'No chance': Real reason Meghan Markle skipped trip to Angola with Prince Harry for 'landmine walk'
The Duke of Sussex visited the southern African nation on Tuesday for a 'landmine walk' with The HALO Trust, following in the footsteps of his late mother, Princess Diana.
The late Princess of Wales visited Angola in January 1997 with the Red Cross to raise awareness of the 15 million landmines left scattered across the country, a remnant of decades of civil war.
Images of Diana bravely walking through a live minefield were beamed across the world and massively increased awareness of the issue of unexploded landmines.
Harry earlier visited Angola with The HALO Trust in 2019 and recreated the iconic photos of his late mother and has maintained links to the organisation since leaving royal duties in 2020.
According to a Sussex source who spoke to the Daily Mail, Harry discouraged his wife from making the visit over concerns for her safety.
"The Duke won't let his wife go to England over security concerns, so there was no chance he'd allow her to go to Angola to walk across landmines," the source said.
Harry was seen meeting Angolan President João Lourenço in the latest sign the Sussexes are attempting to carve out unofficial roles as roving royal ambassadors.
Last year, the ex-working royals 'toured' Nigeria and Colombia but were not representing King Charles nor the British government.
The insider also claimed that Harry was hopeful his latest trip will drive donations from the government of the African country.
"Usually, these trips help to drive a bit more money from the government," the source said.
Meanwhile, the King has allegedly privately expressed concerns his estranged son and daughter in law are attempting to undermine the monarchy internationally.
'King Charles is in a terrible bind – he would love to strip Meghan and Harry of their royal titles, but fears this will look vindictive,' a royal insider told The Mirror newspaper last year after the Nigeria visit.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Sussexes can't be trusted': Harry and Meghan questioned over leaked royal meeting
'To Di For' podcast host Kinsey Schofield discusses reports of King Charles and Prince Harry's top aides holding a secret summit, questioning who leaked the story. 'Somebody leaked this story … I don't see the value in the King leaking this story,' Ms Schofield told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'Despite the Sussexes saying they didn't leak the story, I do believe the Sussexes leaked the story, which goes to prove that they can't be trusted. 'So why would the King risk anything by meeting with Harry and Meghan?'

Sky News AU
7 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Meghan Markle ‘bitter' over Royal Family positive press
'To Di For' podcast host Kinsey Schofield slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as 'short-sighted' amid reports of King Charles and the Sussexes' top aides holding a secret summit. 'I think that they are so short-sighted… they're always in it for the instant gratification,' Ms Schofield told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'I suspected that Meghan was very bitter over some positive press and that was why we saw a mini Sussex blitz.'

Sky News AU
13 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘William will try and veto it': Prince Harry's reconciliation attempt probably doomed for failure
Writer and broadcaster Esther Krakue has discussed Prince Harry's latest 'olive branch' to the Royal Family as the Duke of Sussex attempts to reconcile. 'I actually don't think anything will come of it, I think Prince William in particular will say, 'I don't trust this person',' she told Sky News host Caroline Di Russo. 'I really don't think this is going to go as far as people think because ultimately, I think the King knows that his role as monarch is more consequential than having conversations with Harry. 'I think William, in his capacity, will try and veto it, especially after the horrible year that him and his father and his wife have had just in terms of their health, but also in terms of dealing with the fallout from all the scandalous accusations and allegations made by the Sussexes.'