Teacher's appeal against 14-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting 11-year-old girl rejected
Two months later, he appealed, claiming that their relationship was built on "true love". The judge rejected this claim, citing the 21-year age gap and ruling that it was exploitation, not love.
The now 52-year-old primary school teacher faced eight charges, including sexual assault of a minor and offences under the Children and Young Persons Act.
He pleaded not guilty but was convicted after trial and sentenced to 14 years and two months in prison. The victim is now 31 years old.
A gag order has been imposed to protect the victim's identity.
According to court documents reported by Shin Min Daily News, the victim said she began a relationship with the defendant in September 2006. The following year, their interactions escalated from physical intimacy to digital penetration. The defendant had sex with the victim when she was below 16 years old.
The two had been in an inappropriate relationship for several years until June 13, 2017, when the victim's sister discovered three videos on her mobile phone.
In the clips, the victim spoke about difficulties in the relationship and her intention to end it, but said she could not confide in anyone for fear the defendant would cause trouble. This led to the case being exposed.
The defendant later appealed against his conviction and sentence, claiming he and the victim were in a consensual relationship and that she had taken the lead. However, the High Court judge rejected his account as implausible, calling it an attempt to evade responsibility and discredit the victim.
Noting the 21-year age gap between them, the judge concluded the relationship was not one of love but of exploitation.
The defendant argued that he had not coerced or pressured the victim, but the judge found that he had abused his position of authority to commit the offence.
As the victim's teacher, the defendant should have guided and protected her, the judge said, but instead chose to exploit her for his own ends.
The judge also found the sentence appropriate and dismissed the appeal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Brawl at Bukit Panjang coffee shop leaves two injured
A brawl involving three men broke out at a Bukit Panjang coffee shop on the evening of August 2, with other patrons stepping in to break up the fight. The incident occurred at 8.10pm at a coffee shop located at Block 257 Bangkit Road. An Instagram video uploaded by @sgfollowsall shows two men - one in an orange shirt and another in a white shirt - on the ground, possibly having fallen due to the tussle. A third man in a yellow shirt can also be seen picking up a red plastic chair and using it to strike the man in the white shirt, who is lying on the ground. Even as by-standers attempt to hold him back, he rushes forward and kicks the man in the orange shirt in the face. Another man in green also repeatedly hits the man in orange with a chair. At least three other middle-aged men, visibly agitated and shouting, can be seen standing nearby. Other patrons at the coffee shop quickly step in to intervene and break up the fight. When reporters from Shin Min Daily News visited the coffee shop on August 3, employees said the eatery was crowded at the time, and it is believed that a diner called the police after witnessing the scuffle. "They looked like they were drunk, which probably led to the fight," one western food stall employee said. He added that the police were at the scene for about an hour, and an ambulance was also dispatched. Both the man in white and the man in orange appeared to be bleeding at the mouth. "The man in white is a regular here. They usually come at night." A female worker at a fish soup stall said she had never before witnessed violence of this degree in her three years working at the coffee shop. "There are usually many older men drinking here, but I've never seen them get into fights." In response to Shin Min's queries, the police confirmed that they received a report about the fight. Two men, aged 57 and 65, sustained injuries but refused to be taken to the hospital. Investigations are ongoing.
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Dozens of scam victims show up at Hougang resident's stolen address
A homeowner in Hougang has received nearly a hundred unwanted visitors at his doorstep over the past two years. They are victims of online scams who showed up believing they were there to claim free goods or collect purchases. Scammers have used the homeowner's residential address in online advertisements to promote the supposed sale of illegal items and everyday goods, as well as "giveaways". 'Our Vape Store' According to Shin Min Daily News, the address of a unit at Block 251 Hougang Avenue 3 was misused in online promotions by a website called "Our Vape Store". The site falsely claimed the unit was a pickup location for e-cigarettes. When Shin Min reporters visited the address, the homeowner initially mistook them for customers and promptly called the police, only to realise later that it was a misunderstanding. The man, who only wished to be known as Mr Tan, told Shin Min that it all began in 2023 after he was added to a Telegram group chat. "My Telegram account had my real name on it. I didn't think much of it at first," he said. "But then a friend informed me that someone was using my name to scam people. I filed a police report immediately." Some time later, Mr Tan received a video call from a stranger who claimed to have lost $6,000 in a scam supposedly perpetrated by him. In an attempt to clear his name, Mr. Tan shared a copy of the police report with the caller - without redacting his personal details, including his home address. Things took a turn for the worse, when scammers then began using his address in various Facebook groups to promote fake giveaways. In one instance, victims were told they could collect a free refrigerator from his unit. PHOTO: SHIN MIN DAILY NEWS Victims were lured with heavily discounted products and instructed to pay a deposit upfront, only to realise they had been scammed upon arriving at Mr Tan's flat. Mr Tan added that weekly unwanted visits have been going on for the past two years. In early 2024, he placed a sign at his door explaining that the address had been fraudulently used. "Over the years, I've made several police reports about this, but since no one was hurt and there was no forced entry, the police couldn't take any further action. All we could do was install a security camera at our door." Late-night visit ends with police call In one incident, a delivery driver showed up at 4am to collect goods on behalf of a victim who had paid a deposit online. "We explained the situation to him, and he called the buyer, who refused to believe it was a scam," said Mr Tan. "It dragged on until I called the police, and it wasn't until 6am that things were finally resolved. Everyone involved was a victim." Mr Tan is now speaking out in hopes of warning others against online scams. "If you see free giveaways or are asked to transfer money upfront, please verify the source. Don't be so quick to believe," he stressed.
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Man filmed running on PIE may face jail and fine, lawyer warns
A man was caught on video jogging along the shoulder of the Pan Island Expressway (PIE), sparking online debate and prompting a warning that his actions may have violated the Road Traffic Act. The video, posted by Facebook page is believed to have been recorded around 8.27pm on July 27. Dashcam footage shows a car travelling in the fourth lane of the expressway when a man dressed in black suddenly appears, running on the left shoulder of the road. The footage quickly drew criticism online, with many netizens calling the act dangerous and reckless. Pedestrians are prohibited from walking or running on expressways under the Road Traffic Act, lawyer Huang Guoyan told Shin Min Daily News. First-time offenders may be fined up to $1,000, jailed for up to three months, or both. Repeat offenders face up to $2,000 in fines, six months in jail, or both. "If a traffic accident occurs because of such actions, the individual may also be charged under the Penal Code," he added. Depending on the circumstances, these charges could include recklessly endangering the safety of others, causing hurt by a rash act, or causing grievous hurt by a rash act.
