logo
Race, sex and the Holocaust: As book bans grow across the state, some genres see more bans

Race, sex and the Holocaust: As book bans grow across the state, some genres see more bans

Yahoo16-02-2025

As Tennessee faces a record number of book bans and removals since December 2023, there are certain genres and themes consistently among the most-banned items.
With nearly 1,400 books being either fully removed from school libraries or heavily age-restricted between December 2023 and January 2025, pursuant to the controversial 2022 Age-Appropriate Materials Act, the list of titles removed across the state may be long, but the breakdown of individual titles and themes is remarkably shorter.
The top five banned titles across the state are:
In total, there were 1,155 unique titles banned across the state last year.
'We see that nearly 60% of banned titles nationwide are young adult books or younger,' said Kasey Meehan, Freedom to Read program director at PEN America. 'And there's certainly books that depict all sorts of themes. They depict LGBTQ+ identities, they talk about race and racism. More and more we see books that talk about or confront real world issues like grief, death and mental health concerns and sexual violence.'
Numerous titles banned in Tennessee schools deal with youth mental health and social issues, such as 'Far From the Tree: How Children and their Parents Learn to Accept One Another' by Andrew Solomon, banned in a school in Wilson County, 'Coping with Weapons and Violence in Schools and On Your Streets' by Maryann Miller and 'Drug Use and the Family' by Susan Stefano, both removed in schools in Monroe County.
Meehan said a strong theme over the 2023-2024 school year was the increased removal of books that contained a reference to sex in any way.
This theme was strengthened in Tennessee by the 2024 expansion of the Age Appropriate Materials Act to prohibit public school libraries from having books with 'nudity, or descriptions or depictions of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence, or sadomasochistic abuse,' or any book that is 'patently offensive … or appeals to the prurient interest.'
While this ban ensnares books such as 'Bioethics: Sex, Genetics and Human Reproduction' by Warren Reich and 'Date Violence' by Elaine Landau, both removed in schools in Monroe County, it especially targets books that discuss gender identity of LGBTQ+ issues, for their discussion of sex-related identity concerns, as well as books that deal with issues of race or racism.
'When we look at those two themes in particular, what's important to recognize is that these issues have been historically underrepresented in our public schools,' Meehan said. 'So if we say that 44% of banned titles feature characters of color, it's not the case that 44% of books in a public school library feature characters of color. It's that these books are being disproportionately banned.'
Even a surprising number of books about the Holocaust were removed in Monroe County.
In addition, some books related to book bans were also banned: the classic 'Fahrenheit 451' by Ray Bradbury was banned in Monroe County, and 'The Year They Burned All The Books' by Nancy Garden in Macon County.
Deborah Caldwell-Stone, the director at the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom, said these repeated titles and themes are not an accident, but rather the calculated work of small groups of people to ban the same books across the country.
'We see multiple titles challenged in schools and library districts across the country, and often that is an individual or group who will challenge 10 to 30 books all at once,' she said. 'And we're still seeing efforts to place individuals who would like to censor books on library boards and school boards across the country, in order to put in place policies that require censorship of existing library materials or prevent library staff from buying disfavored categories of library materials.'
Efforts made to ban the same book multiple times across the state are not without an end goal: Tennessee is one of only a few states that has the potential to pass statewide bans on books. According to the Age Appropriate Materials Act, any book that is appealed to the Tennessee Textbook Commission, if found to be in violation of the law, would be banned in all public and charter school districts in the state.
Hayden Shadden, general counsel for the commission, confirmed that they have not had any appeals as of publication. Three were filed in December, but subsequently withdrawn by the complainant.
Caldwell-Stone said the push to remove books from schools is antithetical to the Constitution.
'The argument (that school library books should be banned) functions from the premise that students have no First Amendment rights and that government agencies, including school boards, can engage in the kind of censorship that they're not allowed to engage in under the First Amendment,' she said. 'The courts have been very clear on that.'
Meehan said the common argument in support of bans — that children can get the book elsewhere if they want it badly enough — leaves behind a significant number of children.
'We can't say that all students have access to a public library — not all students have access to a Barnes and Noble, or a bookstore, or can purchase their own books,' she said. 'Public school libraries play a really essential role in providing free access to information. This is the purpose of our library systems: to provide access to information. And the more we restrict access to information, the more we weaken our library systems, but also more broadly, the fabric of our democracy.'
The USA TODAY Network - Tennessee's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Have a story to tell? Reach Angele Latham by email at alatham@gannett.com, by phone at 931-623-9485, or follow her on Twitter at @angele_latham
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: As book bans grow across Tennessee, some genres see more bans

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: Trump's looming cuts to high-speed rail project represent a 'backward vision'
Letters to the Editor: Trump's looming cuts to high-speed rail project represent a 'backward vision'

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: Trump's looming cuts to high-speed rail project represent a 'backward vision'

To the editor: The Pentagon is projected to spend a staggering $2.1 trillion on the F-35 fighter jet program. This weapons system has been plagued by cost overruns, technical failures and delays. Many military analysts now consider the F-35 already obsolete, a Cold War relic in a world facing very different threats. Yet, the Trump administration has raised no concerns. In fact, it's proposed increasing the Pentagon's budget by $150 billion this year, funneling even more money into machines of war. Now contrast that with California's high-speed rail project: a first-of-its-kind system in the U.S. that's projected to create tens of thousands of jobs, stimulate billions in economic activity and drastically reduce carbon emissions. Instead of supporting this vision of a cleaner, more connected America, the Trump administration has actively undermined it ('Trump administration sees 'no viable path' forward to finish high-speed rail project, moves to pull federal funding,' June 4). It's a backward vision: We pour trillions into fighter jets designed to kill, while blocking a transportation system designed to move people, strengthen our economy and protect our planet. Imagine if we invested that $2.1 trillion into a nationwide high-speed rail network, connecting major cities, revitalizing regional economies and leading the world in sustainable infrastructure. It's time to rethink our priorities. The California high-speed rail project deserves more support, not less. Donald Flaherty, Burbank .. To the editor: The fight over high-speed rail is ridiculous. I just returned from three weeks in Japan, a place where bullet trains run the length and breadth of the country and ordinary trains that connect with them go to places the bullet trains don't. When someone wants to go from Tokyo to Kyoto, they don't think about flying or driving, they hop on a train. Compared to Japan, it's as if we're in the Stone Age when it comes to transportation. Plus, these trains run clean on electricity and don't spew harmful exhaust fumes. Murray Zichlinsky, Long Beach This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Trump's bill will create 'big, beautiful workforce': Labor Secy.
Trump's bill will create 'big, beautiful workforce': Labor Secy.

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's bill will create 'big, beautiful workforce': Labor Secy.

The US labor market grew by 139,000 in the month of May, reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), hitting above estimates of 126,000 while the unemployment rate held at 4.2% and average hourly earnings rose by 3.9% year-over-year (above expectations of 3.7%). The US Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer sits down with Yahoo Finance senior Washington correspondent Jennifer Schonberger to talk more about the labor participation rate, the administration's relationship with labor unions, and the private sector investments into local communities and job markets. Last month, Secretary Chavez-DeRemer stated that "the Golden Age is here" in response to April's overwhelming labor addition of 177,000 non-farm payrolls under the Trump administration. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. much stronger than expected jobs report for the month of May, 139,000 on that top line non-farm payroll number, though a bit of a slowdown from April, the unemployment rate holding steady at 4.2% and average hourly earnings clocking in at nearly 4%, jumping up from what we saw in April. For more insight on this morning's report, I want to welcome into the program, Labor Secretary Laurie Chavez DeRemer. Madam Secretary, it's great to see you on this warm, uh, morning in Washington. Well, I'm excited to be here. It was another great day for the jobs report. Well, let's talk about your reaction to the jobs report and the state of the health of the job market now. Well, 139,000 beating expectations for the third month in a row. I think President Trump should pat himself on the back for that leadership and giving us the latitude to go out and work very hard for this jobs report. Um, what we're seeing is hourly you mentioned, um, hourly wages are up as well. Um, this is key for the American people. This is something that has been holding steady, unemployment is holding steady. So, we're we're we're solid on solid footing and we should expect them to keep growing month after month. And this jobs report coming when tariffs were full blast, uh, just this past week we learned that job openings actually increased more than expected. Do you think that this pace of job creation can continue per month as we go through the year? Well, if President Trump continues to double down on these types of negotiations and I understand that he's leveling the playing field with these tariff talks and companies continue to invest tens of trillions of dollars, we're going to see, you know, the labor participation rise. We're going to see job growth increase. We're going to see unemployment decrease. And, you know, for instance, I was just with the president last week in, uh, Pittsburgh, um, to talk to the steel workers. The investment there, 14 billion dollars and another 14 billion. They couldn't have been more excited for their local communities to know that the president is fighting on behalf of them. Those are labor jobs. Those are blue collar jobs. Those change people's lives. You mentioned the labor force participation, right? We did see that drop a bit. Based on what you just said, do you expect a rebound in that? And what do you owe to the drop that we saw at the time? Absolutely. We we were briefed this morning, uh, by, uh, BLS, uh, Labor Statistics. I mean, really it's statistical noise. Um, it's just what, .2%? So we're seeing that. Um, that that doesn't surprise, I don't think anybody who pays attention to these numbers. What we did see is the increase in the job numbers, the actual increase. Um, as I tour around America at Work, I I I think we talked about it last time. Um, I've been on to 13 states. Um, I am seeing the private sector investing in their local communities as well and working with our community colleges, with our career and technical education systems. They're building centers of excellence in order to have the skilled workforce that they need for their sectors. We saw construction jobs go up. We've seen healthcare jobs go up. We're seeing manufacturing jobs hold steady, but still better than under the Biden administration. So this is an exciting time, uh, for the president. It's an exciting time to see a half a million new jobs since the president took office. Um, and again, I would expect these numbers to continue to climb. As a labor participation rate dropped, we saw earnings increase. We've also seen immigration drop. I'm curious with all these factors in play, could we see a tighter labor market with higher wages as we go through the year? Well, I would imagine with what almost 4%, we've seen the hourly wage increase. That matters to, you know, the the everyday worker that they can keep more money in their harder, uh, of their harder money in their own pockets. Um, and and if the labor market does tighten, we're going to create more jobs. That's the focus of this president with our executive orders. 1 million new apprentices. Um, we're going to be, we're going to be focused on spending a lot of those, uh, grant dollars for AI. I'm to focus that. We're training the new native born, uh, Americans are taking most of these jobs. That's what we've seen since the president. Native born Americans have these jobs, these job increases. And then we have young people who are native to AI. And so when we skill them, you can imagine the trajectory that we're going to have in building, uh, the workforce. Members of the Federal Reserve are expecting that inflation will increase and unemployment will go up as a result of the tariffs, whether that's short-term or long-term. But if we look at the solid jobs report this past month, um, at the same time, we also saw inflation drop in the month of April. Is the Fed wrong? Well, I think the president is doing a good job about really the holistic approach and the three-legged stool. You know, as the president and and and on top of that, I I I want to talk about this big beautiful bill, because as the president works with Congress in order to secure permanent tax cuts, that also will continue to support the economy. What I know is that the one big beautiful bill that the president is is pushing, it is good for the American people and that is going to create the one big beautiful workforce. And that's the doubling down of the leadership from this president and allowing us to have the latitude to go out and work with private sector jobs in order to create that. So while he'll work with the Feds and while he'll work with the Treasury, um, they'll determine on what's best for the American people and where the pressure comes from there. Do you think if we do see a hundred percent expensing and depreciation for, uh, for factories and depreciation, I should say, made permanent in this tax bill, what kind of job creation could we see as a result of that, particularly in the manufacturing arena? Well, when a company can release some of their capital funding to invest right in those manufacturings and have a write-off which this bill, um, allows for, I think it's just another doubling down and that the president has the focus of the American people and the American business at heart. He wants people to flourish. Businesses are wanting to flourish in this country, and that's why you're seeing companies onshore. That's why you're seeing companies come back and invest billions if not trillions of dollars, and that adds up, and then they're going to need that workforce. And so that's my part of the equation where I can come in behind the president, behind commerce, behind treasury and say, we're going to create that workforce, we're going to skill these American workers, and they're going to be ready to go on day one.

Shaunavon receives provincial recognition for Age-Friendly work
Shaunavon receives provincial recognition for Age-Friendly work

Hamilton Spectator

time7 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Shaunavon receives provincial recognition for Age-Friendly work

Shaunavon received Provincial Recognition for their Age-Friendly work during a ceremony held last Friday, May 30 at the Grand Coteau Heritage & Cultural Centre. Shaunavon is the ninth community in the province to receive recognition from the Government of Saskatchewan through a recommendation provided by SSM (Saskatchewan Seniors Mechanism). Initiated by the World Health Organization, Age-Friendly communities exist in countries across the world. In Saskatchewan, Age-Friendly operates under the oversight of SSM. Provincial Recognition may be achieved when a community has demonstrated commitment to the Age-Friendly milestones including: forming a local committee, securing the support of municipal government, assessing the needs of the community, and developing action plans to address the identified needs. In Shaunavon, the work of an Aging in Place Task Force in 2021 led to the formation of the Age-Friendly Shaunavon Committee. A municipal resolution was passed in February 2022 stating that the Town of Shaunavon will actively participate, support, promote and work to assess and improve accessibility and inclusion for older persons, persons with disabilities, children and youth in all aspects of community life. Through a Facilitating Independence Grant administered through SSM, the committee hired a part-time Senior Resource Coordinator and opened their downtown office location in 2023. The group offers many programs and services that address the needs of older adults in the community, and includes many intergenerational opportunities. Several dignitaries were on hand for the event including: the Honourable Lori Carr, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, Seniors and Rural and Remote Health and Doug Steele, local MLA for the Cypress Hills Constituency; Cal Vance, Mayor of Shaunavon and other council and staff representatives from both the Town and local Rural Municipalities; Holly Schick, Executive Director of SSM and Linda Pratt, Chair of SSM's provincial Age-Friendly Saskatchewan Committee. Minister Carr presented plaques to the Mayor and to the Chair of the local committee, Debbie committee also includes Ruth Elliott, Kathy Towle and Terri Hetterly and former members Brenda Waldron and Joy Frenette. The late Kim Anderson was recognized throughout the ceremony for her extensive work and dedication in establishing the local committee, having served both as a volunteer and most recently as the part-time Senior Resource Coordinator. Kim's husband Robert, daughters Meghan and Kara, and several grandchildren were in attendance. Holly Schick served as emcee for the event, welcoming everyone and providing details about Age-Friendly Saskatchewan and the Recognition process. Schick then invited remarks from dignitaries and the local committee. Minister Carr brought greetings and a congratulatory message from the Government of Saskatchewan on behalf of Premier Scott Moe. She recognized the local committee's efforts and the support that SSM offers Age-Friendly communities in their work to provide programs and services for older adults and to ensure inclusion of all people in the community. Shaunavon's Mayor, Cal Vance, wished the committee continued success, saying, 'So much has been achieved in a short time frame, but we know there is still much work to do. Council commends your efforts, and we look forward to working with you to ensure that Age-Friendly Shaunavon can continue its important work.' Linda Pratt, Chair of the provincial Age-Friendly Saskatchewan Committee, highlighted the programs and services that the local committee has implemented, noting the intergenerational nature of many of them such as Reading Buddies and Tech Time. She said, 'I like Age-Friendly Shaunavon's vision: Healthy Aging in Shaunavon, and a mission statement that references all ages. This is an important part of our Age-Friendly communication. After all, 'aging' is not something only done by older adults—everyone is aging.' Chair of the local committee, Debbie Olesen, reiterated the importance of Kim Anderson's contributions in establishing Age-Friendly Shaunavon and thanked everyone for attending. Olesen extended appreciation to the Government of Saskatchewan and SSM for recognition. 'It affirms that the work we are doing matters. But most importantly, it shines a light on the heart of Shaunavon, our people. From our volunteers and community partners to local organizations and town leadership, this has truly been a team effort.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store