Majority on Brazil court in favor of tougher social media rules
Brazil's Supreme Court reached a majority Wednesday in favor of toughening social media regulation, in a groundbreaking case for Latin America on the spread of fake news and hate speech.
The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies such as X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not.
The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil.
At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet, a law in effect since 2014, that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it.
By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without court intervention.
One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and three have yet to express an opinion.
Alexandre de Moraes, one of 11 judges of the court, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts.
The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat.
Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation.
He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters.
Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial "persecution."
Lula, who emerged the victor in a tightly-fought election against Bolsonaro in 2022, is advocating for "accelerating regulation" of online platforms.
ffb/ll/dga/mlr/des
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
‘Leave Immediately': Trump administration orders self-deportation for Biden-era parolees
The Trump administration is telling Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans that legally came to the United States under a Biden-era program that they must immediately leave the United States and encouraging them to self-deport. The Department of Homeland Security said on Thursday that it is notifying parole recipients of a program known as CNHV that if they 'have not obtained lawful status to remain in the U.S., they must leave immediately.' The agency said it is also revoking their work permits. 'Ending the CHNV parole programs, as well as the paroles of those who exploited it, will be a necessary return to common-sense policies, a return to public safety, and a return to America First,' said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. The development comes 13 days after the Supreme Court lifted a lower court's order blocking the Trump administration from ending the program. During the Biden presidency, over half-a-million people from the four countries legally came to live and work in the U.S. READ MORE: Trump targets Biden-era migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti for deportation As many as half of the 531,000 migrants who entered the United States through the program have applied for other immigration benefits to adjust their status and may have a path to remain in the country, according to the Justice Action Center, a nonprofit that advocates for immigrants and has defended the parole program in court. This includes individuals who have already applied for asylum or for a green card under the decades-old Cuban Adjustment Act. However, as many as hundreds of thousands of others now face a difficult decision: whether to remain in the U.S. — risking detention and deportation — or to voluntarily return to countries plagued by violence, hunger, and human rights abuses. The Supreme Court ruling did not offer guidance for the Trump administration on how to carry out the ending of the program. Brandon Galli-Graves, Staff Attorney at Justice Action Center, said that the organization does not know how DHS will conduct immigration enforcement toward beneficiaries of the program. He noted that the agency previously said it intended to put as many beneficiaries as possible in expedited proceedings, a type of administrative deportation process that does not require a judge. When the Trump administration ended the program, roughly 117,000 Venezuelans, 211,000 Haitians, 110,000 Cubans, and about 93,000 Nicaraguans had entered the country through the program. It remains unclear whether all parole beneficiaries will receive the deportation notice or only those who have not applied for any other legal status. Galli-Graves said beneficiaries should check with their lawyers to understand how the Supreme Court case affects them. In its statement, the Trump administration referred to parole recipients as 'illegal aliens., ' despite the fact that, to qualify for the program, individuals were required to have a financial sponsor in the U.S., pass health and background checks, and enter the country through an airport. Once admitted, they became eligible to apply for work permits valid for the program's two-year duration. Many CHNV parolees were employed in critical sectors of the U.S. economy, from construction to elder care, helping to address labor shortages in both rural and urban areas, according to several immigration advocates. With parole protections now terminated, many of these individuals face job loss, housing instability, and disruptions to their education. The mass termination also jeopardizes family reunification as thousands of U.S.-based sponsors, including faith communities and cherished family members, now find themselves unable to protect the loved ones they committed to support. 'Rescinding legal protections from hundreds of thousands of people who entered this country through proper channels is a deeply destabilizing decision, not just for the families affected, but also for their loved ones and the communities that have welcomed them,' said Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, President and CEO of Global Refuge. 'These are people who play by the rules.. Tearing up that social contract overnight does nothing to advance our national security or humanitarian leadership.'
CBS News
40 minutes ago
- CBS News
Minnesota girl with epilepsy wins Supreme Court ruling expected to make disability lawsuits against schools easier
A teenage girl from Minnesota who has a rare form of epilepsy won a unanimous Supreme Court ruling on Thursday that's expected to make it easier for families of children with disabilities to sue schools over access to education. The girl's family says that her school district didn't do enough to make sure she has the disability accommodations she needs to learn, including failing to provide adequate instruction in the evening when her seizures are less frequent. But lower courts ruled against the family's claim for damages, despite finding the school had fallen short. That's because courts in that part of the country required plaintiffs to show schools used "bad faith or gross misjudgment," a higher legal standard than most disability discrimination claims. The district, Osseo Area Schools, said that lowering the legal standard could expose the country's understaffed public schools to more lawsuits if their efforts fall short, even if officials are working in good faith. The family appealed to the Supreme Court, which found that lawsuits against schools should have the same requirements as other disability discrimination claims. Children with disabilities and their parents "face daunting challenges on a daily basis. We hold today that those challenges do not include having to satisfy a more stringent standard of proof than other plaintiffs," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. The court rebuffed the district's argument, made late in the appeals process, that all claims over accommodations for people with disabilities should be held to the same higher standard — a potentially major switch that would have been a "five-alarm fire" for the disability rights community, the girl's lawyers said. Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote separately to say he would be willing to consider those arguments at some point in the future, though he didn't say whether they would win. But Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, saw it differently. Sotomayor wrote in another concurrence that adopting those higher standards more broadly would "eviscerate the core" of disability discrimination laws. The girl's attorney Roman Martinez, of Latham & Watkins, called Thursday's ruling a win for the family and "children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country." He added that "it will help protect the reasonable accommodations needed to ensure equal opportunity for all."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Celebrities Are Taking A Stand Against Trump's Immigration Crackdown
This article includes material from HuffPost's weekly culture and entertainment newsletter, The Culture Catchall. Click here to subscribe. Anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles are still on the ground pushing back against the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policies and extreme show of military force. But they aren't the only ones speaking out. This week, celebrities broke their silence on the federal immigration raids where hundreds of immigrants have been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. On Tuesday, Kim Kardashian posted a statement on her Instagram story reacting to the national outcry, writing: 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals — great. But when we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right.' The reality star, a longtime resident of LA, continued to tell her millions of followers how she has witnessed firsthand 'how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city,' noting that they're 'our neighbors, friends, classmates, co-workers and family.' 'No matter where you fall politically,' she added, without naming Trump, 'it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely.' 'There HAS to be a BETTER way,' Kardashian concluded. The Skims founder has largely stayed out of politics over the years, aside from visiting the White House in 2018 to discuss prison reform with Trump. But her new comments caught some heat this week from one Department of Homeland Security official, Tricia McLaughlin, the DHS assistant secretary for public affairs, who made it clear in an X post that she didn't care for the beauty mogul's stance. Some social media users criticized Kardashian's 'performative' post, while others appreciated her for using her platform at the height of Trump's immigration crackdown. And she's not the only celebrity who has spoken out. On Monday, live from the BET Awards in LA, Doechii went viral after she used her acceptance speech for Best Female Hip-Hop Artist to call out the administration's 'ruthless attacks' on people who are 'being swept up and torn from their families,' all to stir up fear and chaos in communities across the city. 'Trump is using military forces to stop a protest. And I want y'all to consider what kind of government it appears to be when every time we exercise our democratic rights to protest, the military is deployed against us,' said the rap star. 'I feel it's my responsibility as an artist to use this moment to speak up for all oppressed people,' she added. 'For Black people, for Latino people, for trans people, for the people of Gaza, we all deserve to live in hope and not in fear, and I hope we stand together, my brothers and my sisters, against hate. And we protest against it.' Kardashian also shared Doechii's speech on her Instagram stories. Eva Longoria also joined the wave when she took to social media to slam the 'inhumane,' 'hard to watch' and 'un-American' mass deportations that have caused dayslong protests in parts of LA. 'We all can agree, nobody wants criminals in our country, nobody wants rapists, nobody wants drug dealers, nobody wants bad actors in our country. That's not what's happening,' she said in an Instagram video. 'These roundups are happening in birthday parties, in elementary school graduations, Home Depot. Those are not criminals.' 'I hope that everyone has more compassion for this issue and realizes we have industries dependent on immigrant labor,' she added. 'These are people who feed us and take care of us and take care of our families and our children and our communities, and we can't deny them as humans. We just can't.' The Hollywood actor concluded the clip by reminding her followers why people are protesting, because 'parents and mothers are being separated from young children.' In her caption, she also linked to several organizations to support, including the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Immigrant Defenders Law Center and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Other celebs have since condemned the immigration raids, too, including Tyler, the Creator, Reneé Rapp and Finneas, according to Euro News. Pedro Pascal, Mark Ruffalo and John Leguizamo also posted on their Instagram pages. The LA protests first broke out last Friday after ICE agents conducted a series of immigration sweeps across Southern California, ABC News reported. Protesters clashed with ICE as they arrested multiple individuals. Local police in riot gear then confronted folks with batons and tear gas. By Saturday, ICE reported that it had arrested 118 immigrants in the LA area as it tried to enforce immigration law. Since then, the Trump administration has deployed over 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to combat the growing protests in the city, which currently has an 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew in place for the downtown LA area. Several political figures have blasted Trump's military response, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who in a primetime address Tuesday warned that the president's continued 'assault' on democracy is just the start of what could spread across the country. 'Look, this isn't just about protests here in Los Angeles,' Newsom said. 'When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to commandeer the National Guard, he made that order apply to every state. This is about all of us. California may be first, but it clearly will not end here.' 'Other states are next. Democracy is next,' he added. Meanwhile, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told Forbes that she blamed federal immigration raids for starting civil unrest in the city, also accusing the administration of deliberately trying to spark chaos by federalizing troops. As rallies against Trump's anti-immigration policies spread nationwide, protesters continue to assert their First Amendment rights in hopes of checking Trump's abuse of power. How, and if, that will end, only time can tell. Subscribe to The Culture Catchall to stay up to date on all things entertainment. California Rep: 'We Don't Want ICE In Our Community. We Want You Out.' Gov. Greg Abbott Deploys National Guard On Texas Anti-ICE Protests There's Growing Anger Over Flags Flown At LA Protests. Here's What Everyone Is Getting Wrong.
