logo
Rachel Jones: Gated Canyons: Dulwich Picture Gallery has an identity crisis

Rachel Jones: Gated Canyons: Dulwich Picture Gallery has an identity crisis

Telegrapha day ago

It's hard to imagine a swifter ascent to art-stardom than that of the 34-year-old British painter Rachel Jones, whose exhilarating work is the subject of a new exhibition at Dulwich Picture Gallery. Like many others, I've been tracking her career for a while, since one of her (mostly) abstract canvases – dense with lozenges and squiggles of colour so powerful that it seemed to bypass the retina and dance and stomp directly on the optic nerve – was included in a 2021 survey of contemporary painting at the Hayward Gallery, just a couple of years after she'd graduated from the Royal Academy Schools.
A little later, now represented by international mega-gallery Thaddaeus Ropac (although they've since parted ways, and Jones, a fervent gardener who lives in a southeast London suburb, today operates independently), she had a solo exhibition at east London's Chisenhale Gallery that blew away Dulwich's head of programme and engagement, Jane Findlay; this exhibition, the first devoted to a single contemporary artist to fill the gallery's temporary exhibition spaces, is the result.
Curated by Findlay across four rooms, it contains lots of new work, including eight vast pictures characteristically executed in oil pastels and oil sticks – all of which, in a taxonomic nightmare for tomorrow's art historians, have the same, intentionally oxymoronic title, 'Gated Canyons', and date from 2024.
On this evidence, Jones's recent output is the same, but different. Like her slightly older peer, Allison Katz, she remains interested in the mouth as a motif: while, at first, Jones's pictures appear entirely abstract, on closer inspection, various shapes – like beads on a necklace, or an earthworm's segmented parts – typically coalesce into gigantic teeth and lips (supposedly inspired by the chops of cartoon characters), here occasionally accompanied by a lewd and dangling tongue.
Lesser, more hackneyed artists consider the eyes as the window to the soul, but for Jones – who's interested in interiority, and uses colour to depict grotto-like landscapes of feeling – these free-floating, disembodied grins are portals to caverns of emotion, where colours bloom like coral or mineral encrustations or moss and lichen. At Dulwich, she also introduces a new figurative element into the mix: squidgy-looking, cartoonish bricks, which (like mouths) suggest the point at which inside and outside meet.
Her smaller works – executed on bark-like slivers of paper and canvas with uneven edges – are bumpier in texture, muddier in hue, and less satisfying than their larger counterparts. In an odd move in these bigger paintings, Jones – with one exception – leaves bare swathes of the underlying brown linen, which imbues them with an unfinished air.
Still, this sludgy negative space can't neutralise her almost caustic pinks and reds, and they radiate self-assurance and charisma – so much so that a dominant pair on display in the low-ceilinged third gallery feels horribly hemmed in.
Quite what they are doing at Dulwich is less certain. Supposedly, Jones's work is in 'dialogue' with the gallery's permanent collection of Old Masters: specifically, and surprisingly, a tiny painting, from c. 1660-65, of the head of a reddish-eyed, white-coated hound, presented against a plain, olive-dark background, by the 17th-century Flemish painter Pieter Boel. While Boel's picture does, I suppose, depict a mouth, it has as much relationship to Jones's paintings as I do to the Dalai Lama.
I understand that Dulwich – which, this autumn, will unveil a new pavilion where under-eights can play – is striving to broaden its audience. But it mustn't evolve into a split-personality institution that, in the pursuit of novelty, and contemporary art's crowd-pulling magic dust, becomes blasé about its core identity.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Love Island fans convinced Ben doesn't fancy stunning American bombshell Toni as they spot giveaway sign
Love Island fans convinced Ben doesn't fancy stunning American bombshell Toni as they spot giveaway sign

The Sun

time11 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Love Island fans convinced Ben doesn't fancy stunning American bombshell Toni as they spot giveaway sign

LOVE Island fans are convinced Ben doesn't fancy new bombshell Toni - despite the fact she stole him from Shakira in the series opener. Loyal ITV2 viewers threatened to call Ofcom over a brutal show twist which saw the American's arrival as the latest instalment kicked off. 7 7 7 Love Island anchor Maya Jama, 30, delivered a huge bombshell when she entered the villa for a second time in episode one. Her bombshell was that a bombshell was arriving. Glam girl Toni, 24 - who is the first ever late show arrival from the United States - then arrived. The couples were left stunned as Las Vegas pool cabana server Toni said: "Good Evening UK! Surprise!" They quickly worked out she is American and on being the first American bombshell Toni says: "Lucky girl, aren't I?" Maya then explained that Toni was to immediately steal a boy. Toni then opted for Ben, 23, meaning Shakira was left single and vulnerable. Yet viewers aren't convinced it's a winning match. One took to X to write: "Ben doesn't fancy that girl btw." Another mused: "Ben doesn't even look like he wants to be there. This season is about to be a mess." A third then added: "Ben did not want to be picked." It remains to be seen what the taxi driver's next move is - and if he will take the time to get to know Toni, who recently revealed her crippling health battle. NEXT STEPS During Monday's episode, Maya then revealed that Burnley lass Shakira is now single. Maya clarified the brunette beauty wouldn't be dumped from the villa immediately, but instead had 24 hours to graft and steal a boy from someone else. She isn't allowed to take Ben back from Antonia, and if she doesn't get chosen, she'll be packing her bags. But if she does get selected in the next re-coupling round, another girl will be going home. Leaving the group with that cliffhanger, Maya then suggested that the girls keep their "boys very close". The show's six couples with Shakira single are now Toni and Ben, Meg and Dejon, Sophie and Harry, Helena and Conor, Alima and Blu, and Megan and Tommy. Yet it might not look good for Shakira, who entered the villa first alongside Meg Moore, 25. She promptly offended swathes of viewers as she made a stark comment about 9-5 jobs. For all the latest on Love Island keep up to date with our live blog. 7 7 7

Perfume lovers have found an M&S scent which smells identical to Chanel Mademoiselle but for £125 cheaper
Perfume lovers have found an M&S scent which smells identical to Chanel Mademoiselle but for £125 cheaper

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Perfume lovers have found an M&S scent which smells identical to Chanel Mademoiselle but for £125 cheaper

MARILYN Monroe famously stated she wore "only Chanel' perfume to bed - which is all very well if you can afford the £135 price tag. Thankfully shoppers have found a 'dupe' for the Chanel Mademoiselle scent at M&S, and it'll only set you back £10. 5 The Marks and Spencer Airport Arrival scent is said to blend 'warm spice with the delicate scent of mimosa.' The description reads: 'Cardamom and pink pepper give a vibrant opening, while violet and iris soften into a base of sandalwood, musk and vanilla.' And for a tenner, this scent could be a huge money-saver. With Chanel Mademoiselle costing £135 at Boots, you can avoid paying £125 for a very similar scent, according to beauty lovers. Bargain hunter Hannah, who posts under @lueurwithhannah, wrote on TikTok: 'If you want to smell like Coco Mademoiselle try this from M&S. 'Same top notes apparently. 'Here for the marks and Spencer dupes.' The designer alternative is said to have an 'ambery woody fragrance with a full-bodied character: sensual, deep and addictive.' It isn't the only M&S perfume to have caused a stir. DUPE SCENTS Alex Pavlova, from the UK, took to social media and claimed a selection of perfume dupes from M&S were so good she had ditched the originals. The £3.50 M&S buy that'll make your whole house smell like a 'boujee candle' She then went on to share four of her favourite ones and how much money the originals cost. The first on her list was a dupe for the £234 Le Labo Santal 33 scent. The cheaper alternative is the Warmth fragrance which costs a fraction of the price at £12. M&S says the expertly blended scent combines aromatic notes of cardamom, cinnamon, cedarwood and sandalwood to evoke a warming feeling of comfort. She also revealed that the Spiced Amber fragrance was a dupe of Paco Rabanne's One Million and saves you £80. Alex was also a fan of Jo Malone's Wood Sage & Sea Salt perfume but at £118 it was on the pricier side. 5 Thankfully, she found a budget-friendly dupe from the British store with their Ocean Musk fragrance. And for those who love the fresh and floral notes of Miss Dior perfume but want to avoid the £122 price tag, you're in luck. Alex revealed that the £10 Blooming Lovely fragrance for M&S was almost identical. Why you should always buy a dupe over designer... Fashion Editor Clemmie Fieldsend says it's time fashion snobs stopped looking down their noses at affordable versions of designer buys. Bargain US supermarket Walmart became a social media sensation when its £60 dupe of Hermès' Birkin bag, dubbed the Wirkin, went viral. Influencer @styledbykristi gushed: "Eighty dollars (£60), you can pretend that you got a Birkin. I mean, everyone will probably know it's not, because who the hell has the money to spend on the real Birkin? Not me.' Me neither. And why bother? I would never spend that on a designer bag (although if someone wants to buy one for me, that's a different story). Plus, if I splashed that much, I'd feel I was being ripped off... We've all been told how the leading brands use the finest leather, thread, dyes and craftsmanship in the world. But all that is inflated by fashion houses to create the desired illusion of exclusivity. Just last year, Dior came under investigation for paying £44 to assemble a bag that sells for £2,000. So while you might think you are paying for top-level craftsmanship carried out by a true artisan, chances are the poorly paid workers are not seeing any of your hard-earned cash. Dupes — not to be mistaken for knock-offs that copy everything from the logo to the inside label — are a more practical and all-round sensible way to go. I bought my first when I was 18. It lasted me four years and only broke after I wore it in the shower. And these days, British high streets have plenty of dupes. In the past three years, Marks & Spencer, H&M and Mango have all seen huge spikes in sales thanks to their canny copies. They use the same viral, must-have marketing tactics that pricey brands have. Fashion folk will tell you that you are making an investment and buying a 'heritage piece' and will turn their noses up at a high street equivalent. But we've been wearing looks inspired by catwalk designers for decades. If we can buy a bag that's the spitting image of the pricier version, but doesn't mean you have to remortgage, why not?

Inside Diana's testy relationship with her mother who let down the Princess 'terribly' on her wedding day
Inside Diana's testy relationship with her mother who let down the Princess 'terribly' on her wedding day

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Inside Diana's testy relationship with her mother who let down the Princess 'terribly' on her wedding day

It's 21 years today since Princess Diana 's mother Frances Shand Kydd was laid to rest following a long health battle against Parkinson's disease and brain cancer. She outlived her daughter by seven years and tragically Frances was not on speaking terms with Diana at the time of her sudden death. Indeed, it has been well documented that Diana and Frances had a testy relationship throughout their life with periods of reconciliation followed by long spells where the pair did not speak to one another. A particular sour point in their relationship started around the time of what should have been one of their happiest memories together - Diana's wedding to Prince Charles in July 1981. Writing in his bombshell autobiography about the late Princess of Wales - titled Diana: Her True Story - Andrew Morton revealed how Diana felt 'let down terribly' by Frances on her wedding day. 'She kept crying and being all valiant and saying that she couldn't cope with the pressure, I tended to think I was the one under pressure because I was the bride' Diana told Morton. Diana goes on to claim that her mother drove her 'mad' during her engagement and Frances was left 'hurt' when she was not included in preparations for the big day. She even makes the shocking allegation that the stress of the wedding led her mother to begin taking the anxiety medication valium which she was on 'ever since'. After the wedding, Diana said the pair didn't speak to each other for three to four years. Despite this, Frances was spotted at Mary's Hospital following the birth of Prince William in June 1982 with the new grandmother reportedly relieved that Diana would not have to endure the pressure of producing a male heir. Frances bitter split with Diana's father in 1969 had a profound on the future Princess. After the four children were left in the care of their father after a fierce custody battle when Diana was seven, Charles Spencer - Diana's younger brother - recalled that 'Diana used to wait on the doorstep for her, but she never came.' He said : 'While she was packing her stuff to leave, she promised Diana she'd come back to see her. 'Our father was a quiet, constant source of love, but our mother wasn't cut out for maternity... she couldn't do it. She was in love with someone else, infatuated really.' Despite her own troubled mother-daughter relationship, by all accounts Frances had a good relationship with her royal grandchildren. William and Harry reportedly enjoyed their visits to Frances home on the rugged and isolated Seil Island off the coast of Scotland which provided a welcome break from royal life for the young Princes. However, Diana's status as one of the most famous women in the world drew a further wedge between the mother and daughter. After divorcing John Spencer, Frances married wallpaper tycoon Peter Shand Kydd. By the late 1980s Frances' second marriage had began to deteriorate and she in part blamed Diana for the break up. Peter allegedly felt overshadowed by his more famous wife after Diana's skyrocketed the popularity of the Spencers. In thier obituary for Frances, The Guardian wrote about why Peter divorced her in 1990. 'I think the pressure of it all was overwhelming and, finally, impossible for Peter. They didn't want him. They wanted me. I became Diana's mum, and not his wife,' Frances is quoted as saying. After Diana separated from Charles in 1992, Frances is reported to have not approved of her later relationships. Diana's former butler - Paul Burrell - claimed that she voiced disapproval of Diana's relationships with heart surgeon Hasnat Khan and businessman Gulu Lalvani during a particularly tetchy phone call. 'It was the slurring voice of Mrs Frances Shand Kydd. What I heard was a torrent of abuse, swearing and upsetting innuendo towards the Princess and towards the male company she was keeping,' Paul said. He added that the call left Diana crumpled on the sitting room carpet, sobbing into her white bathrobe. Frances tendency to be loose looped with members of the press left a damning final legacy in her relationship with Diana. This came after Frances said in an interview months before her daughter's death that it was 'absolutely wonderful' she had been stripped of her HRH title after her divorce from the then Prince Charles, Diana never spoke to her again. Much of Frances' poor relationship with Diana and her other children, stems from her troubled marriage to John Spencer. At just 18 years old, Frances married 30-year-old Edward John Spencer at Westminster Abbey and was one of the youngest brides to wed at the venue, Tina Brown wrote in her 2022 book, The Palace Papers. It marked the beginning of a somewhat difficult chapter in Frances's adult life. Her husband, though polite and friendly on the surface, she soon discovered to be an abusive bully who drank, Ms Brown claimed. Frances and Diana at the Wimbledon Men's Tennis Final in 1993. Frances said in an interview months before her daughter's death that it was 'absolutely wonderful' she had been stripped of her HRH title after her divorce from the then Prince Charles, Diana never spoke to her again As the future heir to Althorp, 'Johnnie' needed a baby boy to continue the Spencer name and inherit the family fortune, though this proved to be a challenge to fulfil. Frances gave birth to her first child - Lady Sarah McCorquodale - in 1955 and went on to have another daughter, Lady Jane Fellowes, in 1957. 'In order to produce a male heir, he made Frances go through six pregnancies in nine years, of which only four were carried to term, and he resented her having any independent life,' Ms Brown wrote. Before Diana was born, Frances did give birth to a baby boy who sadly passed away several hours after birth. It was heart breaking for the couple and Ms Brown told how John refused to allow Frances to see the infant, also named John. She would only discover years later he was born with 'extensive malformation'. 'She struggled from the bed and banged frantically on the locked doors of the nursery to which he had been snatched away,' the former editor in chief of Tatler wrote. Frances recalled: 'My baby was snatched away from me and I never saw his face. Not in life. Not in death. No one ever mentioned what had happened.' Some 18 months later, Diana was born and weighed a healthy 7lb 12oz. Despite this, there was a great sense of disappointment in the Spencer family that 'the new arrival was not the longed-for male heir,' Andrew Morton wrote in his 1992 book, Diana: Her True Story - In Her Own Words. They hadn't even thought of a girl's name for the new arrival and it took the couple a week to settle on Diana. Eventually, Frances did give the Spencer family their much desired male heir and on May 20, 1964, Charles - now the ninth Earl Spencer - was born. Despite having the family they wanted, the couple's marriage broke down just five years later. When her second marriage ended in 1988 and she turned to religion, converting to Catholicism at the age of 58 and devoted the rest of her life to the Church.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store