Albanese responds to Netanyahu's criticism, says he doesn't take comments 'personally'
The Israeli leader had said in a post on X: "History will remember Albanese for what he is: a weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews."
In a letter to Albanese, first reported by Sky News, Netanyahu scolds his Australian counterpart for "intensified" antisemitism "under his watch", saying the Albanese government's call for a Palestinian state "pours fuel on this antisemitic fire". It calls on Albanese to "replace weakness with action, appeasement with resolve, and to do so by a clear date: the Jewish New Year, September 23," known as Rosh Hashanah. The letter is similar to one also issued by Netanyahu to French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday, including the accusations around antisemitism and the ultimatum.
France called Netanyahu's allegation "abject and erroneous". "This is a time for seriousness and responsibility, not for conflation and manipulation," the French presidency added.
Responding to Netanyahu's public rebuke, Albanese on Wednesday said he wouldn't take the comments personally. "I treat leaders of other countries with respect and I engage with them in a diplomatic way," he told reporters in Adelaide.
"I don't take these things personally. I engage with people diplomatically. He has had similar things to say about other leaders."
'Strength not measured by how many you can blow up' Burke said the Israeli prime minister had "lashed out". "Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many people you can leave hungry," he told ABC radio on Wednesday morning.
"Strength is much better measured by what Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has done, which is, when there's a decision we know Israel won't like, he goes straight to Benjamin Netanyahu."
Labor frontbencher Clare O'Neil said Netanyahu's remarks were "disappointing" but that the Australian government wasn't going to "get into a tit-for-tat" with Israel. O'Neil said Albanese had been "unfailingly polite" with Netanyahu and other world leaders.
"I know the Israeli prime minister has had similar things to say about other global leaders with whom he has a disagreement," O'Neil told Channel Seven.
Opposition leader Sussan Ley said in a statement that Netanyahu's remarks were a "direct consequence" of Albanese "mismanaging international relationships". "It is up to Anthony Albanese to explain how he is going to repair this relationship," she said.
Israel responded by revoking the visas of a trio of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.
'We've never felt abandoned' Jewish leader Alex Ryvchin, from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said Australian Jews have not felt abandoned. He said it was important to preserve the relationship between the two countries. "We've never felt abandoned, we've always felt like we can speak to the government and speak to the public of this country and make our case," he told reporters in Sydney.
"When allies speak, they should speak frankly, robustly but also in a dignified way. When I think firing off tweets which contain elements of abuse, I don't think that's the way to operate."
Burke defends visa denial for Israeli politician Burke defended his decision on Wednesday, saying he'd make "no apology" for "being consistent". "If anyone wanted to come on a public speech tour, and they had those views publicly expressed about Israeli children, I would block the visa," he told ABC radio. "I am not going to have a lower bar for the protection of views that are bigoted views against the Palestinian people."
Senior Israeli politician Simcha Rothman was scheduled to appear at events in Melbourne and Sydney. Source: EPA / Abir Sultan
Opposition home affairs spokesperson Andrew Hastie said he didn't agree with Rothman's views, but that the decision to refuse his visa had damaged Australia's relationship with Israel.
"The relationship with Israel now is at an all-time low, and that's largely because of the Albanese foreign policy incompetence from this government," he told ABC radio on Wednesday.
In August, Albanese confirmed Australia's intention to recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. The decision came after more than 100,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge to protest the war in Gaza. Israeli Foreign Affairs Minister Gideon Sa'ar accused the Australian government of fuelling antisemitism as he announced the visa cancellations on social media on Monday. — With additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds
In a reminder of how broken housing affordability and access is, new analysis highlights a major mismatch between the size of Australian homes and the number of people living in them. While the vast bulk of Australian housing is built for larger families, property research firm Cotality has found more than 60 per cent of households are made up of just one or two people. It reveals a misalignment between "who lives in our homes and the kinds of homes we're building", Cotality's head of head of Australian research Eliza Owen said in the report. "Of the lone-person households in Australia, the data suggests around 40 per cent are aged 65 and over," Ms Owen said. "The highest share of households is two people, but the highest share of housing has three bedrooms. "While there's nothing wrong with more bedrooms than people in a dwelling, there could be some inefficiencies in the way housing is being allocated," Ms Owen said. "After all, a 'traditional' family of four may have more need for a three-bedroom dwelling than a household of two people." The report cited data from the 2021 Census, which showed there were more two-person family households in three-bedroom dwellings (about 1.3 million), than three or four-person family households (about 1.1 million). Ms Owen has suggested a way to fix the "efficiency question", which she knows is not politically appealing — send a price signal. "Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than you need, and cheaper to live in smaller housing," she wrote in her research note. She said that logic often leads to calls for tax reform including abolishing stamp duty to cheaper to move between housing, replacing it with a broad-based land tax (which raises costs the more land you own). "These options are both politically difficult as it would involve moving from a tax that applies to a small amount of voters each year who purchase property to one that will tax two thirds of voters (property owners)," she noted. Independent housing researcher Cameron Kusher, speaking to The Business in July, argued high transaction costs, namely stamp duty, discourage moving to a "better sized property" and can lead to people purchasing larger homes than they need to begin with. "People just feel like if I can get a better and bigger home sooner, that's a better outcome," he said. "If we look at what is being built, it's usually very large houses, four or five bedrooms, taking up most of the land on these new housing sites," Mr Kusher said. "A lot of it comes down to how much a piece of a property, [and] how much the land and the house, costs. "I think a lot of people are building bigger homes, thinking 'I'll spend a little bit more up-front and my family will grow into this home'. "It might just be a couple grandkids, or they're planning to have a couple of kids." He noted the effects of rapidly increasing property prices, which can leave people priced out of re-entering the market, and the fact that larger properties can be more likely to appreciate in value at a faster pace. Cotality's Ms Owen said other policy options to encourage people to move into appropriately sized homes could include reforming pension asset tests to include the value of the family home. "Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in our larger cities, that can accommodate smaller households. "But shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these new homes." The government has accepted it is not on track to meet the target to build 1.2 million homes in five years, but Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the ambition, despite Treasury advice it would not be met. In another recent note, Ms Owen questioned the focus of state and federal governments on speeding up building approvals to boost housing supply, warning that the construction industry simply cannot keep pace. "With completion times already above average and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements," she said. Cameron Kusher argued past experience could be a guide on how to approach today's housing problems and ease the construction crunch. "Maybe we need to go back to how things were 30 or 40 years ago, where you have smaller homes and you make them easy to renovate," he told The Business. "Over time, people can actually add bedrooms, bathrooms, car parks, verandahs and all these sorts of things to add value to the home.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
John Menadue critiques Australia's media and our relationship with the United States
John Menadue has been at the heart of Australian public life for over fifty years, working for the Whitlam, Fraser and Hawke governments. He oversaw the effective end to Australia's White Australia Policy, was CEO of Qantas and set up the Centre for Policy Development. In the media he ran The Australian for Rupert Murdoch, launched the online weekly New Matilda and founded the influential public policy platform, Pearls and Irritations. Now aged ninety, John reflects on Australia's media, in particular its coverage of the war in Gaza, our attitudes to race relations, AUKUS, our relationship with the United States and how Australia is navigating its place in the world during a global power shift. Guest: John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations Producer: Catherine Zengerer
SBS Australia
4 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Australian government pushes back against Netanyahu's attack on PM
Australian government pushes back against Netanyahu's attack on PM Published 20 August 2025, 9:02 am The Israeli Prime Minister has launched an explosive verbal spray on the Australian Government, directly accusing Anthony Albanese of betraying Israel. It's an online attack that has dominated Australian politics and led some key supporters of distance themselves from Benjamin Netanyahu.
