logo
Race, sex and the Holocaust: As book bans grow across the state, some genres see more bans

Race, sex and the Holocaust: As book bans grow across the state, some genres see more bans

Yahoo16-02-2025
As Tennessee faces a record number of book bans and removals since December 2023, there are certain genres and themes consistently among the most-banned items.
With nearly 1,400 books being either fully removed from school libraries or heavily age-restricted between December 2023 and January 2025, pursuant to the controversial 2022 Age-Appropriate Materials Act, the list of titles removed across the state may be long, but the breakdown of individual titles and themes is remarkably shorter.
The top five banned titles across the state are:
In total, there were 1,155 unique titles banned across the state last year.
'We see that nearly 60% of banned titles nationwide are young adult books or younger,' said Kasey Meehan, Freedom to Read program director at PEN America. 'And there's certainly books that depict all sorts of themes. They depict LGBTQ+ identities, they talk about race and racism. More and more we see books that talk about or confront real world issues like grief, death and mental health concerns and sexual violence.'
Numerous titles banned in Tennessee schools deal with youth mental health and social issues, such as 'Far From the Tree: How Children and their Parents Learn to Accept One Another' by Andrew Solomon, banned in a school in Wilson County, 'Coping with Weapons and Violence in Schools and On Your Streets' by Maryann Miller and 'Drug Use and the Family' by Susan Stefano, both removed in schools in Monroe County.
Meehan said a strong theme over the 2023-2024 school year was the increased removal of books that contained a reference to sex in any way.
This theme was strengthened in Tennessee by the 2024 expansion of the Age Appropriate Materials Act to prohibit public school libraries from having books with 'nudity, or descriptions or depictions of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence, or sadomasochistic abuse,' or any book that is 'patently offensive … or appeals to the prurient interest.'
While this ban ensnares books such as 'Bioethics: Sex, Genetics and Human Reproduction' by Warren Reich and 'Date Violence' by Elaine Landau, both removed in schools in Monroe County, it especially targets books that discuss gender identity of LGBTQ+ issues, for their discussion of sex-related identity concerns, as well as books that deal with issues of race or racism.
'When we look at those two themes in particular, what's important to recognize is that these issues have been historically underrepresented in our public schools,' Meehan said. 'So if we say that 44% of banned titles feature characters of color, it's not the case that 44% of books in a public school library feature characters of color. It's that these books are being disproportionately banned.'
Even a surprising number of books about the Holocaust were removed in Monroe County.
In addition, some books related to book bans were also banned: the classic 'Fahrenheit 451' by Ray Bradbury was banned in Monroe County, and 'The Year They Burned All The Books' by Nancy Garden in Macon County.
Deborah Caldwell-Stone, the director at the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom, said these repeated titles and themes are not an accident, but rather the calculated work of small groups of people to ban the same books across the country.
'We see multiple titles challenged in schools and library districts across the country, and often that is an individual or group who will challenge 10 to 30 books all at once,' she said. 'And we're still seeing efforts to place individuals who would like to censor books on library boards and school boards across the country, in order to put in place policies that require censorship of existing library materials or prevent library staff from buying disfavored categories of library materials.'
Efforts made to ban the same book multiple times across the state are not without an end goal: Tennessee is one of only a few states that has the potential to pass statewide bans on books. According to the Age Appropriate Materials Act, any book that is appealed to the Tennessee Textbook Commission, if found to be in violation of the law, would be banned in all public and charter school districts in the state.
Hayden Shadden, general counsel for the commission, confirmed that they have not had any appeals as of publication. Three were filed in December, but subsequently withdrawn by the complainant.
Caldwell-Stone said the push to remove books from schools is antithetical to the Constitution.
'The argument (that school library books should be banned) functions from the premise that students have no First Amendment rights and that government agencies, including school boards, can engage in the kind of censorship that they're not allowed to engage in under the First Amendment,' she said. 'The courts have been very clear on that.'
Meehan said the common argument in support of bans — that children can get the book elsewhere if they want it badly enough — leaves behind a significant number of children.
'We can't say that all students have access to a public library — not all students have access to a Barnes and Noble, or a bookstore, or can purchase their own books,' she said. 'Public school libraries play a really essential role in providing free access to information. This is the purpose of our library systems: to provide access to information. And the more we restrict access to information, the more we weaken our library systems, but also more broadly, the fabric of our democracy.'
The USA TODAY Network - Tennessee's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Have a story to tell? Reach Angele Latham by email at alatham@gannett.com, by phone at 931-623-9485, or follow her on Twitter at @angele_latham
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: As book bans grow across Tennessee, some genres see more bans
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour review could put state pension age on course to hit 70
Labour review could put state pension age on course to hit 70

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Labour review could put state pension age on course to hit 70

Labour is paving the way for the state pension age to be raised to 70 as a review considers tying future increases to life expectancy. Suzy Morrissey, who has been commissioned by Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, to review the official retirement age, said she would examine the 'merits' of automatic increases to help bolster the public finances. The New Zealander said she would examine the experience of other countries that already automatically link payments to life expectancy, including Denmark, which recently raised its retirement age to 70. Experts warned that automatic increases could create 'chaos' in retirement plans. Ms Morrissey's call for evidence, published by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) on Monday, said analysis of 'automatic adjustment mechanisms' used in countries such as Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Denmark would form a key part of the review. Ms Morrissey noted that UK life expectancy at age 66 had continued to rise, although she conceded that improvements had been much slower than forecast a decade ago amid a reversal during lockdown. The state pension age will start to rise to 67 from next year and is currently scheduled to rise again to 68 between 2044 and 2046. Any planned increases beyond this are likely to be at least another decade away. However, politicians have previously tried to bring forward increases amid concerns about the burden placed on public finances by the triple lock, which guarantees that the state pension rises by at least 2.5pc each year. Jeremy Hunt, the former chancellor, attempted to bring the increase to 68 forward to the late 2030s. However, he was forced to shelve the plans following a decline in life expectancy that left ministers struggling to justify the change. A man aged 66 in 2050 is now projected to live until 87, compared with 90 using 2014-based projections. Ms Morrissey said she would make her recommendations, which are expected in several years, 'in light of the long-term demographic pressures the country faces', as she noted that spending on the state pension had increased by 19pc over the past decade and 70pc over the past 20 years in real terms. Denmark has tied the official retirement age to life expectancy since 2006 and is one of nine OECD countries to do so. The Danish approach effectively caps the amount of time someone can spend claiming state support, legislating that an average of 14.5 years should be spent in retirement. This means that the retirement age rises by one year for every year life expectancy increases in Denmark. By contrast, the UK Government has set out a principle that future generations should spend 'up to a third' of their adult life in retirement. In 2017, the Government Actuary's Department (GAD) suggested the state pension age would rise to 70 in the 2050s if people spend 32pc of their adult life in retirement, though the GAD will consider changes to life expectancy when it updates its projections for this review. Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, noted that automatically linking life expectancy to the state pension age may have seen it swing by up to eight years, depending on whether you used 2012 or 2014 population projections. He said: 'Having a completely automatic formula to move from changes in life expectancy to changes in state pension age could cause chaos for people's financial planning. 'Every time the population projections are updated, this could move the dates for pension age changes by up to a decade, which would make it impossible for people to plan for their retirement finances. 'Having a rigid rule for setting pension ages creates more volatility and uncertainty than an approach which is more based on judgment and taking into account a wider range of factors.' Catherine Foot, director of the Standard Life Centre for the Future of Retirement, added that any increases would have to be accompanied by policies that helped people to stay in work. The Government has admitted that the previous increase in the state pension age to 66 in the 2010s left 89,000 would-be pensioners languishing on sickness benefits because they were too ill to work. Ms Foot said: 'Working until even the current state pension age is not easy for everyone. The group experiencing the fastest-growing rate of poverty for any working-age adult age group is people aged 60-65, many of whom have fallen out of work due to things like ill health, caring responsibilities or ageism in the labour market. 'Using average life expectancy as the yardstick with which to determine the state pension age inevitably increases inequality and poverty among the pre-retirement population, since it moves the state pension age further away for people who have fallen out of work and are struggling to get back in.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Nancy Mace launches campaign for South Carolina governor
Nancy Mace launches campaign for South Carolina governor

New York Post

time04-08-2025

  • New York Post

Nancy Mace launches campaign for South Carolina governor

US Rep. Nancy Mace is aiming high, officially throwing her hat in the ring for the South Carolina 2026 gubernatorial race to succeed term-limited incumbent Gov. Henry McMaster (R). Mace (R-SC) announced her campaign Monday after weeks of sending strong signals that she intended to vie for her state's governor's mansion, vowing to usher in the state's 'Golden Age.' Her formal campaign launch is set to take place at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, where she graduated in 1999 as the first female graduate from its Corps of Cadets. Following her formal campaign debut, Mace is set to embark on what she has billed the 'Mother of ALL Town Halls Tour,' starting in Myrtle Beach on Wednesday, kicking off her barnstorming of the state. Advertisement The three-term congresswoman has served in the House since 2021, where she quickly rose to national prominence and made a name for herself as one of the more outspoken members of the Republican Party. 3 Rep. Nancy Mace has been teasing a gubernatorial run for weeks. AP 3 Nancy Mace is set to formally debut her gubernatorial campaign at The Citadel. Citadel Military College of South Carolina Advertisement The South Carolina rep previously served in the state house from 2018–2020, after unsuccessfully challenging Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) during his 2014 reelection bid. She now faces a growing field of candidates on the Republican side, including fellow Rep. Ralph Norman, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, state Attorney General Alan Wilson and Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette. Mace has already traded barbs with some of her competitors, namely Wilson, whom she publicly accused of ignoring evidence she presented alleging she suffered sexual abuse from her ex-fiance and others. Wilson has called those claims 'categorically false,' and Mace is facing a defamation suit over the accusations. Advertisement Some polling has pegged Mace as the frontrunner, but indicates that many South Carolinians do not have their minds made up yet. A Targoz Market Research poll, for example, found Mace with a slight lead, but also found over half of GOP primary voters were undecided. 3 Rep. Nancy Mace has worked to bury the hatchet with President Trump. AP Looming over the race will likely be whether President Trump makes a formal endorsement. At the start of her tenure in Congress, Mace criticized Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot, though she later voted against impeaching him. This prompted Trump to endorse former South Carolina Rep. Katie Arrington (R) during the 2022 midterm elections. Advertisement Last year, Mace endorsed Trump over her former home state Gov. Nikki Haley in the 2024 presidential primary. Notably, her fellow congressional foe, Norman, backed Haley and was the only sitting House Republican besides Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) to do so. Over recent years, Mace has drawn national attention for wading into the culture wars. Last year, for example, she crusaded to ensure that women's facilities would be restricted to biological women after the election of Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), the first openly transgender member of the House. Back in 2023, she shocked observers by joining with a band of seven other hardcore conservatives led by former firebrand Rep. Matt Gaetz to oust then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) South Carolina is largely a Republican stronghold state, meaning the winner of the GOP primary is heavily favored to win the general election.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store