (ULC) Act, 1976. In his ruling, Justice Bhaskar Reddy said that the original ULC records were unavailable, with the state admitting that the files were destroyed after the repeal of the Act in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store