'Unpredictable' New Jersey primary hits final stretch with Mikie Sherrill atop a bunched-up field
New Jersey Democrats' primary for governor is coming down to the final month. And while the race is still hotly contested, some candidates are signaling that they view Rep. Mikie Sherrill as the one to beat.
Five of the six Democratic contenders will face off in a two-and-a-half-hour debate on Sunday, following a heated encounter earlier this week that offered a preview of the attacks that could be coming at Sherrill. Both Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka aimed barbs at the congresswoman and cast her as inexperienced and moderate, implying that they view her as an obstacle.
But the race remains very fluid. Limited public polling has shown Sherrill leading the pack, with the candidates largely clustered together and within the surveys' margins of error.
'It is the most unsettled race in the 30 years that I've been working in New Jersey,' said Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky.
The race is difficult to gauge because such a hotly contested primary is unusual in the state, where party bosses have wielded their power to anoint their preferred candidates. But the county parties lost the ability to give their preferred candidates advantageous positions on primary ballots when the state changed its ballot design last year, following a lawsuit from now-Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J.
'It is extremely unpredictable,' said Fulop, one of the top contenders, who later added, 'We've never been here before.'
The county parties could still impact the race, leveraging their turnout operations to boost their endorsed candidates. While Fulop and Rep. Josh Gottheimer did not seek most county endorsements, Sherrill racked up support from the most counties, including key Democratic strongholds like Essex and Middlesex.
'She's the machine candidate and perceived as the front-runner,' Fulop told NBC News. 'I don't think that's a secret.'
Sherrill campaign spokesperson Sean Higgins said Fulop's characterization of the congresswoman as the political machine's candidate was 'remarkably lazy and inaccurate.'
'If you look at her track record of running races, her campaign in 2018 was harnessing and leading a wave of grassroots enthusiasm,' Higgins said in a statement, referencing Sherrill's first run for political office when she won her House seat.
During their Monday debate, hosted by NJ Spotlight News, NJ PBS and WNYC, both Fulop and Baraka targeted Sherrill, accusing her of issuing vague 'platitudes' and of being too moderate.
Fulop said he targeted Sherrill on Monday because he did not feel she had been adequately scrutinized, particularly as the perceived front-runner.
According to video of a news conference provided by Baraka's campaign, the Newark mayor told reporters after Monday's debate, 'I don't agree that she's a progressive. I think her record shows that clearly.' Baraka also clashed with Gottheimer during the debate, who the mayor cast as too conservative.
Sherrill, for her part, said during Monday's debate that she has pushed back on leaders of both parties, noting that she pushed for Trump's first impeachment and would take on Trump as governor.
'In New Jersey, [it is] making sure that we are taking him to court, pushing back against these Medicaid cuts, clawing back federal funding back to New Jersey,' she said.
State Sen. John McKeon, a Sherrill supporter, suggested that attacks on Sherrill's lack of executive experience were 'people looking for soundbites.'
'It doesn't stick,' McKeon said, pointing to her experience as a Navy pilot and prosecutor as proof that she can lead the state government. 'Trenton's not an easy place to navigate, but compared to what she's done in her life, I think it will be a piece of cake.'
McKeon said he welcomed any attacks on her in Sunday's debate, noting, 'She's at her best when she's challenged.'
Although some Democrats view Sherrill as the top candidate in the race, it's all relative. The Democratic primary polls have shown relatively little separation between the contenders, especially compared to repeat candidate Jack Ciatterelli's advantage in the GOP primary. The Democratic race is still wide open, with a crowded field and millions of dollars blanketing the Garden State airwaves with ads ahead of the June 10 primary.
'Every one of them has a pathway to win,' said Roginsky, the Democratic strategist.
Sherrill's campaign has focused on expanding her appeal to a broad coalition of voters from her House district to a statewide campaign, and she could leverage her position as the only woman in the primary. She has stressed her background and her record flipping a Republican district in 2018 and cast herself as the candidate best equipped to take on Trump.
'Voters really want someone who can beat a Republican in November,' said Higgins, the Sherrill campaign spokesperson.
'If people are looking for a winner, and we know they are, I think they'll land at the logical choice, the person who's actually done that. And that's Mikie,' Higgins later added.
Fulop, who described his typical supporter as a 'pragmatic progressive,' said the party should reject establishment candidates to win in November and shouldn't be afraid to criticize Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, who cannot run for re-election due to term limits.
While Democrats may want to make the race about President Donald Trump, Fulop predicted the eventual GOP nominee will make it a referendum on Murphy. He suggested the governor has not adequately combatted the state's high cost of living, transportation woes and culture of political corruption.
'The reality is that if you are, again, the establishment candidate that is defending Phil Murphy and you think you're going to get to the general election and talk about Trump and you're gonna win, you're gonna get blown out,' said Fulop, noting that Trump made gains in New Jersey last November. He lost the state by 6 points, a 10-point improvement from his margin in 2020.
Fulop and Baraka have both made appeals to the party's progressive voters, and Baraka may get a boost among voters who want the party to fight Trump following his arrest last week at a federal immigration detention facility.
Gottheimer, meanwhile, could run up the middle as more of a moderate candidate who has focused his messaging on affordability and lowering taxes. He has also pitched himself as a candidate with crossover appeal, defeating a Republican congressman in 2016 even as Trump narrowly carried his district.
'While the same old status quo candidates in this race take shots at each other, Josh is focused on the two biggest fights facing Jersey: fighting Donald Trump and fighting to get our costs and taxes down,' said Gottheimer campaign spokesperson Peter Optiz. 'Josh is the only candidate with a plan to cut taxes and a record of getting tough things done—that's what he'll do for Jersey families as Governor.'
Former state Senate President Steve Sweeney, who has leaned on his experience in state government and lagged behind the other candidates in some public polls, could have a path as the only candidate from South Jersey, with support from some key county parties with strong turnout operations.
'Steve is kind of the person that represents that steady hand at the wheel that I think a lot of people in New Jersey would like to see, especially with so much chaos in Washington,' said Sweeney spokesperson Kerry Lyons.
A sixth candidate, former Montclair Mayor Sean Spiller, did not meet the fundraising threshold that would have qualified him to accept public campaign funds and participate in the debates. But Spiller, the former head of the state's teacher's union, has benefitted from more than $8 million in ads from Working New Jersey, a super PAC tied to the New Jersey Education Association, and he could get a boost from the state's educators.
Gottheimer and super PACs supporting his campaign have spent $19.4 million combined on ads so far this year, followed by Fulop and his aligned super PAC, which have spent $15 million combined, according to ad-tracking firm AdImpact. Sherrill and her aligned super PAC have spent significantly less so far, $2.9 million. Baraka and his super PAC have spent $2.7 million, and Sweeney and his super PAC have spent $2.5 million
Sherrill's lower spending so far was a strategic decision by the campaign, which opted to hold its money until the final weeks, when it believed voters would be tuning into the race.
Fundraising reports filed earlier this week showed Sherrill's campaign had $4.7 million in its account as of May 9, more than twice as much as the next-closest candidate. From Friday through the June 10 primary, Sherrill has reserved the most airtime of any candidate so far, nearly $1.8 million. Her allied super PAC, One Giant Leap PAC, has reserved $922,000.
Even with the millions of dollars already spent, candidates have mostly stuck to positive messaging — though Sweeney did launch a TV ad last month that knocked 'weak' Democrats and showed images of Sherrill, Gottheimer and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., without mentioning them by name.
It remains to be seen exactly how, when or even if the attacks will ramp up. But each of the candidates is looking for a way to break away from the pack with just a few weeks to go.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount Schedules Annual Shareholder Meeting, Sets Board Expansion Amid Skydance Merger Watch
Paramount Global has set its annual shareholder meeting for July 2, offering the latest signal that the long-gestating merger with Skydance Media is unlikely to close on schedule. In multiple recent regulatory filings and statements, Paramount has maintained its guidance to investors that the $8 billion deal would close during the first half of 2025, which ends June 30. Because it is a 'controlled' company, with Non-Executive Chairwoman Shari Redstone and her family owning most outstanding shares, the merger does not require a shareholder vote. More from Deadline List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More New York Times Defends Report On Elon Musk's Drug Use, Says He's "Lashing Out Because He Doesn't Like Our Article" London Mayor Threatens To Reopen Donald Trump Rift After Swiping At "Inward-Looking" U.S. On Opening Day Of SXSW London Paramount disclosed details about the shareholder meeting, which will be conducted virtually at 9 a.m. ET on July 2, in an updated proxy filing. During the meeting, shareholders will have the chance to vote to add three new members to the company's board of directors. Attorney Mary Boies, ex-judge Roanne Sragow Licht and venture capitalist Charles Ryan have been nominated by the company's board governance committee. Counting existing board members, Redstone, Barbara Byrne, Linda Griego and Susan Schuman, the company will have a total of seven directors. Last year, the board shrunk to four members. Some directors stepped down as the merger plan came into focus, including four in the leadup to the company's 2024 shareholder meeting. The lone hurdle for the Skydance transaction, which followed a lengthy search for a suitor and finally was clinched last summer, remains the approval of the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC review, though, has been clouded by President Donald Trump's battle with CBS and 60 Minutes. Trump has filed a $20 billion lawsuit over the news magazine's handling of an interview with Democratic presidential candidate. FCC Chair Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee who often amplifies Trump's attacks on media companies, has insisted that the commission's evaluation of the deal is entirely separate from the lawsuit. Even if that is the case, Carr has indicated that the agency hasn't meaningfully started its process. Mediation has been ongoing between the parties in the lawsuit. Deadline reported last month that Paramount put forward an 8-figure settlement proposal, but it was rejected by Trump. The delay in the FCC process and the antagonism by Trump have surprised a number of observers, given that Redstone and Skydance backer Larry Ellison are both strong supporters of Trump. As the year began, it appeared the Paramount-Skydance combination would be one of many to take shape in what appeared to be a less-tightly regulated industry. Instead, the deal has been hamstrung by Trump's personal animus toward CBS. The next major date to look for after the annual meeting is July 7, which will kick off a second 90-day extension to close the deal, carrying the parties into October. Meanwhile, three co-CEOs George Cheeks, Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins continue to run Paramount, an usual situation meant to see the company through to the merger. In a shareholder letter released along with the amended proxy, they touted Paramount's accomplishments despite myriad challenges and distractions. 'Against the backdrop of a dynamic and complicated time in the macro-economic environment and our industry, we are proud that 2024 proved to be a transformative year for Paramount,' they wrote. A few merger-related shareholder actions by New York and Rhode Island pension funds are still suspended in Delaware Chancery Court. Another, by Mario Gabelli's GAMECO — the largest holder of Class A stock after Shari Redstone – against National Amusements, was dismissed. While the court has declined to issue an injunction to block the deal, if and when it's signed and sealed there may well be a queue of Class B shareholders in line to sue. The Class A shares carry super voting rights. That gives Redstone nearly 80% voting control of the company put together by her father Sumner Redstone with just a fraction of the equity. Most shareholders of publicly traded Paramount own Class B shares and objected throughout much of the Skydance negotiations that Redstone did the deal over their heads, reaping outsized of Deadline Everything We Know About 'Nobody Wants This' Season 2 So Far List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More Everything We Know About 'Happy Gilmore 2' So Far Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newark mayor sues feds over arrest outside ICE facility
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka speaks outside Peter Rodino Federal Courthouse while announcing a defamation suit against federal officials involved in his May arrest. (Sophie Nieto-Muñoz | New Jersey Monitor) Newark Mayor Ras Baraka is suing federal officials over his May 9 arrest outside an immigration detention center, alleging malicious prosecution and false arrest. He also accused Alina Habba, the acting U.S. Attorney of New Jersey, of defamation over a post on her personal social media account, in which she wrongly stated that Baraka trespassed and ignored multiple warnings from authorities to leave the Newark detention center property. 'To arrest me, to handcuff me, to drag me away, to take my fingerprints and a picture and mugshots for a class-C misdemeanor is egregious. For me to appear in a hearing and after the hearing, for the U.S. Marshals to rush in and basically to take my picture again is egregious and malicious in my mind,' he said Tuesday outside the federal courthouse in Newark. Baraka, one of six candidates vying to be the Democratic nominee in the race to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy, filed the federal lawsuit on the first day of early voting in the state. He said the timing is so that people are held responsible for it 'immediately.' Besides Habba, the 17-page complaint also named Ricky Patel, a supervising agent at Homeland Security Investigations, the agency that arrested Baraka. The mayor also filed a notice of his intent to sue the federal government, said Nancy Erika Smith, his attorney. 'Political prosecutions are for fascist countries, not the United States of America. Mayor Baraka was a target because he has stood up for the constitutional and human rights of all people, including immigrants,' Smith said. Baraka was arrested one week after Delaney Hall, now the largest detention center on the East Coast, opened its doors when he visited to check if its owner, Geo Group, had done the required inspections and secured a certificate of occupancy. The lawsuit details his arrest by the minute. He arrived at 1:42 p.m. and was invited eight minutes later by a Geo Group staffer inside the facility's gates, where he waited until 2:33 p.m., the complaint states. Patel ordered Baraka to leave and threatened to arrest him, and Baraka left the property at 2:38 p.m., the suit states. Three New Jersey House members on site for a facility tour joined the mayor and advocated for his entry. Five minutes later, about 20 armed, masked Department of Homeland Security agents swarmed Baraka and 'violently' arrested him without probable cause, the complaint says. He was taken to another DHS facility where agents photographed and fingerprinted him, an experience he called 'humiliating.' He spent five hours in custody. Before agents took Baraka to the DHS facility, Habba already posted on social media that Baraka 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law.' Later that evening, Habba also allegedly made false statements about his arrest on Fox News, and in public appearances with other DHS officials in the following days. The suit contends that Habba and Patel 'conspired' to promote 'false and defamatory' statements about what happened, including that Baraka stormed the facility. 'The false affidavit was made with malice, particularly seeking to assure that the evening news included videos of the Black mayor of Newark, New Jersey, being led away in handcuffs by federal officials,' the filing states. Baraka said Tuesday that race played a role in the incident. 'It's easy for people to believe that a mayor being arrested, especially a mayor that looks like me, has been arrested for something other than what just happened … When people see me in cuffs, they automatically believe I did something wrong, I was guilty,' he said. 'The reality is, I didn't do anything. I went down there for a press conference.' Habba attended a court hearing in Baraka's case, an unusual move for a U.S. attorney. But his charge was dismissed 13 days after his arrest, which he said he learned only after Habba announced on social media she planned to drop the charges. Judge André Espinosa rebuked the U.S. Attorney's Office while dismissing the charge with prejudice, urging attorneys to operate with a higher standard and avoid using their role to advance political agendas. The same day Baraka's case was dismissed, Habba charged Rep. LaMonica McIver with two felony counts of assaulting officers during the scuffle. McIver has called the move 'purely political.' Habba, Trump's personal attorney who he nominated to serve as interim U.S. attorney for New Jersey, has also said she's investigating Gov. Phil Murphy and state Attorney General Matt Platkin over the state's ban on local law enforcement assisting in civil immigration enforcement. A spokesperson for Habba did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Habba took to social media Monday night to blast Baraka for suing her and offered him 'advice' to instead prioritize violent crime and public safety. 'Far better use of time for the great citizens of New Jersey,' she said. Smith responded by touting a drop in violent crime in Newark during Baraka's term as mayor. Baraka is seeking compensatory damages for pain, suffering, stress, humiliation, mental anguish, personal physical injury, physical sickness and damage to his reputation. 'I don't know if Alina Habba and Ricky Patel have enough resources to pay me for the damages they've caused me. At the end of the day, they should at least apologize — they should at least write me a letter and apologize to me,' he said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Calls Trump's Bill 'Abomination,' Emboldening GOP Critics
Elon Musk speaks alongside President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. Credit - Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images Former White House adviser Elon Musk on Tuesday issued a blistering criticism of President Donald Trump's tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' as the Senate seeks to quickly pass the measure and send it to Trump's desk before July 4. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk said in a post on X, the social media platform he owns. He added that the package is a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' The comments marked Musk's most public break yet with the President, and landed just days after he officially stepped down from his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, an advisory office created by Trump to identify and eliminate waste across the federal government. But it's not the first time Musk has criticized the bill. Last month he gave cover to Republican critics, saying that the measure failed to reduce the federal deficit and undermined his DOGE efforts. In a separate post Tuesday, Musk added that the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden [American] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' He appeared to be referencing projections from budget analysts who estimate the legislation could add more than $2.5 trillion over the next decade to the national deficit, which has grown to $1.3 trillion. 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' Musk wrote. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has likewise concluded that while the bill includes cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other safety net programs, those reductions would be overwhelmed by the tax cuts and other provisions projected to increase the deficit by between $2.3 trillion and $5 trillion over the same period. The House narrowly passed the GOP tax and spending bill last month by just one vote after weeks of tense negotiations between the White House and Republican lawmakers concerned about ballooning deficits. The package, dubbed by Trump as 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' extends his 2017 tax cuts, creates new tax breaks on tips and overtime, and raises the federal debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Musk posted his latest criticisms as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was defending the bill to reporters during a press briefing. She quickly found herself responding to Musk's view. 'The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said. 'It doesn't change the President's opinion.' House Speaker Mike Johnson also pushed back on Musk's criticism, which he called "disappointing" and "surprising." 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big, beautiful bill,' Johnson told reporters. But Musk's rebuke has energized fiscal hawks in the Senate who were already uneasy with the legislation's scope. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican of Utah, responded directly to Musk's post on Tuesday: 'The Senate must make this bill better.' Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican of Kentucky, added: 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' In the House, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the few Republicans to vote against the measure in the House, also responded to Musk: 'He's right.' In the upper chamber, several Senate Republicans including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rick Scott of Florida, and Rand Paul of Kentucky, have called for deeper spending cuts before they will support the bill. If the Senate amends the legislation, it would be sent back to the House for another vote. The bill also includes provisions that have surprised and alarmed some of the President's staunchest allies. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on X that she regretted voting for the bill after discovering a section—buried on pages 278 and 279—that she says strips states of the authority to regulate artificial intelligence for a decade. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights,' she wrote. 'I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' While Trump repeatedly praised Musk during his time in the Administration, reports of internal clashes and disagreements occasionally spilled into public view. Musk previously criticized Trump's protectionist trade policies and tariffs, and his time working for the government was met with uneven results as he came up well short of his goal of slashing $2 trillion from the federal budget. Write to Nik Popli at