Sir David Attenborough names golden eagle chick hatched in Scotland
It comes as part of the South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project (SSGEP), which aims to increase their numbers throughout the country.
Sir David Attenborough named the young eagle Princeling (James Manning/PA)
SSGEP has now expanded its project to England and Wales under Restoring Upland Nature (RUN), to increase the population of the species elsewhere in the UK.
Sir David said: 'Many congratulations to all those in Restoring Upland Nature who have brought about the fledging of a young golden eagle.'
News of Princeling hatching in spring this year was kept secret until he was ready to fly the nest in a bid to protect his safety and welfare.
He was tagged by experts from the RUN team in June, with support from a local Scottish Raptor Study Group, landowners and land managers.
His parents, Emma and Keith, made their nest near Moffat, Dumfries and Galloway, where he later hatched.
Emma was previously translocated by SSGEP in 2021 and was named by Lorna Slater MSP, who at the time served as the Scottish Government's biodiversity minister.
She was named after Emma Ritch, an advocate for women's rights and equality.
Dad Keith fledged his nest locally, near Galloway.
Revealing the latest news, the chief executive of RUN, Dr Cat Barlow, said: 'What an honour it is for RUN to receive such warm recognition from Sir David Attenborough for this game-changing moment in UK conservation.
Princeling the eaglet surveys his surroundings (Ian Georgeson/PA)
'Seeing Princeling thrive in the south of Scotland highlights that, where there are healthy ecosystems and a low risk of persecution, translocated eagles can integrate well into native populations to breed successfully.
'This brings renewed hope to our ambition to reverse biodiversity decline and ensure current and future generations across the UK, including Scotland, England and Wales, can experience that incredible sense of awe on seeing golden eagles soar.
'It is important to highlight that this success is testament to the support we have received from the community, partners, funders, raptor workers, gamekeepers, estate managers and more.
'We know they will all share in our excitement at today's news and look forward to continuing to work with them, and many new partners, as we build on our success, and extend our reach into northern England.'
Princeling being tagged and measured (Restoring Upland Nature/PA)
RUN chairman Michael Clarke said: 'We're absolutely thrilled to welcome Princeling and would like to thank Sir David Attenborough, and all our partners and supporters, for helping us mark this important milestone.
'There has been such a great buzz at our initial success, with golden eagles spotted across southern Scotland and northern England.
'This remarkable recovery story has only been possible through a massive team effort by individuals from all walks of life.
'Our sincere hope now is that Princeling's arrival will cement a sense of shared ownership and responsibility for his survival as a totem of what is possible when people pull together, and share a determination, to consign the illegal persecution of these magnificent birds and other raptors to the history books.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
For the love of peat, why must humble gardeners be victimised?
What really rankles is the non-stop air traffic taking off from nearby Glasgow Airport plus the constant stream of jet-trails overhead, bound for USA, Europe, Japan, Dubai etc, all flying over Scotland releasing their poisons. Why does my little bit of garden peat matter so much it is banned but at any time there are around 4,500 flights in the air guzzling enormous amounts of fuel and causing untold environmental damage? Try the Flightradar24 app and give yourself a fright. I guess gardeners are just an easy target. Scientifically I can understand the environmental damage caused by all these flights and I could even see the point of banning the burning of peat but I fail to see that allowing gardeners to use a bit of peat is going to destroy the planet. David Gilchrist, Paisley. Read more Grouse moor claims are false Robbie Marsland's article ("For nature and wildlife, grouse shooting creates a vicious circle of destruction. Call that 'glorious'?", The Herald, August 12) contains so many inaccuracies about grouse moor management that it would be impossible to address them all in one letter. But several of his key claims cannot go unanswered. He asserts that muirburn 'encourages wildfires'. Estates and gamekeepers – recently praised for their role in tackling Scotland's largest recorded wildfire near Dava and Carrbridge – know the opposite to be true. The Scottish Fire & Rescue Service and the Scottish Government both recognise that controlled muirburn, when carried out by trained professionals, is an essential tool for reducing fuel loads and lowering the risk of devastating, uncontrolled blazes. On medicated grit, Mr Marsland omits that its use is tightly regulated by veterinarians, who must be satisfied of the need before it is deployed. In 2020, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency concluded that flubendazole 'presented a low environmental risk'. Claims that grouse moors are 'wildlife deserts' are also unfounded. Indeed, to give one example, by 2022, 90% of the chicks translocated for the South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project came from private estates – most of them grouse moors. Finally, licensing for grouse shooting, which was introduced last year, has seen over 270 applications approved by NatureScot, with no cases of raptor persecution requiring intervention. The truth is that Mr Marsland prefers to paint a picture of licensing not working, falsely claiming that licences only cover tiny areas immediately surrounding grouse butts. This is demonstrably untrue and was recently debunked by the Scottish Government in response to a parliamentary question. All in all, I find it quite astonishing to see the lengths to which some people will go to pursue extreme agendas with absolutely no regard for the consequences. Ross Ewing, Director of Moorland, Scottish Land & Estates, Musselburgh. Roadworks everywhere I readily identify with John McMenemy's letter (August 16) regarding roadworks and diversions. Back in January 2023, I sent a Freedom of Information request to Edinburgh City Council asking how many separate roadworks there were across the city as, like Mr McMenemy, I was totally fed up with delays everywhere I went. The council sent me a detailed response which confirmed that there was a total of 135 distinct roadworks – consisting of 55 road closures, 38 'give and take' traffic controls, 21 portable traffic lights, 15 lane closures; three narrow roads, and three works on footways. It was illuminating but not surprising. Brian Watt, Edinburgh. Sour milk The proposed congestion charge for Glasgow ('Concerns as plans for a Glasgow congestion charge move forward', The Herald, August 16, and Letters, August 19) will serve no useful purpose, and is no real surprise, as it is merely part of a grand plan to milk the population at every opportunity. Quite simply, we are being harvested. Malcolm Parkin, Kinnesswood, Kinross-shire. Good news at last Everyone expects to open a newspaper these days and find nothing but bad news. It's either happening or about to happen. Donald Trump has no idea how to present good manners never mind good sense as leader of the free world. A young politician is being pilloried for stating her beliefs. There's a huge rise in the amount of sea creatures being stranded on Scottish beaches. A man has been blinded by alcohol while on holiday. I could go on of course but that is not the point of my letter because today in your Business Section is the most welcome and pleasing news this month. CCG (Scotland) has just welcomed 14 new apprentices into its ranks ("Major Scots construction group ramps up intake of apprentices", The Herald, August 19). Isn't this just what the country and the economy need? May I suggest a monthly round-up of similar good-news apprenticeships? Each and every one of them could convince yet another young school leaver that it is a very good idea and that there has always been this option alongside what seems to be every modern parent's desire: for their wean to go to uni. Michael Colgan, Glasgow. Prince Harry penned a letter to his late grandfather (Image: PA) Psst, can you keep a secret? I refer to your article reporting that the Duke of Sussex arranged that a secret, personal letter to his late grandfather be left at the National Memorial Arboretum, and that he had now published this letter ("Harry's secret tribute to his grandfather Prince Philip left at national memorial after VJ Day commemorations", The Herald, August 19). I'm not sure he understands "secret". Allan McDougall, Neilston.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
The Chinese navy may be big, but it has shown itself truly incompetent
In a spectacular own-goal that exposes the perils of aggressive posturing, two Chinese vessels – a People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) destroyer and a China Coast Guard (CCG) cutter – smashed into each other last week while chasing a Philippine Coast Guard vessel in the disputed South China Sea. The incident, near Scarborough Shoal, almost certainly resulted in sailors on the Chinese cutter being killed. Bullying like this is commonplace there but when it merges with such poor seamanship, grey-zone activity quickly moves to the daft-zone as comedy and tragedy merge to create a deadly maritime farce. The clash unfolded during a Philippine mission to aid local fishermen at Scarborough Shoal, a submerged reef about 140 miles west of Luzon, firmly within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The BRP Suluan, a 270-ton Philippine patrol vessel, was escorting supply boats when the CCG cutter 3104 – a repurposed Type 056 corvette – gave chase at high speed, blasting water cannons and attempting hazardous blocking manoeuvres as they have done so many times before. Enter the PLAN's Type 052D destroyer stage left, literally. She is a 7,500-ton behemoth armed to the teeth with guns and missiles, who had conducted her own close passes in the run up to the collision. And by close passes, I mean inside 10 yards, at which range any margin for error has long since gone. Video was taken from the Suluan over her stern and sees the Chinese cutter weaving as it approaches her stern at high speed. The next thing we see is the bow of the warship looming impossibly close to the stern of the Suluan and the bow of the cutter. Turns out, it was impossible. The next time we see the cutter, it is stopped in the water with its bow folded in like paper. Some thought both ships were attempting to try and sandwich the Suluan. I don't agree as that requires a level of coordination and understanding that was clearly absent. More likely is that both Chinese vessels, with the drama of it all, got target fixation which in turn caused them to lose situational awareness (SA) of the other vessel. How the coastguard vessel managed this is a puzzle given that the warship was right in front of them but they did – the Coastguard sailors in the bows who bravely put a fender out reacted faster than the team on the bridge. It's also clear that the Suluan was handled well throughout, unruffled when the two Chinese ships got close on previous passes and consistently manoeuvring to be a difficult target. In these situations speed is everything. The Suluan was a couple of knots slower than the coastguard cutter and as much as seven slower than the warship. Getting away fully was never an option. Although no deaths have been confirmed it is unlikely that any of the Chinese coastguard sailors who were on the fo'c'sle of their cutter during the collision escaped. Subsequent videos have made much of a red mist seen coming from the bows of the warship as the cutter disappeared from the camera's view. It makes no difference at all to the sailors or their families but this was unlikely to be blood. The bows of ships contain a large anchor cable locker full of rust and dust, all of which would have been violently ejected as the PLAN ship crumpled it like foil. The warship's post-collision behaviour was even more surprising. Under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) vessels must render assistance after a collision. Yet the destroyer barely slowed either for this (breach of law) or to check their own watertight integrity (a breach of common sense). We can see two small holes visible in the port bow, but what if it was holed below the waterline? Basic damage control says you slow to check and if you're slick, that only takes a minute. They didn't though. I'm not sure if this was panic and lack of experience by the captain or indicative of a 'press on regardless' wartime mentality. I have noted before that the downside of building so many new warships a year is that you can't generate experience fast enough – some PLAN captains have spent less than eight years at sea – so it could be inexperience rather than bad attitude. I would like to know though as the difference is significant. Manoeuvring multiple warships in close proximity like this is doable. I've done it as a frigate captain working alongside a US destroyer at very close quarters protecting minesweepers from onrushing fast attack craft. In that case, the US captain and I had spent an evening sometime prior mapping it out. The Cod Wars was probably the last time the Royal Navy was asked to be this aggressive ship-on-ship and it didn't work well then either. Warships now are built for speed and manoeuvrability and are not designed to hit other ships. If you can avoid it, you do. Unless, like the other proponents of daft-zone manoeuvring, Russia and Iran, you don't care. To finish off the incident, in a demonstration of ice-cold professionalism, the Suluan slows before jumping on the radio to offer assistance to the now bowless cutter. Good work. Which brings me to the broader point of what Beijing thinks this behaviour will achieve. I understand that they are trying to normalise their illegal claims there but the risk vs reward in this sort of case makes it an odd way to do it. It reminds me of when the Iranian small boats would swarm you as you transited the Strait of Hormuz. It doesn't really intimidate or stop you going, it just makes you wonder why they are doing it and when they do it badly, it diminishes your respect for them as operators. None of this is new. Beijing's forces have caused hundreds of incidents in the South China Sea alone in the past year, from ramming resupply missions at Second Thomas Shoal to water-cannoning fishermen. Hitting one of their own is new, but the mindset is not. Up until now most of the aggressive behaviour has happened in the South China Sea as China continues to ignore the Hague ruling against its 'Nine Dash Line' claim and treat most of the Sea like it's theirs. But just now there are also five Chinese ice breakers off the coast of Alaska, described as 'research vessels' and manoeuvring just outside the Alaskan EEZ. This is designed to test legal systems and stretch resources: but how long before things become dangerous there, or off the coast of the UK? Likewise, it's inevitable that China's rapidly developing nuclear submarine threat will start poking around in US and European underwater infrastructure in the way Russia has been for decades, if it's not happening already. Personally, I don't have any hope that this latest mishap will alter China's strategic behaviour. It's embarrassing, and the Chinese captains will pay the price for that, but it won't make them stop. At the tactical level I would imagine the PLAN and other branches of their maritime militia will now be learning how to better coordinate at sea. Meanwhile everyone who is on the receiving end of this maritime buffoonery knows that they are dealing with a dangerous mix of recklessness and inexperience. It's comedic that the Chinese hit one of their own and tragic that it resulted in deaths – I think those two can coexist. My initial thought when I saw the video was 'play stupid games, win stupid prizes' and despite the fatalities revealed since, I think that's about right. So, as ever, it's about alliances, treaties, cooperation and a collective sense that we will not tolerate this behaviour because when we do, it becomes the next normal. Then it escalates again until a conflict-triggering accident becomes inevitable. We are approaching this now.
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Sir David Attenborough names golden eagle chick born in Scotland
Legendary broadcaster Sir David Attenborough has named the first eaglet to fledge its nest of a golden eagle in Scotland as part of a conservation project. Sir David, 99, named the young bird Princeling, meaning young prince, which he says symbolises new hopes for the restoration of the species. The baby eagle was part of the South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project (SSGEP), which focuses on increasing their numbers across the country. The project has been extended to England and Wales under Restoring Upland Nature (RUN) to increase the population in other parts of the UK. Sir David said: 'Many congratulations to all those in Restoring Upland Nature who have brought about the fledging of a young golden eagle.' Princeling's hatching in spring was kept a secret from the public until he was ready to flee his nest and fly to protect his safety and welfare. His whereabouts were closely monitored after being tagged by RUN experts in June, with support from a local Scottish Raptor Study Group, landowners and land managers. The baby eagle was hatched in Moffat, Dumfries and Galloway where his parents, Emma and Keith, made their nest. Emma was named by Lorna Slater MSP, who served as the Scottish Government's biodiversity minister, after she was translocated by SSGEP in 2021. Princeling's mother was named after Emma Ritch, a Scottish women's right and quality campaigner. Keith fledged his nest locally, near Galloway. Revealing the latest news, the chief executive of RUN, Dr Cat Barlow, said: 'What an honour it is for RUN to receive such warm recognition from Sir David Attenborough for this game-changing moment in UK conservation." 'Seeing Princeling thrive in the south of Scotland highlights that, where there are healthy ecosystems and a low risk of persecution, translocated eagles can integrate well into native populations to breed successfully. 'This brings renewed hope to our ambition to reverse biodiversity decline and ensure current and future generations across the UK, including Scotland, England and Wales, can experience that incredible sense of awe on seeing golden eagles soar." 'It is important to highlight that this success is a testament to the support we have received from the community, partners, funders, raptor workers, gamekeepers, estate managers and more." 'We know they will all share in our excitement at today's news and look forward to continuing to work with them, and many new partners, as we build on our success and extend our reach into northern England.' RUN chairman Michael Clarke said: 'We're absolutely thrilled to welcome Princeling and would like to thank Sir David Attenborough and all our partners and supporters for helping us mark this important milestone." 'There has been such a great buzz at our initial success, with golden eagles spotted across southern Scotland and northern England." 'This remarkable recovery story has only been possible through a massive team effort by individuals from all walks of life." 'Our sincere hope now is that Princeling's arrival will cement a sense of shared ownership and responsibility for his survival as a totem of what is possible when people pull together, and share a determination to consign the illegal persecution of these magnificent birds and other raptors to the history books.'
