Bike taxis to hit Mumbai roads from month-end
The bike taxis are likely to hit Mumbai roads from month-end, said state transport commissioner Vivek Bhimanwar this week.
While the bike taxi policy has been released in the form of a Government Resolution (GR), the state transport department is in the process of receiving applications from aggregator firms and groups interested in coming together to avail of the new bike taxi scheme. 'We will ensure that complete police verification and background checks are done of people planning to run
bike taxis in Mumbai
region,' Bhimanwar said.
Bike taxi scheme also encourages more women to come forward and operate two wheelers. Such bikes will be beneficial to women riders booking such taxis over the app. 'Over time, the percentage of female drivers should gradually increase to 50per cent,' the bike taxi policy states. To ensure the safety of female passengers, a partition must be installed between the passenger and the driver in all bike-taxis, Bhimanwar added.
The bike taxi scheme has also received cabinet approval on April 1, and will be implemented for two wheeler taxi aggregator services in all cities across Maharashtra — cities with a population of at least 1 lakh.
A joint transport commissioner said a single license will be issued by the state transport authority to eligible entities/operators with a minimum of 50 two-wheelers for bike-taxi permits. 'The validity of the bike-taxi permit will be 5 years and all two-wheelers under the aggregator must be 100per cent electric,' the official said.
Under the Motor Vehicles Rules 1989, two-wheeler permits will be non-transferable. All bike-taxis must be painted in a specific colour with 'bike-taxi' written on them, and the service provider's name and contact number must be displayed. 'This will make such taxis different from the other two wheelers operated on the road,' the official said. Also, compliance with emission standards is mandatory.
An official from the transport commissioner's office said the driver of bike taxis should already possess a valid license as per Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and a badge as per Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.
'We will also ensure that the bike taxi riders follow proper traffic rules and ensure road safety of passengers and other motorists. If anybody is found flouting rules, the licence will be suspended and the bike taxi operator will have to undergo a compulsory refresher course in road safety,' the official said.
As per the rules framed recently, the driver's age should not be less than 20 years and not more than 50 years. The driver should not drive for more than 8 hours a day. The service provider must provide training to all two-wheeler drivers and drivers must comply with traffic regulations under the Motor Vehicles Rules.
The autorickshaw unions in the region are opposed to the bike taxis and plan to organise a protest outside all RTOs on May 21. Union leader Shashank Rao claimed it will lead to uncontrolled proliferation of two wheelers. Furthermore, it will also cause a substantial impact on the autorickshaw trade which provides short routes and feeder service from railway stations to housing colonies, he said.
Transport minister Pratap Sarnaik said, 'There have been cases of auto drivers refusing passengers for short distance trips, and if there is a single passenger, the latter can opt for e-bike taxis. Also, why should a single passenger pay fare for three persons travelling in auto or four in taxi. If there is an e-bike taxi, the fare is cheaper and affordable to the rider. Also, he or she can reach the destination quickly and with convenience.'
He further said that the auto unions should rethink their decision to oppose e-bike taxis.
Sarnaik has also urged Marathi youth across the state to come forward in large numbers and join the trade. 'The children of auto drivers, after turning 18, can join this profession and we will help them get permits and grants,' he said. He added that the move will provide self-employment to thousands of youths across the state, adding that there is a 'guaranteed' monthly pay of Rs 25,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: Dealer fined ₹25k for not steering exchanged car's transfer
For failing to transfer the ownership of a city resident's old car, exchanged for a new one, which led to a speeding challan landing at his address, a car dealership will be coughing up ₹25,000 as compensation. Terming them guilty of deficiency in service, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-DF 1 has directed the dealership, Lally Motors, to pay the complainant ₹15,000 for mental agony and ₹10,000 as costs of litigation. Further, the dealership has also been told to clear the pending challan and transfer the exchanged car's ownership to either themselves or the new owner to whom they have sold the vehicle. In 2019, the complainant, Dr Swaran Singh, a resident of Sector 18, had walked into Lally Motors in Industrial Area to purchase a Volkswagen Vento car. Under a scheme, he agreed to exchange his old vehicle, valued around ₹2 lakh, which was adjusted against the price of the new vehicle. After the deal, the dealership had issued a delivery letter-cum-undertaking, dated October 23, 2019, promising that they will be responsible for all future taxes, challans and accidents related to the old car. But three years later, Dr Singh received a challan from the Chandigarh Traffic Police in December 2022, much to his surprise. The photograph attached to the challan showed his old car, which had supposedly been sold to someone else by the dealership. On inspecting further, to his shock, Dr Singh learned that the dealership had failed to transfer the car's ownership to its new owner after the exchange. Approaching the consumer commission, the complainant alleged that the car dealership sold his old car further without transferring its ownership, a violation of the Motor Vehicles Act. The dealership was summoned by the commission but they didn't turn up and were proceeded against ex parte on October 21 2024. Skoda Auto Volkswagen India contested the complaint, taking preliminary objections of maintainability, cause of action, jurisdiction and non-joinder of the necessary party. They alleged that so far as selling of the car went, they had nothing to do with it, and it was a matter between the dealership and the complainant. The commission accepted that the company had no role in the dispute and dismissed the complaint against them. However, it observed that the complainant had submitted documentary proof against the dealership, which was not rebutted in any way. Disposing of the complaint, the commission slapped a ₹25,000 penalty on the dealership, including the compensation and litigation costs.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Make appropriate changes in MV Act to avoid mismatch of vehicles during toll collection: Karnataka HC advises MoRTH
The High Court of Karnataka has advised the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) to review the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and make appropriate changes to address the issue of mismatch of vehicle type that crops up during collection of toll due to variance in vehicular classifications, particularly buses, under the MV Act, and the rules framed under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by Karavali Bus Owners' Association, Udupi, and several individual owners of private buses. The petitioners had questioned deduction of extra toll amount later in addition to the amount deducted from FASTag account instantly when their buses pass through two plazas between Mangaluru and Kundapur due to mismatch in vehicle type. The Court noted that the variance in classification of vehicles in the MV Act and the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 framed under the NH Act is the cause for this litigation and hence the MV Act requires statutory refinement. Background of case The petitioners had registered information of their vehicles in FASTag system as 'minibus' even though the registration certificate of the vehicles issued by the Regional Transport Officer (RTO) classified their vehicles as 'bus' with seating capacity of 38. The argument of the petitioner was that the provision of the MV Act states that vehicles with unladen weight of less than 12,000 kgs are classified as Light Motor Commercial Vehicles (LMCVs), which include 'minibus'. However, toll collecting authorities were collecting extra amount, which applicable for 'bus/truck' later as FASTag was deducting lower toll applicable to LMCVs at toll plazas. The toll collecting had relied on the RTO data of the vehicles belonging to the petitioners as the norms framed under the fee collection rules of 2008 describes a light motor commercial passenger vehicle with seating capacity up to 32 as a 'minibus' and as 'bus/truck' if the seating capacity is more than 32 and/or unladen weight of the vehicle is above 12,000 kg. The court pointed out that MV Act describes a vehicle with unladen weight up to 7,500 kg as a light motor vehicle and beyond 12,000 kg as a heavy passenger motor vehicle but there is 'vacuum' in the Act with respect to classification of vehicles between 7,500 kg and 12,000 kg. Registering as minibus The bus owners were registering their vehicle under the category of 'minibus' in FASTag by taking advantage of the MV Act as many of their buses were under 12,000 kg even though the seating capacity exceeded 32, the court noted while pointing out that base rate of toll for LMVCs/minibus is ₹1.05 per km and for bus/truck is ₹2.2 per km. Though the MV Act defines a medium passenger vehicle, the weight of such vehicles is left undefined, and the definition of a 'bus' is nowhere found in the MV Act, the court said. Also, the court noted a clarification given by the RTO to the petitioner-association that irrespective of the unladen weight of the vehicles, all stage carriage vehicles are mentioned as 'bus' in the registration certificates. Since the toll collection is governed by the NH Act and the fee collection rules, and not under the MV Act, the court upheld the action of the authorities in recovering differential toll amount from the FASTag accounts.
Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
Third-party motor insurance premiums could rise by up to 25%, govt review underway: Report
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) is actively reviewing a proposal to increase Motor Third Party (TP) insurance premiums, following recommendations from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), report CNBC-TV18. The proposal suggests an average hike of 18%, with a steeper increase of 20–25% for at least one vehicle category. A final decision is expected in the next 2–3 weeks, after which a draft notification could be issued for public consultation, as per standard regulatory practice. Motor TP insurance, which is mandatory under the Motor Vehicles Act, covers third-party liabilities resulting from accidents involving insured vehicles. Despite its significance, TP premiums have remained unchanged for four years, even as insurers continue to face mounting losses in the segment. The industry has been under strain due to rising medical costs, court-awarded settlements, and increased vehicle density on Indian roads. Loss ratios — the percentage of premium paid out as claims — have remained alarmingly high in recent years. According to sources: New India Assurance (Public sector) reported a TP loss ratio of 108% in FY25 (Public sector) reported a TP loss ratio of in FY25 Go Digit (Private insurer) posted 69% (Private insurer) posted ICICI Lombard reported a TP loss ratio of64.2% Such figures highlight the underwriting stress general insurers are facing due to stagnant premium rates. For FY25, TP insurance comprised nearly 60% of total motor insurance premiums and contributed 19% to the general insurance industry's overall premium income. Given this substantial share, analysts believe that a 20% hike could boost the sector's combined ratio — a key measure of underwriting profitability — by an estimated 4–5%. Industry experts have long called for systematic and periodic revisions of TP premiums to align with economic realities. The last revision occurred in 2021, and the subsequent rate freeze has exacerbated margin pressures for insurers. Without regular updates, insurers argue, the TP line becomes increasingly unsustainable.
